Archive for Edinburgh Fringe Festival

Airlie Scott Leads a Mischievous, Music‑Rich Mystery on the Jazz Express

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★ This show sweeps you up before you’ve even found your seat. All Aboard the Jazz Express is a high‑spirited, mischievous cabaret that transforms Theatre 1, fheSpace @ Surgeons’ Hall, into the dining car of Europe’s most glamorous train, rattling from Paris to Istanbul with a suitcase full of swing, secrets and delightful nonsense.

The Hot Jazz Vagabonds are the engine of the piece, and what an engine they are. Pete Watson’s accordion curls around the room like cigarette smoke; Alan Gibson’s double bass keeps everything steady with unflappable charm; David Ahmed and Andy Ruiz Palma trade guitar lines with the shimmering ease of musicians who know exactly how to make a room feel alive. Their sound — a blend of hot 1930s swing, smoky chanson and gypsy jazz — is rich, warm and utterly irresistible. It’s no surprise they’ve graced stages from Glastonbury to Ronnie Scott’s; they play with the confidence of a band that has seen every kind of audience and knows how to win them all.

Into this musical whirlwind steps Airlie Scott, elegant, playful and gloriously unpredictable. As Vivienne Valise, she welcomes us aboard with a conspiratorial smile and the revelation that she is, in fact, a spy en route to Istanbul. She suspects one of the musicians is a spy too — and from that moment on, the show becomes a deliciously tongue‑in‑cheek mystery, full of coded glances, sudden revelations and the kind of theatrical chaos that makes audiences beam.

At each stop along the legendary route, the tone shifts just enough to keep things lively. In Belgrade, she slips a message to a spy hidden in the audience. In Vienna, documents are exchanged with suspicious flourish. In Sofia, she bursts into “Joseph Joseph” with infectious energy. And in Milan, her rendition of Tu Vuo’ Fa’ l’Americano is a cheeky delight, capturing the post‑war swagger of Italians playing at being American. She moves with ease from English to French to Italian, each song delivered with a storyteller’s instinct and a cabaret singer’s flair.

One of the loveliest moments sees her seated at a small table, singing in French with a softness that hushes the room. Another has her clicking her fingers to the gypsy jazz beat, weaving through the space with a dancer’s lightness. She is a performer who understands atmosphere — how to build it, how to break it, and how to let the band breathe inside it.

The murder mystery element is handled with a wink rather than a weight. A sudden “shot” rings out; Airlie ducks; the audience follows suit, half‑laughing, half‑startled. Two agents appear on the platform. Papers are shuffled. Suspicions rise. And by the time the train reaches Istanbul, the final twist — involving Alan’s double‑bass‑playing fugitive — lands with just the right mix of absurdity and theatrical satisfaction.

Musically, the show is a joy. The Vagabonds play with precision and personality, never missing a beat, never losing the thread of the story woven around them. The journey from Paris to Istanbul becomes not just a route but a rhythm — each city a new flavour, each song a new clue, each moment another reason to smile.

Theatre‑wise, it’s brisk, charming and beautifully pitched. The audience is drawn in without ever being pushed; the humour is light but clever; the atmosphere is rich without being heavy. It’s the kind of Fringe show that leaves you feeling brighter than when you walked in — a little dazzled, a little amused, and very much entertained.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp

Click here to buy tickets

Leave a Comment

Inside Mandelson’s Mind: ‘Mandy: Prince of Darkness’ Delivers Precision and Irony

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★ A sharply observed, meticulously researched and often darkly funny portrait of Peter Mandelson, delivered through a performance of such precision that it becomes less an impersonation and more an act of political possession. Richard Stirling doesn’t just play Mandelson — he inhabits him.

Mandy: Prince of Darkness is a one‑man political biography told from inside the mind of one of the most enigmatic figures in modern British politics. Stirling structures the piece around Mandelson’s own recollections, justifications and rhetorical flourishes, anchoring each chapter of his career with projected headlines and dates behind him. It’s a simple device, but an extremely effective one: the audience is never left drifting. Every scandal, every comeback, every resignation is pinned to a moment in time.
The effect is cumulative. You begin to realise just how many times Mandelson fell, rose, fell again, and rose again — until finally, as the show concludes, he meets the one scandal he cannot return from.
Performance: A Masterclass in Political Mannerism
Richard Stirling’s performance is the engine of the show, and it is extraordinary. He captures Mandelson’s mannerisms with forensic accuracy: the sly, fox‑like half‑smile; the careful modulation of tone; the way he leans into a phrase as if it were a tool he’s about to use.
But the real brilliance lies in the switches. When Mandelson quotes Tony Blair, Stirling shifts instantly — a recognisable Blair arm‑and‑hand gesture, the slight lift in vocal timbre, the earnestness that borders on sermonising. It’s subtle, funny, and deeply effective. He doesn’t break character; he folds Blair into Mandelson, showing how the two men lived inside each other’s political space.
This is mimicry at its highest level: not caricature, but observation.
Language, Manipulation & the Limits of Persuasion
One of the show’s most interesting threads — and one that came through strongly in your reflections — is the tension between Mandelson’s linguistic brilliance and the public’s instinctive scepticism.
Stirling presents Mandelson as a master manipulator of language: elegant phrasing, polished argument, the kind of rhetorical charm that can make nonsense sound like strategy. But even at his most persuasive, there’s a sense that ordinary people can smell when something isn’t quite right. The show captures that beautifully. You hear the justification, you admire the craft, but you don’t buy the conclusion.
It’s a portrait of a man whose intelligence was both his greatest asset and his greatest blind spot.
The Epstein Irony
The final act of the show deals with the Epstein scandal — the moment that ends Mandelson’s long cycle of comebacks. Stirling plays it with a deliberate irony: the arch‑strategist suddenly presenting himself as naïve, manipulated, unaware.
The email exchanges shown on screen undermine that claim. They hint at a man who knew exactly what he was doing, or at least knew enough not to pretend innocence convincingly. It’s a quietly devastating moment, and Stirling lets the audience draw its own conclusions.
Private Life, Public Persona
Stirling also touches on Mandelson’s approach to his private life. He didn’t hide being gay, but he didn’t foreground it either. It was simply part of who he was, not a political tool nor a public performance. The show treats this with sensitivity, acknowledging the complexity without sensationalising it.
Verdict
Mandy: Prince of Darkness is a superb piece of political theatre: sharp, intelligent, and anchored by a performance of remarkable skill. Richard Stirling gives us a Mandelson who is manipulative, charming, brilliant, flawed, hardworking, private, and ultimately undone by the one scandal he could not outmanoeuvre.
It’s a portrait of a complicated man, delivered by an actor who understands that complexity down to the smallest gesture.
A compelling, thoughtful and thoroughly engaging show.
Reviewed by Pat Harrington
Click here to buy tickets

Leave a Comment

Night Owl’s Kate Bush Celebration Captures the Spirit of a Creative Icon

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★ Some artists resist simplification, and Kate Bush is one of them. Any production attempting to chart her life and work has to grapple with that complexity — the imagination, the eccentricity, the discipline, the sheer strangeness of her creative world. Night Owl Shows’ The Kate Bush Story does exactly that. It doesn’t flatten her. It doesn’t imitate her. It illuminates her.

Led by Hannah Richards, whose expressive presence and vocal intelligence anchor the evening, the production moves confidently through Kate Bush’s catalogue and biography. Richards never slips into impersonation; instead, she channels the emotional and theatrical charge that defines Kate’s work. It’s a performance built on clarity, commitment, and a deep respect for the material.

The band — Edwin Sealey, Ross Taylor, Noah Nelson, and Max Timlin — are superb throughout. Their musicianship is tight, textured, and responsive, giving the show the sonic richness it needs. Kate Bush’s music is famously intricate, and this ensemble handles that intricacy with assurance. Running Up That Hill becomes a rhythmic surge; Cloudbusting lands with warmth and uplift; Wuthering Heights retains its wild, uncanny edge.

Hannah Richards interprets Kate’s music with style

What distinguishes this production is its narrative intelligence. The storytelling sections are crafted with care, offering insights into Kate’s early development, her family’s influence, and her lifelong fascination with technology and experimentation. The show makes clear that Kate Bush wasn’t simply a gifted songwriter — she was a creative architect, shaping sound, image, and atmosphere with equal precision.

Her determination also comes through strongly. The production highlights her ability to say no, to protect her artistic integrity, and to build a career on her own terms. It’s a portrait of an artist who was imaginative, yes, but also quietly formidable.

The audience responds instinctively to this approach. There’s delight, recognition, and a palpable sense of affection in the room. Night Owl Shows have built a reputation for performance‑led productions that combine musicianship with storytelling, and this show fits squarely within that tradition. It’s polished, confident, and clearly made by people who understand why Kate Bush matters.

Two songs stand out as emotional touchstones. Army Dreamers — simple, direct, devastating — reminds us of Kate’s political claritt y and her ability to write anti‑war material with disarming softness. The Man with the Child in His Eyes remains one of the most astonishingly mature (for someone writing at just 13 years old) love songs ever written, and the performance here brings out its tenderness and wisdom.

By the end, the atmosphere is unmistakably feel‑good — warm, engaged, and full of admiration. The Kate Bush Story succeeds not by recreating Kate Bush, but by celebrating her imagination, her courage, and her unmistakable artistic fingerprint.

A vibrant, thoughtful, musically rich tribute to one of Britain’s most distinctive artists.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Click here to buy tickets

Leave a Comment

Fringe Audiences Unite in a Joyful Farewell to Dolly Parton

Click on image to buy ticket

★★★★★ In the days following Dolly Parton’s death, Night Owl Shows made a clear and strong choice: this would be a celebration, not a vigil. Led by Hannah Richards, the company and audience leaned into joy rather than grief, honouring Dolly’s life and music with determination, warmth, and a shared sense of gratitude. Just as she would have wanted.

Some productions arrive at the Fringe with a clear sense of purpose. Night Owl Shows’ The Dolly Parton Story is one of them. Returning to Edinburgh with a fully renewed 2026 staging and a live band, the company leans into what they do best: narrative‑driven musicianship, emotional intelligence, and an instinct for how to honour an artist without embalming them. The result is a show that understands Dolly Parton not as a pop‑culture mascot, but as a woman whose life, work, and impact deserve to be taken seriously.

The production traces Dolly’s rise from her early country roots to becoming one of the most recognisable and decorated figures in modern music. Hannah Richards, backed by the Night Owl Band, anchors the evening with vocal clarity and interpretive restraint. She doesn’t impersonate Dolly; she interprets her. That distinction matters, because this show isn’t chasing kitsch or rhinestone nostalgia. It’s telling a story.

The early biographical section is handled with the respect it deserves. Dolly’s childhood poverty in East Tennessee wasn’t a folksy anecdote — it was a crucible. The show makes that clear, reminding the audience that her songwriting wasn’t accidental brilliance but hard‑won craft shaped by circumstance. Songs like Joshua and Coat of Many Colours aren’t just hits; they’re autobiographical artefacts. When Richards reaches Coat of Many Colours, the staging is deliberately simple, allowing the emotional weight of the song to land without theatrical clutter. It’s the moment where the room collectively leans forward.

Night Owl’s signature format — live performance interwoven with narrative — works particularly well here. The production highlights aspects of Dolly’s life that casual fans often miss. Her philanthropic work, especially the Imagination Library, is given proper space. The revelation that her father never learned to read, and that this shaped her charitable literacy mission, adds a layer of poignancy that deepens rather than sentimentalises her legacy. Likewise, the segment on Dollywood avoids trivia and instead emphasises its cultural and economic impact on Tennessee.

Musically, the show delivers exactly what audiences want: Jolene, 9 to 5, Islands in the Stream, Here You Come Again, Coat of Many Colours, Joshua — performed with enough freshness to avoid the jukebox trap. Richards’ vocals are strong throughout, and the band (Ross Taylor, Sam McDonald, Harry Whitty, Max Timlin) provide the kind of tight, unfussy musicianship that keeps the focus where it belongs: on the songs.

Audience response is warm, vocal, and deeply engaged. Night Owl Shows have built a reputation for sell‑out runs and award‑winning productions across Edinburgh, Brighton, Adelaide, and beyond, and this show fits neatly into that lineage. It’s polished, confident, and built with care.

What elevates The Dolly Parton Story is its balance. It honours Dolly’s catalogue without becoming a greatest‑hits conveyor belt. It celebrates her life without slipping into hagiography. It acknowledges the emotional weight of her story without drowning in sentiment. It’s a production that understands Dolly Parton as a cultural force — musical, philanthropic, economic — whose influence ripples far beyond the stage.

A thoughtful tribute. A strong piece of musical storytelling. And, for many in the room, a necessary celebration.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Click here to buy ticket

 

Leave a Comment

Structure vs. Chaos: Momme Domme’s Ambitious but Unruly Fringe Performance

★★★★ Momme Domme is one of those Fringe experiences that doesn’t politely knock — it kicks the door in, drags you inside, and dares you to keep up. It’s chaotic, surreal, occasionally baffling, and absolutely determined to make you part of the spectacle whether you’re ready or not.

The show’s creator, Peggy Mitchell (Blemme Fatale), stalks the space in a white‑blonde wig, setting the tone as the unhinged architect of this strange universe . Around her, a rotating cast of characters orbit like planets in a system held together by sheer audacity. There’s SUB (Sam Hackney‑Ring), the man in the dog mask gleefully distributing tasks to unsuspecting audience members . CURATOR (Abby Witchalls) oversees the voting rituals with the calm menace of someone who knows exactly how much power she has in the room .

The ensemble is a Fringe microcosm of oddballs and archetypes:

  • NELLY (Rachel Jackson), the football‑mad romantic who seems one bad decision away from disaster .
  • EVE (Fern Russell), the posh blonde with lip‑sync skills sharp enough to cut glass .
  • YARA (Natalie Punter), who snatches a wig, storms out, and returns like she’s in her own personal soap‑opera arc .
  • XENA (Revathi Eswaran), the masked entrepreneur plotting her own party empire from behind a sparkly disguise .

Left: Revathi Eswaran. Right: Fern Russell

It’s a lot — intentionally. The show thrives on overstimulation, on the feeling that you’re watching a Fringe fever dream unfold in real time. But that ambition comes with rough edges. The script is dense, sometimes too clever for its own good, and could use tightening to help the audience follow the emotional through‑line. The sound system struggles under the weight of the chaos, and clarity occasionally gets sacrificed in favour of volume.

I also think the performance would have benefited from a clearer overall structure. With so many characters, tasks, and shifting dynamics happening at once, the show often felt like it was relying on chaos rather than guiding the audience through a deliberate arc. Even a loose framework built around recognisable categories — for example power‑exchange moments, sensation‑based segments, psychological or emotional beats, or audience‑driven decision phases — would have helped anchor the experience. These aren’t about making the show safer or tamer; they’re simply organisational tools that would let the audience understand what mode the performance is in at any given moment. A few defined transitions or thematic “chapters” would give the more experimental elements room to land with greater impact.

One thing that does shine is the backstage graft. Annabel Pearson, the sole stagehand, stage manager, and tech operator, is effectively holding the entire production together with grit and tape . You can feel the live‑wire energy of a show that’s still evolving — and that’s part of the Fringe charm. They’re clearly listening, adjusting, and shaping the piece night by night.

Momme Domme isn’t polished. It isn’t tidy. It isn’t trying to be. It’s a messy, loud, participatory experiment that will either delight you or leave you blinking in confusion — but you won’t forget it. If you’re up for something bold, bizarre, and proudly unrefined, step inside and let the madness wash over you.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Click here to buy tickets

Leave a Comment

A Forgotten Woman: Mrs Oscar Wilde – A Powerful, Humane Solo Show at Edinburgh Fringe

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★ History has never been kind to Constance Lloyd. She appears in the margins of Oscar Wilde’s story — a footnote, a casualty, a name occasionally invoked but rarely explored. A Forgotten Woman: Mrs Oscar Wilde sets out to correct that imbalance, and in Lexi Wolfe’s hands, Constance finally steps out of the shadows with a voice that feels fully, fiercely her own. As the press release puts it, Wolfe “brings Constance Lloyd vividly to life in a powerful solo performance told through her letters” .

This is a one‑woman show, but it never feels small. Through Constance’s letters — intimate, witty, and edged with quiet defiance — Wolfe constructs a portrait of a woman navigating love, intellect, motherhood, and public scandal. The production’s description notes that her voice “emerges from the margins of history to reclaim her place in a story that has long overlooked her” , and that is precisely what the performance achieves. It is not an act of historical correction; it is an act of reclamation.

Wolfe’s performance is the anchor. She plays Constance not as a tragic adjunct to Wilde but as a woman of her own convictions — politically engaged, artistically curious, and emotionally complex. The show traces her life with clarity: the early promise, the marriage, the children, the intellectual pursuits, and the devastating public fallout of Wilde’s trial. What could have been a familiar narrative of suffering becomes instead a study in resilience. Constance’s wit is sharp, her warmth genuine, and her refusal to disappear quietly is rendered with understated power.

The production’s history adds weight. First developed at the Buxton Fringe, Wolfe earned Best Actor nominations in 2016 and 2017, and the show now arrives in Edinburgh “in a newly reimagined form” . Her track record — including Best Actress wins for After Shakespeare (2021) and Baker Street Ladies (2025) — shows an artist who thrives in character‑driven work. This piece feels like the conrinuation of that trajectory.

The staging is simple but effective. A solo show about letters demands intimacy, and theSpace @ Symposium Hall provides it. The 17:05 slot suits the tone: a reflective hour at the end of the afternoon, where audiences can sink into the quiet emotional resonance of the piece.  The show is bold not in spectacle but in its insistence on centring a woman history tried to erase.

Even more affecting is the quiet sadness that runs through Constance’s recollections. When she speaks of her love for Oscar, there’s a sincerity and gentleness that makes the tragedy sharper; she talks about him with hope, with loyalty, with the assumption that their shared life will endure. We, of course, know it won’t. That inevitability hangs over the hour, turning even her happiest memories into something fragile. And in the final moments, when she wonders how she will be remembered — or whether she will be remembered at all — the piece lands with unexpected force. It becomes not just a story of a woman overshadowed by scandal, but a meditation on legacy itself: what survives, what is lost, and who history chooses to forget.

Wolfe never overplays the tragedy; she lets the audience feel its weight through the words themselves. The result is quietly devastating. 

A Forgotten Woman is not just a biographical monologue. It is a reclamation. It reminds us that history is often written by those who survive scandal, not those who endure it. Constance Lloyd deserves better than the footnote she was given. Wolfe gives her the dignity of a full story.

A moving, intelligent, and quietly powerful hour — one of the most humane solo performances at this year’s Fringe.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Buy tickets here

 

Leave a Comment

Edinburgh Fringe Review: The Pitch Finds Humanity and Humour in Belfast’s Divides

Click on image to buy ticket

★★★★★ Set in East Belfast, The Pitch centres on three teenagers whose lives intersect on a contested local football field. Robbie, a soccer‑mad loyalist kid, has spent his whole life practising on the same patch of grass. His sister Melissa is curious, open‑minded, and still figuring out where she fits. Deren, a GAA player raised in the same streets, has never had a home pitch of his own. When plans emerge to convert Robbie’s football field into a Gaelic pitch, the trio collide over sport, culture, identity, and the shifting political landscape around them — all against the backdrop of a looming United Ireland referendum.

Northern Irish theatre has always excelled at interrogating identity through the everyday, but The Pitch arrives at the Edinburgh Fringe with a particular urgency. As one of only five productions selected nationwide for the Pleasance Edinburgh National Partnerships programme, it stands as a flagship example of regional work that speaks directly to the realities of young people in a changing Belfast. This is not a play about “the past”; it is about the present — and the future that is rapidly approaching.

Philip Catherwood’s writing is sharp, funny, and politically literate without ever becoming didactic. The central dispute — whether the pitch should remain a soccer field or become a GAA ground — is not a contrivance. It is a precise metaphor for the cultural shifts happening in East Belfast today. The expansion of Gaelic games into traditionally Protestant areas has become a genuine flashpoint, and the play captures that tension with clarity and nuance.

Robbie’s fear of cultural displacement is rooted in lived experience. He is not a caricature of unionist defensiveness; he is a teenager terrified of losing the one place that feels like his. Deren’s frustration at being treated as an outsider in the community he grew up in is equally grounded. Melissa, caught between the two, embodies the emerging generation — less doctrinaire, more fluid, but still shaped by the legacies around her. The play avoids the tired “two tribes” framing and instead shows how identity is negotiated in mixed communities where lines blur and loyalties shift.

The humour is quintessentially Northern Irish: dry, sharp, and often deployed at moments of tension. Jokes about Tayto crisp packets, Irish street signs, and the semantics of “soccer” are not throwaway gags; they are cultural markers, reminders of how the smallest details become battlegrounds in contested spaces. The comedy never undermines the seriousness of the themes — it humanises them.

The emotional arc is clean and convincing. The characters begin in conflict, move through misunderstanding, and arrive at a fragile but genuine recognition of each other’s fears. The subplot involving Deren’s feelings for Robbie could easily have felt tacked on, but instead it deepens the stakes. It shows how personal vulnerability sits alongside political anxiety, and how the two often inform each other.

The production craft is strong across the board. Director Thea Mayeux keeps the 70‑minute running time tight, with pacing that mirrors the shifting emotional terrain. The staging makes clever use of the pitch as both literal and symbolic space — a place where lines are drawn, erased, and redrawn. Danae Crawford’s technical design supports the transitions without overwhelming them, and Rebekah Fitch’s sound work adds texture, particularly in moments where humour gives way to tension. The ensemble chemistry is exceptional; the three actors feel like real teenagers negotiating real stakes.

James Grimm’s Robbie is all brittle loyalty and jittery defensiveness. Jake Douglas brings warmth and quiet resilience to Deren, grounding the character’s frustrations in something deeply human. Dión Di Maio’s Melissa is a standout — perceptive, funny, and entirely believable as someone navigating mixed loyalties with more maturity than the boys around her. Their dynamic is lived‑in, messy, and convincing.

What ultimately makes The Pitch so effective is its understanding that constitutional debates are not abstract. They filter down into friendships, families, and the small patches of grass where young people define themselves. The play recognises that fear is not irrational when it has precedent, and that hope is not naïve when it is grounded in shared humanity. It offers a vision of common ground that feels earned rather than sentimental.

A witty, moving, and politically intelligent piece of theatre — one of the most thoughtful Northern Irish productions at this year’s Fringe, and a deserved flagship for the Pleasance National Partnerships.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Click here to buy tickets

Leave a Comment

Dusty Limits Leads a Wild, Joyous Burlesque Night at the Liquid Rooms

Click on image to buytickets

★★★★★ Burlesque nights at the Fringe can be hit‑and‑miss, but the Liquid Rooms delivered one of those gloriously chaotic evenings that reminds you why cabaret survives every cultural cycle. Hosted by Fringe stalwart Dusty Limits, whose sly crowd work and razor‑edged asides are well‑documented in his cabaret appearances at The Voodoo Rooms , the night had that unmistakable mix of glamour, grit and mischief that marks out proper burlesque from the pretenders.

Limits is a natural ringmaster — sardonic, warm, and just dangerous enough to keep the room alert. His genuine love of performance, noted in reviews of his Bowie‑themed cabaret work , carries over effortlessly here. He knows how to hold a crowd, tease it, and then hand it over to the performers at exactly the right moment.

The acts themselves were a lively blend of classic strip‑tease, comic burlesque, and magic. The Liquid Rooms — usually a nightclub and live‑music venue  — proved surprisingly intimate for burlesque, helped by tight lighting and a crowd that arrived ready to play along.

What made the night work wasn’t polish but personality. The performers were bold, funny, and gloriously unafraid of leaning into the absurd. One moment you’re watching a sultry slow‑burn strip, the next you’re hit with a comic number that breaks the room open. It’s the kind of cabaret chaos that feels alive — messy in the right ways, sharp in the right moments, and carried by performers who know exactly what they’re doing.

If you wandered in expecting a tidy, packaged Fringe show, you’d be in the wrong place. But if you wanted a late‑night hit of queer joy, camp theatricality, great dance performances and a host who knows how to work a room, this burlesque night more than earned its applause.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Burlesque! Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

Monster Made — A Brutal, Intelligent, Unforgettable Fringe Standout

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★  Some Fringe shows come armed with spectacle; Monster Made arrives with something far more dangerous — an actor who has spent more than a decade sharpening his craft under some of the most demanding teachers in modern performance training. Alex van Ric’s debut is not simply a play. It’s a confrontation. A study. A descent. And, at times, a reckoning.

Van Ric writes, directs and performs the piece, stepping into the skin of Thomas Duncan — a mass murderer whose crimes echo the worst realities of contemporary violence. Opposite him is Astrid Gutscher pres as Amanda Crowley, a lawyer determined to understand the “why” behind the horror. The production is stripped back to its bones: a table, two chairs, two cameras, and the relentless clank of cell doors. It’s all deliberate. Nothing distracts from the acting — because the acting is the point.

A lineage of training that shows in every moment

Van Ric’s performance is steeped in the traditions he’s trained in. You can see the Drama Centre London lineage — the psychological rigour of Christopher Fettes, the movement‑rooted character analysis of Yat Malmgren, the emotional truth‑seeking of Stanislavski as taught by Harold Lang. His body carries the imprint of Laban’s movement psychology; his emotional shifts feel like they’ve been excavated rather than performed.

This is not academic trivia — it’s visible on stage. The way he holds tension in his shoulders when Thomas resists memory. The sudden, violent propulsion when he pushes the table. The collapse into stillness when a buried truth surfaces. It’s all technique, but never mechanical. Giles Foreman’s method‑based coaching is evident in the depth of internalisation, and Roberta Wallach’s influence — that insistence on human truth — pulses through the quieter moments.

A performance that feels like a masterclass

There are scenes where the audience barely breathes. Van Ric moves through rage, denial, cruelty, panic, and — eventually — something resembling remorse. The emotional whiplash is intentional; the script demands it, and he meets it with precision. When Thomas revisits his childhood abuse, the shift is so visceral it feels unsafe to watch — not because it’s graphic, but because it’s honest.

Gutscher pres matches him with a performance that refuses to be overshadowed. Her Amanda Crowley is controlled, furious, compassionate, and exhausted all at once. She pushes him, challenges him, and refuses to let him hide behind ideology. Their scenes together are electric — two people circling the question the play keeps returning to: Is a monster born, or made?

The script: simple, sharp, and devastating

Van Ric’s writing is lean. No ornamentation, no melodrama. The 911 call that opens the show is chilling in its simplicity — a plumber, a machine gun, 416 shots, 12 women and 9 children dead. It sets the tone: this is not a play about spectacle, but about consequence.

The dialogue between Thomas and Amanda is where the piece truly sings. Their exchanges are jagged, painful, and often uncomfortable. Thomas declares himself a fascist; Amanda fires back that fascism is not an opinion but a crime. He insists he would kill again; she insists he was raised to be a monster. The play never excuses him — but it does interrogate him.

A rare Fringe production that aims beyond the festival

By the final scenes, Thomas begins to crack. Not in a sentimental way — van Ric avoids that trap — but in a way that suggests the possibility of self‑awareness. His request for books after the trial is a small moment, but it lands with weight. It’s the first time he asks for something that isn’t rooted in hate.

This is a production that should not end at the Fringe. It belongs in prisons, rehabilitation centres, community programmes — anywhere the question of violence, trauma, and radicalisation needs to be confronted. It’s not comfortable theatre. It’s necessary theatre.

Verdict

Monster Made is one of the standout productions of this year’s Fringe. Not because it is loud, or shocking, or provocative — but because it is precise, disciplined, and anchored in a profound understanding of acting craft. Van Ric delivers a performance shaped by the giants who trained him, and Gutscher pres meets him beat for beat.

A brutal, intelligent, unforgettable piece of work.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp

Click here to buy tickets

 

Leave a Comment

1518: The Dancing Plague — Satire, Chaos and Queer Heart at the Fringe

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★There’s something deliciously Fringe about a show that invites you to “shake your a** and dance ’til you (hopefully don’t!) die,” and 1518: The Dancing Plague leans into that promise with full satirical commitment. Based on the very real medieval mass hysteria that had Strasbourg’s citizens dancing themselves into oblivion, Hannah Ponturo’s comedy arrives at theSpaceUK fresh from Los Angeles—armed with a sold‑out reading, a Daredevil Festival pedigree, and the kind of chaotic energy that thrives in late‑night Edinburgh.

At its heart is a queer romance between Katherine and Anna, two peasants whose long‑fractured relationship reignites just as the city collapses around them. It’s a smart dramatic anchor: while clergy and civic authorities scramble to contain the outbreak, the play keeps circling back to the human impulse to connect even when the world is wobbling off its axis. The production promised “uncanny parallels” to our own recent crises, and the show doesn’t shy away from them—Covid echoes, political absurdity, and the familiar spectacle of institutions panicking while ordinary people try to make sense of the mess.

We loved the drag devil/angel narrator

Ponturo’s writing has that LA‑meets‑NYC flavour: punchy, self‑aware, and unafraid of silliness as a delivery system for something sharper. The production, created with Open Variations Theater, fits neatly into their mission of reimagining lesser‑known stories with contemporary bite. You can feel the interdisciplinary New York influence in the way the piece layers satire, history, and outright party vibes into a single 50‑minute burst.

And yes, it is a dance party. The show wants you complicit in the hysteria—laughing at it, recognising it, maybe even feeling the tug of it. The absurdity of people dancing themselves to death becomes a mirror held up to the way we cope with uncertainty now: distraction as survival, movement as denial, rhythm as rebellion.

It’s messy, cheeky, knowingly ridiculous, and unexpectedly tender. Exactly the sort of Fringe show that sneaks up on you: you arrive for the chaos, and leave thinking about the systems that shape how we behave when everything goes sideways.

If you’re looking for a satire with historical weirdness, queer heart, and a healthy disrespect for authority, 1518: The Dancing Plague earns its place on your August shortlist.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Click here for tickets

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »