Archive for Uncategorized

MEET THE DEBUTS: Six New Voices Rewiring the Fringe 2026

Every Fringe season brings its share of debuts, but every so often a cluster arrives that feels less like a cohort and more like a cultural weather front — a shift in tone, form, and ambition. This year’s newcomers aren’t just telling jokes; they’re wrestling with identity, mortality, monstrosity, societal collapse, and the strange business of being seen. In other words: perfect Counter Culture territory.

Here are six debut hours that deserve your attention.


Aarian Mehrabani: How’s Your Head?
More information

Aarian Mehrabani walks into his debut hour with the kind of life story that would make most comedians quietly pack up their notebooks and go home. Blind, bisexual, brown, Iranian heritage — and then, as if the universe wanted to test the limits of narrative plausibility, an aggressive brain cancer diagnosis in 2024. But what makes How’s Your Head? compelling isn’t the biography; it’s the perspective. Mehrabani refuses to be anyone’s inspirational mascot. Instead, he turns his lived experience into something sharper, stranger, and far more politically charged.

As a co‑founder of FlawBored — the multi‑award‑winning theatre company behind It’s a Motherfking Pleasure — Mehrabani already has form in dismantling the narratives imposed on disabled performers. His debut stand‑up hour continues that project, but with a new intimacy. He weaves together STI clinic confessions, Persian identity crises, hospital‑bed absurdities, and the dark humour that emerges when your own brain becomes the antagonist. It’s bold, deeply personal, and delivered with a wit that’s both biting and disarmingly warm.

What’s striking is how Mehrabani handles the material: not as trauma porn, not as uplift, but as a reclamation. He treats his experiences as raw material for comedy, not a moral lesson. The result is a show that feels alive — a blend of theatrical intelligence, political awareness, and a refusal to let anyone else define the terms of his story.

Directed by Dec Munro and developed with support from The Lowry’s Developed With programme, How’s Your Head? marks the first time a member of FlawBored has stepped out with a solo work. It’s a milestone, and it shows. The craft is evident: tight writing, emotional clarity, and a sense of humour that can pivot from filth to philosophy in a heartbeat.

Mehrabani’s CV is already stacked. A graduate of the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama, he co‑founded FlawBored in 2021, won the Untapped Award, sold out the Fringe, transferred off‑Broadway, and is currently developing new work with the Royal Court. As an actor, he’s appeared at The Watermill, the Royal Exchange, and will soon feature in David Baddiel’s Channel 4 thriller Hunting Alice Bell. Critics have called him “pure genius,” “wincingly relevant,” and “ridiculously entertaining” — and for once, the hype feels justified.

How’s Your Head? introduces a vital new voice to the stand‑up circuit: irreverent, political, theatrical, and defiantly unpitying. It’s a show about identity, illness, desire, and the strange business of surviving your own story — and laughing at it anyway.


Harvey Cobb: Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet
More information

Harvey Cobb’s debut is what happens when a circus performer decides to stage an existential crisis in public — and juggle through it. Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet is part clown show, part performance art, part breakdown, and entirely Fringe. It’s a masterclass in absurdity: pink boot juggling, contemporary dance, ridiculous characters, silly songs, and one very opinionated sock puppet.

British‑born and Rotterdam‑based, Cobb brings the precision of a trained circus artist and the chaos of someone who’s realised that “serious art” might just be another form of self‑delusion. The show blurs the line between high art and cheap entertainment, between sincerity and satire, between the performer’s need to be applauded and his fear of being dismissed as novelty. It’s a meta‑theatrical tightrope walk — and Cobb never stops wobbling.

The conceit is deliciously self‑aware. Harvey presents himself as a pretentious artist, desperate to be taken seriously, only to be undermined by his tyrannical producer, his own insecurities, and the increasingly unhinged antics of Mr Sock. As the façade crumbles, the show becomes a study in vulnerability disguised as farce. Beneath the juggling and slapstick lies a quiet truth about the hunger for validation — and the absurdity of chasing it through art.

Cobb’s background gives the show its muscularity. A graduate of Codarts Rotterdam with a degree in Circus, he’s already won the BNG Circus Prize for Something About Pink, and his work carries the physical confidence of someone who can literally balance on anything. But what makes Pink Boots sing is its emotional balance: the tension between craft and collapse, between control and chaos.

The production’s international creative team — Matthias Romir, Pepijn Ronaldo, Captain Frodo, Yiorgos Bereris, Cahit Metin, Julia Gut, and Inge Den Adel — help shape a piece that feels both anarchic and meticulously designed. It’s a show that knows exactly what it’s doing, even when it pretends not to.

As De Volkskrant put it, Cobb is “a born performer, a funny and idiosyncratic improvisational talent.” At the Fringe, that translates into a debut that’s equal parts circus, confession, and catastrophe — a glitter‑streaked exploration of what it means to want to be seen.

Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet is chaotic, heartfelt, and quietly profound beneath the absurdity. It’s Fringe distilled to its purest form: a man, a sock, and the desperate, beautiful need to make art out of failure.


Mothman: A Romance Musical
More information

Some Fringe shows arrive with a premise so gloriously deranged that you can feel the cult status forming before the lights even go down. Mothman: A Romance Musical is one of those shows — a cryptid‑infused, B‑movie‑loving, queer‑coded fever dream from alternative comedians Alex Franklin and Nikola McMurtrie, who have already amassed awards, critical acclaim, and millions of online views. Now they’re bringing their collaborative debut to Edinburgh, and it’s exactly the kind of unhinged, big‑hearted chaos the Fringe was built for.

The set‑up is deliciously absurd: it’s 1943, the Nazis are winning, and America’s last hope is a super‑soldier experiment gone wrong because — of course — a moth got into the machine. Fast‑forward to 2024 and a trio of monster‑hunters stumble into the woods of West Virginia, only to find themselves entangled in forbidden cryptid romance, betrayal, cannibalism, and a Wisdom Tree. It’s a show that lovingly skewers the tropes of classic creature‑features while prancing through themes of identity, sexuality, and self‑acceptance with a sincerity that catches you off guard.

Franklin and McMurtrie write and perform alongside Alex Prescot and Hudson Hughes, creating a four‑person ensemble that feels like a Fringe supergroup: musical comedy finalists, award‑winners, drag‑adjacent chaos merchants, and performers who understand that the line between horror and heart is often thinner than a moth’s wing. Their world is one where camp meets earnestness, where the monstrous becomes desirable, and where the absurd becomes a vehicle for something unexpectedly tender.

What elevates Mothman beyond its delightful silliness is the emotional intelligence humming beneath the spectacle. Franklin — a trans, half‑Chinese musical comedian with a growing cult following — brings a sharp, self‑aware wit that turns even the most ludicrous moments into reflections on belonging. McMurtrie, a Scottish sketch and musical comedian with a background in dance and multimedia chaos, injects the show with physicality and ambition that borders on the operatic. Together, they create a piece that feels both anarchic and meticulously crafted.

The show has already previewed in London and Brighton, where it picked up a nomination for The Nest New Writing Award with Chichester Festival Theatre — a sign that beneath the cannibalism and cryptid lust, there’s real craft at work. Reviewers of their solo work have called Franklin “deeply affecting and incredibly funny” and McMurtrie “maniacally ambitious,” and Mothman looks set to combine the best of both.

This is the kind of Fringe musical that becomes a late‑night word‑of‑mouth obsession: camp, chaotic, queer, and unexpectedly moving. A romance musical about falling in love with a monster shouldn’t work — which is precisely why it does.. It’s camp, earnest, ridiculous — and taps into the desire to be loved for the parts of ourselves that feel monstrous.


Rob Preston: Amazing Global Solutions
More information

Rob Preston’s debut arrives with the confidence of a man who has stared directly into the abyss of the modern internet and decided to build a consultancy firm there. Fresh from the 2025 Fringe hit Brainsluts, Preston steps into the spotlight alone — or rather, accompanied by a gallery of grotesques who feel alarmingly familiar to anyone who has spent more than six minutes online.

Amazing Global Solutions is a rapid‑fire descent into the algorithmic psyche: bleak, bizarre, and blisteringly funny. Preston plays a consultant armed with the worst ideas the internet has ever produced — casually delivered with the breezy self‑assurance of a man who believes he can “fix mental health,” “dominate the content space,” and “bring lasting international peace to the entirety of the globe, globally.” It’s the kind of corporate nightmare where every buzzword is a threat and every solution is somehow more horrifying than the problem.

What makes Preston’s work sing is the accuracy. His characters — influencer‑bros, corporate stooges, privileged poshos, dog‑obsessed retirees — aren’t caricatures so much as exaggerated truths, the logical endpoints of a culture that has replaced empathy with engagement metrics. Through sharply observed vignettes rooted in the UK’s current socio‑political climate, he exposes how extremism, self‑help jargon, and moral bankruptcy can merge into something both hilarious and deeply unsettling.

Preston’s pedigree shows. Shortlisted for BBC New Comedian of the Year 2024 and Pleasance Reserve 2025, and a semi‑finalist in the Leicester Square Sketch Off, he’s already carved out a reputation for precision‑tooled character work. His writing has appeared on Radio 4 Extra, and his digital sketches have racked up over a million likes — proof that his brand of satire lands just as hard on a phone screen as it does in a theatre.

As a comic actor, he starred in Brainsluts at the 2025 Fringe, earning four‑star reviews from The Guardian, The Times, and The Stage. This year he also appears in Leo Reich’s Channel 4/A24 sitcom It Gets Worse — a title that feels like a mission statement for the world his characters inhabit.

Amazing Global Solutions is satire for the age of burnout, misinformation, and weaponised positivity — a show that understands the horror of modern life isn’t the chaos, but the people who insist they can optimise it.


Fanny Bleach: The Nearly Naked Show
More information

Fanny Bleach — the cult drag‑thing alter ego of Geordie theatre‑maker Emma Crowley‑Bennett — arrives at the Fringe with a debut that feels less like a comedy hour and more like a feral reclamation ritual. A member of the beloved sketch group Your Aunt Fanny and winner of Top of the Slops Season 3, Bleach brings a show that is part freak‑show fantasia, part drag séance, and part howl of defiance from the sticky floor of the patriarchy.

The Nearly Naked Show is a subversive, silly and surprisingly tender tour through the disgusting and the depraved — a carnival of characters dredged from the creepiest crevices of Bleach’s imagination. Mundane realities warp into surreal nightmares populated by bodily mutations, deviant behaviour, bad hags and kidney‑harvesting call‑centre workers. It’s grotesque, glittery, and gloriously unhinged: a fantasia of guts, gunk and glitter that refuses to apologise for the body’s unruly truths.

But beneath the filth and the physical comedy lies something sharper. The show grew out of Crowley‑Bennett’s own experiences navigating the power imbalances of early acting work and the dubious “training” environments that shape so many young women in the industry. The Nearly Naked Show becomes her way of taking the wheel back — a space where she calls the shots, owns her autonomy, and channels rage into laughter rather than silence. It’s a reclamation of the female body in all its gory glory, and a reminder that sometimes the most radical act is to be loud, lewd and entirely yourself.

Bleach’s background in physical theatre, drag and sketch comedy gives the show its muscularity: immersive monologues, rapid‑fire character work, shock humour and a kind of joyous theatrical chaos that feels both meticulously crafted and on the brink of collapse. Costumes by Freya Wright and creative support from Mizz Barber help build a world that’s as visually anarchic as it is thematically pointed.

As one reviewer put it: “A parade of chaos, craft and cntery… face acting heaven” — Narc* “Borders on being impossibly outrageous… an hour of sheer brilliance” — Broadway World

If the Fringe still has room for dangerous, disgusting, defiantly political drag — and it absolutely should — then The Nearly Naked Show is where you’ll find it.


Hudson Hughes: At Your Service
More information

Hudson Hughes arrives at the Fringe with a debut that feels like a séance conducted by a man who’s spent too long in the green room of daytime television. At Your Service is a silly, spooky, surprisingly tender horror‑comedy about a vicar who has outlived his cultural moment — and possibly his sanity. It’s the kind of show that takes Britain’s fondness for cosy clerical TV personalities and drags it, wheezing, into the age of burnout, branding, and supernatural interference.

For nearly two decades, the Reverend Derek Gritt has been a comforting presence in Britain’s living rooms — a soft‑voiced emissary of “holy vibes” and gentle moralising. But the world has moved on, and Rev. Gritt now finds himself banished to online obscurity, clinging to relevance with the desperation of a man who knows the algorithm is not on his side. His last shot at a comeback? Travelling to the quaint village of Godsby‑upon‑Treen to televise the funeral of his biggest fan, Jane Plemley. A simple gig, except for one small detail: Jane is definitely, absolutely, categorically not a witch. And the Reverend’s crippling vaping addiction isn’t helping.

What follows is a gloriously unhinged blend of satanic panic, career anxiety, and ecclesiastical slapstick. Hughes plays Gritt with a mix of Alan Titchmarsh wholesomeness and Beetlejuice‑adjacent chaos, creating a character who is both deeply silly and strangely sympathetic. The show elevates traditional character comedy with a barrage of gags, electronic props, original music, and a creeping sense that something very wrong is happening just offstage.

Hughes is no newcomer to Fringe mayhem. As the creator of the cult-hit gameshow Hot Rubber, a two‑time Sketch Off finalist, and a director for BBC’s Literally, he’s already carved out a niche as a performer who thrives in the space where absurdity meets craft. His previous Fringe work includes Gay Witch Sex Cult and the critically adored Dr Dolittle Kills A Man (And Reads Extracts From His New Book) — a show described as “a tiny miracle” and “a raging, manic mishmash of character comedy and anarchic jokes.” That lineage shows here: At Your Service is meticulously chaotic, gleefully theatrical, and powered by a performer who understands that horror and humour share the same nervous system.

With script editing from Aidan Pittman, music from Robbie Smith, and technical support from Anand Sankar, the show has the feel of a miniature gothic epic — a late‑night Fringe treat for anyone who likes their comedy with a side of occult bureaucracy.

At Your Service is what happens when Britain’s cosy clerical nostalgia collides with the existential dread of the digital age. Think Inside No. 9 meets The Exorcist meets a PR consultant who’s run out of ideas — and then imagine the whole thing performed by a man who looks like he’s been awake for three days trying to fix his own Wikipedia page.

A horror‑comedy for a country that no longer knows what it believes in.


Why These Debuts Matter

What links these six shows isn’t genre but intent. Each one is wrestling with something: identity, art, capitalism, mythology, the body, the self. They’re not just trying to make you laugh; they’re trying to make sense of the world — or at least make the chaos feel briefly coherent.

That’s the Fringe at its best.
And that’s Counter Culture’s sweet spot.

By Pat Harrington

Leave a Comment

Review: Cabaret at the Playhouse (London)

Promotional image for the musical 'Cabaret' at the Kit Kat Club, featuring a performer with vintage styled hair and makeup, highlighted in gold lettering.

This production has a central insight: that the glitter and the terror of Cabaret are not opposites but dance partners. The Kit Kat Klub is both refuge and warning, a place where pleasure becomes a kind of defiance and denial becomes a kind of doom. This staging leans into that contradiction with confidence. It lets decadence and danger sit side by side until the audience can no longer tell where one ends and the other begins. The political becomes personal, the personal becomes political, and the entertainment becomes quietly, insistently unsettling.

The design does a great deal of this work. The Kit Kat Klub appears at first like a jewel — warm, golden, inviting — but the closer you look, the more you see the cracks. The circular stage, capable of rising and turning, creates a sense of perpetual motion, as if Berlin itself is spinning faster than its inhabitants can keep up. Musicians perched in balconies on either side of the Dress Circle add to the intimacy: the sense that the audience is not watching a performance so much as being folded into it. As the story darkens, the lighting shifts from amber glow to cold, surgical blues, guiding us through the slow descent without ever announcing it.

Into this world wanders Baker Mukasa’s Clifford Bradshaw, searching for inspiration and finding Eva Noblezada’s Sally Bowles — a woman who performs herself with such conviction that she almost believes the act. Their relationship becomes the show’s emotional axis, even as the world outside begins to tilt. This production honours the fluidity of Berlin’s social and sexual landscape. Cliff’s bisexuality, so often erased in adaptations, is acknowledged lightly but unmistakably: the flirtatious ease with Lucas Koch’s Ernst Ludwig, the MC’s insinuating presence, the staging of “Two Ladies” with its playful nod to a ménage à trois. It’s a Berlin where improvisation — sexual, social, moral — is simply how people survive.

Eva Noblezada’s Sally is all brittle glamour and bravado. Her costumes are less overtly sexual than in some productions, and that choice pays off: it reveals her fragility rather than her allure. She is a woman who performs even when no one is watching, because the performance is the only thing holding her together. Her abortion is handled with restraint and clarity — not sensationalised, not softened. It is the moment her fantasy of freedom collapses. She chooses the cabaret over domesticity, chaos over stability, the night over the morning after. Her final “Cabaret” is not a victory cry but a desperate insistence that she is still in control, even as the world closes in around her.

The quieter love story between Robert Hands’ Herr Schultz and Ruthie Henshall’s Fraulein Schneider becomes the production’s emotional anchor. Their romance is gentle, almost old‑fashioned, a fragile pocket of hope unfolding in the shadow of something monstrous. When Schneider decides not to marry Schultz, it is not hatred that drives her but fear — the small, frightened compromises ordinary people make when the world begins to harden. Henshall’s delivery of “What Would You Do?” becomes a lament for the way authoritarianism seeps into daily life, not through grand gestures but through the erosion of courage.

Lucas Koch’s Ernst Ludwig embodies that erosion. He begins as a charming, worldly traveller — the sort of man who seems to know everyone and everything. Cliff trusts him. The audience trusts him. And that is precisely the point. His eventual reveal as a Nazi organiser is not a twist but an inevitability. He represents the banality of extremism: the friendly man who helps you with your luggage may also be helping dismantle your society.

Hovering above all this is Reeve Carney’s MC, the production’s most visually striking presence. His costumes — one sharply sinister, one grotesquely clownish — capture his duality: playful on the surface, predatory underneath. His stamping on a glass, echoing the Jewish wedding tradition, during the attack on Herr Schultz’s property is one of the production’s boldest symbolic gestures. It is a moment where the cabaret’s illusions shatter.

Musically, the production is at its strongest when it uses the score to chart the emotional and political descent. “Mein Herr” is delivered with delicious cheek, the line about “crossing Europe man by man” landing with perfect comic timing. The choreography leans into humour rather than seduction, revealing Sally’s wit as armour. “Tomorrow Belongs to Me” appears twice — one as something almost pastoral, the other as something rigid and chilling. The contrast is devastating: the same melody, one seemingly innocent, one poisoned.

Fraulein Schneider’s “What Would You Do?” becomes the show’s heartbreaking centrepiece. It is not a political speech but a weary confession. She is not choosing fear over love; she is choosing survival over hope. The production gives her space, and the result is quietly shattering.

“If You Could See Her” is staged as a deliberate provocation. Without the film’s visual cue of a mocking Nazi audience, the anti‑Semitic punchline lands with a jolt. The production refuses to soften it. The ugliness is the point. It is the moment the cabaret’s humour curdles.

What this revival captures with unnerving clarity is the moment when the party finally ends — not with a crash, but with a tightening. The walls don’t slam shut; they inch inward. The audience feels it before the characters do. The Kit Kat Klub, once a sanctuary of permissiveness and possibility, begins to feel smaller, the air thinner. The decadence that once felt liberating now feels like a distraction — a glitter curtain pulled across a gathering storm.

And the tragedy, of course, is that most people inside the club don’t see it coming. Or rather, they see something, but they refuse to believe it is as bad as it looks. This production understands that authoritarianism rarely announces itself. It creeps. It flatters. It reassures. It tells you that everything is fine, that the ugliness is temporary, that the men in armbands are only keeping order. It tells you that you can keep dancing.

Fraulein Schneider embodies this perfectly. She is not naïve; she is frightened. She knows the world is changing, but she clings to the hope that if she keeps her head down, if she makes the “sensible” choice, the danger might pass her by. Her decision not to marry Schultz is not a capitulation to hatred but to fear — the quiet, corrosive fear that convinces ordinary people to make small compromises that become, in hindsight, catastrophic.

Ernst Ludwig’s unveiling is the clearest sign of how the walls close in. He doesn’t change; we simply see him more clearly. The genial traveller becomes the face of a movement that has been growing in plain sight. The production makes the point sharply: extremism does not arrive as a monster. It arrives as a neighbour.

Even the MC, once the embodiment of mischief and possibility, becomes a darker figure as the show progresses. Carney’s grin sharpens. His jokes curdle. His presence becomes less an invitation and more a warning. When he stamps on the glass, it is the moment the cabaret’s illusions shatter. The club is no longer a refuge; it is a mirror held up to a society that has already surrendered.

By the time Eva Noblezada sings “Cabaret,” toward the end, the party is already over. She is performing in the ruins, insisting she is fine because the alternative — acknowledging the collapse — is unbearable. Her defiance becomes a kind of denial, a refusal to look at the world as it is. And that, the production suggests, is how societies fall: not because no one sees the danger, but because too many people convince themselves it is exaggerated or won’t affect them personally.

The brilliance of this revival is that it shows how the collapse happens in increments. A joke here. A shrug there. A song sung in a different key. People tell themselves it’s not their problem, not their fight, not yet. They keep dancing because the music hasn’t stopped — and by the time it does, the exits are already blocked.

One of the evening’s unexpected pleasures was the strikingly young audience. Their presence gave the production an added charge. Cabaret has always been a warning as much as a story — a reminder of how quickly freedoms can erode. Seeing younger theatre‑goers respond so strongly to those themes made the political resonance feel sharper, more contemporary, more urgent.

This Cabaret understands the show’s political heart: that authoritarianism rarely arrives with a bang. It arrives with a shrug, a joke, a song sung in a different key. Societies collapse not through dramatic gestures but through small compromises, quiet fears, and the seductive belief that the party can go on forever. This production refuses that comfort. It shows us the party ending, the good times over.

By Pat Harrington

Advert

A vinyl record with the title 'Lyrics to Live By 2' displayed prominently, featuring a beige and black color scheme, accompanied by a description of further reflections, meditations, and life lessons. There is a 'Buy Now' button and the author's name, Tim Bragg.

Leave a Comment

Review: The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher

Promotional image for the play 'The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher' by Hilary Mantel, adapted for the stage by Alexandra Wood, featuring two characters looking through a window, with event details for Everyman Theatre in Liverpool.

The play is set in 1983, the year before the real attempt to assassinate Margaret Thatcher with the IRA’s Brighton bomb.

The plot is simple enough. Caroline, a middle aged divorced, childless black woman living in an upstairs flat in plush Windsor, lets Brendan, a young twenty-something male with a Liverpool accent into her home because she believes him to be the plumber she’d been expecting to fix her boiler. He is carrying a bag that she assumes contains his tools.

It soon emerges the bag in fact contains a rifle, and her flat had been selected because her window provides the ideal vantage point from which to shoot Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher as she leaves an engagement visiting a hospital across the road. Brendan was to await three rings of Caroline’s telephone as a signal that Thatcher was leaving the hospital, at which point he would ready himself in position to fire.

Format

The play is a two-hander between 0’ Neil as Brendan and Reynolds’ as Caroline, with them also briefly taking on some minor parts towards the end.

The stage is arranged as a studio flat, simple but nice, and suitably vintage, with a kitchen area, a small table with two chairs, a double bed, and a bathroom/toilet behind a door.

Act One features a near-continuous dialogue between the two characters, with much witty dialogue. Through this we learn all we need to know about their respective lives.

At one point, Brendan does briefly tie Caroline’s hands to prevent her escape while he uses the toilet. He also threatens to gag her and makes it clear that he prepared to use violence against her if necessary, and does use some mild violence when she tries to thwart his plan by hiding the magazine from his gun in the sugar bowl.

But it’s always clear that he doesn’t really want to do this and, although he responds to her raising the possibility of him hitting one of the nurses or doctors by mistake as they shake hands with Thatcher as merely ‘collateral damage,’ he obviously doesn’t want this to happen either. His target is Thatcher, and nobody else.

Both Brendan and Caroline are, in different ways, both very sympathetically written and portrayed.

Themes

Brendan’s motivations are revealed through his dialogue with Caroline. Though the organisation he is working for is never named, he speaks passionately of the IRA Hunger Strikers, rattling off their names when Caroline insists that, besides Bobby Sands, nobody even remembers them. But mass unemployment, which then stood at three million in the UK, and the lack of a future for young people like himself and his nine-year-old nephew are also revealed as primary motivations. The previous years Falklands War is also referenced, the sinking of the Belgrano as it was sailing away from British forces, and the sinking of HMS Sheffield in response by the Argentinians.

A sub-theme is of how the relationship between a captor and a hostage can develop into a bond. Understandably, Caroline is at first terrified at finding she has invited an armed would-be assassin into her home. But as the play develops, this bond between the two quickly grows. She takes an interest in his life, making it very clear that she is no lover of the Prime Minister herself.

The casting of a black woman as Caroline is in itself interesting, undercutting Brendan’s inverted snobbery against the sort of people who live in leafy Windsor, far away from the problems of both working class Liverpool and the ‘Troubles’ in Ireland. Brendan expresses no racism towards Caroline, but he is clearly surprised that she is able to identify a poem he quotes to her as being by Yates (which cues up a good line from Caroline about Yates believing in fairies, and thus, ‘not the ideal person to take political instruction from’). It would have been easy choice to have the character of Caroline be the sort of upper class or upper middle-class woman we imagine lives in Windsor. Making her black added an extra dimension to the story, which I assume is also the case in Mantel’s original source material.

Although she attempts to dissuade Brendan from his chosen path through verbal persuasion, as well as the physical attempt by hiding his magazine, it’s also clear that she is increasingly excited by suddenly finding herself at the centre of a potentially historic moment. When Brendan tells her that, when the time comes she can wait in the bathroom until it’s all over, she responds with, ‘No, I want to see it! I’m not missing this,’ which received probably the biggest of many laughs from the near packed theatre audience.

Another theme that is present is the question of whether individual acts of violence, no matter how justified or heroic, ever really change anything. ‘So, you kill her, they put in Willie Whitelaw or ‘On Your Bike’, and everything carries on as before.’

Tonal Shift

Brendan was resigned to his mission being a suicide mission. He had no plans to escape, and fully expected to be shot dead as soon as he exited the building after the deed had been done. But he shows openness to Caroline’s suggestion that the possibility of escape may exist through leaving her flat and entering an adjoining flat via two doors linked by a passageway, although she has never personally made this journey.

As the two leave the flat, the play takes a surrealistic turn that closes Act One and continues through most of the shorter Act Two.

Here we see the two actors play out, in increasingly rapid succession, each one punctuated by several effigies of Thatcher crashing to the floor of the stage from above, various alternative scenarios. These include, Brendan really missing his shot and hitting a surgeon rather than the Prime Minister, Brendan indeed being shot dead as he leaves the flat after a successful assassination, Brendan being visited in prison by his uncomprehending nine-year-old nephew, who has been established as the one person Brendan truly loves.  In another universe, a grown-up version of the nephew poses proudly for tourists by a Bobby Sands-style mural for his martyred uncle (it might have been better if we’d seen this mural, but this is a minor criticism).  In yet another possible world, Caroline has become something of a celebrity in the aftermath of the event, expressing her surprise at being interviewed by David Frost, and also finding herself being condemned as a ‘terrorist’ herself for her refusal to condemn Brendan. I thought there was an implied criticism of the recent proscription of a certain pro-Palestinian organisation here, especially as Caroline chants ‘Fight this law!’ at the audience.

This sudden tonal shift from the almost homely scene in the flat was disconcerting, making for feelings of shock and unease among the audience, or so it seemed to me, but it was very effective.

Finally, this bombardment of the senses is resolved and we end up back in Caroline’s flat, as the phone rings three times and the shot is fired.

Conclusion

This is a very political play, but one which offers no easy answers or moral certainties.

I won’t give away the ending, of whether or not Brendan is successful or not in his mission. I’ll simply finish by saying that this was a great play, superbly written and directed, gripping, humorous and thought provoking. Full compliments to all concerned, especially to our two actors.

After they had taken their well-deserved standing ovation, O’ Neil spoke briefly but movingly about how seeing a play a play at this theatre as a young working class kid twenty-years ago had first raised in him the possibility of, and desire to become an actor. The Everyman is a superb venue and theatre company, and has been the starting point for many great Liverpool actors, including Julie Walters, Bill Nighy, Pete Poselthwaite, Stephen Graham, Alison Steadman, David Morrissey and Ken Campbell with his legendary Science Fiction Theatre in the early 1960s (a topic which deserves its own article).

Long may it continue.

Anthony C Green, May, 2026

The play continues at the Everyman until May 23rd, and will hopefully soon be touring across the country.

Promotional image for the novel 'SPECIAL' by Anthony C. Green featuring the book cover and the text 'BUY NOW'.

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 21st – 27th March 2026

An artistic poster featuring a large vulture in flight against a blue sky, with the words 'CULTURE VULTURE' prominently displayed at the top, and 'Counter Culture' logo along with event dates at the bottom.

This week’s Culture Vulture moves between shadow and light, from the moral labyrinth of post-war Vienna to the existential drift of modern memory, with plenty of sharp turns in between. It’s a schedule that rewards curiosity—whether that’s revisiting the classics or taking a chance on more challenging contemporary work.

🌟 Highlights this week:

The Third Man (Saturday) remains a masterclass in atmosphere and ambiguity; Training Day (Sunday) delivers a blistering study in corruption anchored by a towering central performance; and Boiling Point (Thursday) offers one of the most intense cinematic experiences of recent years, unfolding in a single, breathless take.

Alongside these, there’s a strong literary thread on Sunday evening via BBC Four, and a run of documentaries that probe power, identity, and memory. In short, a week that leans into substance without sacrificing entertainment. Selections and previews are by Pat Harrington.

Saturday 21st March

🌟 The Third Man (1949) BBC Two, 1:00 PM

Carol Reed’s masterpiece returns like a half‑remembered dream, its post‑war Vienna still carved into zones of occupation and moral exhaustion. The city becomes a character in its own right—bomb‑pitted, rain‑slick, and permanently off‑kilter—where every doorway seems to hide a watcher and every friendship carries a price.

Joseph Cotten’s bewildered Holly Martins stumbles through this broken landscape with the earnestness of a man who hasn’t yet realised the world has moved on without him. And then, of course, there’s Orson Welles: appearing late, disappearing early, yet haunting every frame. His Harry Lime is charm weaponised—an easy smile masking a worldview stripped of sentiment, a man who thrives in the cracks where empires collapse.

Reed’s tilted camerawork and Robert Krasker’s chiaroscuro photography create a visual grammar of unease, while Anton Karas’s zither score—jaunty, ironic, unforgettable—cuts against the darkness like a grin in a graveyard.

What lingers is the film’s moral clarity: not the simplicity of good versus evil, but the harder truth that in a ruined world, decency is a fragile, stubborn act. The Third Man understands that corruption isn’t always monstrous; sometimes it’s merely convenient. And that makes it all the more chilling.

Hobson’s Choice (1954) Talking Pictures, 4:35 PM

David Lean’s shift from epic sweep to cobbled‑street intimacy yields one of his most generous films—a wry, affectionate portrait of working‑class aspiration in a world that insists on knowing its place. Charles Laughton gives a gloriously blustering turn as Henry Hobson, a man pickled in his own self‑importance, but it’s Brenda de Banzie’s Maggie who quietly takes the reins. Her resolve is the film’s true engine: calm, practical, and utterly unwilling to let circumstance dictate her future.

Lean treats the Salford streets with a craftsman’s eye—warm light on shop windows, the bustle of trade, the small rituals of labour that give a community its rhythm. And in John Mills’ shy, gifted bootmaker, the film finds a tender study of talent overlooked until someone insists on seeing it.

What makes Hobson’s Choice endure is its humane clarity. It understands that liberation often begins in the domestic sphere, in the simple refusal to accept the limits others set for you. It’s a comedy, yes, but one with a spine of steel and a deep affection for the people who quietly reshape their world through competence, courage, and sheer bloody-mindedness.

A deeply satisfying piece of British storytelling—funny, warm, and sharper than it first appears.

Meet the Parents (2000) ITV2, 9:00 PM

A comedy of manners sharpened into something closer to a social gauntlet, Meet the Parents remains painfully funny because it understands a simple truth: nothing exposes our insecurities faster than meeting the in‑laws. Ben Stiller’s Greg Focker arrives as the perennial outsider—earnest, eager, catastrophically overthinking every gesture—only to collide with Robert De Niro’s Jack Byrnes, a patriarch whose quiet scrutiny feels more like an interrogation conducted under soft lighting.

What begins as mild awkwardness escalates with almost architectural precision. Each scene adds a fresh layer of discomfort: a misplaced joke, a family heirloom shattered, a cat that refuses to cooperate. The comedy works because it’s recognisable—every misstep is rooted in the desperate human urge to be liked, to belong, to prove oneself worthy of the people we love.

De Niro plays Jack with a beautifully controlled menace, the kind that never raises its voice because it doesn’t need to. Stiller, meanwhile, gives one of his finest physical performances, a man whose body seems to fold in on itself as the weekend unravels.

The result is a film that’s both excruciating and oddly tender. Beneath the humiliation lies a story about acceptance, vulnerability, and the fragile negotiations that bind families together.

La Chimera (2023) BBC Four, 9:20 PM

Alice Rohrwacher’s latest drifts in like a half‑remembered folktale, a story told in the hush between waking and sleep. Set among tomb‑raiders and dreamers on the fringes of modern Italy, it follows Arthur—Josh O’Connor, all haunted eyes and inward tilt—as he moves through the world like a man caught between realms. He’s grieving, searching, pulled backwards by a love he can’t relinquish and a past that refuses to stay buried.

Rohrwacher isn’t interested in tidy plotting or narrative closure; she’s after something more elusive. The film moves with the logic of memory—scenes folding into one another, time slipping, the camera wandering with a curiosity that feels almost archaeological. Earth, stone, dust, and song: everything here has texture, a lived‑in tactility that makes the film feel dug up rather than constructed.

What emerges is a meditation on longing and the quiet ache of things lost. It’s a film that asks you to surrender to its rhythm, to let its melancholy humour and gentle strangeness wash over you. Not for viewers who need firm handrails, but for those willing to meet it where it lives, La Chimera is quietly, insistently haunting—a story that lingers like a ghost brushing past your shoulder.

Aftersun (2022) BBC Two, 11:45 PM

Charlotte Wells’ debut unfolds like a memory you can’t quite hold still—sun‑bleached, tender, and edged with the quiet knowledge of what you didn’t understand at the time. Set on a modest Turkish holiday, it follows young Sophie and her father Calum, their days filled with the small rituals of a package break: poolside games, camcorder footage, the soft choreography of a relationship built on love and unspoken strain.

Paul Mescal gives a performance of extraordinary restraint, playing a man who is present and absent all at once—warm, playful, but carrying a weight he never names. Wells captures him in fragments: a glance held too long, a smile that falters, a moment alone on a balcony where the mask slips. The film trusts the audience to read between the lines, to feel the emotional weather gathering at the edges of the frame.

What makes Aftersun so quietly devastating is its structure: the adult Sophie piecing together her father through the grainy footage of that holiday, trying to understand the man she loved but never fully knew. It’s a film about the limits of memory, the tenderness of hindsight, and the way certain moments lodge in the heart long after the details fade.

Its emotional impact doesn’t announce itself. It creeps in, gentle and insistent, and stays with you long after the credits roll—like a song you can’t stop hearing, even when you’re not sure where you first learned it.

Infinity Pool (2023) Channel 4, 12:45 AM

Brandon Cronenberg’s Infinity Pool slinks in with the confidence of a nightmare that knows exactly where it’s taking you. Set in a luxury resort sealed off from the country surrounding it, the film skewers the kind of wealth that treats borders, laws, and even human life as optional inconveniences. Alexander Skarsgård’s blocked novelist arrives hoping for inspiration; what he finds instead is a world where consequence can be bought off, duplicated, or discarded entirely.

Cronenberg builds his satire with a cold, clinical precision. The resort’s sterile opulence sits uneasily beside the brutality it enables, and every indulgence feels like a step further into moral freefall. Mia Goth is mesmerising as the agent of chaos—playful, predatory, and utterly unbound—drawing Skarsgård’s character into a spiral where violence becomes entertainment and identity starts to slip.

The film is deliberately excessive, pushing its imagery and ideas to the point of discomfort. But beneath the provocation lies a sharp critique: a portrait of privilege so insulated that it forgets what it means to be accountable, or even recognisably human.

Disturbing, hypnotic, and darkly funny in places, Infinity Pool is less a holiday from reality than a descent into the kind of moral vacuum only money can buy.

Sunday 22nd March

Roman Holiday (1953) Sky Arts, 8:00 PM

There are films that feel like postcards from another world, and Roman Holiday is one of them—sunlit, effervescent, and carried by Audrey Hepburn’s luminous presence. As Princess Ann slipping the leash of royal duty for a single stolen day, Hepburn moves through Rome with a mixture of wonder and quiet yearning, discovering the city—and herself—with every sidestreet detour.

Gregory Peck’s newspaperman plays the perfect foil: steady, wry, and increasingly undone by the simple pleasure of watching someone taste freedom for the first time. Their chemistry is gentle rather than grand, built on shared glances and the kind of conversations that only happen when time feels briefly suspended.

Rome itself becomes a co‑conspirator—alive, spontaneous, full of possibility. The Vespa ride, the Mouth of Truth, the dance by the river: each moment feels both carefree and tinged with the knowledge that such days can’t last.

That’s the film’s quiet magic. Beneath the charm and sparkle lies a bittersweet truth about responsibility, desire, and the cost of returning to the life that awaits you. Roman Holiday is light, yes, but never trivial. It’s a reminder of how fleeting joy can be—and how deeply it can lodge in the memory.

🌟 Training Day (2001) BBC Two, 10:00 PM

Antoine Fuqua’s Training Day traps you in the heat and grime of Los Angeles over the course of a single, punishing day—a crucible in which ideals are tested, bent, and finally broken. At its centre is Denzel Washington’s Oscar‑winning Alonzo Harris, a detective who moves through the city with the swagger of a man who believes he owns it. Charismatic, terrifying, and utterly unpredictable, he turns every conversation into a power play, every smile into a warning.

Ethan Hawke’s rookie cop, Jake Hoyt, becomes our uneasy proxy—earnest, principled, and slowly realising he’s been invited into a world where the rules are rewritten to suit the man with the loudest voice and the deepest pockets. The film’s tension comes from that dawning awareness: the sense that corruption isn’t a sudden fall but a series of small compromises, each one easier to justify than the last.

Fuqua shoots the city with a kind of bruised beauty—sun‑blasted streets, cramped apartments, neighbourhoods humming with life and danger. It’s a portrait of power operating in plain sight, and of a system that rewards those willing to blur the line between protector and predator.

Victoria and Abdul (2017) BBC Two, 11:55 PM

Stephen Frears approaches this unlikely royal friendship with a light touch, but there’s a quiet charge beneath the decorum. Judi Dench, returning to Queen Victoria with the authority of someone who understands both the crown and the woman beneath it, gives a performance steeped in weariness, wit, and a longing for connection. Her Victoria is formidable, yes, but also lonely—boxed in by ritual, surrounded by courtiers who speak to her position rather than her person.

Into this world steps Abdul Karim, played with warmth and openness by Ali Fazal, whose presence unsettles the palace not through scandal but through sincerity. Their bond—part mentorship, part companionship—becomes a small act of rebellion against the machinery of empire, exposing the anxieties of those who fear any shift in the established order.

Frears keeps the tone gentle, even playful, but he never ignores the politics humming underneath: the racial prejudice, the class rigidity, the discomfort of a court that cannot fathom affection crossing its invisible boundaries. What emerges is a film about the human need to be seen, even at the end of a life lived in public.

Anchored by Dench’s quiet gravitas, Victoria & Abdul becomes more than a royal anecdote. It’s a tender study of connection in a world built to prevent it.

Poems in Their Place: W.B. Yeats BBC Four, 7:50 PM

Seamus Heaney guides us through Yeats’s world with the ease of one poet recognising another across time—a conversation conducted through fields, shorelines, and the shifting Irish light. Rather than dissecting the poems, he lets them breathe in the landscapes that shaped them: the loughs and lanes of Sligo, the windswept edges of the west, the houses where history pressed close against the imagination.

Heaney’s reflections are intimate without ever becoming possessive. He speaks of Yeats as someone both towering and touchable, a poet whose work is inseparable from the soil underfoot and the political weather of his age. The programme moves gently, allowing the cadences of the verse to settle into the scenery, as if the land itself were reciting alongside him.

What emerges is less a lecture than a pilgrimage—an exploration of how poetry lodges in place, and how place, in turn, becomes a kind of memory. For anyone drawn to Yeats, or to the idea that landscape can hold a story long after the storyteller is gone, it’s quietly transporting.

The Life and Loves of Oscar Wilde BBC Four, 8:00 PM

This concise portrait of Oscar Wilde moves with the clarity of someone determined to see the man whole—brilliance, bravado, vulnerability and all. It traces his rise with affectionate precision: the wit that dazzled London society, the theatrical flair that made him both irresistible and faintly dangerous, the cultivated persona that shimmered somewhere between performance and truth.

But the programme never lets the sparkle obscure the cost. Wilde’s contradictions—public confidence and private longing, moral sharpness and reckless desire—are handled with a steady, humane touch. His downfall is neither sensationalised nor softened; instead, it’s presented as the inevitable collision between a man determined to live expansively and a society determined to punish him for it.

What emerges is a portrait of a life lived in full colour, shadowed by the cruelty of its ending but never reduced to it. Clear‑eyed, engaging, and quietly moving, it honours Wilde not just as a literary icon but as a human being caught between genius and the world that couldn’t bear it.

The Picture of Dorian Gray (Read by Luke Thompson) BBC Four, 9:00 PM

Stripped of its visual decadence and returned to the purity of voice, Wilde’s dark moral fable feels sharper, colder, and more intimate than ever. Luke Thompson reads with a clarity that lets the prose do the work—those glittering aphorisms, the velvet‑soft seductions, the slow tightening of the moral noose. Without the distraction of costume or setting, you hear the novel’s true architecture: wit curdling into cruelty, beauty shading into corruption, the steady erosion of a soul convinced it can outrun consequence.

Thompson’s delivery captures the novel’s duality—its surface charm and its creeping dread—allowing Wilde’s language to shimmer and then darken, sentence by sentence. What emerges is a reminder of how modern the book still feels: a study of vanity, influence, and the seductive lie that one can live without cost.

In this pared‑back form, Dorian Gray becomes even more unsettling. The portrait may be unseen, but you feel its presence in every pause, every shift in tone. A classic made newly dangerous by the simple act of being spoken aloud.

Peer Gynt (1978 adaptation) BBC Four, 10:00 PM

This 1978 adaptation tackles Ibsen’s sprawling, shape‑shifting epic with a theatrical boldness that refuses to tame it. Peer Gynt has always been a journey through the self as much as through the world—a restless wanderer slipping between reality and fantasy, truth and self‑mythology—and the production leans into that instability. Sets shift, tones collide, and the boundaries between the literal and the symbolic blur in ways that feel deliberately disorienting.

The result is uneven, yes, but in a way that suits the material. Peer’s odyssey is a patchwork of bravado, delusion, longing, and evasion, and the adaptation captures that sense of a man constantly reinventing himself to avoid the one thing he fears most: being known. When the production lands—particularly in its quieter, more introspective passages—it finds a surprising emotional clarity beneath the spectacle.

What rewards the patient viewer is the cumulative effect: a portrait of identity as something provisional, performed, and often hollow. The ambition is unmistakable, the theatricality unapologetic, and for those willing to meet it halfway, the journey becomes strangely compelling—a reminder that some stories are meant to be wrestled with rather than neatly resolved.

Monday 23rd March

The Northman (2022) Film4, 9:00 PM

Robert Eggers’ The Northman unfolds like a saga carved into stone—brutal, ritualistic, and steeped in the kind of mythic inevitability that feels closer to legend than recorded history. Alexander Skarsgård’s Amleth moves through this world with the single‑minded force of a man shaped by prophecy and vengeance, his body as much a weapon as the blades he wields.

Eggers builds the film with an almost archaeological precision: longhouses lit by fire and smoke, landscapes that feel ancient and indifferent, rituals that blur the line between the spiritual and the hallucinatory. The result is immersive in the truest sense—you don’t watch the world, you’re dropped into it, surrounded by its mud, blood, and incantations.

The violence is unflinching but never gratuitous; it’s part of the film’s cosmology, a reflection of a society where honour and brutality are inseparable. Nicole Kidman and Anya Taylor‑Joy bring sharp, unsettling energy to the story, complicating the revenge narrative with their own forms of power and survival.

Demanding but deeply rewarding, The Northman is a vision of myth rendered with startling clarity—visually striking, emotionally primal, and driven by the sense that fate is a tide no one can outrun.

Ammonite (2020) BBC Two, 12:00 AM

Francis Lee’s Ammonite is a study in silence—an intimate drama carved from wind, stone, and the unspoken ache of two women who find each other in the margins of their lives. Kate Winslet’s Mary Anning is all flinty resolve and inwardness, a woman shaped by the harsh Dorset coast and the harder realities of being a working‑class scientist in a world that refuses to see her. Saoirse Ronan’s Charlotte arrives fragile, grieving, and adrift, her presence unsettling Mary’s carefully contained solitude.

Lee’s direction is stark and unhurried, letting glances, gestures, and the rhythm of labour carry the emotional weight. The landscape mirrors the characters—bleak, beautiful, and quietly alive with possibility. What emerges between Mary and Charlotte is less a sweeping romance than a slow, tentative thaw: two people learning to trust touch, attention, and the idea that desire might be something they’re allowed to claim.

The film’s power lies in its precision. Every silence feels deliberate, every moment of connection earned. Winslet and Ronan give performances built from small, exact choices, revealing entire emotional histories in the way they hold themselves—or allow themselves to soften.

Restrained, intimate, and emotionally exacting, Ammonite lingers like a tide pulling back, leaving behind traces of something raw and deeply felt.

Just One Thing (Episode 1) BBC One, 2:00 PM

Returning in the shadow of Dr Michael Mosley’s loss, Just One Thing continues with the clarity and practicality that made the series so widely trusted. The tone is gentle but assured, honouring Mosley’s legacy without leaning into sentimentality. The focus remains where he always placed it: small, evidence‑based habits that can make everyday life feel a little healthier, a little more manageable.

This opening episode reaffirms the show’s strengths—accessible science, clear explanations, and a sense of wellbeing rooted in curiosity rather than pressure. It’s a reminder that good advice doesn’t need to be grand or transformative; sometimes one small, sustainable change is enough.

Quiet, useful, and grounded in the spirit of Mosley’s work, it’s a thoughtful continuation rather than a reinvention.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver Sky One, 10:40 PM

John Oliver returns with his trademark blend of forensic research and exasperated humour, slicing through the week’s headlines with a precision that feels both cathartic and slightly alarming. The show’s great trick has always been its ability to turn sprawling, often bleak subjects into something digestible without sanding off their seriousness, and this episode keeps that balance intact.

But there’s an added tension now: the world has grown so absurd, so relentlessly self‑parodic, that satire risks being overtaken by the news itself. Oliver leans into that challenge, using it as fuel rather than a limitation—pushing deeper, asking sharper questions, and finding comedy in the gap between what should happen and what actually does.

Smart, pointed, and occasionally furious, it’s a reminder that satire works best not when it mocks the world, but when it tries—however hopelessly—to make sense of it.

Tuesday 24th March

Of Human Bondage (1934) Talking Pictures, 8:10 AM

John Cromwell’s adaptation of Maugham’s novel still lands with a surprising sting—a drama stripped of glamour, driven instead by the messy, humiliating tangle of desire and self‑destruction. Leslie Howard gives a quietly wounded performance as Philip Carey, the medical student whose longing curdles into obsession, but it’s Bette Davis who seizes the film and refuses to let go.

Her Mildred is ferocious, abrasive, and utterly alive—a woman who weaponises vulnerability as easily as contempt. Davis plays her without apology, giving one of the great early performances of her career: sharp‑edged, unpredictable, and psychologically exact. It’s the kind of turn that feels modern even now, refusing to soften a character who is both victim and tormentor.

The film itself is lean and emotionally direct, its rawness heightened by the stark black‑and‑white photography and the sense of lives lived on the edge of respectability. What endures is the honesty of it—the recognition that love can be degrading, that longing can hollow a person out, and that sometimes the hardest thing is admitting what we’ve allowed ourselves to become.

A psychologically astute drama, anchored by Davis at her most fearless.

Power: The Downfall of Huw Edwards Channel 5, 9:00 PM


This dramatisation tackles a story still raw in the public consciousness, approaching it with a seriousness that acknowledges both the human cost and the institutional implications. Rather than indulging in lurid detail, the programme frames the events as part of a wider pattern—how power operates within trusted institutions, how oversight falters, and how reputations can shape or shield behaviour until the moment they no longer can.

It’s difficult viewing by design. The drama raises uncomfortable questions about accountability, newsroom culture, and the structures that allow problems to go unchallenged until they erupt into crisis. There’s no easy catharsis here, just a steady, disquieting examination of how systems fail—and what happens when the public’s faith in those systems fractures.

A sober, troubling piece of television, more interested in the mechanisms of power than in sensationalising the individuals caught within them.

Wednesday 25th March

Carlito’s Way (1993) Film4, 9:00 PM

Brian De Palma’s Carlito’s Way is a gangster film with its eyes fixed not on the rise, but on the impossibility of escape. Al Pacino gives one of his most quietly affecting performances as Carlito Brigante, a man freshly out of prison and genuinely trying to carve out a life beyond the violence that once defined him. What makes the film so compelling is the tension between that desire and the gravitational pull of his past—every choice he makes shadowed by the knowledge that the world he’s trying to leave behind isn’t finished with him.

Pacino plays Carlito with a weary grace, a man who can see the trap closing even as he tries to outrun it. Opposite him, Sean Penn’s turn as the coked‑up lawyer Dave Kleinfeld is a masterclass in self‑destruction, a reminder that danger doesn’t always come from the expected direction.

De Palma’s direction is stylish without being showy, saving his bravura flourishes for the moments when fate tightens its grip—the nightclub sequences, the subway chase, the final dash through Grand Central. Beneath the suspense lies a deep melancholy: a sense that redemption is always just out of reach for men like Carlito, no matter how sincerely they chase it.

A gangster film about regret rather than ambition, anchored by Pacino at his most soulful.

The Duchess (2008) BBC Two, 11:30 PM

Saul Dibb’s The Duchess presents Georgian aristocracy with all the expected polish—silks, salons, and stately homes—but it’s the quiet critique running beneath the surface that gives the film its bite. Keira Knightley plays Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, with a luminous intelligence that makes her confinement all the more painful to watch: a woman celebrated in public yet controlled, diminished, and traded in private.

Ralph Fiennes is chillingly restrained as the Duke, embodying a system in which power is exercised through silence, entitlement, and the casual assumption that a woman’s life is not her own. The film never needs to shout its politics; the constraints are written into every room Georgiana enters, every choice she’s denied, every compromise she’s forced to make.

What emerges is a portrait of a life lived under exquisite pressure—elegant on the surface, quietly devastating beneath. Dibb’s direction keeps the tone measured, allowing the emotional truth to seep through the cracks in the grandeur.

A beautifully mounted period drama that understands the cost of being admired but not free.

Thursday 26th March

🌟 Boiling Point (2021) Film4, 11:45 PM

Philip Barantini’s Boiling Point unfolds in a single, unbroken take, but the real trick is how quickly it pulls you into the rhythm of a kitchen on the brink—orders piling up, tempers fraying, and the quiet, corrosive pressures that hospitality workers carry long after the plates are cleared. Stephen Graham is extraordinary as Andy, a head chef barely holding himself together, his charm and authority flickering under the weight of exhaustion, debt, and unspoken grief.

The camera moves through the restaurant like another member of staff—darting, weaving, catching fragments of conversations that reveal whole lives in seconds. What emerges is a portrait of an industry built on adrenaline and compromise, where the smallest misstep can send everything spiralling. The tension is relentless, but never gratuitous; it’s rooted in the emotional truth of people trying to do their best in a system that gives them no room to breathe.

Stressful, exhilarating, and painfully recognisable, Boiling Point captures the chaos with documentary immediacy and the heartbreak with quiet precision. It’s a film that leaves you wrung out, but deeply impressed by the humanity burning beneath the heat.

Licorice Pizza (2021) BBC Two, 12:00 AM

Paul Thomas Anderson’s Licorice Pizza moves with the shambling confidence of memory—episodic, sun‑drenched, and stitched together from the kind of half‑formed adventures that feel trivial at the time and formative in hindsight. Alana Haim and Cooper Hoffman anchor the film with performances that feel wonderfully lived‑in: awkward, impulsive, and full of that restless energy that comes from wanting life to start faster than it actually does.

Anderson isn’t chasing plot so much as texture. The film drifts through 1970s San Fernando Valley with a kind of affectionate curiosity—political campaigns, waterbeds, wayward actors, and small hustles all folding into a portrait of youth that’s more about possibility than direction. The looseness is the point; ambition here is messy, instinctive, and often misguided, but always sincere.

What makes the film so charming is its emotional precision beneath the shaggy surface. Anderson captures the strange, elastic space between adolescence and adulthood, where confidence and uncertainty coexist and every encounter feels like it might tilt a life one way or another.

Shaggy, charming, and full of lived‑in detail, Licorice Pizza is less a coming‑of‑age story than a beautifully meandering reminder of how it feels to be young and hungry for something you can’t yet name.

Classic Movies: The Story of Ran Sky Arts, 8:00 PM

This thoughtful documentary digs into the making of Ran, Akira Kurosawa’s late‑career epic—a film so vast in scope and so steeped in Shakespearean tragedy that it feels carved into the landscape itself. The programme traces how Kurosawa fused King Lear with Japanese history and his own lifelong preoccupations: ageing, betrayal, the fragility of power, and the chaos unleashed when authority collapses.

What emerges is a portrait of a filmmaker working at the height of his visual imagination. The documentary lingers on the film’s extraordinary craft—those sweeping battle tableaux, the meticulous colour design, the way silence and stillness can be as devastating as violence. It also acknowledges the emotional depth beneath the spectacle: a story about a man undone not by fate, but by the consequences of his own cruelty.

Clear, engaging, and rich in insight, it’s a compelling look at how Ran became both a monumental achievement and a deeply personal reckoning for Kurosawa

Matter of Mind: My Alzheimer’s PBS America, 9:10 PM

This documentary approaches Alzheimer’s not as a medical puzzle to be solved but as a lived reality—messy, tender, frightening, and threaded with moments of startling clarity. Rather than leaning on experts or statistics, it centres the people navigating the condition day by day: individuals trying to hold onto their sense of self, and families learning to adapt with patience, grief, and unexpected resilience.

The film’s strength lies in its refusal to generalise. Each story is specific, shaped by personality, circumstance, and the small rituals that help maintain dignity. There’s no sentimentality, but neither is there despair; instead, the documentary finds its emotional weight in the honesty of its subjects and the quiet courage required to keep moving through uncertainty.

A deeply human look at dementia, grounded in experience rather than abstraction, and a reminder that understanding begins with listening.

Friday 27th March

Femme (2023) BBC Two, 11:00 PM

Femme is a thriller built on shifting identities and dangerous intimacy, a film that refuses to let you settle into easy judgments. Nathan Stewart‑Jarrett plays Jules with a brittle, wounded intensity—a drag performer whose life is shattered by a violent attack. When he later encounters George MacKay’s Preston, the man he believes responsible, the film slips into a tense psychological dance where revenge, desire, and self‑presentation blur in increasingly unsettling ways.

What makes the film so compelling is its moral complexity. Jules’ pursuit of Preston is driven by trauma, but the closer he gets, the more the boundaries between hunter and hunted begin to dissolve. The directors, Sam H. Freeman and Ng Choon Ping, keep the tone tight and claustrophobic, using London’s night-time spaces—clubs, flats, back rooms—as stages for shifting power and unstable truths.

It’s uncomfortable by design, a story about the masks people wear and the danger of believing you can control the narrative once you step into someone else’s world. Stylish, tense, and emotionally jagged.

Benedetta (2021) Channel 4, 1:00 AM

Paul Verhoeven’s Benedetta is provocative in the way only he can manage—irreverent, mischievous, and entirely uninterested in playing by the rules of the historical drama. Set in a 17th‑century convent, the film treats religion, desire, and power with a mixture of seriousness and sly humour, refusing to separate the spiritual from the bodily. Virginie Efira is magnetic as Benedetta, a nun whose visions, charisma, and appetites unsettle the fragile hierarchies around her.

Verhoeven leans into the contradictions: faith as performance, ecstasy as rebellion, and institutional piety as a mask for political manoeuvring. The result is a film that’s both playful and pointed, exposing the hypocrisies of religious authority while allowing its characters a messy, complicated humanity.

It’s not subtle, but that’s the pleasure. Benedetta pushes at boundaries with a wink and a scalpel, inviting you to question where devotion ends and desire begins.

Provocative, irreverent, and unmistakably Verhoeven.

Billy Idol: Should Be Dead Sky Arts, 9:00 PM

This documentary charts Billy Idol’s journey with a mix of amusement and awe, tracing the arc of a man who lived through the kind of excess that usually ends careers—or lives. What emerges isn’t just a rock‑and‑roll cautionary tale but a portrait of sheer, stubborn survival. Idol’s swagger, his peroxide sneer, and his knack for reinvention all come into focus as the film digs into the chaos of the early years and the hard‑won clarity that followed.

There’s plenty of entertainment in the anecdotes—wild tours, bad decisions, and the kind of near‑misses that would flatten most people—but the documentary also finds space for reflection. Idol comes across as someone who understands the cost of his own mythology, even as he continues to enjoy the performance of it.

An engaging, surprisingly thoughtful look at a rock icon who, by all reasonable measures, shouldn’t still be here—but absolutely is.

I Was a Teenage Sex Pistol Sky Arts, 11:20 PM

This documentary captures punk at the exact moment it stopped being a rumble in the underground and became a cultural detonation. Told with the rough edges intact, it’s less a tidy history lesson than a chaotic snapshot of the Sex Pistols’ early orbit—full of swagger, mischief, and the kind of combustible personalities that made the movement feel both inevitable and unsustainable.

There’s a scrappy immediacy to the storytelling, reflecting a scene built on impulse rather than strategy. The film leans into the contradictions: the DIY ethos colliding with sudden notoriety, the thrill of tearing down the old order, and the messy, often self‑inflicted fallout that followed.

Loud, unruly, and strangely poignant in hindsight, it’s a reminder of how a handful of teenagers managed to jolt British culture awake—whether it was ready or not.

The M Factor: Shredding the Silence on Menopause PBS America, 8:55 PM

This documentary tackles menopause with the clarity and compassion it has long been denied, treating it not as a private ordeal but as a major health and social issue that deserves open conversation. By centring women’s lived experiences—physical, emotional, and professional—it exposes how silence and stigma have shaped everything from medical care to workplace expectations.

The programme balances personal testimony with clear, accessible science, making space for the complexity of a transition that is too often dismissed or minimised. What emerges is a portrait of resilience and frustration, but also of possibility: a sense that honest discussion can lead to better support, better policy, and a better understanding of what half the population will go through.

An important, empathetic exploration of a subject that should never have been overlooked in the first place.

Secrets of the Sun (Parts 1 & 2) Channel 5, 9:00 PM & 10:00 PM

Dara Ó Briain brings clarity and enthusiasm to a fascinating exploration of our nearest star.

📺 Streaming Choice

The Predator of Seville (Netflix) All episodes available from Friday 27 March

A disturbing but necessary true-crime series that foregrounds victims’ voices over sensationalism. Thoughtful, measured, and quietly powerful.

Mike and Nick and Nick and Alice (Disney+) From Friday 27 March

An offbeat crime caper driven by odd-couple chemistry and escalating absurdity. Uneven, but often sharply funny.

Daredevil: Born Again – Season 2 (Disney+) Season 2 available from Wednesday 25 March

The second season of Daredevil: Born Again pushes further into the shadows, doubling down on the qualities that have always set Matt Murdock apart from the broader Marvel sprawl. This is a world of bruised knuckles, compromised ideals, and the uneasy knowledge that justice—real justice—rarely comes cleanly.

Charlie Cox remains the show’s anchor, playing Murdock with a weary conviction that makes every choice feel weighted with consequence. The series leans into that moral ambiguity, exploring what happens when a man who believes in the law keeps finding himself drawn back to the violence he’s sworn to rise above.

The action is tight and grounded, but it’s the introspection that gives the season its charge: questions of identity, faith, and the cost of trying to save a city that keeps slipping through your fingers.

A darker, more reflective corner of Marvel—still muscular, still gripping, but driven by character rather than spectacle.

The Pitt – Season 1 & Season 2 (eps 1–4) (HBO Max) Available from Thursday 26 March

Ambitious, character-driven drama that thrives on tension and shifting loyalties. Demanding but rewarding.

Advert

The image features a blurred background with soft lighting, overlayed with the text 'THE WHITE ROOMS', a 'BUY NOW' button, and the name 'TP BRAGG' on a dark panel.

Leave a Comment

Exploring the 1954 BBC Adaptation of 1984: A Classic Review

1954 BBC television production reviewed by Anthony C Green

Cover of the 1954 BBC television adaptation of 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' featuring key characters and cast names in a vintage graphic design.
Click on image to view or buy

Introduction

A repeat showing of this production in 1977 was almost certainly my first exposure, as a largely apolitical fifteen-year-old, to Orwell’s masterpiece. I watched it with my friend Neil (RIP). I can’t vouch for how much of it we understood, and it would be another three or four years before I first tackled the book.

Though I might not have initially ‘got’ the world of 1984 and its political message during my initial viewing of the recording of this live television production, in murky, spotty, unrestored black and white. But it must have had an impact, because every time I’ve read the book since, perhaps on four occasions all the way through, I’ve pictured Winston Smith as Peter Cushing, who played the lead in the play.

Even the great John Hurt, who did a fine job with the role in the film version that was released, somewhat inevitably in the real 1984, didn’t succeed in separating the two in my mind.

As well as Orwell’s iconic novel itself, this production and the 1984 film, I’ve also read and reviewed  the book Julia by Sandra Newman, a retelling of the story from the point of view of Winston Smith’s eponymous lover rather than that of Winston Review: Julia By Sandra Newman, and   an excellent theatrical production by the Bath Playhouse theatre company here in Liverpool last year, which I also reviewed 1984 Play Review: A Dystopian Masterpiece | Counter Culture

So, I can now justifiably claim a decent grounding in the world and mythos of the story, and having picked up the DVD/Blu Ray physical media combo restoration of this first attempt to bring Orwell’s nightmare vision to life visually for the British public, I thought it would be interesting to take a second look, almost five decades after my first, and more than seven decades since it first aired.

1984 Pre 1954

We should perhaps first remind ourselves that this wasn’t an adaptation of some dusty old classic of English literature. The production took place a mere five years after the novel was first published, and only four after the death of Orwell.

The first radio adaptation of the book was broadcast on American radio in 1949, while the author was still around. I don’t know if he ever got to hear it.

The idea of a television adaptation had been knocking around the BBC before even that. They had been quick to obtain the rights to dramatise the novel from Orwell that year, when it quickly became clear that the book was an instant classic.

As it turned out, the Americans once again got there first with a CBS production in 1953.

A limited amount of the footage from the recording of this has survived. Still, the consensus is that it wasn’t great, and with only fifty minutes of runtime, excluding the advertisements of which we were blessedly free in the UK in those far-off pre-commercial TV days, it’s hard to see how it could have been.

The  BBC production, was always going to be a big deal, what today we would call ‘event TV’, ultimately broadcast less than a year-and-a-half after what was almost inarguably the world’s first ever TV event, the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth 11, for which many British families specifically bought their first television set, with many others crowding the living rooms of the only families in their street who had.

A script had been commissioned in late 1953, written by one Hugh Faulks in consultation with Orwell’s widow Sonia, with the hope of airing in April 1954.

However, when Rudolph Cartier was hired as Director/Producer, he rejected Faulk’s script, pushing back the broadcast by eight months.

Cartier was a German Jew who was already a well-established and successful film director when he fled the Nazi regime for Britain in 1936.

It was his work on the Quatermass Experiment in 1953 that secured him the 1984 job. This had served as the British public’s first introduction to television Science Fiction/Horror, and it had been a massive success.

The character of Professor Quatermass had been the creation of Nigel Kneale, who also wrote the script for the six-part series. He and Cartier had next worked together on an adaptation of Wuthering Heights, and Cartier, a man with a reputation for getting his own way, had made it a precondition for accepting the 1984 job that Kneale write the script.

It’s primarily to these two individuals, to their skill, courage and persistence, who we owe a debt of gratitude for the play being as good as it turned out to be.

The Cast

With the BBC having agreed to his demand to have Kneale on board, Cartier assembled a great team of actors, almost all of whom had experience in both film and theatre work, as well as the new-fangled medium of television, which was crucial given the potential pitfalls of attempting to bring such a dark and complex novel to life on the small screen under the technical and financial limitations of the day.

Peter Cushing was still three years away from The Curse of Frankenstein, the film that made him a household name and would forever associate him in the minds of the viewing public with the Horror genre, as well as launching Hammer Film Studios as the home of great British horror.

But even in 1954, though not quite yet a ‘star’, he would already have been a familiar face to cinema goers and the smaller numbers of television viewers.

Yvonne Mitchell was given the role of Julia. She’d played Cathy in the recent Cartier/Kneale Wuthering Heights, a role for which she’d received criticism for being too tall, and that this had detracted from the essential manliness of a Heathcliffe played by the relatively diminutive Richard Todd.

 There are relatively few speaking roles in the adaptation, and the minimum number of Extras they could get away with while remaining credible. But there are still several faces and names who are still familiar to viewers of a certain generation to this day, including the great Donald Pleasance as Syme, Andre Morell as O’Brien, and Wilfred Bramble who appears first as ‘Old Man’ early in the play, a decade before he became the Dirty Old Man in Steptoe and Son (and the ‘very clean’ old man in the Beatles A Hard Day’s Night), before reappearing towards the end as ‘Thin Prisoner’ following Winston and Julia’s incarnation.

All involved, cast and crew, played their part in creating a dark, sinister tone that was fully in keeping with the spirit of Orwell’s novel.

The Broadcast

The play was first broadcast on December 12th 1954. As was the norm, the bulk of the production was performed live by the actors, though with some pre-filmed insets. As I mentioned, this was a lavish production by the standards of the time. For one thing, it had a whopping one hour, fifty minutes running time (more than double that of the CBS production), including a five-minute interval, allowing viewers the chance to use the toilet, which in many cases would have involved braving the cold of a British winter in their backyard, or to make a nice cup of tea, the actors an opportunity to catch their breath and perhaps have a quick ciggy, and the crew time to, in the words of Cartier, ‘move the furniture around.’

Although the actors would also have had short breaks during the insets, almost two hours is still a long time for actors to perform with no possibility of a retake, and it took meticulous planning by Cartier and crew to make the whole thing work.

When Mark Gattis produced a live recreation of the Quatermass Experiment on BBC Four in 2005, starring himself and David Tennant, they under-ran by a full twenty minutes, which is an indication of how difficult working in the television medium would have been five decades earlier, when live productions were, by necessity, the norm.

1984 ran to time almost to the second, and, as far as I can tell, nobody once fluffed a line or missed their mark.

The scale of the production is also indicated by the BBC’s agreement to the use of an original musical score, written by John Hotchkis, for which he conducted a 17-piece orchestra in an adjacent studio as the play went out, instead of the customary pre-recorded, canned incidental music.

The composition does its job of enhancing the bleak, sinister nature of the work, and the knowledge that it was being played live by real musicians as the production was being beamed into people’s homes via aerials mounted on chimney pots also adds to our appreciation of how ambitious this project was for the time.

We don’t have precise figures for the cost, but it’s believed the budget rose from an original allocation of around £2000 to an eventual figure closer to £3000.

Credit is due to the BBC  for giving Kneale and Cartier the freedom and the money to do it their way.

The pre-filmed insets include a recreation of Winston visiting the ‘Prole’ sector, where he discovers the antique shop and its owner, which ultimately leads to his downfall. That these were shot on London streets still recovering from the damage inflicted by the Luftwaffe only a decade or so earlier, and the period black and white realist style of the production, plays a big part in establishing an atmosphere in keeping with the book to a degree that has still never been equalled.

It’s also worth noting that wartime rationing had only come to an end in Britain the year before. Viewers would therefore have had direct and recent, and in some cases ongoing, if less severe, experience of the shortages and lack of choice depicted, which can only have added to the play’s powerful impression.

The premise that the nature of the society with which the story is concerned had its origins in the aftermath of a nuclear war would have also been resonant in these early days of the Cold War, only nine years after the atomic bomb was unleashed on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

It was also, of course, only a year or so since the death of Stalin, upon whom Big Brother was clearly modelled.

The familiar picture of Big Brother (actually a member of the design crew who happened to have the right moustache) continues to stare out from the screen during the Interval, which is included in the physical media version.

This was a clever artistic choice by Cartier that still holds power today, perhaps even more so now than then. Even back in 1954, there were dark rumours that the televisions rapidly becoming commonplace in people’s homes were not simply transmitters but also receivers with the ability to ‘watch the watchers.’

Perhaps, that’s not quite so far-fetched now, in the era of ‘Smart’ TVs.

Big Brother is watching you?

The play was initially shown in the Sunday Night Theatre slot usually reserved for classic adaptations like Wuthering Heights, or genteel so-called ‘Comedies of Manners,’ sometimes broadcast directly from actual theatrical performances.

That 1984 was shown in this slot led to controversy, as we will come to shortly.

As was customary, the cast and crew reconvened for a repeat performance four days later. The reasoning behind this was that the second performance would generally be better than the first, because all concerned would have had the opportunity to learn from mistakes and iron out any logistical problems with the initial production.

Cushing always insisted that the Sunday night version was better, that a certain amount of spontaneity and energy was lost the second time around.

We’ll never be able to assess the validity of this because, as was also customary, only the second performance was recorded for posterity.

Given the common practice at the BBC of reusing tapes for other shows, a practice that continued into the 1970s (and of which Johnny-Come-Lately ITV was also guilty), we are fortunate that this recording survived to be enjoyed by viewers today.

Controversy and Mythology

This controversy arose in the four-day gap between the two performances.

It was real enough, but it has been rather exaggerated over the years, largely through later interviews with both Cartier and Kneale, especially the latter, who became skilled in the art of enhancing reality through the judicious use of embellishment.

The mythologised version of what happened is that the first showing was immediately followed by an outcry in the press at such horrors being inflicted on the viewing public, especially on a Sunday, and in the run-up to Christmas, with questions raised in parliament, and consideration given to cancelling the second performance completely.

The mood changed, so the story goes, when Prince Philip made an offhand comment at some function or other about how much he and his wife, our young and popular new Queen, had enjoyed the production.

The reality is that the critical reaction in the newspapers had been almost wholly positive. The exception was the Daily Worker, the paper of the Communist Party of Great Britain (forerunner of today’s Morning Star), which had long denounced Orwell as a Trotskyist and his works as anti-Soviet propaganda. Their cultural critic attacked the play as portraying a ‘Tory guttersnipe version of socialism.’

There were, however, and this is where the kernel of truth in the myth lies, plenty of letters to the press by outraged viewers, which were duly reported by the newspapers. Most of these did indeed cite the sanctity of Sundays as a day of religious observance, or at least of wholesome family relaxation, not a day for infesting their living rooms with dystopian visions of a nightmare future, especially in the run-up to Christmas.

A small number of MPs questioned whether such horror was in keeping with the ‘Educate, Entertain and Inform’ Reithian values on which the BBC had been founded. But the issue wasn’t formally debated in parliament.

The Daily Express, perhaps sensing an opportunity to capitalise on the response of some of its readers, ran with a sensationalist headline concerning a woman dying whilst watching the play. She had suffered a fatal heart attack while doing the ironing, but it seems unlikely there was any connection between this and what she happened to be watching on TV at the time.

Prince Philip’s remark concerning him and the Queen having watched and enjoyed the play seems to be true, but this had no great impact on how it was regarded.

Certainly, the BBC never seriously considered cancelling the second performance.

However, they did begin the second airing with a few minutes of what we would today call a ‘trigger-warning,’ in which the head of BBC drama, Michael Barry warned that some viewers may find some of what they were about to see disturbing, and concluded with hope that they would retain more hope for the future than was to found in the play. Thankfully, this has also been retained in the physical media release.

1984 After 1954

A film version, also with Donald Pleasence in the cast, but with no involvement from Kneale and Cartier, was released in 1956. That’s available on YouTube. It clearly owes much to its predecessor, but lacks its power and authenticity, and somewhat misses the point of the novel by implying a happy ending for Winston and Julia.

In 1965, the BBC attempted to repeat the 1954 experience with another theatrical TV production, not performed live, but using Kneale’s original script with a few changes.

This was part of a three-play series produced under the umbrella title of The World Of George Orwell. Sadly,1984 is the only adaptation that survives. You can also watch this free online, but again this doesn’t quite hit the mark, and is ruined, for me, early on by making the Goldstein character on the telescreen during the ‘Two-Minute Hate’ look and sound more like a comedic parody than a sinister, counter-revolutionary receptacle for the repressed frustrations of the Party rank and file.

In addition to the version that was released in 1984 itself, there’s also a joint Russian/Finnish film production made in 2023, which I’ve just become aware of, and will be renting on Amazon soon.

Conclusion

The 1954 production is a historical television landmark that, unlike so much vintage television, we are fortunate to have survived for us to view and enjoy today.

I still regard it as the definitive adaptation, with a great script, great acting, and an atmosphere fully in keeping with the original novel.

It is available to rent or buy on Amazon. But I highly recommend the relatively inexpensive DVD/Blu-ray set for its excellent Special Features, from which I gained most of my information for this article.

In whatever form you choose to watch it, watch it you should.

Anthony C Green, August 2025

PS This satire of the production from January 1955 is worth a listen. The popularity and importance of The Goons, and their influence on artists such as John Lennon and the Mony Python team, is hard to understand today. Their humour hasn’t dated well, but this works well as an entertaining and affectionate dig at the BBC itself, and it adds a little more to our knowledge and understanding of how the Cartier/Kneale play was regarded at the time.

Leave a Comment

Rainee Blake Captures Joni Mitchell’s Essence

Five black stars on a white background representing a review rating.

Joni Mitchell: Take Me As I Am at the Edinburgh Fringe 2025 is a small marvel. Rainee Blake doesn’t just sing Joni—she is Joni. She performs in character, speaking to us as if we’ve been invited into her home after a tour. There’s a wry, playful sense of humour in the way she tells stories, teasing the audience, laughing at herself, and sharing secrets that feel half-confessed. It’s intimate, and it works.

A young woman in a cream-colored embroidered dress sitting on the floor while playing an acoustic guitar.

I went in only knowing a few songs—Big Yellow Taxi and Both Sides Now. Both were delivered with warmth and beauty, reminding me why they became classics. But it was the lesser-known songs that surprised me. Coyote and Woodstock felt alive, urgent, and new. Blake’s voice, tuned to Joni’s strange chords, carried the ache of longing and the restless energy of the road.

What impressed me most was the honesty. No attempt at polish or distance—just raw storytelling woven through song. At times it felt like time travel, the room holding its breath as she played. It’s rare at the Fringe to find something this still, this sure of itself. Take Me As I Am is not a tribute—it’s a meeting with Joni Mitchell in her prime.

Reviewed By Pat Harrington

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

The Legend of Queen: Capturing Freddie Mercury’s Spirit at the Fringe

Five black stars on a white background, symbolizing a five-star rating.

The Legend of Queen – Edinburgh Fringe 2025

For me, Queen has never just been a band. Their music was part of the fabric of my upbringing, something I shared with my late mother, who loved them as much as I do. So when The Legend of Queen was announced for this year’s Fringe, I knew I had to be there. It wasn’t simply about nostalgia—it was about measuring whether this show could capture even a fraction of what made Queen so extraordinary. My favourite track, Killer Queen, sums up their appeal: clever, witty lyrics, bound to a melody that still sparkles fifty years on. But behind that style was Freddie Mercury, a frontman whose vocal range and theatricality were unmatched. He sang like an opera star, commanding power one moment and tenderness the next. Any tribute, to succeed, has to reckon with that legacy.

A performer singing passionately on stage, wearing a red jacket with white details, surrounded by band members playing instruments in a vibrant concert setting, with a backdrop featuring 'The Legend of Queen' on the screen.
Peter Marchant radiated charisma

Peter Marchant, leading the Night Owl Band, stepped into that daunting role and didn’t disappoint. His voice carried the weight of expectation and delivered—clear, strong, flexible enough to soar and twist across the songs without ever straining. But just as important, he radiated charisma. Freddie was never only about technique; he was about presence, energy, and generosity to his audience. Marchant channelled that same generosity. He didn’t mimic Mercury so much as embody a spirit of joy in performance. The Night Owl Band were tight and versatile, taking us on a journey through Queen’s different musical phases—from the raw power of early rock, through their disco-inflected experiments, to the anthems that can still fill a stadium.

What struck me most was the atmosphere in the room. I’ve attended other Night Owl shows at the Fringe and enjoyed them, but the crowd here was far more alive. It was as if Queen’s music unlocked something in everyone. People were singing at the top of their lungs, clapping in time, stomping their feet, and before long the floor was shaking with dancing. I joined in too—I couldn’t help it. It was infectious. Looking around, I noticed the mix of people: older fans reliving their youth, teenagers discovering the music as if it were brand new, families sharing a common soundtrack. That, to me, is Queen’s true legacy. They never belonged to a single time or generation. Their songs still speak across age and background, uniting people in pure, unguarded enjoyment.

There’s also something to be said about Queen’s cultural role. At a time when rock was often macho and narrow, Freddie Mercury embodied flamboyance and theatricality. He brought camp, opera, and drama into the mainstream, unapologetically. Songs like Radio Gaga or Bohemian Rhapsody didn’t just push musical boundaries; they expanded ideas of what performance could be. Seeing a tribute show in 2025 that can still spark such joy suggests that Queen’s boldness remains relevant. In a festival full of new writing and experimental theatre, The Legend of Queen reminds us that art also survives by being passed on, reinterpreted, and celebrated anew.

By the end of the night, I felt both exhilarated and oddly moved. I had gone in with scepticism—could anyone really take on Mercury’s voice?—and left convinced that while no one can ever replace Freddie, the spirit of his music can still be shared in ways that feel vital and alive. Marchant and his band offered not just a tribute, but a communal act of remembrance and renewal. My mother would have loved it. And I walked out into the Edinburgh night with our favourite songs in my head, grateful that some legends never fade.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

The Billy Joel Story: A Night of Music and Emotion

Five black stars in a row on a white background, representing a rating or review.

Angus Munro brings real energy and warmth to The Billy Joel Story at theSpace @ Symposium Hall. From the moment he sits at the piano, you know you’re in for something special. He doesn’t just sing the songs; he lives them, and the outstanding musicians around him give the music a full, rich life on stage.

Logo for The Billy Joel Story featuring baseball motifs and song titles such as 'Uptown Girl' and 'Piano Man'.

The show is more than a tribute concert. It tells Joel’s story, weaving together music, slides, and anecdotes in a way that makes you feel close to the man behind the songs. We see glimpses of his early days in piano bars, the rise to fame, and the personal stories that inspired classics like “Piano Man,” “Just the Way You Are,” and “Uptown Girl.” These touches make the evening both entertaining and informative, giving the audience the sense of a journey as well as a performance.

The musicianship is outstanding. Every note feels sharp and alive. The drums drive the beat, the guitars add colour, and the piano riffs drop you right into Joel’s world. Angus Munro proves himself to be not just a singer but a gifted all-round performer. His piano and saxophone solos echo the originals yet have his own style. There is humour and warmth in his storytelling, and his voice has both the power and tenderness needed to carry songs that millions know by heart.

What makes the show so enjoyable is its atmosphere. The audience can’t help but sing along, tapping feet and smiling as hit after hit rolls out. It’s joyful, uplifting, and full of life. By the end you feel lighter, happier, carried along by the music and the story. It’s a reminder of how much Billy Joel’s work still means to people and why his songs have stood the test of time.

This is not a show to miss. If you want to feel happy, uplifted, joyful, then The Billy Joel Story will give you just that.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp

Leave a Comment

Immerse Yourself in Caledonia’s Vibrant Folk Tradition

Five black stars on a light background, representing a five-star rating.
Artwork featuring the title 'Caledonia' with various musical instruments including a violin, pipes, guitar, and accordion, representing Scottish folk and traditional music.

Caledonia is a warm rush of Scottish air. theSpace @ Surgeons’ Hall suits it. The room feels close. The music fills it. Elsa Jean McTaggart is mesmerising. She sings with poise. She moves between violin and pipes with ease. It’s beautiful to hear and to watch. Gary Lister’s vocals blend well. His playing gives the songs weight and swing. You feel the ceilidh spirit in the room. Old tunes meet fresh arrangements. Stories stitch it all together. Footage of the islands deepens the mood. You can almost smell the peat smoke.

This is folk as living culture, not museum piece. The set is tight. The pace is kind. You leave lighter, and a little prouder of Scotland’s songbook. Forty-five minutes pass in a blink.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

A Fresh Take on The Wizard of Oz: Talentz Team Review

Four black stars representing a rating or review.

142 words, 1 minute read time.

The youthful Talentz team bring a fresh perspective on the popular standard, The Wizard of Oz. All the familiar characters are there, Dorothy, Auntie Em, the Scarecrow, the Tin Man and the Cowardly Lion. In this production, inspired by the recent film, Wicked, Toto talks once the storm lands her and Dorothy over the rainbow into the land of Oz. I loved seeing things from a dog’s point of view.

A young actress dressed in a pink gown smiles brightly, holding a prop while performing on stage. Behind her, two actors portray the Scarecrow and the Cowardly Lion, with expressive poses, in a colorful theatrical setting.

We all know the story, how the motley crew follow the Yellow Brick Road to the Emerald City, beset by the vengeful Wicked Witch of the West. These young people deliver this enchanting story with a freshness and enthusiasm that captivates the audience and transports them to the magical land of Oz. My only criticism was that sometimes the accompanying music drowns out the singing in solo pieces.

Reviewed by David Kerr

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »