Archive for Edinburgh Fringe Festival

John-Luke Roberts: What I Talk About When I Run About Talking

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★ John‑Luke Roberts returns to the Fringe with an hour that blends surrealism, sharp language play and candid reflections on health, therapy and mortality. In a small room that suits his conversational style, he delivers a show that’s warm, inventive and consistently funny, proving once again why he occupies such a singular corner of British comedy.

John-Luke Roberts has long occupied a distinctive corner of British comedy, where surrealism, wordplay and intelligent observation meet. What I Talk About When I Run About Talking demonstrates why he has earned that reputation. This is a show that is often gloriously absurd, occasionally deeply personal and consistently engaging.

The intimate venue suits both the performer and the material. With room for around sixty people, it creates exactly the kind of atmosphere this show needs. Audience and performer feel part of the same conversation rather than separated by a stage. There’s also something pleasingly Fringe about the adjoining bar, where people can gather over a drink before taking their seats. By the time Roberts walks on, the audience already feels relaxed and receptive, and he rewards that goodwill from the opening moments.

One of Roberts’ greatest strengths is his command of language. He clearly enjoys words, not simply as vehicles for jokes but as toys to be turned over, stretched and occasionally twisted into unexpected shapes. His delivery is conversational yet meticulously controlled. There’s never a sense that he’s racing towards punchlines. Instead, he allows ideas to unfold at their own pace, trusting the audience to follow him wherever he’s heading.

What impressed me most was his ability to move effortlessly between comedy and subjects that, in other hands, might feel overwhelmingly serious. He speaks candidly about a recent health scare involving tumours on his lungs, alongside reflections on mortality and therapy. These are not easy themes to make funny, yet Roberts never trivialises them. Instead, he finds humour in the way we process frightening experiences and the strange mental journeys they provoke.

His stories about therapy were among the afternoon’s highlights. The recurring image of his therapist ending sessions with probing questions for him to ponder until the next appointment became an inspired comic device. It reminded me, oddly enough, of the cliffhanger endings from the old Batman television series, forever leaving viewers hanging until the next episode. Roberts mines that structure brilliantly, turning psychological introspection into something unexpectedly hilarious.

Interspersed throughout the show are short poems that arrive almost without warning. They provide delightful changes of pace and consistently earned some of the biggest laughs of the evening. Roberts understands the value of surprise. Just as the audience thinks they know where a routine is heading, he quietly changes direction and lands somewhere entirely unexpected.

His physical presence on stage should not be overlooked either. Although this is a language-rich show, he uses movement economically and effectively, maintaining the audience’s attention throughout. He projects warmth and confidence without becoming overbearing, and there is a generosity to his performance that keeps everyone with him.

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the hour is its rhythm. Many stand-up shows have noticeable peaks and quieter patches. This one scarcely does. Roberts maintains a steady flow of laughs from beginning to end, moving naturally between stories, observations, poems and surreal detours. The different strands might appear unrelated on paper, yet on stage they knit together into a coherent whole.

Comedy that embraces the surreal can sometimes become self-indulgent or leave audiences behind. Roberts avoids that trap. However eccentric the destination, he always provides enough emotional truth to keep the audience invested. Beneath the absurdity lies an astute observer of human behaviour, capable of making us laugh at life’s anxieties without ever dismissing their seriousness.

Above all, John-Luke Roberts knows how to entertain an audience. He combines intelligence, imagination, excellent timing and complete command of the room into an hour that feels fresh, thoughtful and consistently funny. Fringe audiences looking for comedy that rewards careful listening as much as spontaneous laughter should make time for this show.

Reviewed by Patrick Harrington

Click here to buy tickets

Click here to read an interview with John-Luke Roberts

Leave a Comment

Jenny Gorelick’s SORRY: Sharp, Honest and Very Funny

Leave a Comment

Summerhall Sauna Theatre: Turning Up the Heat on Fringe Performance

The Edinburgh Fringe has always thrived on experimentation, but every so often something arrives that genuinely shifts the boundaries of what performance can be. This year, that distinction belongs to the Summerhall Sauna Theatre: a fully functioning, 82 person sauna transformed into an intimate performance venue. It’s an idea that sounds eccentric until you step inside and open your mind.
When I took the press tour the structures around the sauna were still being polished around the edges. Finishing touches were underway on the lockers and rest area, but the core is already fully operational: a sound booth with a window overlooking the sauna, cold showers for cooling down, two plunge pools capable of holding ice, and both unisex and individual changing rooms. Audiences are asked to wear swimsuits, and you’ll need two towels—one for sitting in the sauna, one for drying off afterwards. If you don’t have any you can hire and swimming suits are also available for sale. Water stations sit just outside the entrance, a reminder that this is theatre with a physiological dimension.

Aufguss: The Ancient Ritual at the Heart of It

Central to the experience is Aufguss, a practice with roots stretching back roughly two thousand years across Eastern and Northern Europe. Historically, saunas were communal and spiritual spaces—used for births, healing rituals, and preparing the dead. Over time, Aufguss evolved from a practical method of circulating heat into a stylised ritual led by a Saunameister. Today, it’s a choreographed art form: towels snapping and sweeping through the air, aromatic steam rising in waves, music underscoring the movement.
It’s part wellness, part ceremony, part performance. And in the Summerhall sauna, it becomes something else again—an expressive tool for storytelling.
During the press tour, performers demonstrated the technique with a kind of dance that sits somewhere between gesture and ritual. Towels became extensions of the body, which will be used to waft scent and heat around the room. It’s hypnotic to watch, and will be even more striking when you’re inside the sauna feeling the temperature shift with each movement.

A Taste of What’s On

One of the highlights of the preview was a performance by Nick Cazenbaum, known for Bubble Schmeises. His work—funny, sharp, rooted in Jewish identity—landed beautifully in the sauna’s intimate atmosphere. Accompanied by musicians, he delivered a story alongside a  wonderfully off‑beat rendition of Consider Yourself, reimagined with a jazzy, klezmer‑inflected twist. It was warm, witty, and perfectly suited to the space.
But the programme goes further than comedy.

Alfgas x the Waves

Among the flagship productions is Alfgas x The Waves, a bewitching reimagining of Virginia Woolf’s The Waves. Woolf’s novel is already fluid and sensory, and here it’s refracted through dance, heat, scent, sound, and light. The result is an immersive experience that feels less like watching a performance and more like being gently folded into one.
The sauna becomes a kind of emotional chamber. Heat rises and falls with the performers’ movements; scents drift in at key moments; light shifts in soft pulses. The effect is tender, atmospheric, and unexpectedly romantic—like falling in love on a summer afternoon, except you’re sitting in a sauna with strangers, wrapped in steam.

A Theatre That Travels

Perhaps one of the most exciting aspect is that the entire structure is mobile. Once the Fringe ends, the sauna theatre can be taken apart and transported to communities that may never have encountered anything like this. It’s an inclusive idea: performance that doesn’t wait for audiences to come to it, but instead goes to them.
It may take time for people to adjust to the idea of theatre in a sauna. But once they do, it’s easy to imagine this becoming a new kind of cultural space—one where storytelling is felt as much as seen. I love it!
Find out more and buy tickets here
Report from Pat Harrington

Leave a Comment

James Beyer on Reclaiming Roscoe Arbuckle: The Story Behind Room 1219

Click on image to buy tickets

Hotel St Francis, San Francisco, September 1921: a silent‑era star at the height of his fame, a young actress in distress, and a companion whose testimony would ignite one of Hollywood’s earliest media infernos. Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle, Virginia Rappe and Maude Delmont — three names forever tied to the secrets of Room 1219. Arbuckle, the man who turned slapstick into gold, saw his world collapse overnight as a charge of murder shattered his career and made him Hollywood’s first fall guy.

A century later, writer James Beyer revisits that pivotal moment in Room 1219, exploring Arbuckle’s meteoric rise, the scandal that consumed him, and the ruthless machinery of public opinion that ensured his downfall. In this interview, Beyer discusses the research, the responsibility, and the creative choices behind bringing one of Hollywood’s most contested stories back into the spotlight.

Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle’s case is one of Hollywood’s earliest and most explosive scandals. What drew you to this particular moment in cinema history, and why revisit it now?

The inspiration for writing Room 1219 came from attending many solo shows at previous Fringe Festivals, where performers portrayed figures from film or theatre. Arbuckle’s story struck me as an ideal vehicle for that format. The process hasn’t been urgent in a topical sense — it’s actually been quite protracted — though perhaps there’s a personal urgency now that I’m 77 and keen to ensure the play finally reaches an audience. I hope this won’t be my last chance, but it certainly motivated me to finish it.

The show promises to tell Arbuckle’s side of the story. How did you navigate the balance between historical fact, public myth, and emotional truth?

Historical fact, public myth, and emotional truth are all essential to Arbuckle’s story. Each has been carefully researched and woven into the script so the audience experiences a subtle shift in tone as the play progresses. It builds toward an emotionally charged final section where Arbuckle reveals the anguish and torment he endured as a result of the scandal. All three facets are handled fairly and sensitively.

James Beyer is both a musician and a film historian. How does that dual background shape the tone, pacing, and perspective of the script?

The music complements the mood on stage and creates comedic moments throughout. It supports both comedy and tragedy — reflecting Arbuckle’s early life, his later career, and the events of September 5th, 1921, with their tragic aftermath. The music isn’t the driving force; Arbuckle’s story is. Sound effects are also used to enhance the atmosphere.

This is a one‑man show led by Douglas Arbuckle. What made him the right performer to carry such a complex and controversial figure on his own?

Douglas Arbuckle is an excellent choice for several reasons. First — he is an Arbuckle. He has researched Roscoe’s character extensively, making his portrayal compelling and authentic. He has read accounts of Arbuckle’s life, watched his films, and perfected a convincing accent. All of this gives him a deep understanding of Arbuckle’s complex personality. In addition, Douglas is a highly experienced actor.

Alan Borthwick directs the production. What was his approach to staging a story that is both intimate and historically sprawling?

We had to choose between an intimate focus and a sprawling historical narrative to keep within the 50‑minute Fringe allocation. We chose intimacy. The play shows that despite Arbuckle’s immense talent and popularity, once he was branded a scapegoat for Hollywood’s perceived moral failings, there was no escape from ruination.

The press release mentions Arbuckle being treated harshly and unfairly. What aspects of his treatment by the media and public are most misunderstood today?

There are countless variations of the Arbuckle story in the public domain — some well‑researched, others sensationalised. Sensational news captured the public’s attention in 1921 and still does today. The embellished accounts of the press galvanised people into believing Arbuckle was guilty of murder (later reduced to manslaughter). Both the public and the film industry judged him quickly, fed by the biased gutter press of newspaper barons like Hearst.

The show includes original music by David Lyle. How does the score support the storytelling, and what emotional colours does it bring?

Although the press release indicated original music, the company later decided to use published material for the mood‑music extracts and the two songs performed in the show. Arbuckle would have been familiar with the songs chosen, and the mood music comes from material written for silent cinema. These extracts and songs are taken from published works of the period. For how the music supports the storytelling, see my earlier response — it mirrors the emotional shifts of the narrative.

Keystone Theatricals is a new Edinburgh company. What does launching Room 1219 say about your artistic identity and ambitions?

Keystone Theatricals was set up primarily for Room 1219. The name “Keystone” was chosen for two reasons: it was the studio that launched Arbuckle’s film career, and it also suggests a strong base or foothold. Artistically, I see Keystone promoting solo shows about significant historical figures, not necessarily limited to stage and screen. Tickets are selling well, so perhaps 2027 will see a re‑run. Beyond that, there are no immediate plans.

Arbuckle’s rise and fall mirror the early power structures of Hollywood. How do you explore those dynamics without turning the show into a lecture on film history?

The play explores these dynamics through significant episodes from Arbuckle’s life and career. It uses the masks of comedy and tragedy to tell his story. The storytelling style prevents the show from becoming a lecture, and ideally it will motivate some audience members to learn more about this period in cinema history afterwards.

With a 50‑minute runtime, the show is tightly focused. What do you hope audiences walk away questioning or reconsidering?

We hope audiences leave more enlightened about this period in cinema history and better understand the circumstances surrounding the scandal, which may previously have been coloured by sensationalised accounts. The powerful ending should evoke sympathy for Arbuckle and encourage a reassessment of how he was treated.

 

Leave a Comment

Inside The Pitch: Philip Catherwood on Culture, Conflict and Coming‑of‑Age in Modern Belfast

The Pitch – click on image to buy tickets

As the writer of The Pitch, Philip Catherwood has been right at the centre of a story that’s as much about modern Belfast as it is about sport. He’s watched the play grow from a spark of local controversy into a piece that captures humour, identity, political tension and the shifting cultural landscape of Northern Ireland. His voice in the room is steady, instinctive, and rooted in lived experience — someone who understands how a single pitch can hold decades of history, and how three characters can carry the weight of a changing country. In conversation, he moves easily between the personal and the political, between the craft of rehearsal and the bigger questions the play raises. What follows is his take on how The Pitch came to life.

When you first started shaping The Pitch, what was the spark — the moment you realised this wasn’t just a story about Gaelic football but something bigger?

The spark came from a news story about a GAA club trying to refurbish a soccer pitch into a Gaelic football ground in East Belfast — the area I grew up in. If you don’t know Belfast’s geography or demographics, East Belfast is a strongly Unionist area, and the idea of GAA there is still contentious for some. But things are changing. For me, that story was the perfect example of how cultural identity is shifting in Northern Ireland, how the ground is moving, and how the country might be edging towards Irish Unity. That’s when I realised the play wasn’t just about sport — it was about who we are becoming.

The show sits right in the middle of Belfast humour and political tension. How did you balance the jokes with the weight underneath?

Honestly, it was easy. Belfast humour is built for serious subjects — we deal with heavy things by joking about them. We’re always ribbing each other, always finding the lighter side. I never felt the play tipping too far into seriousness or silliness. The priority was authenticity: real Belfast characters handling real issues in the way people here actually do.

Robbie, Deren, Melissa — three very different ways of seeing the same place. Which of them shifted the most as you developed the script?

They’re the perfect trio to guide the audience through this story. Robbie comes from a Unionist background, Deren from a Nationalist one, and Melissa — though she’s Robbie’s younger sister — represents a younger generation sitting somewhere between those identities.

Robbie changed the most during development. He’s frustrated, hot‑headed, and his views on Irish Unity are visceral. But I wanted him to be sympathetic too. He’s scared of losing part of his identity, and that fear doesn’t make him a bad person. It just makes him human. James Grimm, who plays him, captures that internal struggle beautifully.

There’s a United Ireland referendum hanging over everything. How did you decide how loudly or quietly that should sit in the background?

It starts quietly. Characters mention it in passing because it’s just been announced, and they’re unsure how things will unfold. As time moves forward, the referendum gains momentum and becomes a central part of Robbie, Deren and Melissa’s interactions. Whether a United Ireland happens or not… you’ll have to come and see.

Tell me about a rehearsal where something unexpected happened — a moment that changed how you saw the piece.

There are too many to choose from. The actors are brilliant at ad‑libbing and improvising — adding lines, shifting meanings, finding new beats. We’ve done a few versions of the play before, so they’re comfortable with their characters and with each other. Improv happens naturally, and half the time you won’t even notice it’s unscripted.

Gaelic football is central, but it’s not really “about” the sport. What’s the heartbeat of the show once you strip the pitch away.

At its heart, it’s a coming‑of‑age story. It’s about friendships, relationships, family. It’s about growing up in a unique place with a troubled history and a cultural divide that’s lasted for centuries. I wanted to give a snapshot of modern Belfast — not The Troubles, not the Peace Process, but right now. The conversations young people are having today.

Every production has a detail you fight for — something tiny that most people won’t clock. What’s that detail in The Pitch?

All the little local jokes. They landed perfectly in Belfast but might not be as familiar elsewhere — Tayto, Van Morrison, the Red Hand of Ulster, Down GAA, Buckfast, pastie baps. Those wee references make the world feel real, so they’re staying in.

The show deals with identity, belonging, and the idea of home. How has writing or performing it shifted your own sense of those things?

Like Robbie, I’m from a Unionist background and didn’t grow up with Gaelic football or much Irish cultural tradition. Working on the play broadened my understanding of Irish history and let me explore perspectives I hadn’t fully grasped before. It’s even inspired me to start writing a new play set in 17th‑century Colonial Ireland.

If you had one more week in the room — one more chance to push something further — what part of The Pitch would you dig into?

I’d explore the Irish Unity referendum in more detail — the practical implications. How it would affect people in Northern Ireland. What it would mean for social care, education, housing, sport, transport. All the everyday things. But I’m happy with how much we cover without turning it into a lecture. If you want to dip your toes into the topic of Irish Unity while following the journeys of three funny, flawed Belfast characters, this is the show to see.

You can buy tickets here

 

Leave a Comment

00:45:00 – Five Walk In. One Walk Out. The Audience Decides.

Five people walk into a room, and only one will make it out alive. The clock is running, the rules are brutal, and the audience isn’t allowed to sit comfortably in the dark.

This is a real‑time experiment led by a scientist who wants to know whether one person’s life can ever be worth more than another’s — and what happens when ordinary people are pushed to make that decision. It’s a story about spectators who discover they’re participants, about the moment when watching becomes acting, and about the uncomfortable truth that complicity is rarely abstract.

The playwright behind 00:45:00, Katie Gaven, understands that moral pressure isn’t a gimmick — it’s a provocation. Here, she talks about how the idea formed, why she wants audiences to feel implicated, and how the show has transformed on its journey to the Edinburgh Fringe.

When did the premise of five people entering a room and only one leaving stop being a dramatic device and start becoming a moral experiment you wanted to run on an audience?

The dramatic premise came to me pretty quickly once I knew I wanted to write a psychological thriller, and the decision to turn it into a social or moral experiment developed hand in hand with that. I’ve always loved the horror genre, especially psychological horror, and a lot of the material that inspired me was told through digital mediums — Alice in Borderland, Black Mirror, Squid Game.

That made me ask myself: if I’m going to work in this genre, why tell it through live theatre? The thing I love most about theatre is the way it connects people. So it made sense that the experiment should involve the audience directly.

The show asks whether one life can ever be “worth more” than another. Do you see that as a provocation, or as a question we all quietly answer every day without admitting it.

Honestly, I think it can be both. Weighing one life against another is not something we like to think about day to day. Putting people in that spot is tricky — you can lose the trust of an audience if you mishandle it.

But I also believe one of our best human qualities is empathy, the kind that ignites us to fight and advocate for others. That’s what I wanted to experiment with. It’s a question I’ve asked our audiences to think about, and I hope we can all try to make sense of it together.

Immersive theatre often lets audiences hide behind the novelty of participation. You seem to be doing the opposite — forcing them to confront complicity. What made you want to push them into that uncomfortable territory.

It’s a hard balance, and I’m still figuring it out. One of the main things I’m discovering through new drafts and conversations is that there’s actually positivity in acknowledging complicity. When we treat that acknowledgment as a victory — a step in the right direction — it becomes easier to inspire ourselves and others to do more.

Complicity is difficult to reckon with in everyday life. I think it’s good to be reminded of it, prodded to engage with it. It’s something I’m still unpacking within myself.

 

You explore corruption of power and the temptation to look away from injustice. Were there particular moments — political, personal, global — that made you realise this was the story you needed to tell now.

There are so many things that factored into it. The world feels full of terrifying injustices, and while media can be a tool, it can also be desensitizing. We see horrible acts of violence and political injustice every day, and I often feel horrible but also powerless — unsure how I can personally make a difference.

I consider myself privileged, and I never want that to become an excuse to disengage. I feel desperate to actively engage in these conversations and hold myself accountable. This play is an attempt at searching for that action.

The piece was first produced at UNCSA and is now leaping to the Fringe. How has the show changed as it moved from a university environment to an international stage.

OMG it has changed so. freaking. much. We did our first production at my university in a very controlled environment, got incredibly helpful feedback, and were insanely fortunate to be supported by the Thomas S. Kenan Institute for the Arts and fiscally sponsored by Producer Hub.

The play has gone through new drafts, more audience feedback, and a total transformation thanks to the financial support that allowed us to collaborate with amazing artists — our publicist Rosaline Hodgetts, lighting designer Miles Goldsmith, and many more. I can’t wait to share what we’ve been working on.

You’re a six‑time published playwright with recognition from Scholastics, The Blank Theatre, and California Young Playwrights. Does 00:45:00 feel like a continuation of your earlier work, or a rupture — a new artistic chapter.

This is definitely a new artistic chapter. Believe it or not, I’m mostly known as a comedic writer, so working on this play has been a new and vulnerable experience. I’ve never been so scared or excited for a play before. Experimenting with this genre has taught me so much, and I’m excited to see how it influences me as an actor, writer, and director.

Audience participation can be gimmicky if mishandled. How do you ensure the involvement here isn’t a trick, but a genuine ethical pressure point.

For us, it’s important to keep our end goal in mind. If we believe the audience participation is important and impactful, the audience will believe that too.

We’re specific about what success looks like for each character so we understand how participation affects their journey. Most interaction is between the audience and Dr. Wilison, so establishing her objective from the moment she welcomes the audience is crucial. Every bit of participation gets her closer to her goal, and treating those interactions as integral makes them feel genuine.

The show is supported by the Kenan Institute and fiscally sponsored by Producer Hub. Did that backing give you freedom, or sharpen your sense of responsibility.

It definitely sharpened our sense of responsibility. This has been a huge learning experience in balancing collaboration, and I’m beyond grateful for the opportunity.

There’s no way we could’ve done this without the financial support and collaboration from the Kenan Institute and Producer Hub. Getting new work onto the stage is a huge challenge, and for most young playwrights it would be impossible without this kind of help. We feel unbelievably lucky and are doing everything we can to make them proud.

Your cast comes from varied backgrounds — film, theatre, dance, visual art. How did those different artistic languages shape the tension inside the room.

It helps that we all come from the same training program, so we share the same acting vocabulary. I’m an actress first and then a writer, so connecting with the cast as a director through familiar techniques has been great.

At the same time, being multifaceted artists helps us collaborate. Each person brings unique skills. Our best days are when we embrace our different approaches and use them intentionally to build a cohesive world.

Fringe audiences are famously game for risk, but they’re also saturated with choice. What do you hope they walk out carrying — adrenaline, discomfort, clarity, or simply a question they can’t un‑ask.

Absolutely a question they can’t un‑ask. I want this to spark conversation. I don’t know the answers to the questions I’m asking — I want to learn through others.

I also hope to inspire actionable activism instead of passivity. I wrote this play because I’m still unsure how to create change, but I believe the first step is recognizing you want to get involved and engaging in conversations to figure out how.

We hope people interested in those discussions will come see us at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival — August 17–22 at thespaceUK @ Surgeon’s Hall (Stephenson Theatre) and August 24–28 at thespaceUK @ Venue 45. Join us for an experiment you won’t forget.

Buy tickets here

 

Leave a Comment

Kate Butch: Camp, Chaos and Kindness at the Fringe

Click on image to buy ticket

Kate Butch doesn’t just do drag — she weaponises wordplay. Her Fringe show titles are gloriously bad puns elevated to high art, and A Kate in the Hand is Worth Two in the Butch might be her most audacious yet. Beneath the camp and chaos, there’s a performer who knows exactly how to turn silliness into sincerity. This year, she’s blurring the line between persona and person, sequins and soul, glamour and  grit — all while reminding us that kindness can be just as radical as comedy.

Your show titles are always deliciously cheeky. What’s the story behind this one?

I’ve always been fascinated by proverbs and idioms, so when I realised I could shoehorn my name into one then I was thrilled! I adore a really clunky title in a Fringe show, where the pun is so garishly bad it loops back round into being genius (Glenn Moore and Joe Lycett are the masters of this genre). My first show was the ridiculously titled Kate If You Wanna Go Butcher, so I think this one is an improvement.

Drag comedy is a space where identity, satire, and joy collide. What’s the collision point in this show?

I think it’s in the parts where the persona slips a little, and you get a glance at the person underneath the sequins. I’ve always tried to keep a firm divide between my on‑ and off‑stage identities, but with this show I’m going to blur that line a little.

You’ve built a persona that’s both glamorous and chaotic. What’s the moment where that duality shines?

‘Glamorous’ is VERY generous, thank you! There’s a moment where the chaos descends somewhat into violence (and that’s all I’m giving away!), but don’t worry — I look proper fit while it happens.

What’s the cultural itch you’re scratching this year?

I’m being more creative with my meal‑deal choices.

Drag is political even when it’s not trying to be. What’s the quiet political thread in this show?

I think the overarching theme is kindness, and remembering to be kind to others and, possibly more importantly, yourself. To stand in your power and not take any shit from anyone, which is still a lesson I’m trying to learn.

Pleasance crowds can be rowdy. What energy do you want them to bring?

I love an audience that’s up for it. Edinburgh can be exhausting, for both performers and audiences, so anyone that can bring some hype to my show will get it returned back to them in spades. My advice to an audience is not to pack in as many shows as humanly possible — you’ll knacker yourself before 5 PM and then each show after that will feel like a slog. Take a break. Get a macaroni pie.

What’s the joke or bit that always gets you laughing, even in rehearsal?

There’s a photo of me that is used in the show which I think is so funny. If anyone asks me how the show is going I just show them that picture, and it somehow depicts EXACTLY how I am feeling at any one moment. I might sell prints of it afterwards.

What’s the costume moment you’re most excited about?

Honestly? The fact that I don’t have to wear the same thing every day. For previous shows I’ve had the ONE show costume, which is usually made of something very much not machine‑washable, and by the end of the run it could probably get up and walk away. Being able to perform the show without having to worry about how much Febreze I have left, or the 4D aromatic experience I’m inflicting on the audience, is very liberating.

If someone walks in expecting pure camp, what deeper thing might they find?

I hope that there’s a very human side to the show, and that despite the very specific‑to‑me stuff I am talking about, there’ll be a thread that anyone can relate to. They’ll also get to see me do some manual labour, so there’s that.

What’s inspiring you right now — drag, music, pop culture, or something stranger?

TikToks of people falling over. Timeless.

Kate Butch: A Kate in the Hand is Worth Two in the Butch 🎭 Pleasance King Dome | Edinburgh Fringe 2026 🕗 8 PM | Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

John‑Luke Roberts: Running, Talking, and Twisting Comedy Into New Shapes

Click on image to buy tickets

John‑Luke Roberts has always been one of the Fringe’s great experimenters — a comic who treats absurdity as both art form and philosophy. His new show, What I Talk About When I Run About Talking, takes that impulse and runs with it, literally and metaphorically. It’s part stand‑up, part linguistic labyrinth, part existential sprint. Roberts has built a reputation for turning nonsense into meaning and meaning into nonsense, often in the same breath.

We talked about mortality, mechanics, and the strange joy of chasing ideas until they collapse laughing.

 

Your show titles always feel like riddles, jokes, and philosophical puzzles at the same time. What unlocked this one for you?

Haruki Murakami wrote a book called What I Talk About When I Talk About Running, and it’s a really good title, isn’t it? I think Murakami wrote it as a play on Raymond Carver’s What I Talk About When I Talk About Love, and must have thought, “That’s a really good title, I’m having that.” Anyway, I was playing around with it in my head and made myself laugh by saying, “What I Talk About When I Run About, Talking,” and then thought, “I’m having that.” When I started building a show that was more stand‑uppy and verbal than my other shows, I thought the title was a good fit. Once I attached it, I tried to make the show feel like the title.

You’ve built a reputation for bending comedy into strange shapes. Has there been a moment where you thought, “This might be too weird… even for me”?

That’s a really interesting question. I think the only thing that’s stopped me doing something is trying it out and it not getting a laugh. Once I’d dressed as my dead‑dad‑dressed‑as‑a‑vampire and performed naked as Mediaeval Poet Geoffrey Chaucer, I’ll give any stupid or weird idea a go. These days I’m more careful about emotional risks. I used to be quite devil‑may‑care about trauma‑dumping on stage or putting myself through unprocessed emotional stuff, and I’m very wary of that now.

Running and talking — two acts of escape. Did one inspire the other, or did they collide by accident?

They can be, but you can also run and talk in circles, which can feel like escape but actually trap you. I just took the title from Murakami and jiggled it, but as it happens the show is partly about escaping and trapping yourself.

You often smuggle big ideas into silly moments. What’s the idea you’re wrestling with this year?

I had a big health scare in November, so the show has a lot about mortality in it. Beyond that, it’s about identity and about words. I don’t want to over‑explain it, but I got some really helpful notes from Lara Ricote the other day, and we worked out it’s about identity and “the edges of things.” Hope that helps. But yes, also, it is silly.

Monkey Barrel has become a home for comics who like to experiment. What does that room give you that others don’t?

First and foremost, it gives me a decent split of the ticket sales. Beyond that, being at Monkey Barrel works as a stamp of approval for comedy audiences — it helps get people in because they think, “He must be all right, he’s on at Monkey Barrel.” I always feel looked after there; it’s run by people who really like and understand comedy.

How much of this show is meticulously planned, and how much is you letting chaos in through the side door?

This time round it’s pretty meticulously planned. Within each routine I give myself leeway to improvise or play around the theme. There’s no audience participation in this one, so chaos can’t really come in that way. But honestly, even when I did a lot of audience participation, I could be 95 percent sure of what they’d do anyway.

You’ve always been interested in the mechanics of comedy. What’s the new structural gamble you’re playing with?

Genuinely, it’s trying to do a straightforward conversational stand‑up show. I’ve had a rule for myself that whenever a tricksy ending or puzzle‑box structure offered itself up, I’d go the other way. I think I’ve done that, and I really like how the show plays.

Fringe audiences arrive exhausted, overwhelmed, or over‑stimulated. What do you hope they leave your show carrying?

I hope they leave energised, laughing, and thinking a bit. I hope the ideas ricochet around their heads for a while and intermingle with their own.

Comedy is changing — fast. What do you think live performance still does better than anything else?

Bringing people together and fostering human connection. I hope — and I think — that as generative AI starts poisoning all the digital wells, people will treasure the humanness and authenticity of live performance even more. Comedy is all about social bonding and laughing with other people, so the best place to watch it is in a room full of them.

What’s feeding your brain right now — books, music, obsessions — that’s quietly shaping the show?

I’ve been listening to a lot of Modest Mouse — a band you’d think I liked, but I’ve only just started. I’m watching a lot of stand‑up specials and finding exciting things in the form I hadn’t noticed before. I’ve been watching quite a few American specials and started thinking about them differently. Generally, a UK stand‑up hour has a unifying theme or story; a US hour is often a series of bits. I used to think, “Why can’t they put the work in to finish their shows?” but now I see them more like albums — a series of tracks that the audience draws associations between, or not. You can take an audience to a really satisfying place that way.

 

John‑Luke Roberts: What I Talk About When I Run About Talking 🎭 Monkey Barrel Comedy | Edinburgh Fringe 2026 🕐 Times vary | Buy tickets  here 

Leave a Comment

Elton Reimagined: Jess Robinson’s Joyful, Bonkers, Brilliant Tribute

Click on image to buy tickets

Jess Robinson has never been content to simply imitate. She transforms. Whether she’s channeling divas, pop icons, or political figures, Robinson’s work is about reinvention — finding the emotional truth inside the performance. Her new Fringe show, Elton Reimagined, takes one of music’s most flamboyant legends and rebuilds him through a kaleidoscope of voices. It’s cabaret, comedy, and confession rolled into one glitter‑drenched hour.

We talked about voice, vulnerability, and the joy of going all‑in.

Elton John is a towering musical figure. What made you want to pull him apart and rebuild him?

Partly because I love him, and partly because I was curious. I’ve spent my whole career asking, “What if?” What if Barbra Streisand sang this? What if Kate Bush got hold of that? What if somebody looked at a familiar song through a completely different lens? Elton’s catalogue is so rich that it can survive being stretched, twisted and reimagined. The songs are incredibly well written — you can take them a long way from the originals and they still stand up.

You’re known for vocal precision. What’s the hardest Elton vocal trick to nail?

Oddly enough, it’s not really Elton’s voice. I don’t do men… well, not in that way. The challenge is finding the point where Elton disappears and somebody else arrives. People think impressions are about getting the voice right, but they’re actually about making hundreds of tiny decisions — where someone places a vowel, how they shape a phrase, how much breath they use. It’s like being a vocal detective. And because these are songs people know so well, the audience can tell instantly if you’ve got it wrong.

Cabaret lets you play with theatricality. What’s the moment in this show where you go full spectacle?

Lady Gaga performing Crocodile Rock definitely qualifies. Without giving too much away, there’s a point where I look at myself and think, “Well, this escalated quickly.” The audience is swept along in total giddiness.

Elton’s music is emotional, flamboyant, and deeply personal. Which song unlocked the show for you?

Your Song. I know that’s a slightly obvious answer, but there’s a reason it’s become such a classic — it’s deceptively simple. Once I found a version that felt fresh and personal, I suddenly understood what the whole show was trying to be. Everything else grew from there.

You’ve always blended comedy with musicianship. How do you keep both in balance without one overpowering the other?

For me, the music always comes first. The comedy invites people in, but the music has to earn its place. I never want the audience to think, “That was a funny impression.” I want them to think, “Wow, that’s so clever,” or “[sniff] — I didn’t expect to feel something there.” The biggest compliment is when people laugh one minute and find themselves unexpectedly moved the next. That’s the sweet spot.

What’s the unexpected angle on Elton that audiences won’t see coming?

How vulnerable he is. We tend to think of Elton as the glasses, the costumes, the confidence and the huge personality. But underneath all that, there are songs about loneliness, longing, heartbreak, insecurity and survival. The older I get, the more interesting I find that side of him.

Cabaret crowds are wonderfully chaotic. What’s the energy you hope they bring?

Everything I had in mind when I created the show — abandon, joy, playfulness, curiosity, and a willingness to come with me. There are moments where people think they know where we’re heading and then suddenly we’re somewhere completely different. The best audiences are the ones who surrender to the journey a bit. Also, laughing in the right places and standing ovations never hurt.

What’s the costume, prop, or musical flourish you’re most excited about?

Probably the fact that we’ve gone all in. There’s no point doing Elton by halves. There are feathers, surprises, glorious new arrangements I made with Matthew Floyd Jones, and a fun but mildly terrifying moment with a washing line and 25 quick‑fire impressions picked on the spot by the audience.

If Elton himself walked in, what moment would you want him to see?

Barbra Streisand singing I’m Still Standing — it’s an emotional rollercoaster. It’s camp and musically clever. And then he can stay for the finale. Not because it’s the biggest moment, but because it’s where all the threads come together. It’s joyful, emotional, slightly bonkers and completely sincere — which feels quite Elton, actually.

What’s feeding your creativity right now — albums, artists, obsessions?

At the moment I’m in one of those lovely periods where several creative worlds are colliding. Earlier this year I published my book Life is Rosi, which tells the parallel stories of my grandmother and me through our diaries at the age of twenty‑three. I’m exploring whether that might become a stage show or a film, which is exciting. I’m also recording my favourite reinterpretations from Elton Reimagined for an album release — and the fact that it’s coming out on vinyl makes me disproportionately happy. There’s something wonderfully tangible and romantic about vinyl that feels right for these songs. Beyond that, I’m always fascinated by voice, storytelling and transformation. Whether it’s a song, a character, a memoir or an impression, I’m interested in what happens when you take something familiar and look at it from a completely different angle. In fact, I also have a TED Talk coming up in September, which I’ll be honing and rehearsing during the Edinburgh Festival.

Jess Robinson: Elton Reimagined 🎭 Assembly George Square Gardens | Edinburgh Fringe 2026 🕗 7:30 PM | T

Buy tickets here  

Leave a Comment

Eleanor Morton: Diving Deep with The Mermaid

Click on image to buy ticket

Eleanor Morton’s The Mermaid dives headfirst into myth and modernity, blending folklore, feminism, and absurd humour. The show follows a self‑aware mermaid navigating the contradictions of beauty, desire, and identity — part stand‑up, part storytelling, part social satire. Morton, known for her sharp wit and surreal imagination, uses the mythical creature as a mirror for how women are seen, shaped, and sometimes submerged by culture.

We spoke with her about mythology, body politics, and finding comedy in the deep end.

A mermaid at the Fringe — myth meets modernity. What drew you to this creature as a lens for comedy?

I discovered when I was working on Haunted House, my 2024 show about ghosts, that it’s much easier to structure a show around something you love talking about rather than trying to write the jokes first. I love mythology and history and folklore, and mermaids also feel very modern — they’re still a hugely popular symbol, something little girls want to be. You can even become a professional mermaid and spend your day in a silicon tail waving at tourists. Mermaids are timeless symbols of what it means to be human, and there’s so much comedy in that.

Your work often blends surrealism with sharp social commentary. Where does this show sit on that spectrum?

That’s a good way to describe it — half‑weird, half‑serious. I’d say it sits squarely in the middle. Even if I tried to write something purely fantastical, my cynical side would creep in. Mermaids are beautiful and fun, but they’ve also always been used as social commentary, especially about women. In the 16th century Mary Queen of Scots was depicted as a mermaid in graffiti, symbolising her supposed loose morals — ironic, because mermaids don’t actually have sex. The sea and its creatures are endlessly fascinating, and mermaids have a dark past tied to politics. Basically, my motto is: if you’re not laughing, you’re learning.

Scotland has a long tradition of folklore. Did any particular myth feed into this show?

Originally I had a whole bit about selkies — the Scottish mythical creature that turns from a seal into a beautiful woman — but it had to get cut for time. We’ve got lots of watery creatures: selkies, kelpies, which are river‑dwelling horses that drown people, and obviously Nessie. My favourite is the Blue Men of the Minch, blue mermen who cause storms and shipwrecks.

You’re brilliant at creating characters who feel both absurd and painfully real. Who is your mermaid?

She’s me — someone who always wanted to be a mermaid when I was younger, even though I didn’t really enjoy swimming or the sea. It’s about the dichotomy between the sexy Ariel‑like mermaids of pop culture and the ugly, darker ones of myth, and how both shape how we see women: what we think we should be versus what we really are.

What’s the moment in the show where the surreal cracks open and something true slips out?

I talk a lot about how men see women, and how mermaids symbolise that. Patriarchal culture loves to see women as either Madonnas or Whores, and mermaids float between those ideas. They lure sailors to their deaths but they’re also pretty and demure. I link that to how men are taught not to trust women — especially beautiful women — because secretly, underneath it all, women are monsters. It’s also an excuse to do jokes about the manosphere and women having crushes on weird cartoon characters.

You’ve always had a knack for political undercurrents. What’s the quiet political heartbeat of this show?

Probably the idea that women are expected to be one thing instead of a multitude, and how much our bodies are used against us. I grew up in the mid‑2000s — a terrible time for body image as a girl. I talk about how disconnected we are from our own bodies and how culture relies on that disconnection to keep us insecure and buying stuff.

The Fringe can feel like a sea of noise. How do you carve out your own tide?

It’s easy to compare yourself to others — ticket sales, reviews, all that — but you’ve got to focus on your own thing and ask, “Is this better than it was yesterday?” I go see plays and things outside comedy, and I revisit places I grew up around because they feel far from Fringe madness.

What’s the strangest thing you discovered while writing The Mermaid?

That in the original Little Mermaid story by Hans Christian Andersen, she’s only twelve, and the prince makes her sleep in a basket outside his room.

If someone comes in expecting pure silliness, what deeper thing might they accidentally find?

Hopefully an undercurrent — I’d hate to say empowerment because it sounds cheesy — but maybe a celebration of women’s bodies. That sounds very hippie‑feminist, but honestly, straight men will enjoy the show too. There are some pictures of boobs.

What’s inspiring you right now — art, music, weird internet corners?

Mostly weird internet corners. I’m obsessed with The Broken Veil podcast — a spooky, immersive show that’s hard to define genre‑wise. Joel Morris and Will Maclean have made this incredible radiophonic‑workshop‑style experience with basically no money. It reminds me why creating things for the sake of it is so good for us.

Eleanor Morton: The Mermaid 🕐 1 PM | Monkey Barrel Cabaret Voltaire 1

🎟 Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »