Archive for Netflix

Culture Vulture 6th–12th June 2026

The countdown to the World Cup continues, and football runs through this week’s selections like a thread stitched into the cultural fabric. From 1966: The World Cup Final in Colour and Lionesses: How Football Came Home to Gareth Southgate’s thoughtful exploration of modern masculinity and Kevin Bridges’ search for the soul of the beautiful game, television seems determined to remind us why football remains far more than a sport. It is memory, identity, aspiration and sometimes national therapy.

Away from the pitch, there is plenty to tempt the curious viewer. Ken Loach reflects on a lifetime spent chronicling working-class Britain, Steven Spielberg offers perhaps his most personal film in The Fabelmans, while science fiction enthusiasts are spoiled with everything from Blade Runner 2049 and Ex Machina to documentaries tracing the genre’s history from Mary Shelley to Isaac Asimov. Add in ancient Greece, Constantine the Great, James Dean, Clint Eastwood, Billy Idol and Muhammad Ali, and the result is one of the most varied weeks of the year so far.

As always, Culture Vulture’s aim is not simply to recommend programmes but to encourage exploration. The best television and cinema take us somewhere unexpected. This week, whether that journey leads to a football stadium, a distant galaxy, an Alpine village or the Roman Empire, there are plenty of worthwhile destinations.

Saturday 6th June

The Longest Day (1962) – Film4, 1:10pm

There’s a kind of architectural grace to The Longest Day — a film built not for spectacle but for endurance. Every sequence feels placed with deliberation, every perspective a brick in a vast, collective structure. It doesn’t chase emotion; it constructs it, piece by piece, until the enormity of D‑Day becomes something you can inhabit rather than merely watch.

What’s remarkable is its refusal to narrow the lens. Instead of a single hero’s journey, we get a mosaic of nationalities and motives, each fragment carrying its own rhythm. The film’s scale becomes human precisely because it’s broken into smaller, comprehensible acts — soldiers crossing fields, commanders weighing impossible decisions, civilians caught in the undertow of history.

Shot in stark black and white, it has the clarity of reportage. There’s no glamour in the mud, no romanticism in the chaos. Even the grand set‑pieces feel matter‑of‑fact, as if the camera were recording rather than interpreting. That restraint gives the film its moral weight: it honours the event by refusing to simplify it.

What lingers is the design — the sense that you’re watching not just a film but a reconstruction of memory itself. It may lack the visceral immediacy of modern war cinema, but its precision and quiet authority have aged beautifully. The Longest Day endures because it understands that history, like architecture, is built to last.

Prometheus (2012) – 5Star, 9:00pm

Few films divide opinion quite as consistently as Prometheus, and perhaps that is part of its appeal. It is a work that reaches, sometimes beyond its grasp, but always with an evident seriousness of intent. Ridley Scott returns to a universe he helped define, yet seems determined not to repeat himself.

What emerges is less a horror film than a meditation—albeit an uneasy one—on origins and belief. The questions it raises are large, almost unwieldy: who made us, and why? And more importantly, what does it mean if the answers are not comforting?

Visually, it is often extraordinary. Scott’s control of space, light and texture transforms even the simplest scenes into something imposing. The environments feel simultaneously alien and strangely recognisable, reinforcing the film’s central unease.

Yet the narrative resists coherence at times. Characters behave unpredictably, motivations blur, and the plot occasionally strains under the weight of its ideas. But even these flaws feel oddly consistent with the film’s ambition—it is less interested in tidy storytelling than in provocation.

For all its imperfections, Prometheus remains compelling. It is a film that invites interrogation rather than passive viewing, and that alone makes it worth revisiting.

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) – Channel 4, 9:00pm

At its core, Bohemian Rhapsody is not a biography in the strict sense, but a celebration—one that occasionally sacrifices nuance for momentum. It moves briskly through familiar milestones, selecting moments that reinforce its central narrative of rise, fall and triumphant return.

Where it falters, it does so through simplification. Complex relationships are streamlined, tensions softened, contradictions smoothed over. But the film seems unconcerned with precision. Its priorities lie elsewhere.

Those priorities become clear in its musical sequences. Here, the film shifts register entirely, allowing performance to take precedence over narrative. The energy becomes infectious, the pacing more assured, the purpose more focused.

The Live Aid reconstruction is the culmination of that approach. Meticulously staged and emotionally calibrated, it is less a re-creation than a kind of cinematic homage. It works not because it is perfect, but because it understands what the moment represents.

In the end, it is a film that succeeds through feeling rather than detail. And while it may not satisfy every expectation, it is difficult to deny its impact.

Vermiglio (2024) – BBC Four, 9:20pm

Vermiglio unfolds with remarkable patience, allowing its world to emerge gradually rather than assert itself. Set within an isolated mountain community, it captures not just a place but a way of life that feels quietly on the verge of transition.

The pacing is deliberate, almost meditative. Moments are allowed to breathe, conversations linger, silences carry weight. There is little sense of urgency, yet a subtle tension runs beneath the surface.

Visually, the film is striking in its restraint. The landscape is not presented as spectacle, but as presence—constant, watchful, shaping the lives within it. Interiors are equally carefully composed, each frame suggesting relationships before they are spoken.

What gives the film its depth is its attention to detail. Small gestures, fleeting glances, everyday routines—these become the building blocks of something much larger. It is observation elevated into storytelling.

By its conclusion, Vermiglio does not so much resolve as settle. It leaves behind an impression rather than a statement, and that impression stays with you.

Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – BBC One, 10:20pm

Sequels often struggle under the weight of expectation, but Blade Runner 2049 approaches its inheritance with unusual confidence. Rather than attempting to replicate the original, it expands upon it—both visually and philosophically.

Villeneuve’s direction is precise, almost measured. Scenes unfold with a calm assurance that allows the ideas to surface naturally. There is no rush to explain, no urgency to conclude. The film trusts its audience.

Visually, it is extraordinary. Every frame feels composed, every environment carefully realised. The scale is vast, yet the focus remains intimate. This balance between spectacle and introspection is rare, and here it is sustained throughout.

Thematically, it deepens the original’s concerns with identity and memory. What does it mean to be human? And perhaps more intriguingly, what does it mean to believe that you are?

There is a quiet melancholy running through the film, a sense of distance that never fully resolves. It gives the narrative its emotional core, even when the plot becomes secondary.

The result is a sequel that feels both respectful and independent—a continuation that justifies its own existence.

BlackBerry (2023) – Channel 4, 11:35pm

BlackBerry approaches its subject with an unexpected lightness of touch. What might have been a straightforward corporate drama instead becomes something more agile—part satire, part character study, part cautionary tale.

The story of rapid ascent is handled with energy. Innovation, ambition and a certain degree of naïveté drive the early stages, creating a sense of inevitability that feels almost exhilarating.

Then, almost imperceptibly, the tone begins to shift. Success becomes pressure, growth becomes instability, and the cracks begin to show. The transition is gradual, which makes it all the more convincing.

Performance plays a central role here. The characters are drawn with enough specificity to feel real, yet broad enough to capture the wider themes. There is humour, but also tension.

What the film ultimately captures is not just the rise and fall of a company, but the fragility of success itself. It is as much about timing as it is about innovation.

Sunday 7th June

Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) – BBC Two, 1:00pm

Adapted from Tennessee Williams, the film retains much of the play’s theatrical intensity while opening it out just enough for the screen. The result is a chamber piece charged with emotional pressure.

The performances are central. Elizabeth Taylor and Paul Newman bring a volatile chemistry that never quite settles. Their exchanges carry a sense of unfinished business, of things left unsaid.

Beneath the surface lies a network of tensions—family, identity, expectation—that never fully resolve. The film thrives on this instability.

Dialogue does much of the work, but it is supported by careful staging and pacing. Scenes are allowed to unfold without interruption, creating a sense of accumulation.

It is a film that operates as much in what it withholds as in what it reveals.

The Beautiful Game (2024) – Channel 4, 3:35pm

Football provides the framework, but the film’s interests lie elsewhere. It uses the sport as a means of exploring dignity, resilience and the possibility of redemption.

The narrative is straightforward, but effective. Each character brings a different perspective, allowing the themes to emerge organically rather than being imposed.

There is a warmth to the storytelling that carries it through its more predictable moments. It never feels cynical, even when it leans towards sentiment.

Visually, it keeps things grounded. The emphasis remains on people rather than spectacle.

By the end, it is less about victory than about recognition—of self, of worth, of possibility.

Unforgiven (1992) – BBC Two, 10:45pm

Unforgiven dismantles the mythology of the western with quiet precision. It does not reject the genre outright, but it questions its assumptions at every turn.

Eastwood’s performance is central to that process. His character carries the weight of history—both personal and cinematic. Every action feels deliberate, considered.

Violence is presented without glamour. Its consequences are immediate and lasting, stripping away any sense of heroism.

The film’s pacing reflects its themes. It moves slowly, allowing tension to build without release.

What remains is something far more complex than a traditional western. It is a reflection on memory, regret and the stories we tell ourselves.

The Damned United (2009) – BBC One, 11:30pm

At first glance, it looks like a football film — the dugouts, the touchline fury, the familiar choreography of triumph and disaster. But The Damned United is really something narrower and far more revealing: a character study disguised as a sports drama. Brian Clough isn’t presented as a legend in waiting but as a man caught between swagger and self‑doubt, ambition and insecurity. The film is less interested in what he won than in what it cost him to want it so badly.

Michael Sheen captures that contradiction with unnerving precision. His Clough is magnetic one moment and brittle the next, a man who performs confidence because he cannot bear to show how fragile he feels underneath. Sheen plays him as someone who needs the room to love him but fears the moment they stop. It’s a performance built on tension — the kind that flickers behind the eyes rather than erupts in speeches.

The film’s structure helps enormously. By focusing on a single, disastrous chapter of Clough’s career, it avoids the sprawl of the traditional biopic. Instead, it becomes a study in pressure: the Leeds job as crucible, as mirror, as trap. The narrowness gives it clarity. We’re not watching a life; we’re watching a moment that defines one.

There’s humour here — sharp, needling, often at Clough’s expense — but it’s threaded with discomfort. The film refuses to indulge in easy admiration. It understands that charisma can be corrosive, that brilliance can shade into self‑destruction, and that the line between confidence and delusion is thinner than most of us would like to admit.

In the end, The Damned United is as much about failure as success, and that’s what makes it compelling. It’s a portrait of a man who wanted greatness so fiercely that he almost broke himself chasing it — and a reminder that sometimes the most interesting stories are the ones where things fall apart.

Monday 8th June

Bridge of Spies (2015) – Film4, 8:00pm

Spielberg treats the Cold War not as spectacle but as moral geometry — a landscape of lines, boundaries and quiet negotiations. The film moves with deliberate calm, its tension drawn from the spaces between words rather than the explosions that usually define the genre. It’s a story about decency under pressure, and the courage required to remain ordinary when the world demands extremes.

Tom Hanks anchors it with a performance of quiet conviction. His character, James Donovan, is not a man of grand gestures but of steady principles. In a world of paranoia and posturing, his restraint becomes radical. Hanks plays him as someone who believes that fairness is not naïve but necessary — that the law, even when inconvenient, is the last defence against chaos.

Visually, the film is composed like a negotiation itself: muted tones, careful framing, the chill of divided Berlin rendered with painterly precision. Spielberg’s camera doesn’t shout; it listens. Every shot feels weighed, every silence deliberate. The result is a film that trusts its audience to feel the gravity of diplomacy without the need for spectacle.

All of Us Strangers (2023) – Channel 4, 10:00pm

All of Us Strangers moves like a dream you’re not entirely sure you want to wake from — drifting between memory, imagination and lived experience with a kind of emotional weightlessness. It resists the usual scaffolding of narrative, choosing instead to follow the currents of feeling: uncertain, searching, unresolved. The film’s pacing mirrors its themes, as if time itself were hesitating.

The performances carry the film’s emotional charge. There’s a vulnerability here that never feels engineered — a kind of openness that allows the smallest gestures to land with surprising force. Andrew Scott, in particular, plays grief as something porous, a state that leaks into everything without ever announcing itself.

Relationships are drawn with unusual care. Nothing is simplified, nothing forced into neat arcs. Instead, the film allows complexity to emerge gradually, like a photograph developing in slow motion. The connections feel fragile but real, shaped as much by what is unsaid as by what is spoken.

Visually, the film walks a delicate line between realism and abstraction. Interiors glow with a soft, uncanny warmth; exteriors feel slightly out of reach, as though the world were being remembered rather than observed. It’s a film that understands how memory distorts even as it preserves.

All of Us Strangers doesn’t tie its threads together; it lets them drift, trusting that the audience will feel the shape of what can’t quite be articulated.


Tuesday 9th June

The Fabelmans (2022)

Film4, 9:00pm

Spielberg turns the camera on himself — or at least on the emotional terrain of his childhood. The Fabelmans is a film about the birth of an artist, but also about the fractures and loyalties of family life. It’s tender, painful, funny and occasionally startling in its honesty. What makes it so affecting is the way Spielberg balances the mythmaking of cinema with the messiness of real life. The film understands that art can be both an escape and a reckoning.

The performances are uniformly superb. Michelle Williams gives one of her finest turns as a woman torn between duty and desire, while Paul Dano brings quiet, heartbreaking dignity to a father who cannot quite understand the world his son is entering. The film’s emotional centre, though, is Gabriel LaBelle, who plays the young Spielberg with a mixture of vulnerability and fierce creative instinct.

What lingers is the film’s generosity. Even when depicting pain, it refuses to be cruel. It is a work of memory — imperfect, selective, but deeply felt. A late‑career masterpiece.

Muhammad Ali Night

BBC Four, from 10:00pm

A portrait of a man whose influence extended far beyond sport. Ali remains one of the most charismatic figures of the 20th century, and the documentaries capture both his brilliance and his contradictions. The programmes avoid hagiography, instead presenting a man who was equal parts poet, fighter, activist and showman.

Brexit: A Very British Civil War (Part Two)

BBC Two, 11:00pm

The conclusion of a story that continues to shape British public life. The documentary is clear‑eyed without being cynical, tracing the political and cultural fractures that remain unresolved.

Science Fiction in the Atomic Age: Mary Shelley to Isaac Asimov

Sky Arts, 11:00pm

A quietly absorbing journey through the roots of a genre that has always doubled as a cultural pressure gauge. What the programme understands — and articulates beautifully — is that science fiction isn’t really about the future at all. It’s about the present: the fears we can’t name, the hopes we barely admit, the technologies we suspect might outgrow us.

Tracing a line from Frankenstein to Foundation gives the documentary a pleasing sweep. Mary Shelley’s gothic anxiety about creation and responsibility sits surprisingly comfortably beside Asimov’s cool, rational visions of robotics and empire. The programme treats these works not as curiosities but as milestones in our evolving relationship with science — each one a marker of what humanity was afraid of, or yearning for, at a particular moment.

What makes it compelling is its refusal to flatten the genre into a single narrative. Instead, it shows how science fiction has always been a conversation: between writers and readers, between imagination and technology, between dread and possibility. The Atomic Age becomes a kind of crucible, where fear of annihilation and excitement about progress coexist uneasily.

By the end, you’re left with a sense of continuity — that the questions Shelley posed in the 19th century are still with us, simply wearing new clothes. The documentary doesn’t try to answer them. It just reminds us why we keep asking.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

ITV1, 11:00pm

Terminator 2 remains one of those rare sequels that doesn’t just outdo its predecessor — it redefines the terrain entirely. What James Cameron achieves here is a kind of muscular elegance: action cinema engineered with the precision of a machine and the emotional pulse of something unmistakably human. The film moves with propulsive force, yet never feels rushed; every set‑piece is earned, every beat calibrated.

What surprises, even now, is the emotional undercurrent. Beneath the molten steel, the chases, the relentless forward motion, there’s a story about connection — unlikely, fragile, and all the more affecting for it. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s T‑800, once a symbol of implacable threat, becomes a study in programmed compassion, while Linda Hamilton’s Sarah Connor is transformed into something fierce, haunted and utterly compelling.

Visually, the film still feels astonishingly modern. The liquid‑metal T‑1000 remains one of cinema’s great creations, not because of the effects alone but because of the cold, unsettling grace with which it moves. Cameron understands that technology is most frightening when it feels inevitable.

More than three decades on, T2 hasn’t lost its edge. It’s still the benchmark — the film that proved action cinema could be thrilling, intelligent and unexpectedly tender, all at once.

Mean Streets (1973)

Film4, 11:55pm

Mean Streets still feels like a live wire — raw, restless, and vibrating with the energy of a filmmaker discovering his voice in real time. Scorsese’s breakthrough isn’t polished; it isn’t meant to be. It moves with the jittery rhythm of the neighbourhood it depicts, a world where loyalty is currency and guilt is a constant, unpayable debt. You don’t watch it so much as get pulled into its orbit.

Harvey Keitel’s Charlie is the film’s uneasy centre of gravity, a man trying to balance faith, obligation and the gravitational pull of old streets that refuse to let him go. He’s torn between the life he wants and the life he owes — a tension Scorsese renders with a kind of bruised tenderness. Charlie’s moral compass spins, but never quite settles.

Then there’s De Niro’s Johnny Boy, a performance that still feels dangerous. He’s chaos in a leather jacket — charming, reckless, infuriating, and impossible to ignore. The chemistry between Keitel and De Niro is electric, the kind that suggests a lifetime of shared history even when the script leaves it unspoken.

What gives the film its enduring power is its authenticity. Scorsese isn’t mythologising the streets; he’s remembering them — the bars, the debts, the rituals of masculinity, the way violence can erupt from nothing and return to nothing just as quickly. It’s a portrait of a community that traps as much as it sustains.

Half a century on, Mean Streets still crackles. It’s messy, alive, and utterly sincere — a film that understands how hard it is to leave the places that shaped you, even when you know you should.


Wednesday 10th June

Constantine the Great

PBS America, 8:50pm

History on an epic scale as the life of the Roman emperor unfolds. The documentary traces Constantine’s rise with clarity and sweep, showing how one man’s political instincts and religious convictions reshaped the ancient world. It’s a reminder that empires turn on personalities as much as armies.

Riddick (2013)

Sky One, 9:00pm

Riddick is the franchise stripped back to its sinew — no prophecy, no operatic world‑building, just a man, a hostile planet and the stubborn will to outlive whatever wants him dead. It’s a return to the lean, survivalist instincts that made the character compelling in the first place. The film moves with a kind of simplicity, as if clearing its throat after the bloated mythology of Chronicles.

Vin Diesel slips back into the role with the ease of someone putting on a well‑worn jacket. His Riddick is still all gravel and glare, but there’s a sharper edge here — a sense of calculation beneath the brute force. The film gives him room to be cunning rather than merely indestructible, and that shift makes the action feel more grounded, more earned.

The setup is classic pulp: abandoned on a sun‑scorched world, hunted by mercenaries who underestimate him, and stalked by creatures that definitely don’t. But the execution has a pleasing clarity. Director David Twohy knows exactly what kind of film he’s making — a survival thriller with sci‑fi trimmings — and he doesn’t clutter it with unnecessary lore.

What emerges is a story that feels oddly refreshing in its directness. No grand destinies, no cosmic stakes, just a man trying to stay alive long enough to get off the rock he’s been left on. It’s not profound, but it is satisfying — a reminder that sometimes the most effective sequels are the ones that remember what worked in the first place.

Ken Loach Remembers

BBC Four, 10:05pm

A reflective, moving look back at a career spent chronicling working‑class Britain. Loach speaks with the clarity and compassion that have defined his work for decades. There’s a sense of summing up here — not nostalgia, but a quiet reckoning with the stories he felt compelled to tell.

The Old Oak (2023)

BBC Four, 10:20pm

The Old Oak feels like a final note held just a little longer than expected — quiet, steady, and full of the moral clarity that has defined Loach’s career. Set in a former mining town hollowed out by decades of loss, the film watches what happens when a community already on its knees is asked to absorb even more change. There’s no sentimentality here, just the hard, necessary work of people trying to live alongside one another.

Loach treats migration not as a political talking point but as a human encounter: awkward, fraught, hopeful, and often tender in ways that catch you off guard. The pub at the film’s centre becomes a kind of pressure chamber, a place where old grievances and new possibilities collide. It’s a setting Loach understands instinctively — the last communal room in a town that has lost almost everything else.

What gives the film its quiet power is its belief in connection. Not easy connection, not the tidy kind that resolves itself by the credits, but the slow, fragile kind built through shared meals, shared stories, and the recognition of mutual struggle. Loach has always been at his best when he shows solidarity not as a slogan but as a practice, and The Old Oak is steeped in that sensibility.

As a final chapter, it feels right. Not triumphant, not despairing — simply honest. A filmmaker taking one last look at the people he has spent a lifetime championing, and offering them, and us, a measure of hope.

Witches: Truth Behind the Trials

National Geographic, 10:00pm

An examination of fear, power and one of history’s most enduring moral panics. The documentary digs into the social and political forces that fuelled witch trials, showing how hysteria becomes a tool for control.

Up the Junction

BBC Four, 12:25am

Up the Junction still lands with the force of something freshly made — raw, unvarnished, and unwilling to soften its edges for comfort. It’s one of those rare pieces of television that feels like a rupture, a reminder of just how radical British TV once dared to be. The film’s honesty is almost abrasive: no sentimentality, no tidy resolutions, just the lived reality of working‑class women navigating a world that offers them little and judges them for taking even that.

What makes it endure is its refusal to look away. The performances have a documentary immediacy, the kind that makes you forget you’re watching actors at all. The social commentary isn’t delivered as message but as experience — embedded in the rhythms of daily life, the choices constrained by circumstance, the quiet tragedies that accumulate.

Half a century on, its power hasn’t dimmed. If anything, its clarity feels sharper now, a reminder of a time when television didn’t just reflect society but confronted it.


Thursday 11th June

The Making of King Arthur

BBC Four, 8:00pm

A thoughtful exploration of Britain’s most enduring legend — part history, part myth, part national mirror. The programme traces how Arthur has been reinvented across centuries, reflecting the hopes and anxieties of each era.

James Dean: The Emotional Man

Sky Arts, 9:00pmA portrait of a performer who seemed to burn from the inside out. James Dean’s career was brief enough to feel like a flash, yet the emotional afterglow has lasted decades — a mixture of youthful intensity, unresolved longing and that strange, magnetic vulnerability that made him look both invincible and breakable at the same time.

The documentary leans into that duality. It doesn’t try to tidy him into a myth, nor does it pretend the myth isn’t part of the story. Instead, it traces the tension between the boy he was, the man he was becoming, and the icon the world insisted on making him. You feel the fragility beneath the swagger, the ache beneath the cool.

What emerges is a study in contradictions: a performer who seemed to reveal everything while giving almost nothing away; a symbol of rebellion who was, in many ways, searching for connection; a star whose brief life became a template for a certain kind of cinematic longing.

It’s a reminder that some figures endure not because they were fully understood, but because they never quite were. Dean remains one of them.

Constantine the Great (Part Two)

PBS America, 8:35pm

The concluding chapter follows the emperor’s creation of Constantinople and the reshaping of an empire. A sweeping end to a story that still echoes through European history.

Ex Machina (2014)

Film4, 10:45pm

Ex Machina still feels like a shard of ice slipped under the skin — sleek, controlled, and quietly unnerving. Alex Garland builds his story with the precision of a psychological trap, letting tension accumulate in the pauses, the glances, the silences that stretch just a little too long. It’s science fiction pared back to its essentials: intelligence, power, desire, and the dangerous spaces where they overlap.

Oscar Isaac gives the film its swaggering volatility, a tech‑messiah with a god complex and a taste for manipulation. Alicia Vikander, by contrast, is all poise and ambiguity — a performance so finely calibrated you’re never entirely sure where the machine ends and the person begins. Their scenes hum with a kind of electric unease.

Visually, the film is immaculate. Glass, concrete, soft light, and the sense that every surface is observing you. Garland uses the environment like a second script, a place where transparency becomes its own form of menace.

And then there’s the final act — cold, precise, inevitable. It lands not with shock but with the quiet, devastating logic of a conclusion you should have seen coming all along.

Arena: Clint Eastwood – Out of the West

BBC Four, 11:05pm

A portrait of one of Hollywood’s last great auteurs — a filmmaker whose career spans genres, decades and cultural shifts. The documentary is affectionate without being fawning.

Clint Eastwood: American Filmmaker

BBC Four, 12:05am

The second part of an excellent Eastwood double bill, tracing the evolution of a director who has always been more complex than his public image suggests.

Little Richard: I Am Everything (2023)

Channel 4, 1:55am

A blast of colour, noise and unapologetic self‑invention, Little Richard: I Am Everything is as flamboyant and furious as the man himself. The documentary refuses to sand down the contradictions — the joy, the rage, the brilliance, the lifelong tug‑of‑war between identity and expectation. It understands that Little Richard didn’t just help invent rock and roll; he detonated it, reshaping the cultural landscape with a scream, a shimmy and a streak of eyeliner.

What the film captures so well is the emotional voltage behind the performance. The joy is real — ecstatic, liberating — but so is the fury, the sense of someone fighting to claim space in a world determined to shrink him. The archival footage crackles, the interviews deepen the portrait, and the whole thing moves with the rhythm of a man who refused to be quiet.

It’s vibrant, defiant, and impossible to ignore — just like Richard himself.


Friday 12th June

Hunting the Debt Predators

Channel 4, 8:00pm

Investigative journalism at its most urgent. A look at those who profit from financial hardship — and the people fighting back. The programme is angry, clear‑eyed and necessary.

Queer (2024)

BBC Two, 11:00pm

A bold, jagged adaptation of Burroughs that refuses to smooth the edges of the source material. Queer moves with a kind of raw, intimate unease — a film that sits inside longing, self‑loathing and desire without trying to tidy any of it into catharsis. It feels both anchored in its period and strangely unmoored from time, as if the emotional landscape hasn’t changed as much as we’d like to think.

The film leans into the book’s nervy, uncomfortable honesty. Relationships are sketched in quick, piercing strokes; the vulnerability is palpable but never overstated. What emerges is a portrait of a man circling his own loneliness, reaching out and recoiling in the same breath.

Visually, it balances grit with a kind of feverish lyricism — realism shading into hallucination, memory bleeding into the present. It’s a film that trusts atmosphere as much as narrative.

The result is unsettling, intimate, and quietly devastating. It doesn’t seek resolution; it simply sits with the ache.

Queen & Slim (2019)

BBC Two, 1:10am

Queen & Slim unfolds like a modern myth written on the move — a road movie where romance, tragedy and political urgency are braided so tightly they become inseparable. It starts quietly, almost tentatively, then gathers emotional force until it hits with the weight of something inevitable.

What makes it so powerful is the intimacy at its core. The relationship grows in the spaces between danger, in the glances and hesitations, in the way two people learn to trust each other while the world closes in. The film never rushes that connection; it lets it breathe, deepen, complicate.

Visually, it’s striking — bold compositions, saturated colours, a sense of America as both vast and claustrophobic. The landscapes feel mythic, yet the violence and injustice that shape the journey are painfully real.

By the end, the film leaves you with a mixture of ache and awe. It’s a love story, a protest and a lament.


Streaming Choice

Michael Jackson: The Verdict (Netflix)

All three episodes available from Wednesday 3rd June

A forensic, often uncomfortable examination of one of the most scrutinised trials in modern pop‑culture history. The documentary avoids sensationalism, instead laying out the legal, cultural and media forces that shaped the case. It’s sober, detailed and designed to provoke reflection rather than deliver easy answers.

USA 94: Brazil’s Return to Glory (Netflix)

Available from Sunday 7th June

A richly assembled look back at one of the World Cup’s most emotionally charged triumphs. The documentary captures both the tactical evolution of the Brazilian side and the wider cultural moment that surrounded their victory. For football fans, it’s a warm bath of nostalgia; for everyone else, it’s a reminder of how sport can become a national myth.

Daisy Jones & The Six (ITVX)

All 10 episodes available from Sunday 7th June

One of the finest music dramas of recent years. Adapted from Taylor Jenkins Reid’s novel, the series charts the rise and implosion of a fictional 1970s rock band with such conviction that it feels like a recovered piece of music history. The performances are magnetic, the songs are genuinely good, and the emotional fallout is handled with surprising delicacy. It first appeared on Prime, where I watched it, and I loved every episode.

The Score (ITVX)

Both episodes available from Monday 8th June

A taut, stylish two‑parter that blends crime drama with character study. The Score is less interested in the mechanics of wrongdoing than in the people who find themselves pulled into its orbit. Sharp writing and a lean runtime make it an easy, satisfying binge.

The Evil Lawyer (Netflix)

All seven episodes available from Thursday 11th June

A taut, stylish legal thriller with a decidedly dark streak, The Evil Lawyer takes the familiar architecture of courtroom drama and twists it into something sharper and more morally slippery. The series follows a defence attorney whose brilliance is matched only by his capacity for manipulation, and the result is a portrait of power exercised in the shadows — calculated, ruthless, and unsettlingly compelling.

What gives the show its bite is the way it treats the law not as a noble ideal but as a weapon, wielded by someone who understands exactly how to bend systems, people and outcomes to his will. The tension comes less from the cases themselves than from the psychological games surrounding them: alliances formed and broken, truths buried, motives obscured.

Across seven episodes, the series maintains a sleek, propulsive rhythm. It’s glossy without being hollow, cynical without losing its grip on character, and just heightened enough to feel addictive. Beneath the twists, there’s a clear fascination with the cost of ambition — and the ease with which morality can be traded away when winning becomes the only metric that matters.

Leave a Comment

Review of ‘Last Stop Larimah’

There’s a kind of town you come across in the Northern Territory now and then. A pub, a few weather-beaten buildings, maybe a servo if you’re lucky, sitting alone beside the highway as if the rest of the country forgot about it years ago. Larimah is one of those places. Blink while driving north from Daly Waters and you’d miss it entirely. But after watching Last Stop Larimah, you’ll never forget it.

Promotional poster for the HBO documentary 'Last Stop Larrimah: Murder Down Under', featuring a central smiling man in a cowboy hat and various residents in front of Larrimah signs. Text includes release information and credits.

The film circles around the disappearance of Paddy Moriarty, a hard-drinking bush character who vanished one day in 2017 along with his little dog. In any ordinary town it would’ve been odd enough. In Larimah, where the population could nearly fit around a card table, it turned into something between a murder mystery and a bush ballad.

What makes the documentary work so well is that it understands the Territory instinctively. It doesn’t arrive with a clipboard and a superior attitude from Sydney or Melbourne. It lets people talk. It lets silences hang in the air and it understands that Territorians often say the funniest things completely by accident, and that half the truth out bush is hidden inside exaggeration, gossip and old grudges.

And Christ-on-a-Bike, there are grudges in Larimah.

The townsfolk eye each other off like characters from some subtropical western. Everybody’s got a theory about Paddy. Everybody’s got a complaint about somebody else. One woman keeps a collection of homemade dolls hanging from trees that would frighten the life out of you after dark. Another resident carries on like a frontier publican from 1953. There are barking dogs, rusted machinery, warm beer, old caravans and enough personal feuds to start a small war.

The remarkable thing is that none of it feels forced. Australians of a certain age will recognise these people instantly. Every small town had a few once upon a time. Blokes who’d gone north after marriages collapsed. Women tougher than wire. Old bush workers who drank too much, talked too loud and somehow survived everything the country threw at them.

The Territory itself hangs over every scene. Those huge empty distances. The glare coming off the road. The sense that civilisation is a very thin arrangement out there and could blow away in the dry season wind. The filmmakers are wise enough not to overdo it. They let the country speak for itself.

What stays with you afterwards isn’t really the mystery, though that’s compelling enough. It’s the feeling that you’ve glimpsed a fading Australia. Not the tourist-brochure version with infinity pools and sunset cocktails, but the old north where people could still disappear into the scrub and where communities ran on gossip, resilience and sheer bloody-mindedness.

There’s a sadness underneath it all. Larimah feels like the last flicker of a world built by fettlers, drovers, station hands and wanderers who preferred hard country to easy company. Towns like it are disappearing now. The highways got better, the traffic got faster, and modern Australia slowly flowed around them.

But for an hour and a half, Last Stop Larimah takes you back there. Back to the beer-stained bars and dusty verges of the old Territory. Back to an Australia that was eccentric, suspicious, hilarious and strangely free.

A wonderful documentary. Funny without trying too hard, unsettling without becoming morbid, and full of affection for the people of the north. Exactly the sort of story the Territory tells best.

By David Ironside

Available to view in the UK on Netflix.

Picture credit: By http://www.impawards.com/2023/last_stop_larrimah.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=78798121

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture: 16th–22nd May 2026

There’s a strong undercurrent running through this week’s selections: institutions under pressure, myths being dismantled, and the uneasy relationship between image and reality. Whether it’s the collapsing morality of Brighton Rock, the paranoia of The Teachers’ Lounge, the media manipulations of Berlusconi and Elon Musk, or Marilyn Monroe trapped within the machinery of celebrity, much of this week’s viewing circles around people caught inside systems larger than themselves. Even the lighter selections carry that tension beneath the surface. Mean Girls understands social hierarchy as ruthlessly as any political thriller, while Rivals turns 1980s television into a battlefield of ego, money and performance.

Three highlights stand out this week. 🌟 Apocalypse Now remains one of cinema’s greatest visions of imperial madness, still overwhelming nearly fifty years on. 🌟 The Teachers’ Lounge is one of the sharpest recent dramas about institutional panic and surveillance culture. 🌟 BBC Four’s Dylan night offers a fascinating meditation on artistic reinvention, obsession and mythmaking around one of popular music’s most elusive figures.

As ever, Culture Vulture tries to look beyond simple entertainment value. This week’s programmes and films repeatedly ask who controls narratives, who benefits from power, and how individuals navigate systems built around spectacle, authority and manipulation. Fortunately, they also happen to be exceptionally entertaining.

Saturday 16th May 2026

🌟 The Teachers’ Lounge (2023) – BBC Four, 9pm and available on BBC iPlayer

This tense German drama turns an ordinary secondary school into a miniature surveillance state. When a series of thefts leads to accusations among staff and pupils, idealistic teacher Carla Nowak finds herself trapped inside a spiralling culture of suspicion, institutional self-protection and moral panic. What begins as a seemingly minor disciplinary issue gradually escalates into something far more unsettling.

Director İlker Çatak understands how quickly modern institutions can become consumed by process rather than justice. The school’s language of fairness and safeguarding masks deeper anxieties around authority, reputation and control, while social media and digital communication intensify every misunderstanding. Leonie Benesch gives a superb performance as a teacher attempting to remain principled while the structures around her quietly collapse.

What makes The Teachers’ Lounge so effective is its refusal to offer easy villains. Almost everyone believes they are acting reasonably, yet the collective result becomes increasingly oppressive and irrational. Sharp, claustrophobic and deeply contemporary, it is one of the most perceptive films about institutional anxiety in recent years.

Brighton Rock (1947) – Talking Pictures, 1.40pm

Few British crime films capture moral decay as vividly as Brighton Rock. Adapted from Brighton Rock by Graham Greene, the film turns the seaside resort into a landscape of spiritual corruption and post-war unease. Richard Attenborough delivers a chilling performance as Pinkie Brown, a teenage gangster whose cruelty seems inseparable from his terror of the world around him.

The Brighton depicted here feels haunted by decline, its cheap entertainments masking something darker beneath the surface. Decades later, the film still feels unsettling precisely because it refuses easy redemption or comforting morality.

Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison (1957) – Film4, 2.55pm

Deborah Kerr and Robert Mitchum bring remarkable emotional subtlety to this wartime drama about isolation, repression and companionship. Director John Huston allows silence and atmosphere to do much of the work, creating a sense of emotional tension that lingers throughout.

The film quietly reflects the anxieties of the 1950s: duty, faith, masculinity and the difficulty of emotional honesty. Beneath the tropical setting lies a surprisingly mature meditation on loneliness and sacrifice.

Mandate for Murder: Britain’s Struggle in Palestine – PBS America, 10.15pm

This documentary examines the final years of the British Mandate in Palestine, exploring how imperial policy, insurgency and diplomatic failure combined to shape a conflict whose consequences still reverberate globally today.

Dense but highly absorbing, it offers valuable historical context for understanding a region still trapped within unresolved tensions from that era.

Upgrade (2018) – Legend, 11.15pm

Leigh Whannell’s brutal techno-thriller feels increasingly plausible with every passing year. Set in a near future dominated by surveillance capitalism and invasive technology, Upgrade follows a paralysed mechanic implanted with an experimental AI system after a violent attack leaves his wife dead.

The film’s ending remains one of the bleakest mainstream science-fiction finales of recent years — a chilling warning about autonomy, algorithms and technological dependency.

The Last Duel (2021) – Channel 4, 11.20pm

Ridley Scott returns to medieval Europe with a film examining violence, masculinity and power through sharply contemporary eyes. Jodie Comer gives the film its moral centre in a story less about spectacle than institutional injustice.

Far from being merely historical drama, the film becomes a study of credibility, entitlement and systems protecting themselves.

Sunday 17th May 2026

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953) – BBC Two, 2.30pm

Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell radiate charisma in one of Hollywood’s most joyous musicals. Beneath the glamour sits a surprisingly sharp satire about money, romance and survival within post-war America.

The film’s refusal to punish female ambition remains refreshingly modern.

Mean Girls (2004) – ITV2, 7.05pm

Tina Fey’s Mean Girls arrives in 2004 looking like a bubblegum teen comedy, all pink plastics and cafeteria cartography, but beneath the gloss it’s doing something far more sly. Fey treats the American high school not as a backdrop but as a fully functioning micro‑state — a place where power is negotiated through appearance, language, and the ever‑shifting borders of adolescent allegiance. The film understands that the real curriculum isn’t maths or English but the daily study of how to survive socially without losing your sense of self.

What gives it its staying power is the precision of its observation. Every corridor becomes a diplomatic zone. Every lunch table a fragile coalition. Every outfit a communiqué. And into this world walks Cady Heron, a girl raised outside the system who must learn its rules at speed. Her journey — from naïve outsider to calculating insider and back again — is less a plot than a case study in how identity is shaped, warped and sometimes obliterated by the need to belong.

Long before Instagram, TikTok or the relentless metrics of modern teenage life, Mean Girls grasped the exhausting labour of self‑surveillance. The way young people monitor themselves with the vigilance of border guards. The way a single misstep can feel like a geopolitical crisis. Watching it now, you realise Fey wasn’t just writing jokes; she was diagnosing a culture on the brink of becoming permanently performative.

And yet the film never loses its lightness. It’s funny, quotable, brisk — but threaded with a melancholy awareness of how fragile teenage identities really are. Beneath the bright colours and the comic timing lies a portrait of a generation rehearsing adulthood under fluorescent lights, trying on personas like costumes, hoping one of them might fit.

It remains, two decades on, one of the sharpest dissections of adolescent politics ever smuggled into a mainstream comedy. A film that saw the future coming and, with a raised eyebrow, warned us what it would feel like to live inside it.

The Cage – Episode 4 of 5 – BBC One, 9pm, full series available on BBC iPlayer

This gripping thriller continues to build tension around surveillance, secrecy and institutional distrust. The show’s atmosphere of quiet paranoia increasingly feels rooted in contemporary anxieties about systems designed more to contain than protect.

Brother (2022) – BBC Two, 10.50pm

Based on David Chariandy’s acclaimed novel, Brother is a deeply moving exploration of grief, race and masculinity within Toronto’s Caribbean community. Director Clement Virgo handles the material with enormous sensitivity.

Quietly devastating, it lingers long after the credits.

Mosul (2022) – Great Action, 1.30am

In Mosul, the war is not a backdrop but a suffocating atmosphere—grit, dust, and exhaustion pressed into every frame. The film rejects the clean lines of heroism and instead inhabits the chaos of a city pulverised by ideology and survival instinct. Streets are reduced to rubble, loyalties to reflex. What remains is the human impulse to endure, even when meaning has collapsed.

The Iraqi fighters here are not symbols but men hollowed by repetition—each skirmish another act of attrition rather than triumph. Director Matthew Michael Carnahan captures the rhythm of fatigue: the way violence becomes procedural, stripped of rhetoric, leaving only the weary mechanics of staying alive. The camera moves like a participant, not an observer, its urgency mirroring the moral claustrophobia of a world where every choice corrodes.

By the end, Mosul feels less like a war film than a study in entropy. Ideology dissolves, leaving behind the stubborn persistence of humanity amid ruin—a portrait of courage that refuses to flatter itself.

Monday 18th May 2026

Our Tiny Islands – More4, 9pm

This quietly beautiful documentary visits the Scottish island of Iona, where sheep farmer Joanne balances agricultural life with the fragile realities of island survival.

At a time when television often chases noise and conflict, Our Tiny Islands offers something slower and more reflective.

The Cage – BBC One, 9pm, full series on BBC iPlayer

The latest episode deepens the show’s atmosphere of institutional paranoia, pushing its characters further into moral uncertainty.

Lucy Worsley Investigates: The American Revolution – BBC Two, 9pm, available

Lucy Worsley explores the myths, contradictions and contested narratives surrounding the American Revolution.

Timely viewing at a moment when democratic ideals and national identity are once again fiercely contested.

Thailand: The Dark Side of Paradise – BBC Three, 9pm, 9.45pm and 10.30pm

This documentary strand explores the criminal underworlds and hidden economies operating beneath Thailand’s tourist image, examining how escapism, organised crime and inequality collide.

There is a strong undercurrent of melancholy beneath the beaches and nightlife.

Destroyer (2018) – BBC Two, 11.45pm

Nicole Kidman gives one of her boldest performances in this bleak neo-noir about trauma, guilt and institutional corruption.

Difficult, uncompromising and deeply atmospheric.

Tuesday 19th May 2026

Corinthians: We Were the Champions – BBC Four, 10pm, available on BBC iPlayer

This is the story of a team history almost forgot — the Manchester Corinthians Ladies FC, founded in 1949 and forged in defiance of the FA’s long, punitive ban on women’s football. The documentary gathers ten surviving players, now in their seventies, eighties and nineties, and lets them speak with the clarity of people who lived through something both exhilarating and quietly outrageous: a period when women were told, officially and repeatedly, that the sport they loved was not for them.

What emerges is not a tale of plucky novelty but of solidarity under constraint. These women built their own infrastructure when the governing body refused them pitches, recognition or even basic legitimacy. They toured the world, played to vast crowds abroad, and won tournaments that the FA pretended didn’t exist. The film treats these achievements not as curiosities but as acts of cultural resistance — small, determined rebellions against a system that tried to erase them.

There’s a tenderness to the way the documentary listens. The players recall the thrill of travel, the camaraderie of long coach journeys, the pride of representing a country that refused to acknowledge them. But threaded through the anecdotes is a sharper truth: that their success forced the FA, decades later, into a rare moment of contrition. The apology lands like a delayed recognition of what they always knew — that they were champions long before anyone bothered to write it down.

More than a sports documentary, it becomes a study of perseverance, collective dignity and the politics of being told “no” and playing on anyway. A portrait of women who refused to wait for permission, and in doing so changed the landscape of the game for everyone who followed.

Belmarsh: Serial Killers and High Security – Channel 5, 11.05pm and 12.05am

This two-part documentary enters Britain’s most notorious high-security prison, examining violent offenders alongside the institutional systems built to contain them.

The programme raises uncomfortable questions about punishment, spectacle and society’s fascination with true crime.

Small Town Big Riot – BBC Three, 11.20pm and 12.20am

BBC Three revisits the 2023 riots in Kirkby, Merseyside, before turning to local opposition surrounding a planned asylum centre.

Rather than simplifying events into slogans, the documentary explores mistrust, economic pressure and fractured community identity in modern Britain.

Berlusconi: Condemned to Win – Part 3 – BBC Four, 11.30pm, also available on BBC iPlayer

This fascinating documentary examines how Silvio Berlusconi fused celebrity culture, media ownership and populist politics long before such tactics became globally familiar.

Watching it now often feels less like history than prophecy.

The Krays (1990) – BBC One, 11.45pm

Peter Medak’s portrait of the Kray twins remains one of Britain’s most psychologically interesting gangster films — less interested in swagger than emotional dependency and social claustrophobia.

Wednesday 20th May 2026

The Future with Hannah Fry – BBC Two, 7.30pm, available on BBC iPlayer

Hannah Fry returns with another accessible exploration of science, technology and rapidly changing modern life.

At a moment when AI and automation dominate public debate, the programme offers useful reflection rather than panic.

Green Book (2018) – BBC Three, 9pmGreen Book (2018) — BBC Three — 9pm

Green Book is at its most compelling when it stops trying to solve America and simply lets its two leads inhabit the uneasy space between them. Mahershala Ali and Viggo Mortensen give the film its emotional ballast: Ali with his contained, almost architectural precision; Mortensen with a looser, more instinctive physicality. Together they create a dynamic that feels lived‑in rather than schematic — two men negotiating the boundaries of class, race and masculinity in a country that insists those boundaries are fixed.

Set against the backdrop of a segregated America, the road trip becomes a kind of moving pressure chamber. Each town, each bar, each immaculate Southern mansion exposes a different facet of the racial order: its absurdities, its cruelties, its rituals of humiliation. The film doesn’t always confront these structures with the sharpness they deserve, but it does understand how racism shapes the smallest interactions — the glances, the silences, the rules that are never spoken aloud because everyone already knows them.

What keeps the film interesting today is precisely this tension. It wants reconciliation, warmth, the possibility of mutual recognition. But it can’t entirely escape the shadows cast by the world it depicts. The friendship that develops between Don Shirley and Tony Lip is touching, yes, but it is also freighted with the asymmetries of the era: who gets to move freely, who gets to speak plainly, who gets to be fully themselves without consequence.

Viewed now, Green Book feels like a film caught between two impulses — the desire to soothe and the need to acknowledge. It doesn’t resolve that contradiction, but in its better moments it lets the audience sit with it. And in the performances of Ali and Mortensen, you sense the deeper story beneath the surface: two men travelling through a country that is still deciding who counts, and on what terms.

Marilyn and the Mob – Channel 4, 10pm and 11pm

This two-part documentary explores the long-rumoured connections between Marilyn Monroe, organised crime and Hollywood power structures.

At its best, the programme becomes less about conspiracy and more about exploitation, celebrity and institutional manipulation.

Thursday 21st May 2026

Marilyn Monroe Night – BBC Four, from 8pm

BBC Four devotes the evening to Marilyn Monroe, beginning with Eva Marilyn (1987), in which photographer Eve Arnold reflects on her encounters with Monroe beyond the studio image.

The evening also includes Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953), a programme on Jane Russell, and How to Marry a Millionaire (1953).

Taken together, the evening becomes less nostalgia than a meditation on celebrity, femininity and the machinery of fame.

Shadow of a Doubt (1943) – Film4, 2.25pm

Often cited by Alfred Hitchcock as one of his personal favourites, this superb thriller transforms small-town America into a landscape of hidden menace and creeping paranoia.

The Elon Musk Show: The Next Chapter – BBC Two, 9pm

This follow-up documentary examines the increasingly chaotic and politically divisive public life of Elon Musk.

The programme asks increasingly urgent questions about private wealth, technology and democratic accountability.

Friday 22nd May 2026

🌟 Apocalypse Now (1979) – Film4, 9pm

Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now remains one of cinema’s great, disorienting plunges into the abyss — a film that doesn’t so much depict war as inhale it, choke on it, and exhale something feverish and unsteady. Loosely tracing the bones of Heart of Darkness, it follows Captain Willard upriver on a mission that becomes less a military assignment than a descent through layers of moral erosion. Each stop along the river feels like a different stage of psychic collapse, a place where the usual coordinates — duty, sanity, purpose — have slipped out of reach.

What still astonishes, nearly fifty years on, is the film’s hallucinatory density. Coppola shoots Vietnam as a landscape where reality buckles under the weight of spectacle: helicopters choreographed to Wagner, flares blooming like poisonous flowers, the jungle vibrating with menace. It’s war as theatre, war as ritual, war as a kind of collective madness in which everyone is performing a version of themselves they no longer recognise.

Willard’s journey towards Colonel Kurtz becomes a study in contagion — how violence seeps into the bloodstream, how the line between hunter and hunted dissolves. By the time we reach Kurtz’s compound, the film has shed any pretence of conventional narrative. What’s left is a confrontation with the darkest corners of human capability, delivered in whispers, shadows and the oppressive heat of a world where morality has evaporated.

The scale is operatic, the mood narcotic, the effect overwhelming. Even now, the film feels less like something you watch than something you endure — a fever dream that drags you into its undertow and leaves you blinking, unsettled, unsure where the nightmare ends and the world resumes.

🌟 Dylan Night – BBC Four, from 9pm

Close-up portrait of an older man with curly hair, wearing a black leather jacket and a bolo tie. He has a serious expression and is looking directly at the camera.
Bob Dylan by KollectivFutur

BBC Four celebrates Bob Dylan with Sings DylanSings Dylan 2Shadow Kingdom and the fascinating documentary Tangled Up with Dylan: The Ballad of A.J. Weberman.

Together they become an exploration not simply of Dylan’s music, but of obsession, mythology and artistic reinvention itself.

And Now for Something Completely Different (1971) – BBC Two, 11pm

Before Monty Python became a national institution — the sort of comedy outfit wheeled out for anniversaries, retrospectives and reverent documentaries — they were something far stranger and more volatile. This early film, a stitched‑together anthology of their best sketches, captures them in their anarchic prime: gleefully dismantling authority, respectability and the very idea that comedy should obey the rules of narrative, logic or even basic continuity.

What’s striking, watching it now, is how alive it still feels. The humour doesn’t build; it detonates. Sketches begin in one register and end in another entirely. Punchlines are abandoned mid‑stride. Characters wander in from other sketches as if lost. It’s comedy as controlled demolition, performed by a troupe who understood that the quickest way to expose the absurdity of British life was simply to tilt it a few degrees and let the madness spill out.

The unpredictability is the point. By refusing normal structures — setups, payoffs, tidy resolutions — the Pythons created a form that mirrored the chaos they were mocking. Bureaucracy, class, patriotism, masculinity, the BBC itself: everything is fair game, and everything collapses under the weight of its own pomposity.

Half a century on, the film remains a reminder of how radical they once were. Before the merchandise, the nostalgia and the canonisation, there was this: a group of very clever people breaking comedy open just to see what new shapes it could make.

Streaming Choice

Untold: Liverpool’s Miracle of Istanbul – Available from Tuesday 19th May on Netflix

The 2005 Champions League final has been replayed so often it risks feeling like folklore rather than fact — a story polished by repetition, its edges smoothed by nostalgia. What this Untold documentary does is return to the rawness of the night itself, stripping away the myth to reveal the sheer improbability of what Liverpool achieved in Istanbul. It treats the match not as a highlight reel but as a collective emotional event: a moment when belief, identity and sheer stubborn refusal to accept defeat collided in a way that still feels faintly unreal.

The film understands that football at this level is never just football. It’s memory, inheritance, a kind of secular faith. The first half is presented almost as a study in despair — 3–0 down to an AC Milan side of almost absurd quality, the gulf between the teams looking unbridgeable. And then comes the shift: the surge of noise, the recalibration of hope, the sense that something irrational and magnificent is beginning to stir. The documentary captures that momentum with real care, showing how a team can be transformed not just tactically but spiritually.

What makes it compelling is the way it listens to the people who lived it — players, supporters, commentators — each carrying their own version of the night. For some, it’s a story of resilience; for others, of destiny; for many, a reminder of why football matters at all. The match becomes a vessel for something larger: the idea that identity is shaped not only by triumph but by the moments when triumph seemed impossible.

Nearly twenty years on, the Miracle of Istanbul remains one of sport’s great narrative ruptures — a night when logic failed and belief took over. This documentary honours that strangeness. It shows how a single match can become a communal memory, retold and re‑felt across generations, and why Liverpool supporters still speak of it with a kind of reverent disbelief.

Inspector Ricciardi – Series 3 available from Friday 22nd May on Channel 4 Streaming

One of television’s most atmospheric European crime dramas returns with more melancholy, mystery and political unease in 1930s Naples.

Inside Thailand’s British Drug Gangs: Untold – Available from Tuesday 19th May on Channel 4 Streaming

This unsettling documentary examines British criminal networks operating within Thailand’s tourist economy.

Kylie – All three episodes available from Wednesday on Netflix

A surprisingly reflective documentary series exploring Kylie Minogue’s career, resilience and ability to survive shifting pop landscapes.

I Saw the TV Glow – Available now on Netflix

Jane Schoenbrun’s haunting cult film explores identity, media obsession and emotional alienation through the lens of late-night television and adolescent loneliness.

Rivals – Season 2 available now on Disney+ UK

Jilly Cooper’s gloriously excessive world of media rivalry, sex and ambition returns with even more ego, manipulation and silk-shirted chaos.

Radio Picks

60 Years of Hurt – Radio 4, Saturday 10am

A sharply observed, six‑part excavation of England’s longest‑running national complex. Presented by David Baddiel, the series traces how decades of footballing disappointment — the near‑misses, the penalty traumas, the tournaments that slipped away — have seeped into the country’s sense of itself. What begins as sporting failure becomes cultural inheritance.

Across the six weeks, Baddiel brings in voices who’ve lived it from the inside and the outside: Dear England playwright James Graham, and former England stalwarts Stuart Pearce and David Seaman, among others. Their perspectives give the programme its mix of humour, melancholy and quiet revelation — a portrait of modern Britain told through the ache of what might have been.

Funny, rueful, and unexpectedly tender about the stories a nation builds around its own heartbreak.

Tarot and the Art of Creativity – Radio 4, Sunday 7.15pm

This thoughtful feature explores the relationship between tarot, symbolism and artistic inspiration. Rather than treating tarot as mere superstition, the programme examines it as metaphor, storytelling and creative provocation.

In an increasingly data-driven culture, there is something quietly refreshing about a programme willing to explore ambiguity and imagination.

Podcast Picks

The Story of Money with Gillian Tett and Robin Wigglesworth

What Gillian Tett and Robin Wigglesworth do so well in The Story of Money is peel back the surface of finance — the headlines, the market jitters, the jargon — and reveal the hidden architecture underneath. They speak with the clarity of people who have spent years watching how money actually behaves in the real world: not as an abstract economic force, but as a system of beliefs, habits, hierarchies and power structures that shape almost every aspect of modern life.

There’s a conversational ease to the way they explain things. You never feel lectured; you feel invited in. Tett draws on her anthropological instincts, showing how financial systems evolve like cultures, with rituals, taboos and unspoken rules. Wigglesworth brings the long view — the sweep of history, the way ideas about value and risk mutate across centuries. Together they make the complex feel graspable without ever flattening it.

What emerges is a portrait of money as something far stranger and more human than we usually admit. It’s a story of trust and illusion, of institutions built on collective belief, of crises that expose the fragility of systems we assume are solid. And in their hands, these ideas become not just intellectually engaging but quietly revealing about how power operates today — who benefits, who carries the risk, and who gets written out of the narrative.

It’s the kind of programme that leaves you seeing the world differently: the headlines, the markets, the political arguments, even the way we talk about debt and value. Tett and Wigglesworth don’t just explain finance; they illuminate the psychology and politics that sit beneath it, reminding you that money is never just money. It’s a story we’re all living inside, whether we realise it or not.

Gangster Presents: The Story of Ronnie Biggs

A fascinating exploration of Ronnie Biggs, celebrity criminality and Britain’s complicated fascination with outlaw mythology.

Everyday Positivity with Kate Cocker

Everyday Positivity with Kate Cocker

Everyday Positivity has become one of those rare fixtures in my day — a small, steadying voice that slips into the morning and quietly resets the emotional weather. I listen to Kate Cocker every single day, and over time I’ve realised how much I’ve absorbed from the little nuggets she drops almost casually, as if she’s chatting across a kitchen table rather than broadcasting to thousands.

What makes her so effective is the tone: calm, conversational, never preachy. She doesn’t arrive with grand theories or the glossy language of self‑help. Instead, she offers practical reflections on anxiety, stress and the low‑level emotional static that modern life generates. Her Pillars of Positivity have become a kind of internal toolkit — simple, repeatable habits that help you reorient yourself when the day starts to tilt. And her thoughts on gratitude are delivered with such gentle clarity that they feel less like advice and more like reminders of things you already knew but had somehow misplaced.

There’s something disarmingly human about the way she speaks. She acknowledges the messiness of real life — the wobbling confidence, the overthinking, the days when you feel slightly out of step with yourself — and then offers a way to navigate it without judgement. It’s not therapy, not philosophy, not performance. It’s companionship with good advice.

What the podcast ultimately provides is a rhythm: a moment of pause, a breath, a recalibration. And in a world that rarely grants us any of those, Kate Cocker’s voice becomes a small act of daily repair — a reminder that steadiness can be practised, and that positivity, when done properly, is less about cheerfulness than about choosing how to meet the day.

Promotional image for 'The White Rooms' by TP Bragg featuring a blurred background and text overlay.

Leave a Comment

Mark Rober’s CrunchLabs Season 3: Science Meets Adventure

A smiling man wearing a baseball cap and a black t-shirt, set against a backdrop of tools on a pegboard.
Mark Rober


Season 3 of Mark Rober’s CrunchLabs continues the show’s mission to make science feel playful, intuitive, and radically accessible. The new run leans into spectacle without losing its educational core, using engineering challenges, large‑scale experiments, and hands‑on problem‑solving to spark curiosity across ages.

A Season Built on Curiosity and Momentum

Season 3 arrives with a clear sense of identity: science as adventure, engineering as storytelling. Each episode is structured around a central question or challenge, and the solutions unfold through experimentation rather than explanation. The tone remains warm and family‑friendly, but the scale of the builds has grown—bigger machines, bolder tests, and a wider cast of collaborators.

Plot Outline

The season’s ten episodes follow a consistent rhythm of inquiry, design, and discovery, each anchored in a specific engineering problem or scientific principle.

  • Lava vs Laser Destruction Test (Ep. 1)
    A comparison of destructive forces, pitting molten lava against high‑powered lasers to explore material science and energy transfer.
  • Backyard Squirrel 2.0 — Bank Heist (Ep. 2)
    A sequel to Rober’s viral squirrel obstacle courses, this time escalating into a full “bank heist” scenario that blends behavioural science with mechanical design.
  • Building a Liquid Sand Hot Tub (Ep. 3)
    A demonstration of fluidisation—how sand behaves like a liquid when air is forced through it—explained through a playful, oversized build.
  • This Ball Is Impossible to Hit (Ep. 4)
    Engineering meets sport as Rober designs a wiffle ball challenge that levels the playing field against professional players.
  • Vortex Cannon vs Drone (Ep. 5)
    A look at aerodynamics and pressure systems through the construction of a giant vortex cannon capable of knocking drones out of the air.
  • Glitter Bomb 1.0 vs Porch Pirates (Ep. 6)
    A return to the original Glitter Bomb design, revisiting the engineering behind one of Rober’s most famous inventions.
  • Engineers vs Food Robots (Ep. 7)
    A chaotic, comedic exploration of automation and robotics through the lens of everyday kitchen tasks.
  • Mark Rober vs Ninja Kidz (Ep. 8)
    A collaboration episode built around physics‑based “Minute to Win It” challenges.
  • Engineers vs Custom Go‑Kart Racing (Ep. 9)
    A 24‑hour design sprint where CrunchLabs engineers build and race custom go‑karts, highlighting rapid prototyping and creative constraints.
  • Episode 10 (Ep. 10)
    Details remain unlisted, but it completes the season’s arc of escalating engineering challenges.

Engineering as Storytelling

What distinguishes Season 3 is its narrative clarity. Each episode treats engineering not as a set of instructions but as a story: a problem emerges, ideas collide, prototypes fail, and solutions evolve. This structure mirrors real scientific thinking, making the process visible rather than presenting polished results.

A Tone That Invites Participation

Rober’s on‑screen presence remains the show’s anchor—enthusiastic, transparent, and disarmingly clear. The experiments are ambitious, but the explanations are grounded in everyday analogies. The show’s ethos is simple: science is not something you watch; it’s something you try.

A Season That Stands Apart

In a landscape dominated by drama and high‑stakes fiction, CrunchLabs offers something refreshingly different: a reminder that curiosity is a form of joy. Season 3 reinforces the idea that learning can be spectacular without losing its substance, and that engineering is at its best when it invites everyone to play.

Available on Netflix.

By Chris Storton

Pictkure credit: By Newhcrossaint – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=158421134

Leave a Comment

Suburban Stillness, Violent Faultlines: Inside Love & Death

A promotional poster for the HBO Max series 'Love & Death' featuring Elizabeth Olsen, with a close-up of her face and an intense expression. The text reads 'Not every dream has a perfect ending.'


The first season of Love & Death examines how an ordinary suburban life can fracture under the weight of desire, repression, and unmet expectations. Rather than sensationalising a notorious true crime, the series focuses on the psychological pressures that precede violence, tracing the slow unravelling of Candy Montgomery and the community around her.

A Suburbia Built on Quiet Tension

Set in late‑1970s and early‑1980s Wylie, Texas, the series follows Candy Montgomery, a church‑going housewife whose life appears orderly and conventional. Beneath that surface lies a growing sense of dissatisfaction—emotional, marital, and existential. The show uses this suburban stillness as a pressure chamber, letting small gestures, glances, and routines accumulate into something volatile.

Plot Outline

  • A life that looks stable:
    Candy’s world is defined by church activities, family obligations, and the expectations of her community. Her marriage to Pat is functional but emotionally stagnant, and she begins to feel confined by the narrow script of suburban womanhood.
  • The affair with Allan Gore:
    Candy initiates an affair with Allan, the husband of her friend Betty Gore. Both are seeking escape from their own marital frustrations, and the relationship becomes a catalyst for everything that follows. Their affair is portrayed not as scandalous spectacle but as a symptom of deeper emotional dislocation.
  • Betty’s growing suspicion:
    Betty struggles with postpartum depression and marital strain, and her unease intensifies as she senses the distance between herself and Allan. Her emotional fragility becomes one of the season’s most affecting threads, grounding the story in the human cost of secrecy.
  • The killing and its aftermath:
    The series builds toward the 1980 killing of Betty Gore, for which Candy is accused. The violence is not depicted as a twist but as the tragic culmination of mounting psychological pressure. The courtroom battle that follows—led by Candy’s lawyer Don Crowder—centres on questions of self‑defence, memory, and motive.

Characters Drawn with Ambiguity

  • Candy Montgomery:
    Elizabeth Olsen plays Candy with a quiet, unsettling opacity. She is neither villain nor victim, but a woman whose internal contradictions become impossible to contain.
  • Allan Gore:
    Jesse Plemons brings a muted, conflicted energy to Allan, a man caught between obligation and longing. His passivity becomes one of the story’s most destabilising forces.
  • Betty Gore:
    Lily Rabe’s portrayal of Betty is deeply empathetic, capturing a woman overwhelmed by isolation and suspicion. Her presence haunts the series even after her death.
  • Pat Montgomery and the wider community:
    The supporting characters—friends, church members, lawyers—form a social ecosystem that both sustains and suffocates Candy. Their reactions reveal the fragility of the moral order they believe they uphold.

A Story Told with Restraint

The series avoids sensationalism, choosing instead to explore how ordinary people rationalise extraordinary choices. Its power lies in the slow accumulation of emotional detail: the quiet moments in cars, the awkward church gatherings, the unspoken resentments. These textures make the eventual violence feel tragically inevitable rather than shocking.

By Chris Storton

Available on Netflix.

Picture credit: By HBO Max – IMP Awards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=73266730

Leave a Comment

Why One Piece Season 1 Captivates Fans Worldwide

Logo of 'One Piece' featuring a skull with a straw hat and crossed bones.


Season 1 of Netflix’s One Piece establishes a confident, big‑hearted foundation for the Straw Hat story. It balances fidelity to Eiichiro Oda’s world with a grounded emotional register, creating an adventure that feels earnest, generous, and built to last.

A World That Opens Itself Slowly

The season adapts the East Blue arc, tracing Luffy’s first steps toward becoming King of the Pirates. What stands out, revisiting it now, is how assured the world‑building feels. The series doesn’t rush to impress; it trusts that the strangeness of Devil Fruits, the theatricality of pirates, and the moral ambiguity of the Marines will speak for themselves. The tone is bright without being naive, playful without losing emotional weight.

Plot Outline

  • The spark of the age:
    Gold Roger’s execution sets the world into motion, and the show uses this moment as a thematic anchor: freedom, ambition, and the cost of chasing both.
  • Luffy’s beginning:
    Luffy’s rubber‑body abilities and his uncomplicated belief in friendship define the early episodes. His escape from Alvida’s ship and his meeting with Koby establish the season’s moral compass.
  • Gathering the crew:
    Shells Town introduces Zoro and Nami, each carrying their own histories of loss and distrust. Their early alliance with Luffy is uneasy, which makes their eventual cohesion feel earned.
  • East Blue conflicts:
    The Buggy, Syrup Village, and Baratie arcs unfold with a rhythm that mirrors the manga: bursts of chaos punctuated by moments of surprising tenderness. Usopp and Sanji join not out of convenience but because their lives intersect with Luffy’s in ways that change them.
  • Arlong Park:
    The season’s emotional centre arrives with Nami’s story. Her past with Arlong gives the show its first real sense of scale—how oppression shapes people, and how solidarity can undo it. The walk to Arlong Park remains the season’s defining image of chosen family.

Characters Drawn with Clean Lines

The introductions are sharp and memorable. Luffy’s optimism is not a quirk but a worldview. Zoro’s stoicism is a shield he hasn’t yet learned to lower. Nami’s guarded intelligence is the product of survival, not cynicism. Each character arrives with a clear silhouette, and the season lets those silhouettes deepen rather than distort.

A Foundation Built on Heart

Season 1 works because it refuses to apologise for its sincerity. It believes in adventure as a moral act—an insistence that the world can be reshaped through loyalty, courage, and stubborn hope. With Season 2 now expanding the universe, the first season reads as a statement of intent: this is a story that values connection over spectacle, and it’s stronger for it.

By Chris Storton

Leave a Comment

Beauty in Black Season 2: Power Dynamics Explored

Promotional poster for Tyler Perry's 'Beauty in Black' featuring two women with striking makeup and close-up portraits, emphasizing beauty and solidarity. Release date mentioned as October 24, available on Netflix.

Season 2 of Beauty in Black deepens its examination of power, identity, and reinvention as Kimmie Bellarie steps into the centre of a fractured dynasty. The season blends melodrama, corporate warfare, and psychological tension, tracing how a woman once dismissed as an outsider becomes the gravitational force reshaping the Bellarie empire.

A Season Built on Upheaval

The second season begins with Kimmie’s sudden elevation from Chicago club dancer to the new Mrs. Bellarie and chief operating officer of the Beauty in Black hair‑care empire. Her marriage to Horace Bellarie destabilises the family hierarchy, provoking resentment from his sons Roy and Charles, his brother Norman, and his ex‑wife Olivia. This shift in power is not merely a plot device; it becomes the season’s thematic engine, exploring how legitimacy is constructed and contested within a dynasty that has long relied on secrecy and entitlement.

Plot Outline

  • Episodes 1–3:
    Kimmie’s rise sends shockwaves through the Bellarie family. Horace’s backroom manoeuvres collide with his children’s expectations, while Kimmie, Rain, and Sylvie adjust to their new status. Rivalries intensify as old grudges surface, culminating in a sibling confrontation that exposes fractures too deep to ignore.
  • Episodes 4–6:
    A violent development shatters Kimmie’s trust and pulls her deeper into the family’s criminal entanglements. Rain pursues her own vendettas, and the Bellarie men make increasingly reckless decisions. Kimmie begins asserting her authority, even as Horace undergoes experimental cancer treatment abroad and attempts to guide her from a distance.
  • Episodes 7–8:
    The boardroom becomes a battleground. Kimmie confronts the Bellaries head‑on, challenging their assumptions about inheritance, loyalty, and leadership. Impulsive choices by Charles and Rain escalate into dangerous consequences, while Kimmie’s strategic instincts sharpen. By the season’s end, she forms an unexpected alliance with Mallory—once an adversary—reshaping the power map of the entire family.

Identity as a Battleground

The season’s emotional core lies in its exploration of identity under pressure. Kimmie’s transformation is not portrayed as a fairy‑tale ascent but as a negotiation between past and present. Her confidence grows from Horace’s early belief in her potential, yet her authority is forged through conflict—each challenge forcing her to redefine who she is and what she is willing to become. The show treats identity as fluid, shaped by circumstance and sharpened by opposition.

Character Dynamics and Moral Complexity

The Bellarie family’s dysfunction provides fertile ground for character‑driven drama. Roy’s rage, Charles’s impulsiveness, Norman’s scheming, and Olivia’s bitterness create a volatile ecosystem in which every decision carries emotional and financial stakes. Kimmie’s moral arc is particularly compelling: she is neither ingénue nor villain, but a woman learning to navigate a world built to exclude her. Her alliance with Mallory—rooted in shared betrayal and ambition—adds a final twist that reframes the season’s earlier conflicts.

A Season That Leaves a Mark

What lingers after the final episode is not simply the intrigue but the sense of a world in transition. The Bellarie empire is no longer governed by lineage alone; it is being reshaped by someone who understands both its vulnerabilities and its potential. Season 2 becomes a study in how power is seized, defended, and reinvented—and how identity can be both armour and weapon.

By Chris Storton

Available on Netflix.

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 4-10 April 2026

A week of craft, chaos, counterculture, and the quiet machinery of power

Graphic featuring a soaring vulture with the text 'CULTURE VULTURE' prominently displayed above it, alongside the 'COUNTER CULTURE' logo and event dates of April 4-10, 2026.

Some weeks arrive quietly; others feel like they’ve been stitched together with a kind of mischievous intent. This one belongs to the latter. Across seven days, the schedules offer a collision of noir, protest, mythmaking, and the strange ways people reinvent themselves when the world isn’t looking. From Altman’s social x‑ray to Hendrix’s sonic upheavals, from carnival grifters to political gardeners, the week asks the same question in different accents: who gets to write the story, and who gets written into it? Selections and writing is by Pat Harrington.

Before we dive in, here are the three programmes that define the week’s mood.

🌟 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE WEEK

1. Gosford Park — BBC4, Thursday 10.50pm

Altman’s masterpiece of class, cruelty, and quiet rebellion. A house full of secrets, a murder that barely matters, and a camera that catches everything people wish it wouldn’t.

2. Band of Gypsys — Sky Arts, Friday 9pm

Hendrix in transition: raw, searching, and on the cusp of a reinvention the world never got to see completed.

3. Storyville: André Is an Idiot — BBC4, Tuesday 10pm

A documentary that begins with a provocation and ends with something tender, complicated, and unexpectedly humane.


📅 SATURDAY 4 APRIL

10.00pm — Channel 5 Benny Hill — CANCELLED


There are cancellations that feel like bureaucratic reshuffles, and there are cancellations that land with the weight of a quiet cultural verdict. This one belongs firmly to the latter. Benny Hill isn’t just a relic of another broadcasting era; it’s a reminder of the elastic boundaries of humour, the ways societies once laughed, and the ways they now refuse to.

What’s striking is how little noise accompanies the decision. No grand announcement, no retrospective, no attempt to reframe the show as “of its time.” Just a silent excision from the schedule — the kind of administrative gesture that says more than any op‑ed could. It reflects a shift in sensibility: a recognition that comedy built on caricature, leering, and the easy objectification of women no longer passes as harmless nostalgia.

But there’s something more interesting beneath the surface. The cancellation isn’t about erasing the past; it’s about acknowledging the distance travelled. It’s a reminder that culture is not static — that what once drew mass laughter can, in hindsight, reveal the power structures and blind spots of its age. Channel 5’s quiet removal feels less like censorship and more like a society tidying away the artefacts it no longer wishes to celebrate.

In the end, the absence becomes the story. A gap in the schedule that marks a cultural turning point: the moment when a nation that once embraced Hill’s brand of cheeky irreverence decides, almost sheepishly, that it has outgrown him. Not with outrage, but with a shrug — which may be the most damning judgement of all.

10.50pm — BBC1 The Outfit (2022)


The Outfit is a chamber piece disguised as a crime thriller — a film that understands the power of a single room, a single night, and a man who has spent his life mastering the art of precision. Mark Rylance plays Leonard, a tailor (or “cutter,” as he insists) whose quiet shop becomes the pressure cooker for a gangland conspiracy. The film unfolds like a piece of bespoke tailoring: every line measured, every cut deliberate, every reveal stitched into place with care.

What makes the film so compelling is its restraint. Moore resists the temptation to expand outward into the wider criminal underworld; instead, he keeps us locked in the shop, where the walls seem to absorb every lie, every threat, every shifting allegiance. Rylance’s performance is a study in stillness — a man who has survived by observing, by listening, by never revealing more than he must. The tension comes not from gunfire but from the slow, methodical unravelling of secrets.

As the night spirals into violence, the film becomes a meditation on craft — the craft of tailoring, yes, but also the craft of survival. Leonard’s tools are scissors, chalk, and cloth, yet he wields them with the same precision the gangsters apply to their own brutal trade. The film suggests that everyone is cutting something: fabric, deals, corners, throats. And in the end, the question becomes not who is guilty, but who is the better craftsman.

12.00am — BBC2 The Beasts (2022)

Some films arrive like storms; The Beasts arrives like a pressure system — slow, tightening, and impossible to ignore. Rodrigo Sorogoyen builds his drama not from spectacle but from the quiet, grinding hostility that accumulates when a community decides that outsiders are a problem to be solved rather than neighbours to be understood. The Galician countryside is rendered not as pastoral idyll but as a landscape shaped by old resentments, economic precarity, and the kind of masculine pride that curdles into menace.

What makes the film so unsettling is its moral clarity. Sorogoyen refuses to romanticise rural life or demonise the couple at the centre of the story; instead, he shows how fear and frustration can metastasise into something far more dangerous. The conflict over land and wind turbines becomes a proxy for deeper anxieties — about belonging, about dignity, about who gets to decide the future of a place that has been shrinking for generations. Violence here is not an aberration but the logical endpoint of a community that feels cornered.

The performances are extraordinary in their restraint. Denis Ménochet plays Antoine with a kind of stubborn decency — a man who believes that reason, patience, and goodwill can overcome hostility, even as the audience senses the ground shifting beneath him. Opposite him, the brothers who torment the couple are not caricatures but wounded men, shaped by a lifetime of hard labour and harder disappointments. Their menace is intimate, almost familial; the kind that grows in the gaps where empathy should be.

When the film finally tips into open brutality, it feels both shocking and inevitable. Sorogoyen stages violence not as catharsis but as indictment — a reminder that communities can devour their own when fear becomes a form of identity. Yet the film’s final act, anchored by Marina Foïs, refuses to collapse into despair. Her quiet, relentless determination becomes the film’s moral centre: a testament to endurance in the face of cruelty, and to the possibility of reclaiming one’s story even after others have tried to write it for you.

By the end, The Beasts leaves you with the uneasy sense that the real horror isn’t the violence itself but the social conditions that make it seem reasonable to the people who commit it. It’s a film about borders — between locals and outsiders, pride and paranoia, survival and surrender — and how easily those borders can be crossed when no one is watching. Sorogoyen doesn’t offer comfort. He offers truth, and the truth here is as raw as the landscape that holds it.

12.55am — Channel 4 Nightmare Alley (2021)


Del Toro’s Nightmare Alley is a carnival of corruption — a noir soaked in sawdust, cigarette smoke, and the seductive promise of reinvention. Bradley Cooper plays Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who discovers that the line between showmanship and manipulation is perilously thin. The early carnival scenes are among del Toro’s richest work: a world of geeks, grifters, and broken souls who cling to illusion because reality offers them nothing.

The film’s second half shifts into the polished world of high‑society spiritualism, where the cons become more elaborate and the stakes more lethal. Cooper’s performance is a slow burn, a man who believes he can outsmart fate even as he walks straight into its jaws. Cate Blanchett, as the femme fatale psychologist, plays her role with a glacial elegance that suggests she has alreabedy read the final chapter of Stanton’s story.

What gives the film its power is its moral clarity. Del Toro is fascinated by the machinery of exploitation — the way people sell hope, fear, and fantasy to those desperate enough to buy them. The carnival and the city are mirrors of each other: one openly grotesque, the other politely monstrous. In the end, the film circles back to its opening question: what makes a man a geek? The answer lands with the force of inevitability.


📅 SUNDAY 5 APRIL

9.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers History: The Ancients

There’s a particular pleasure in watching a programme that refuses to treat the past as a museum exhibit. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Ancients does exactly that, rummaging through the intimate habits of early civilisations with a mixture of irreverence and genuine curiosity. It’s history told with a raised eyebrow, but never with contempt; the series understands that the strangeness of the past is often just a mirror held at an unfamiliar angle.

What gives the episode its bite is the way it punctures the myth of ancient societies as either prudish or perpetually orgiastic. Instead, it reveals a world where desire, ritual, power, and superstition were tangled together in ways that feel both alien and uncomfortably familiar. The humour works because it’s grounded in empathy — a recognition that people have always tried to make sense of their bodies, their urges, and the rules imposed upon them.

Beneath the jokes lies a quiet critique of how modern culture sanitises its own contradictions. The ancients may have carved their fantasies into stone or woven them into religious rites, but we’re hardly less conflicted; we’ve simply buried our anxieties under algorithms, etiquette, and the illusion of sophistication. The programme’s real achievement is showing that the past wasn’t “bonkers” so much as human — messy, inventive, and endlessly negotiating the boundaries between pleasure and propriety.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the distance between then and now is thinner than we like to pretend. The ancients weren’t strangers; they were us, just with different lighting and fewer inhibitions. And in its cheeky, good‑natured way, the episode invites us to consider what future historians will make of our own rituals — and whether they’ll laugh with us or at us.

10.00pm — BBC1 The Imitation Game (2014)

Some biopics polish their subjects until they gleam; The Imitation Game does something more interesting. It presents Alan Turing not as a saint or a martyr, but as a man whose brilliance was both his armour and his undoing. The film moves with the clipped urgency of wartime Britain, yet beneath the period trappings lies a quieter story — one about the cost of being different in a country that demands sameness.

Benedict Cumberbatch plays Turing with a kind of brittle precision, capturing the awkwardness, arrogance, and vulnerability that made him both indispensable and intolerable to the establishment he served. His work at Bletchley Park is framed not as a triumph of lone genius but as a fragile collaboration held together by necessity, secrecy, and the unspoken knowledge that the stakes were measured in millions of lives. The film understands that heroism often looks nothing like the myths we build around it.

What lingers, though, is the cruelty that followed. The state that relied on Turing’s mind to shorten the war later turned that same mind into a target, punishing him for the very identity it had quietly exploited. The film doesn’t sensationalise this; it lets the injustice sit there, cold and bureaucratic, a reminder that nations can be both grateful and merciless in the same breath. It’s a portrait of a society that feared what it could not categorise.

Yet the film also finds moments of grace — in Turing’s bond with Joan Clarke, played with understated strength by Keira Knightley, and in the fleeting glimpses of camaraderie among the codebreakers. These relationships don’t soften the tragedy, but they give it texture, showing the human connections that flickered even in the shadow of secrecy.

By the end, The Imitation Game becomes less a wartime thriller than a moral reckoning. It asks what a country owes to those who save it, and whether intelligence, difference, or queerness can ever be safely housed within institutions built to suppress all three. The answer, delivered with quiet devastation, is that history remembers Turing more kindly than the nation that destroyed him.

10.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers History: The Tudors

There’s something deliciously subversive about taking the Tudors — a dynasty obsessed with image, lineage, and the theatre of power — and examining them through the lens of intimacy. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Tudors does this with a kind of gleeful precision, peeling back the velvet curtains to reveal a world where desire was both a private indulgence and a public weapon. The result is a portrait of a monarchy that governed its bedrooms with the same paranoia it governed its borders.

What the episode captures so well is the contradiction at the heart of Tudor England: a society that preached piety while conducting its most consequential politics between sheets, confessionals, and whispered corridors. The humour lands because it’s rooted in truth — the Tudors were, in many ways, the architects of Britain’s long, uneasy relationship with sex, shame, and spectacle. Their scandals weren’t distractions from power; they were power, reshaping alliances, faiths, and the very structure of the state.

Yet the programme never slips into mockery. Instead, it treats the Tudors as deeply human — flawed, frightened, and often trapped by the very systems they built. Henry VIII’s marital chaos becomes less a punchline and more a study in insecurity; Anne Boleyn’s rise and fall reads like a cautionary tale about the dangers of being both desired and inconvenient. The episode’s irreverence is a way of cutting through the mythmaking, revealing the fragile bodies beneath the portraits.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the Tudors weren’t “bonkers” so much as emblematic of a nation learning to weaponise morality. Their anxieties echo into the present — the policing of desire, the obsession with reputation, the belief that private behaviour can justify public punishment. The episode invites us to laugh, but also to recognise the lineage of our own contradictions.

11.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers Histor:y The Georgians

If the Tudors gave Britain its taste for spectacle, the Georgians perfected the art of contradiction. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Georgians dives headlong into an era that preached refinement while indulging in excess, a society that built coffee‑house civility on top of a foundation of gossip, scandal, and the relentless policing of reputation. The episode treats the period with a kind of affectionate mischief, revealing a world where desire and decorum were locked in a perpetual duel.

What makes the Georgian instalment so compelling is its refusal to flatten the era into caricature. Yes, the wigs were absurd and the moralising loud, but beneath the powdered surfaces lay a culture grappling with modernity — urbanisation, print culture, new money, new freedoms, and new anxieties about who was allowed to enjoy them. The programme captures this beautifully, showing how sex became both a commodity and a battleground, a way to climb the social ladder or tumble spectacularly from it.

The humour works because it exposes the hypocrisy without sneering at the people trapped inside it. The Georgians weren’t uniquely “bonkers”; they were navigating a rapidly changing world with the tools they had — pamphlets, salons, clandestine clubs, and a legal system that punished the vulnerable while protecting the powerful. The episode’s irreverence becomes a way of cutting through the self‑mythologising, revealing the messy humanity beneath the brocade.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the Georgians were less an aberration and more a prototype for the modern British psyche: outwardly restrained, inwardly chaotic, and forever negotiating the gap between public virtue and private appetite. The episode invites us to laugh at their contradictions, but also to recognise how many of them we’ve inherited — just with better plumbing and worse social media.

10.15pm — ITV1 Hot Fuzz (2007)


Some comedies wink at the audience; Hot Fuzz stares straight at you with a grin that knows exactly what it’s doing. Edgar Wright’s second entry in the Cornetto Trilogy is often remembered for its kinetic action and rapid‑fire jokes, but beneath the surface lies a surprisingly sharp dissection of English parochialism — the kind that hides its authoritarian streak behind hanging baskets and Neighbourhood Watch newsletters. It’s a film about the violence required to maintain the illusion of tranquillity.

Simon Pegg’s Nicholas Angel is the perfect outsider: competent to the point of discomfort, earnest enough to be mocked, and so committed to order that he becomes a threat to the cosy stagnation of Sandford. His arrival exposes the village’s central contradiction — that “the greater good” is often a euphemism for conformity enforced at knifepoint. Wright plays this tension for laughs, but the humour never fully masks the unease. The village’s obsession with perfection feels uncomfortably familiar in a country that still prizes appearances over accountability.

What makes the film endure is its affection for the very things it critiques. Wright understands the rhythms of rural life — the gossip, the rituals, the way everyone knows everyone else’s business — and he captures them with both satire and warmth. The partnership between Angel and Danny (Nick Frost) becomes the film’s emotional anchor: a friendship forged in the gap between idealism and reality, between the rules on paper and the messy humanity they’re meant to protect.

When the film erupts into full‑blown action pastiche, it does so with a kind of joyous inevitability. The gunfights and explosions aren’t just genre homage; they’re the logical endpoint of a community that has mistaken control for harmony. Wright’s brilliance lies in showing how easily the language of policing can slip into the language of purity — and how quickly a village fête can turn into a battleground when people cling too tightly to their myths.

By the end, Hot Fuzz has pulled off a rare trick: it delivers the pleasures of an action blockbuster while quietly interrogating the politics of small‑town respectability. It’s a film that laughs with you, then asks — gently, insistently — what exactly we’re laughing at. And whether the joke is really as harmless as it seems.

11.50pm — BBC2 Being There (1979)


Being There is a satire that feels eerily prophetic — a film about a man with no interior life who becomes a political oracle simply because he speaks in platitudes. Peter Sellers’ performance as Chance the gardener is a masterclass in understatement: a man who knows nothing, wants nothing, and yet becomes the blank screen onto which a desperate society projects its hopes.

Ashby directs with a light touch, allowing the absurdity to accumulate gradually. The humour is gentle but pointed, revealing how easily power can be seduced by simplicity — or what it mistakes for simplicity. Chance’s gardening metaphors are treated as profound wisdom, not because they are insightful but because people hear what they want to hear. The film becomes a study in the dangers of interpretation, of the human need to find meaning even where none exists.

What makes the film endure is its moral ambiguity. Chance is not malicious; he is simply empty. The satire is aimed not at him but at the world that elevates him — a world hungry for certainty, for clarity, for a voice that sounds authoritative even when it says nothing. The final image, often debated, feels less like a joke and more like a warning: in politics, gravity is optional.


📅 MONDAY 6 APRIL

12.50pm — Channel 5 Clash of the Titans (1981)

Some films stand as monuments to a particular moment in cinematic craft, and Clash of the Titans is one of them. It represents the final great flourish of Ray Harryhausen’s stop‑motion artistry — a handmade mythology constructed frame by painstaking frame, just before digital effects swept in and rewrote the grammar of fantasy cinema. There’s a tactile charge to the film, a sense that every creature has been coaxed into existence rather than rendered into it.

Harryhausen’s creations remain the film’s heartbeat. Medusa, in particular, is a masterclass in atmosphere: a creature of shadow, menace, and unnervingly deliberate movement. Her scenes feel carved out of darkness, lit by the flicker of torches and the tension of inevitability. The Kraken, too, carries a grandeur that owes everything to its physicality — a reminder that scale, when sculpted rather than simulated, has a weight that lingers.

The film’s English roots give it a distinctive texture. Shot partly at Pinewood Studios and anchored by Laurence Olivier’s imperious Zeus, it sits firmly within the tradition of British mythic storytelling — a lineage that treats folklore not as escapism but as cultural inheritance. There’s a theatricality to the performances, a sense of pageantry that feels closer to stagecraft than blockbuster bombast.

What makes Clash of the Titans important is not simply its place in Harryhausen’s career, but its position in film history. It marks the end of an era when fantasy was built by hand, when imagination was translated into miniature sets, armatures, and incremental gestures. Its imperfections are part of its power: evidence of human labour, ingenuity, and the belief that myth deserved to be made tangible.

Seen today, the film feels like a hinge — the last breath of one tradition and the quiet prelude to another. It endures not as nostalgia, but as testament: a reminder that cinema’s magic has many forms, and that some of the most enduring wonders were crafted one frame at a time.

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (1/3)

There’s a particular tension in watching a travelogue about a country that is both ancient and accelerating, both deeply rooted and relentlessly surveilled. China with Ben Fogle opens with that tension fully visible, and to its credit, the programme doesn’t try to smooth it away. Fogle steps into a nation where tradition, ambition, and state oversight sit side by side — sometimes harmoniously, sometimes uneasily, always revealing something about the forces shaping modern China.

What gives the episode its quiet power is Fogle’s instinct to observe rather than impose. He moves through landscapes where centuries‑old customs coexist with the architecture of a rising superpower, and the contrast is never treated as spectacle. Instead, it becomes a study in how people adapt: how communities negotiate the demands of progress, how individuals carve out pockets of autonomy within systems designed to watch, measure, and optimise their lives.

The programme doesn’t pretend to offer a definitive portrait — China is too vast, too contradictory for that — but it does capture the texture of a society in motion. Fogle’s encounters feel grounded, shaped by curiosity rather than judgement. The result is a portrait of a country where the past is never fully past, and where the future arrives with both promise and pressure.

By the end of the first episode, what lingers is not a single image but a mood: a sense of a nation balancing on the fault line between heritage and hyper‑modernity. Fogle’s journey becomes a way of tracing that line — and of asking, gently but insistently, what is gained and what is lost when a society moves at such velocity.

10.00pm — BBC2 Gosford Park (2001)


There are films that observe a society, and there are films that quietly prise it open. Gosford Park belongs to the latter category. Altman approaches the English country‑house murder mystery not as a puzzle to be solved but as a social autopsy, peeling back the layers of a world that survives on ritual, silence, and the unspoken understanding that some lives matter more than others. The camera glides like a rumour, catching the small betrayals that keep the machinery of class running.

What makes the film so quietly devastating is its refusal to grant the audience the comfort of a single villain. The cruelty here is structural, ambient — a kind of atmospheric pressure that shapes everyone inside the house, from the brittle aristocrats clinging to relevance to the servants who know the household’s secrets because they have no choice but to witness them. Altman shows how power is maintained not through grand gestures but through the daily choreography of deference and dismissal.

The murder, when it arrives, feels less like a rupture than an inevitability. It’s as though the house itself has exhaled after decades of holding its breath. Altman treats the crime not as a narrative climax but as a moral footnote — a reminder that violence is often the final expression of a system that has been quietly violent all along. The detectives, with their procedural fussiness, seem almost comic in their inability to grasp the deeper truth: the real crime is the hierarchy itself.

What lingers is the film’s compassion for the people trapped within these structures. The servants, especially, are drawn with a tenderness that never slips into sentimentality. Their solidarity is subtle, improvised, and often wordless — a shared understanding forged in the corridors and sculleries where the powerful rarely look. Altman gives them the dignity of interiority, of private griefs and small defiances.

By the time the credits roll, Gosford Park has done something rare: it has taken a familiar genre and used it as a Trojan horse to smuggle in a critique of class, complicity, and the stories a nation tells itself to avoid looking in the mirror. It’s a film that watches us watching it, quietly asking whether we’re any less entangled in these old hierarchies than the characters onscreen. The answer, of course, is the one we’d rather not give.

1.00am — Sky Arts Catching Fire: The Story of Anita Pallenberg

Some figures slip through the cracks of official history, not because they were insignificant, but because they were too disruptive, too magnetic, too unwilling to play the role assigned to them. Catching Fire: The Story of Anita Pallenberg understands this instinctively. It treats Pallenberg not as an accessory to the Rolling Stones’ mythology but as one of its architects — a woman whose presence shaped the band’s golden era as surely as any riff or lyric.

The documentary moves with a kind of smoky elegance, tracing Pallenberg’s life through the contradictions that made her so compelling: muse and maker, icon and outsider, adored and punished in equal measure. What emerges is a portrait of a woman who refused to shrink herself to fit the expectations of the men orbiting her. She wasn’t a footnote in rock history; she was one of its gravitational forces.

What the film captures beautifully is the cost of that defiance. Pallenberg lived in a world that celebrated rebellion while quietly enforcing its own hierarchies — a world where men could burn bright and be forgiven, while women were expected to glow decoratively and then disappear. The documentary doesn’t sanitise the chaos, but it refuses to let the chaos define her. Instead, it shows a life lived at full voltage, with all the danger and brilliance that entails.

There’s a tenderness to the storytelling, too. Interviews, archival footage, and Pallenberg’s own words create a sense of intimacy — as though the film is trying, at last, to give her the space she was so often denied. It’s a reclamation, not a eulogy. A reminder that behind the myth was a woman of sharp intelligence, creative instinct, and a refusal to be anyone’s ornament.

By the end, Catching Fire becomes more than a rock‑and‑roll documentary. It’s a study in agency, survival, and the price of living unapologetically in a world that prefers its women compliant. Pallenberg emerges not as a cautionary tale but as a necessary one — a figure who shaped a cultural moment and paid dearly for the privilege of being unforgettable.


📅 TUESDAY 7 APRIL

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (2/3)


If the first episode traced the tension between heritage and modernity, the second plunges straight into the circuitry of China’s technological future — a landscape where innovation and state power are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing ones. China with Ben Fogle steps into this world with a mixture of curiosity and caution, aware that the gleaming surfaces of progress often conceal deeper questions about autonomy, identity, and the cost of efficiency.

Fogle’s journey through China’s technological heartlands is framed not as a parade of gadgets but as a study in how a society imagines its future. He encounters cities built at astonishing speed, infrastructures that seem to rewrite the rules of scale, and communities whose daily lives are shaped by systems designed to monitor, optimise, and predict. The programme doesn’t sensationalise this; instead, it lets the viewer sit with the unease — the sense that convenience and control have become indistinguishable.

What the episode captures particularly well is the human dimension of this transformation. Fogle meets people who see technology as liberation, others who see it as inevitability, and some who navigate it with a quiet pragmatism born of living inside a system too vast to resist. Their stories reveal a country where ambition is both a national project and a personal burden, where the future arrives not as a choice but as an instruction.

By the end, the episode leaves you with a sense of a nation accelerating so quickly that even its own citizens struggle to keep pace. Fogle doesn’t pretend to resolve the contradictions — he simply illuminates them. The result is a portrait of a society where innovation is inseparable from oversight, and where the promise of progress is always shadowed by the question of who gets to define it.

10.00pm — BBC4 Storyville: André Is an Idiot


Some documentaries announce themselves with a thesis; this one begins with a provocation. André Is an Idiot uses its deliberately abrasive title as a kind of misdirection — a dare, almost — before unfolding into something far more humane, layered, and quietly disarming. What looks at first like a character study of a difficult man becomes, instead, a meditation on misunderstanding, vulnerability, and the stories we tell about people when we don’t yet know how to see them.

The film’s strength lies in its refusal to flatten André into a type. Instead, it traces the contours of a life shaped by frustration, miscommunication, and the small daily collisions that accumulate into reputation. The camera lingers not on spectacle but on the moments where dignity and exasperation meet — the pauses, the hesitations, the flashes of humour that reveal a person far more complex than the label pinned to him.

What emerges is a portrait of a man navigating a world that often feels ill‑fitted to his temperament. The documentary treats him neither as a saint nor a cautionary tale, but as someone trying — sometimes clumsily, sometimes defiantly — to assert his place in a society that prefers its people easily categorised. The tenderness comes from the film’s willingness to sit with contradiction, to let André be difficult without making him disposable.

By the end, the title feels less like an insult and more like a commentary on the way we rush to judgement. The film invites the viewer to reconsider the casual cruelty of labels, the speed with which we reduce people to their roughest edges, and the possibility that empathy begins where certainty ends. It’s a Storyville entry that starts with a jolt and ends with a quiet ache — a reminder that the most interesting stories are often the ones that refuse to behave.

10.10pm — BBC3 Misbehaviour (2020)


There’s a particular electricity to stories about disruption — not the grand, cinematic kind, but the small, strategic acts that tilt the world a few degrees off its axis. Misbehaviour captures that spirit with a lightness that never dilutes its politics. It retells the 1970 Miss World protest with wit, warmth, and a clear understanding that history often turns on the moments when ordinary people decide they’ve had enough of being politely ignored.

The film’s great strength is its refusal to flatten the event into a single narrative. Instead, it shows the protest as a collision of perspectives: second‑wave feminists challenging the commodification of women; contestants navigating the pageant as a rare route to opportunity; organisers clinging to a tradition they believe harmless. The result is a story where everyone is both right and wrong in ways that feel recognisably human. The politics are sharp, but the film never forgets the people inside them.

Keira Knightley and Jessie Buckley anchor the film with performances that capture two very different forms of rebellion — one methodical, one chaotic — while Gugu Mbatha‑Raw brings a quiet, devastating dignity to the role of Jennifer Hosten, the first Black Miss World. Her storyline becomes the film’s moral hinge, revealing how liberation movements can collide even when they share the same enemy.

What lingers is the sense of a world on the cusp of change. The protest doesn’t topple the patriarchy, but it cracks the veneer of inevitability that sustained it. The film understands that progress often begins with disruption that looks, at first, like mischief — a handful of women storming a stage, refusing to let the spectacle proceed as planned.

By the end, Misbehaviour becomes a celebration of the unruly, the inconvenient, and the politically impolite. It reminds us that history is rarely made by those who wait their turn. Sometimes it’s made by those who stand up in the middle of a live broadcast and decide the script needs rewriting.

10.40pm — BBC1 Brooklyn (2015)


Brooklyn is one of those rare films that understands the emotional architecture of leaving home — the way departure is never a single act but a series of small, accumulating ruptures. Saoirse Ronan’s Eilis moves through the story with a kind of luminous uncertainty, caught between the gravitational pull of Ireland and the intoxicating possibility of America. Crowley directs with a gentleness that never tips into sentimentality; he lets the silences do the heavy lifting, the pauses between words revealing more than any speech could manage.

What gives the film its quiet power is its attention to the textures of ordinary life. The boarding‑house dinners, the shop counter rituals, the tentative courtship with Tony — each scene is rendered with a tenderness that feels almost archival, as though the film is preserving a way of being that modern life has eroded. Yet beneath the softness lies something sharper: the guilt of leaving, the ache of belonging to two places at once, the knowledge that every choice closes a door behind you. Ronan captures this beautifully, her performance a study in the slow, painful process of becoming someone new.

The film’s emotional pivot arrives not with a dramatic revelation but with a return — a homecoming that feels both comforting and suffocating. Ireland welcomes Eilis back with open arms, but the embrace is too tight, too expectant, too eager to fold her into the life she might have lived. The tension becomes almost unbearable: the pull of familiarity versus the pull of self‑invention. Crowley refuses to villainise either side; instead, he shows how both can be true, how love can be both anchor and obstacle.

In the end, Brooklyn is a film about choosing the life you want rather than the life others imagine for you. It understands that identity is not a fixed point but a negotiation — between past and future, between duty and desire, between the person you were and the person you’re trying to become. It’s a film that lingers not because of its drama but because of its honesty. It knows that the hardest journeys are not across oceans but within ourselves.


📅 WEDNESDAY 8 APRIL

9.00pm — BBC2 Michael Jackson: An American Tragedy (1/3)

The first part of Michael Jackson: An American Tragedy approaches its subject with a forensic calm that feels almost clinical at first — but that restraint is precisely what gives the episode its power. Rather than indulging in the familiar spectacle of scandal, the documentary steps back and examines the machinery that built Jackson, shaped him, and ultimately consumed him. It treats his life not as a sequence of headlines but as a case study in what happens when extraordinary talent collides with extraordinary pressure.

What emerges is a portrait of a child who never had the luxury of being one. The film traces the early years with a kind of quiet dread, showing how discipline, ambition, and emotional deprivation fused into something both miraculous and damaging. Jackson’s genius is never in question, but the documentary is more interested in the cost of that genius — the way fame became both armour and prison, a place where he could hide and a place he could never escape. The contradictions pile up: adored yet isolated, powerful yet vulnerable, mythic yet painfully human.

As the episode moves into Jackson’s adulthood, the tone shifts from biography to pathology. The documentary doesn’t sensationalise; instead, it maps the pressures that accumulated around him like geological layers — the expectations of a global audience, the distortions of celebrity, the unresolved wounds of childhood. It becomes clear that Jackson’s life was shaped as much by the people who needed something from him as by his own choices. The tragedy is not a single event but a long, slow erosion.

By the end of the episode, what lingers is not judgement but sorrow. The documentary invites the viewer to consider Jackson not as an icon or a cautionary tale, but as a man caught in a system that rewarded his brilliance while exploiting his fragility. It’s a story of talent weaponised, innocence commodified, and a life lived under a microscope so bright it burned. The tragedy, the film suggests, is not simply what happened to Michael Jackson — it’s that no one ever allowed him to be anything other than Michael Jackson.

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (3/3)


The final episode of China with Ben Fogle takes us into the country’s so‑called “Silicon Valley,” a place where the future doesn’t feel like a distant horizon but something humming directly beneath your feet. Fogle moves through this landscape with a mixture of curiosity and caution, aware that the gleaming surfaces — the labs, the campuses, the frictionless digital systems — are only half the story. The other half is harder to see: the invisible circuitry of data, monitoring, and state‑sanctioned efficiency that underpins the entire ecosystem.

What the episode captures so well is the tension between aspiration and oversight. The young entrepreneurs Fogle meets speak the language of innovation — disruption, scale, global ambition — yet their world is bounded by a political architecture that watches as much as it enables. The documentary doesn’t sensationalise this; instead, it lets the contradictions sit quietly in the frame. A drone demonstration becomes a metaphor for the country itself: elegant, impressive, and always under control.

Fogle’s strength as a presenter is his ability to remain open without being naïve. He asks the right questions, not to provoke but to understand, and the answers he receives often reveal more in what is unsaid. The episode becomes a study in modern power: how it presents itself, how it justifies itself, and how it embeds itself in the everyday. The technology is dazzling, but the implications are unsettling — a reminder that progress and surveillance can grow from the same root system.

By the time the credits roll, the series has shifted from travelogue to something more reflective. Fogle leaves China with admiration for its ingenuity and unease about its methods — a duality the documentary refuses to resolve. The final impression is of a nation racing toward the future at extraordinary speed, but with a watchful eye on everyone running alongside it. It’s a conclusion that lingers, not because it offers answers, but because it understands the complexity of the questions.

9.00pm — BBC4 Building Britain’s Biggest Nuclear Power Station (1/2)

The first episode of Building Britain’s Biggest Nuclear Power Station opens with the kind of calm, methodical confidence that major infrastructure projects like to project — but beneath the polished diagrams and sweeping drone shots, there’s a hum of unease. Hinkley Point C is presented as both marvel and gamble: a cathedral of concrete rising out of the Somerset coast, built on the promise of energy security in a world that feels increasingly unstable. The documentary understands that this is not just engineering; it’s politics, economics, and national identity poured into a single, colossal structure.

What the episode captures so effectively is the sheer scale of the undertaking. Workers move like ants across a landscape reshaped by ambition, each task a tiny part of a machine so vast it’s almost abstract. The film lingers on the details — the rebar forests, the precision pours, the logistical choreography — but it also acknowledges the human cost. Deadlines slip, budgets swell, and the pressure on the workforce becomes its own kind of invisible infrastructure. The project is both triumph and burden, a symbol of what Britain wants to be and a reminder of what it struggles to deliver.

There’s a quiet tension running through the narrative: the sense that the future being built here is both necessary and precarious. Nuclear power is framed as a solution to the climate crisis, yet the documentary never lets the viewer forget the contradictions — the environmental trade‑offs, the geopolitical entanglements, the decades‑long commitments that outlast governments and public sentiment. The camera often pulls back to show the plant against the coastline, a visual reminder that this monument to progress sits on shifting ground.

By the end of the episode, the project feels less like a construction site and more like a national Rorschach test. Supporters see resilience, innovation, and long‑term thinking; critics see risk, overreach, and a future mortgaged to an uncertain technology. The documentary doesn’t take sides — it simply lays out the enormity of what’s being attempted and invites the viewer to sit with the complexity. It’s a portrait of a country trying to build its way out of vulnerability, one concrete pour at a time.


📅 THURSDAY 9 APRIL

10.30pm — BBC4 Helen Mirren Remembers Gosford Park

Mirren revisits Altman’s ensemble masterpiece with warmth and precision, reflecting on the film’s intricate upstairs–downstairs choreography and the quiet emotional intelligence that shaped her performance. Her recollections sharpen the film’s sense of lived‑in detail: the unspoken hierarchies, the subtle glances that carry whole histories, the way Altman’s roaming camera trusted actors to build worlds in the margins. It’s a gentle, generous remembrance that reaffirms Gosford Park as a rare feat of collective storytelling.

10.50pm — BBC4 Gosford Park (2001)


See Monday above for reviews.


📅 FRIDAY 10 APRIL

8.00pm — Sky Documentaries Kurt Cobain: Montage of Heck


Montage of Heck is less a documentary than a psychological excavation — a collage of home videos, journals, drawings, and audio fragments that mirrors the chaos and tenderness of Cobain’s inner world. Brett Morgen avoids the tidy arc of the traditional biopic, opting instead for emotional truth. The result is a film that feels intimate, unsettling, and deeply humane.

What stands out is the vulnerability. We see Cobain not as the reluctant spokesman of a generation but as a child trying to navigate a fractured family, a teenager searching for belonging, and an adult overwhelmed by the weight of expectation. The animation sequences, drawn from Cobain’s own artwork, feel like windows into a mind that never stopped buzzing — a place where beauty and pain coexisted uneasily.

The film doesn’t sensationalise Cobain’s struggles, nor does it romanticise them. Instead, it contextualises them — showing the pressures, internal and external, that shaped his life. Morgen allows the contradictions to stand: the humour alongside the despair, the creativity alongside the self‑destruction. It’s a portrait of a man who was both extraordinarily gifted and profoundly vulnerable.

9.00pm — Sky Arts Band of Gypsys


Band of Gypsys captures Hendrix at a moment of profound artistic transition — shedding the psychedelic iconography that made him famous and stepping into a rawer, more politically charged sound. There’s a sense of risk in every note, as though he’s testing the tensile strength of his own creativity. The film doesn’t try to mythologise him; instead, it shows the work, the sweat, the searching.

The interplay between Hendrix, Buddy Miles, and Billy Cox is electric. Miles’ drumming has a muscular, almost militant quality, grounding Hendrix’s improvisations in something earthy and insistent. Cox provides the stabilising centre, the gravitational pull that keeps the music from flying apart. Together, they create a sound that feels like a bridge between eras — the blues reimagined through the lens of civil rights, funk, and the gathering storm of the 1970s.

What’s striking is how loose the performances are, yet how intentional they feel. Hendrix bends the guitar to his will, coaxing out sounds that seem to come from some future he alone could hear. There’s a sense of possibility in the air, as though he’s on the cusp of reinventing himself yet again. The tragedy, of course, is that this reinvention was cut short. But the film stands as a document of what might have been — a glimpse into a new Hendrix, one we only met briefly

10.15pm — Sky Arts Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock


A performance that still feels like a cultural rupture: Hendrix bending the national anthem into a howl of protest, possibility, and psychic overload. The set remains astonishing not just for its virtuosity but for the way it captures a country tearing itself open—feedback as prophecy, improvisation as dissent. More than a historical artefact, it still vibrates with the shock of a new world being forced into existence.

11.30pm — Sky Arts Phil Lynott: Songs for While I’m Away


Emer Reynolds’ documentary approaches Phil Lynott with a tenderness that feels almost like a corrective. Too often, Lynott is remembered as a rock‑and‑roll archetype — the swaggering frontman, the leather‑clad poet. But Reynolds digs deeper, revealing a man shaped by contradictions: Irish and Black in a country that struggled to understand either identity; working‑class yet steeped in literature; charismatic yet profoundly private.

Through interviews, archival footage, and Lynott’s own words, the documentary paints a portrait of an artist who understood the power of myth but never fully believed in his own. His songwriting emerges as a form of self‑invention — a way of carving out space in a world that didn’t quite know what to make of him. The music becomes both shield and confession, a place where he could be larger than life and painfully human at the same time.

Reynolds avoids the easy tragedy narrative. Instead, she shows a man who lived intensely, loved fiercely, and left behind songs that still feel like letters addressed to the listener. The film acknowledges the darkness — the addiction, the pressures, the loneliness — but it never lets those elements define him. It treats Lynott not as a cautionary tale but as a complex, creative force.


STREAMING CHOICES

Netflix — Trust Me: The False Prophet (All four episodes, available Wed 8 April)

A chilling documentary series about a charismatic manipulator who builds a following through charm, coercion, and carefully crafted lies. Each episode peels back another layer of the persona he constructs to keep people close and compliant. A study in power, persuasion, and the human hunger for certainty.

Walter Presents — French Roulette (All four episodes, available Fri 10 April)

A sleek French thriller where chance, crime, and desire collide in unexpected ways. The series moves with the precision of a well‑loaded revolver — every click matters. Stylish, tense, and quietly seductive.

Disney+ — The Testaments (First three episodes, available Wed 8 April)

A return to Gilead that expands the world of The Handmaid’s Tale with new perspectives and deeper political intrigue. The series explores resistance, complicity, and the cost of survival under authoritarian rule. Visually stark, emotionally charged, and morally unflinching.

Marquee TV — Caravaggio: Exhibition on Screen (Available Mon 6 April)

A richly filmed exploration of Caravaggio’s turbulent life and revolutionary art. The documentary blends expert commentary with close‑up examinations of his canvases, revealing the violence and vulnerability beneath the chiaroscuro. A feast for anyone who loves art that stares back.

Disney+ — Star Wars: Maul — Shadow Lord (First two episodes, available Mon 6 April)

A dark, kinetic expansion of the Star Wars universe centred on one of its most enigmatic figures. The series traces Maul’s rise through betrayal, rage, and the seductive pull of power. Atmospheric, operatic, and steeped in the mythology of the Sith.


Leave a Comment

One Piece Season 2: Themes of Dreams and Loyalty

Logo of the anime One Piece featuring a skull with a straw hat and crossed bones, accompanied by stylized lettering.


Season 2 of One Piece arrives as a production that has grown into its own skin—bigger in scope, steadier in tone, and more emotionally articulate. As the Straw Hats enter the Grand Line, the series leans into sincerity, spectacle, and the unruly joy of a world that keeps widening.

The Season’s Arc

The new run adapts several major manga arcs—Loguetown, Reverse Mountain, Whisky Peak, Little Garden, and Drum Island—bringing giants, dinosaurs, bounty hunters, and the long‑awaited arrival of Tony Tony Chopper into the live‑action fold. The narrative follows the crew’s first steps into the Grand Line, where the seas are stranger, the politics sharper, and the enemies more organised. Baroque Works emerges as a shadowy antagonist, while Marine Captain Smoker becomes a persistent force on the crew’s heels.

Emotional and Thematic Texture

The season’s emotional register is widely described as more confident and more willing to trust its characters. That confidence shows in three interlocking themes:

  • The weight of dreams: Each Straw Hat confronts the tension between ambition and vulnerability, giving the season a grounded emotional spine.
  • Chosen family: The bonds between the crew feel lived‑in now, shaped by shared danger and mutual belief rather than simple camaraderie.
  • Loyalty under pressure: With Baroque Works manipulating events from the shadows, the crew’s trust in one another becomes a narrative engine rather than a decorative sentiment.

Luffy’s optimism remains the gravitational centre, but the show allows the quieter, more wounded parts of the ensemble to breathe.

Craft, World‑Building, and Visual Scale

Season 2 expands the world with a richer, more tactile aesthetic. Critics note the introduction of new islands, elaborate creature design, and a broader palette of environments—from the icy isolation of Drum Island to the prehistoric chaos of Little Garden. The action choreography is sharper, the humour more natural, and the pacing more assured. The show continues to blend cartoonish energy with grounded physicality, a balance that has become its signature.

Why the Season Lands

The adaptation succeeds because it respects Eiichiro Oda’s universe without being beholden to mimicry. It remixes certain beats to heighten emotional impact, foregrounds sincerity over cynicism, and trusts that the heart of One Piece lies not in spectacle alone but in the fragile courage of people who choose to believe in one another.

Available on Netflix.

By Chris Storton

Picture credit: By Netflix, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=82474258

Leave a Comment

The Man in the High Castle: A Deeper Look at Season One

A world split by conquest, a story split by dimensions, and characters split by conscience.

A simple black silhouette of a tree with branches and leaves.

Season one blends the oppressive plausibility of Philip K. Dick’s 1962 novel with a broader emotional and political canvas. It keeps the book’s philosophical unease while expanding its characters, deepening its romantic tensions, and giving even its villains a voice that feels disturbingly rational.

Plot and Premise

America in 1962 is divided between Nazi Germany in the east and Imperial Japan in the west. Daily life unfolds under occupation, surveillance, and quiet fear. Into this world appear a series of mysterious films that seem to show an alternate reality—one in which the Allies won the war. These films become the centre of a struggle involving resistance cells, Nazi officials, Japanese intelligence, and ordinary people trying to survive.

Juliana Crain is drawn into the resistance after her sister’s death, Frank Frink is pulled between love and fear, and Joe Blake’s loyalties remain ambiguous. Their paths converge around the films, which hint at something far stranger than propaganda: the possibility of intersecting dimensions.

The Novel’s Background and How the Series Builds on It

Philip K. Dick’s original novel was published in 1962 and won the Hugo Award the following year. Critics praised its unsettling realism, its refusal to offer moral clarity, and its philosophical depth. Dick’s interest in authenticity, identity, and the instability of reality shaped the book’s tone, and those themes remain the backbone of the series.

The show keeps the divided world, the oppressive atmosphere, and the idea of a forbidden artefact that destabilises the occupiers’ worldview. But it expands the narrative in several key ways:

• The novel’s banned book becomes the show’s mysterious films, allowing the story to explore the multiverse more explicitly.

• Characters who were sketched briefly in the novel become central emotional anchors.

• The Reich’s internal politics and succession crises are explored in far greater detail.

Character Depth and the Power of a Villain’s Voice

One of the series’ most striking achievements is its creation of Obergruppenführer John Smith, a character who does not appear in the novel. He embodies the show’s Shakespearean instinct to give villains the best lines. Smith is not a caricature; he is articulate, persuasive, and chilling precisely because he believes in the moral coherence of his ideology. His scenes reveal how authoritarianism seduces through order, community, and the promise of safety.

This complexity mirrors Dick’s original approach: evil is most dangerous when it is ordinary, rationalised, and woven into daily life.

Romance as Resistance and Compromise

The series pushes its romantic threads far beyond the novel, not to soften the world but to expose its fault lines. Every relationship becomes a site where fear, loyalty, and survival collide. In an occupied America, intimacy is never private; it is shaped — and sometimes warped — by the machinery of oppression.

  • Juliana and Frank’s relationship carries the weight of fear and obligation. Their love is threaded with the knowledge that one wrong move can destroy them both. Frank’s vulnerability as a Jewish man under Nazi rule turns even the smallest gesture of affection into an act of courage. Their bond becomes a negotiation between hope and the brutal arithmetic of staying alive.
  • Juliana and Joe’s connection is built on ambiguity and betrayal. Joe represents possibility and danger in equal measure. Their attraction is shadowed by secrets, shifting allegiances, and the knowledge that trust is a luxury neither can afford. The tension between them mirrors the instability of the world they inhabit — a world where motives are never clean and loyalties can be fatal.

In a landscape where surveillance is constant and betrayal is routine, choosing to care for someone becomes a political act. Love is not a retreat from the world but a refusal to let the regime dictate the limits of human connection. Intimacy becomes a quiet form of rebellion: a way of insisting on tenderness in a system designed to erase it. At the same time, every romantic choice carries compromise — the risk of endangering others, the temptation to protect oneself, the moral cost of survival.

The show understands that under totalitarianism, romance is never just romance. It is a test of character, a measure of what people are willing to risk, and a reminder of what oppression tries hardest to extinguish.

The Mystery of the Films and the Multiverse

The films are the show’s most distinctive invention. They introduce a metaphysical dimension that lifts the narrative beyond alternate history. Season one plants the idea that these films may come from another reality entirely. This sense of dimensional bleed-through gives the story a haunting quality, echoing Dick’s lifelong fascination with parallel worlds and unstable realities

Atmosphere and World-Building

The series excels at creating a world that feels both familiar and deeply wrong. The Pacific States’ tense multiculturalism, the Reich’s sterile order, and the everyday rituals of occupation create a setting that feels lived-in and frighteningly plausible. Propaganda, architecture, and small social cues reinforce the sense of a society reshaped by totalitarian power.

How the Adaptation Strengthens the Story

• A broader emotional canvas: The series expands the novel’s intimate psychological focus into a sweeping political and romantic drama.

• A more complex villainy: John Smith’s presence gives the show a philosophical antagonist worthy of the story’s scale.

• A stronger sense of mystery: The films allow the narrative to explore metaphysics in a way that is both faithful to Dick and dramatically compelling.

• A richer exploration of resistance: The show examines not just rebellion but the compromises, betrayals, and moral erosion that accompany it.

Verdict

Season one of The Man in the High Castle succeeds as both an adaptation and an expansion. It honours Philip K. Dick’s philosophical unease while building a world of emotional depth, political tension, and metaphysical intrigue. The romantic threads give the story its heart, the villain gives it its spine, and the films give it its haunting sense of possibility. It’s a rare blend of intellectual ambition and human storytelling, and it remains one of the most intriguing alternate-history dramas of the last decade.

By Pat Harrington

Read Pat Harrington’s review of Season Two (warning contains spoilers)

The Man In The High Castle is available on Netflix (all four seasons)

Picture credit: By Amazon Video – Facebook, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=65111009

Book cover of 'The Angela Suite' by Anthony C. Green featuring a pair of feet and a background of an urban skyline. Includes text 'BUY NOW'.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »