Posts Tagged LGBTQ+ history

Volcano’s Archive: Queer Lives Documented from Within, Not Looking In

Leave a Comment

A Public Display of Affection: Jonathan Wilson on Memory, Survival and Quiet Rebellion

Click on image to buy ticket

Jonathan Wilson arrives at the Fringe with A Public Display of Affection, a piece that slips between testimony, memory, and performance with the ease of someone who has lived every inch of the story he’s telling. Rooted in Toronto’s queer history of the 1970s and ’80s, the show doesn’t behave like a museum piece. Instead, it breathes—funny, dangerous, tender, and defiantly ordinary in all the ways queer life has always been. Wilson begins as the “queer elder” at the lectern, but the façade doesn’t last long. What follows is a reckoning with survival, desire, chosen family, and the quiet rebellions that once made even holding hands feel like an act of resistance.

As he brings the work to Edinburgh, Wilson isn’t simply exporting a Canadian story. He’s returning to the country his parents once called home, folding questions of belonging, memory, and inheritance into a performance that refuses nostalgia and insists on truth. In an intimate space like Gilded Balloon’s The Snug, the show becomes less a lecture and more a conversation—one that asks younger queer audiences to imagine their own futures while remembering the people who never got the chance.

This interview explores how the piece evolved, what histories risk being erased, and why Wilson believes humour, imperfection, and community are as essential to queer survival as any political victory. Counter Culture asked him to explain.

You’re bringing a critically acclaimed Toronto production to the Fringe. What shifts when a show rooted in 1970s and ’80s Toronto queer history suddenly meets an Edinburgh audience with a completely different cultural memory?

I’ve learned that although the street names change, the emotions and the struggles are the same. Edinburgh audiences probably haven’t heard of Yonge Street or the St. Charles Tavern in Toronto, but they understand first love, shame, chosen family, and trying to build a life when the world keeps suggesting you shouldn’t exist.

The piece begins as a formal “queer elder” talk and then unravels into something far more intimate and dangerous. Was that structural rupture always part of the concept, or did it emerge as you explored how testimony differs from nostalgia?

It wasn’t planned at all. It happened organically when I discovered I was a terrible historian. The play began as a series of readings for students studying queer history, and I felt an unspoken pressure to be a “good” example. Thankfully, the darker, funnier, and more truthful stories of my friends kept interrupting. The moment I stopped trying to be an authority and started becoming a witness, the play finally knew what it wanted to be.

The press release describes the show as a journey through love, loss, lust, and survival. Which of those threads proved hardest to balance without tipping the piece into sentimentality?

Survival. It’s very easy to turn surviving into a sort of sainthood, but of course we weren’t saints. We were messy, funny, horny, selfish, generous, frightened kids trying to get through another day. But we weren’t simply surviving. We were falling in love, dancing until sunrise, making terrible fashion choices, flirting outrageously, and creating families from scratch.

You chart moments where even holding hands felt like rebellion. How do you stage that kind of quiet defiance in a way that lands with audiences who’ve grown up in a more visible, though still imperfect, queer landscape?

By resisting the urge to make it look heroic. Holding someone’s hand shouldn’t be brave. The tragedy is that it was. It should be gloriously ordinary. I hope younger audiences don’t leave thinking, How courageous they were. I hope they leave wondering why something so beautifully mundane was ever considered dangerous. So much queer history is presented as a warning. I want this show to be an invitation to imagine a long life and an earned elderhood.

Critics have called the show “a forgotten slice of Toronto LGBTQ history brought to life.” What part of that history do you feel is most at risk of being rewritten or erased today?

The ordinary lives. The street kids I loved. My chosen family. The young people on the margins who can still disappear, even within a so‑called respectable queer history. We remember the marches, the police persecution, and the court victories, as we should. But we forget the shared rooms, the back‑alley bars, the friendships, the first kisses, the tacky wallpaper, and the people who never became famous enough to be remembered.

You blend razor‑sharp humour with devastating honesty. Given your background in Second City, improvisation, and comedy, how did you decide where humour helps the story, and where it would undermine it?

Laughter opens us up to hear truth — but importantly, the laughter isn’t there only to soften the truth. It is part of the truth. Queer people have always laughed at funerals, flirted in impossible circumstances, and found joy where no one expected it. That’s an important part of our history too.

Your past work includes My Own Private Oshawa, The Normal Heart, and The Lion King. How does A Public Display of Affection sit alongside those roles in terms of emotional weight and personal investment?

There’s nowhere to hide. When you’re playing Ned Weeks in The Normal Heart or Timon in The Lion King, someone else has written the words. This time, every laugh, every silence, and every difficult memory belongs to me. It’s easily the most exposing thing I’ve ever performed. Even my earlier solo work reflected the version of myself I was capable of sharing in my thirties. This show is what that story looks like after another thirty years of living.

Bringing the play to Scotland feels less like exporting a Canadian piece than finally bringing my own family story home. My parents left Scotland for Canada in the early 1960s, so growing up, Scotland was always referred to as “home.” I’ve written some of that tension into this new version of the show, and it has taken me somewhere even more personal than I expected. Because of course… there’s no place like home.

The show insists on remembering at a moment when queer histories risk disappearing beneath progress and assimilation. What’s the one memory you felt absolutely had to remain unfiltered?

The feeling that disappearing was always a possibility. Not in some abstract political sense. Literally. Friends vanished. Spaces vanished. Entire generations vanished. The danger isn’t forgetting the dates. The danger is forgetting what it actually felt like to be alive.

Gilded Balloon’s The Snug is an intimate space. How does that closeness shape the performance, especially when the material moves between humour, danger, and testimony?

You can’t fake intimacy in a space like The Snug. There’s nowhere to perform at people. I’m simply with them. Some nights it feels less like theatre and more like a conversation that’s wandered somewhere unexpectedly honest. Those are usually the best nights.

If you could speak directly to younger queer people encountering this history for the first time, what’s the one uncomfortable truth you hope the show gives them permission to hold onto?

You don’t owe anyone perfection. Every generation inherits unfinished work. You’ll make mistakes. You’ll disagree with the generation before you. One day you’ll probably horrify the generation after you. Welcome to the club. But don’t confuse having more rights with no longer needing each other. Community isn’t something history gave us. It’s something every generation has to build again.

Click here to buy tickets

 

Leave a Comment

Fabulett 1933

⭐⭐⭐⭐

Fabulett 1933 is an extraordinary one-person musical that brilliantly brings to life a pivotal era in history through the eyes of the charismatic MC, Felix, masterfully portrayed by Michael Trauffer. Set against the backdrop of Berlin in 1933, a city teetering on the precipice of change, the show immerses its audience in the vibrant world of cabaret, a unique form of entertainment that effortlessly blends music, satire, comedy, and political commentary.

Michael Trauffer is compelling as Felix

At the heart of Fabulett 1933 is Felix, the magnetic MC of a gay cabaret club. As the story unfolds, we witness Felix’s struggle against the encroaching closure of his cherished venue and the ominous rise of fascism. The show deftly weaves together historical accuracy with original songs and performances that once fell under the Nazis’ label of “degenerate.” Trauffer’s performance captures the essence of the era, embodying the resilience and defiance that characterized those who dared to speak out.

Cabaret, a genre that reached its zenith in Berlin during the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), finds a poignant representation in Fabulett 1933. This unique form of artistic expression emerged as a powerful platform for social critique and artistic experimentation, flourishing within the vibrant heart of the city. It introduced audiences to a fusion of music, comedy, and political commentary, challenging societal norms and inciting thought-provoking discussions. Renowned figures such as Marlene Dietrich, Kurt Weill, Bertolt Brecht, and Max Reinhardt breathed life into this genre, pushing the boundaries of creative expression.

However, the looming shadow of the Nazi regime cast a sinister pall over this artistic revolution. With their oppressive tactics, the Nazis stifled cabaret, banning and censoring its performers and venues, effectively quashing a beacon of intellectual and artistic freedom.

Fabulett 1933 resonates powerfully through its masterful depiction of the Weimar Republic’s cabaret scene. Trauffer’s portrayal of Felix captures the essence of a complex character who confronts not only the closure of his club but also his own battle against intolerance. The show garnered well-deserved acclaim during its runs at London’s Canal Café Theatre and the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, receiving multiple 4-star reviews.

Critics have been effusive in their praise for Fabulett 1933, with descriptions such as “a captivating and moving performance that blends history, humor, and heartbreak” underscoring the show’s emotional depth. Another review aptly hails it as “an elegant slice of cabaret that transports us to the final days of one of Germany’s most vibrant eras,” invoking the nostalgia and vibrancy of the time. Perhaps most significantly, the show is heralded as “a powerful reminder of the importance of visibility and resistance in the face of oppression,” encapsulating the poignant message of Fabulett 1933.

One cannot discuss the show without acknowledging the rich historical context that serves as its backdrop. The Weimar Republic, a brief yet remarkable period of relative tolerance and cultural expression for gays, is illuminated through the lens of Felix’s experiences. This vibrant subculture emerged in Berlin, characterized by a proliferation of bars, clubs, magazines, organizations, and artists catering to the gay community. The influence of figures like Magnus Hirschfeld, founder of the Institute for Sexual Science, is palpable. Hirschfeld’s dedication to scientific and legal reforms, including the repeal of the infamous Paragraph 175, was a defining moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights.

Fabulett 1933 gracefully navigates the delicate balance between its serious subject matter and moments of levity. Humor surfaces through the witty banter exchanged between Felix and his pianist Hans, creating a dynamic that lightens the mood without diluting the show’s emotional impact.

Central to the performance are the songs that encapsulate the era’s spirit. Trauffer’s adept translation of iconic pieces like “Das Lila Lied” (The Lavender Song) and “Maskulinum-Femininum” showcases his talent in preserving the essence of the original lyrics. Additionally, Trauffer’s original compositions, notably “Your Cabaret Needs You” and “Invisible,” enhance the show’s emotional resonance, serving as a powerful testament to the enduring spirit of resistance.

In a world that often grapples with issues of freedom, identity, and acceptance, Fabulett 1933 stands as a poignant reminder of the struggles faced by those who dared to be different. Through Felix’s journey, the audience is urged to recognize the invaluable importance of diversity and resist the encroachment of oppression. This evocative and thought-provoking musical serves as a cautionary tale, encouraging us to remain vigilant against red flags and warning signs that threaten the very essence of human rights and freedom.

Fabulett 1933 is more than a show; it’s an immersive experience that transports us to a time when artistic expression and personal authenticity clashed with a world descending into darkness. Michael Trauffer’s remarkable performance, combined with the rich tapestry of historical nuances and unforgettable melodies, leaves an indelible mark on the hearts and minds of its audience.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Venue
302
Underbelly, Bristo Square – Clover
22:00
Aug 12-13, 15-20, 22-27
1 hour
Suitability: 14+ (Guideline)

Leave a Comment