Posts Tagged Gilded Balloon

Tom Read Wilson Delights with a Charming Alphabet of Talent

Click on image to buy tickets

★★★★★Tom Read Wilson has long been a familiar face on Celebs Go Dating (E4), but seeing him live reveals just how much more there is behind the polished charm and impeccable diction. His Fringe show, The A to Z of Me, is a full display of his multi‑talented personality — and he wastes no time proving it. The hour is packed with tap dancing, Shakespearean sonnets, poems, songs, and even a few well‑timed jokes. It’s a variety platter delivered with such ease that the audience can’t help but be swept along.

The conceit of the show — using an A to Z of words to define himself — is clever, playful, and surprisingly revealing. Each letter becomes a doorway into a different facet of his personality, from the theatrical to the tender. The alphabet is the perfect prism through which to learn about his logophil It’s a neat idea, but what makes it work is his delivery: warm, articulate, and just a little mischievous.

What stands out most is how effortlessly he charms the room. There’s a sense of genuine connection — not just performance — as he moves from one skill to the next. One moment he’s tapping away with crisp precision, the next he’s reciting Shakespeare with a flourish, then suddenly he’s singing with a sincerity that hushes the room. It’s eclectic, but never chaotic; everything feels stitched together by his unmistakable personality.

If you’re looking for a show that packs a punch — something lively, polished, and full of surprises — The A to Z of Me is well worth your time. Being entertained by Tom Read Wilson is simply delightful, and this hour proves he’s far more than the persona you’ve seen on television.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp
Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

Michelle Shocked Takes on Big Tech at the Fringe

★★★★★

Anyone attending Michelle Shocked: Bootleg This is met with a screen image inviting them to scan a QR code to vote for one of two options, Truth or Reality. Like your reviewer, most folks voted for Truth.

Michelle came on stage dressed as a stereotypical punk anarchist, reminiscent of Siouxie Sioux in her heyday. She describes herself as a bit of an anarchist to deliver an impassioned cri de coeur against the predatory monopolist behaviour of big tech Silicon Valley companies, especially Google.

She delivers her passionate message in a confiding, but humorous conversational manner aided by an occasional song, and a big on-stage screen. She gives the stories behind some of her well-known songs. She rails against the pseudo-democracy of bought-and-paid-for politicians in her home country. The only really protected speech in the US today is copyrighted speech, she says.

As an artist whose career took off from a bootleg tape, she is not going to allow Google to bootleg all her work and profit from it, even though it took her twenty years. She’s astonished by the misrepresentation of her personal life on Wikipedia and the fact that she is an ‘insufficient authority’ to challenge errors of fact in her own entry. Still, she carries on with her music and her mission.

All she ever wanted to do was write songs that change the world, but she realises that certain people – those who take unearned profit from the sweat and labour of others – don’t want to change the world as they’re very comfortable with it as it is.

Looking back on her struggle she’s inspired by Emily Dickinson’s poem, I took my Power in my Hand, itself inspired by the biblical story of David and Goliath.

I took my Power in my Hand —
And went against the World —
‘Twas not so much as David — had —
But I — was twice as bold —

I aimed my Pebble — but Myself
Was all the one that fell —
Was it Goliath — was too large —
Or was myself — too small?

Nevertheless, despite it all, she continues. May she yet win more victories against the remorseless Big Tech death machine.

Reviewed by David Kerr

Michelle Shocked: Bootleg This
20:30hrs Gilded Balloon Patter House, Venue 24
Aug 8-11 and 14-16

Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

Good Girl: Mimi Collins on Betrayal, Consent and Starting Again

Click on image to buy ticket

Some Fringe shows don’t just tell a story — they hit a nerve. Good Girl is one of them. It’s direct, open, and unexpectedly funny even when things get heavy. Mimi Collins doesn’t hide behind performance tricks or distance herself from the material. She steps straight into it and shows what it really takes to put yourself back together after everything falls apart.

What follows is a conversation about betrayal, identity, kink, consent, and the strange, stubborn hope that keeps people standing even when the ground gives way. It’s not tidy. It’s not polite. It’s real — and that’s why it lands.

Alix’s breaking point — Your show begins with infidelity but quickly becomes about the reaction rather than the betrayal. Why do you think so many people are more shocked by their own responses than by the crisis itself?

How we expect ourselves to react in certain situations is a core part of our sense of self. If you were to see a crime being committed, for example, most people would say they’d intervene. That’s who they think they are. But what happens if, when confronted with that reality, they don’t?

The truth is, we often don’t know ourselves as well as we think we do. And that’s an incredibly unnerving thing to face. When Alix realizes her reaction to this betrayal is nothing like what she would have guessed — nothing like what she would advise others to do, or what her younger self would tell her to do — it rocks her entire world. Her core identity. And it’s really hard to find your footing again when you’re suddenly standing in quicksand.

Emotional self‑deception — You portray Alix as flawed, contradictory, and sometimes complicit in her own pain. What made you want to resist the “pure victim” narrative?

The only way to connect with people is to tell the truth. The truth is what allows the audience to connect with the characters. And the truth is, there is no pure victim. Just like there is no pure villain. We are flawed. We make mistakes. We handle hard situations imperfectly. And all we can do is wake up tomorrow and try to be better than we were the day before.

Therapy as storytelling — The piece unfolds through therapy sessions, late‑night confessions and “hey girl” texts. How did you use these forms to reveal the logic of someone trying to hold a collapsing marriage together?

The three avenues sort of act as a filtration system. They offer different amounts of external input. The “hey girl” texts are external information with a calculated response, therapy sessions are external conversations designed to spark internal dialogue, and the late-night confessions — well, that’s just Alix and her audience. That’s where she gets to be completely unfiltered. Say the inside thoughts out loud. The things you’d never say in daylight — not even at a whisper. The audience allows her a space to give voice to her deepest fears and most shameful secrets. And by giving voice to them, they lose their power. And she might just be able to find herself again.

The nude photo moment — Posting a nude online is a huge turning point. What does that impulsive act unlock for Alix that nothing else could?

Well — let’s be frank. Infidelity can really do a number on your self-esteem. And while infidelity rarely has much to do with the person on the receiving end, it is not unreasonable for that person to wonder — is it me? Am I simply undesirable? And, listen, I am not advising people to post nudes online. But… if you do, you’ll get an answer.

But to push beyond the initial impulse, posting a nude online offers Alix a new vantage point from which to see herself. It almost allows her to try on a new skin. And in discovering what this new person she’s playing as craves, she becomes more aware of her own needs. Needs she has been minimizing for a long time, that very much deserve to be tended to.

BDSM as sanctuary — The kink community becomes the safest, most honest space in the story. What surprised you most when exploring BDSM as a site of healing rather than taboo?

Oh, I found so much about the BDSM community to be surprising. But the most surprising thing is probably the length and depth of the conversations surrounding each and every facet of “play” or “a scene” — terms used to describe encounters (often but not always sexual) in the BDSM space.

Participants in the BDSM community talk. All the time. They have to. There’s no other way to build the trust and the consent necessary to safely play in these spaces that explore taboos.

And the welcome and open exploration of these taboos is what removes the shame around them. Shame is such a destructive force in so many relationships, and perhaps the most common precursor to deception. So removing that from the mix only enhances participants’ ability to trust one another.

Consent vs. marriage — The show contrasts the instability of a socially “acceptable” marriage with the radical communication of kink. What does that say about how society defines healthy relationships?

A lot of societal milestones (job, marriage, house, children, etc.) are in place to determine status — socially or otherwise. We put a lot of emphasis on this status. Which means we’ll fight for it even when it isn’t actually serving us. It also means we often don’t question if it’s actually what we want, until it’s too late.

We assume we want to get married, buy a house, and have kids. Because that’s what we’re taught is the pinnacle of achievement from a young age.

But the kink community assumes nothing. Everything is a question — pet names, sexual acts, aftercare, all options are presented as equal, with no pre‑conceived judgment attached to the answer — because these are not questions we’re taught to have answers for. And if you can let go of the shame, as I talked about before, and really answer honestly, you can discover a LOT about yourself.

Autobiographical risk — You describe the piece as “largely autobiographical.” What boundaries did you redraw for yourself while writing something so emotionally exposed?

This is a hard story to tell. But I think it’s one that a lot of people will see themselves in. There were a lot of times in the writing of it that I wanted to fictionalize something as a means to protect myself, as a shield. To create some distance. But then the story would suffer. And that feels like a disservice to the people who need to hear it.

So I was constantly redrawing my boundaries to expand them and break them down. If I’m going to do this, I’m going all in. There’s no use in softening the blow, we’re in it now.

Working with Ellie Pyle — You and director Ellie Pyle have a long creative shorthand. What was the darkest or most vulnerable territory she pushed you into that you wouldn’t have gone alone?

It’s because of Ellie that I’m performing this piece. That was not the original plan. But I did an early staged reading before we found an actress and she said, “You have to do this. It’s gotta be you.” And — devastatingly — she was right. It’s my story. I have to tell it. I would not have made that choice without her… erm, stern encouragement.

That said, she took incredible care of me. If you watch the show, you’ll learn about the stoplight safeword system often employed in BDSM. (Green, yellow, red — you get it, right?). And she, hilariously, co‑opted this for rehearsal. We’d run a tough scene and after it she’d ask, “color?” And if I said “green,” she’d know we were good to push on. But “yellow” meant we’d take a break, and “red” meant we needed to pivot to something else. It was both a really smart and clean way to check in with me, and also… very very funny.

Staying too long — The show asks why people stay in relationships that no longer serve them. What’s the most uncomfortable truth you discovered while exploring that question?

There are a lot of hard truths to face in this piece! But the most uncomfortable one is that we often stay in spaces that no longer serve us because we don’t think we deserve better. Or — crucially — that better exists.

But we do. And it does. It might not be what we envisioned, and that vision of how you thought your life would be is really hard to let go of. The grief for the future you imagined is heavy. But you have to remind yourself that that future never really existed. And you can’t find the actual future that’s meant for you until you let the other one go.

Pain into pleasure — The press release says the story is ultimately about turning pain into pleasure. What does that transformation look like for Alix by the end of the piece?

Well to find out properly, you’ll have to come see the play. But, without giving too much away, that transformation looks like finally facing the pain head on, owning it, and dealing with it, so as to make room for pleasure.

Good Girl 10.20pm, Gilded Balloon Patter House 5th–31st August

You can buy tickets here 

 

Leave a Comment

Alice Fraser: Finding Light in the Dark with Oh Man!

Click on image to buy ticket

Alice Fraser’s Oh Man! is a masterclass in emotional excavation — a show that balances razor‑sharp wit with philosophical depth. Known for weaving comedy through grief, absurdity, and the strange tenderness of being human, Fraser invites audiences into a space where laughter and heartbreak coexist. As she returns to the Edinburgh Fringe, her latest work asks what it means to stay hopeful when the world feels unrecognisable.

Below, our conversation moves between the personal and the universal — a dialogue about storytelling, resilience, and the art of finding light in the dark.

You’ve always blurred the line between stand‑up and storytelling. What does that hybrid form let you say that straight comedy can’t? 

It lets me hold contradictions in the same breath. Comedy alone can deflect pain; storytelling can drown in it. When they meet, you get something closer to truth — laughter that doesn’t erase the ache but makes it bearable.

This show feels like a reckoning — a conversation with the world as it is now. What moment or feeling first sparked Oh Man!?

A sense of exhaustion, honestly. The world felt like it was shouting all the time, and I wanted to whisper back. The show began as a quiet question: how do we stay kind when everything around us rewards cruelty?

You often use humour to approach grief and moral complexity. How do you decide when to let the audience laugh and when to let them sit in silence?

You don’t decide — you listen. The audience tells you when they need air. Sometimes silence is the most generous thing you can give them.

There’s a philosophical undercurrent in your work — from ethics to empathy. Which thinkers or ideas have shaped how you write and perform?

I grew up on philosophy podcasts and Buddhist texts. I love the Stoics for their clarity and absurdists for their chaos. Mostly, I’m drawn to anyone who admits they don’t have the answers.

You’ve performed globally, but the Fringe has a particular energy. What does returning to Edinburgh mean for you at this stage of your career?

It’s like coming home to a house that’s constantly being rebuilt. Every year the walls shift, the neighbours change, and you still find your way back to the kitchen table.

Your shows often feel like letters to the future. What do you hope audiences carry with them after Oh Man! ends?

A feeling that the more broken things get, the more we need to look after each other. That tenderness isn’t weakness — it’s rebellion.

Comedy can be a kind of truth‑telling. What truths are you most interested in revealing right now?

That we’re all ridiculous and sacred at once. The truth isn’t tidy; it’s messy and human and full of contradictions.

You’ve spoken about the tension between sincerity and irony in modern culture. How do you keep sincerity alive onstage without it feeling sentimental?

By being specific. Sentimentality is vague; sincerity is precise. If you tell the truth exactly as you felt it, people recognise themselves in it.

If someone walked into Oh Man! expecting a traditional stand‑up hour, what do you hope they walk out with instead?

A sense that comedy can hold more than punchlines — that it can be a conversation, a confession, a shared breath.

What’s the idea or story that still feels too big, too dark, or too tender to tackle — at least for now?

The real story is too dark to tell until I’ve found the light in it. That’s the work — finding the light.

Alice Fraser: Oh Man! — 8:45 PM, Gilded Balloon Teviot, Edinburgh Fringe 2026 Tickets here 

Leave a Comment

A Public Display of Affection: Jonathan Wilson on Memory, Survival and Quiet Rebellion

Click on image to buy ticket

Jonathan Wilson arrives at the Fringe with A Public Display of Affection, a piece that slips between testimony, memory, and performance with the ease of someone who has lived every inch of the story he’s telling. Rooted in Toronto’s queer history of the 1970s and ’80s, the show doesn’t behave like a museum piece. Instead, it breathes—funny, dangerous, tender, and defiantly ordinary in all the ways queer life has always been. Wilson begins as the “queer elder” at the lectern, but the façade doesn’t last long. What follows is a reckoning with survival, desire, chosen family, and the quiet rebellions that once made even holding hands feel like an act of resistance.

As he brings the work to Edinburgh, Wilson isn’t simply exporting a Canadian story. He’s returning to the country his parents once called home, folding questions of belonging, memory, and inheritance into a performance that refuses nostalgia and insists on truth. In an intimate space like Gilded Balloon’s The Snug, the show becomes less a lecture and more a conversation—one that asks younger queer audiences to imagine their own futures while remembering the people who never got the chance.

This interview explores how the piece evolved, what histories risk being erased, and why Wilson believes humour, imperfection, and community are as essential to queer survival as any political victory. Counter Culture asked him to explain.

You’re bringing a critically acclaimed Toronto production to the Fringe. What shifts when a show rooted in 1970s and ’80s Toronto queer history suddenly meets an Edinburgh audience with a completely different cultural memory?

I’ve learned that although the street names change, the emotions and the struggles are the same. Edinburgh audiences probably haven’t heard of Yonge Street or the St. Charles Tavern in Toronto, but they understand first love, shame, chosen family, and trying to build a life when the world keeps suggesting you shouldn’t exist.

The piece begins as a formal “queer elder” talk and then unravels into something far more intimate and dangerous. Was that structural rupture always part of the concept, or did it emerge as you explored how testimony differs from nostalgia?

It wasn’t planned at all. It happened organically when I discovered I was a terrible historian. The play began as a series of readings for students studying queer history, and I felt an unspoken pressure to be a “good” example. Thankfully, the darker, funnier, and more truthful stories of my friends kept interrupting. The moment I stopped trying to be an authority and started becoming a witness, the play finally knew what it wanted to be.

The press release describes the show as a journey through love, loss, lust, and survival. Which of those threads proved hardest to balance without tipping the piece into sentimentality?

Survival. It’s very easy to turn surviving into a sort of sainthood, but of course we weren’t saints. We were messy, funny, horny, selfish, generous, frightened kids trying to get through another day. But we weren’t simply surviving. We were falling in love, dancing until sunrise, making terrible fashion choices, flirting outrageously, and creating families from scratch.

You chart moments where even holding hands felt like rebellion. How do you stage that kind of quiet defiance in a way that lands with audiences who’ve grown up in a more visible, though still imperfect, queer landscape?

By resisting the urge to make it look heroic. Holding someone’s hand shouldn’t be brave. The tragedy is that it was. It should be gloriously ordinary. I hope younger audiences don’t leave thinking, How courageous they were. I hope they leave wondering why something so beautifully mundane was ever considered dangerous. So much queer history is presented as a warning. I want this show to be an invitation to imagine a long life and an earned elderhood.

Critics have called the show “a forgotten slice of Toronto LGBTQ history brought to life.” What part of that history do you feel is most at risk of being rewritten or erased today?

The ordinary lives. The street kids I loved. My chosen family. The young people on the margins who can still disappear, even within a so‑called respectable queer history. We remember the marches, the police persecution, and the court victories, as we should. But we forget the shared rooms, the back‑alley bars, the friendships, the first kisses, the tacky wallpaper, and the people who never became famous enough to be remembered.

You blend razor‑sharp humour with devastating honesty. Given your background in Second City, improvisation, and comedy, how did you decide where humour helps the story, and where it would undermine it?

Laughter opens us up to hear truth — but importantly, the laughter isn’t there only to soften the truth. It is part of the truth. Queer people have always laughed at funerals, flirted in impossible circumstances, and found joy where no one expected it. That’s an important part of our history too.

Your past work includes My Own Private Oshawa, The Normal Heart, and The Lion King. How does A Public Display of Affection sit alongside those roles in terms of emotional weight and personal investment?

There’s nowhere to hide. When you’re playing Ned Weeks in The Normal Heart or Timon in The Lion King, someone else has written the words. This time, every laugh, every silence, and every difficult memory belongs to me. It’s easily the most exposing thing I’ve ever performed. Even my earlier solo work reflected the version of myself I was capable of sharing in my thirties. This show is what that story looks like after another thirty years of living.

Bringing the play to Scotland feels less like exporting a Canadian piece than finally bringing my own family story home. My parents left Scotland for Canada in the early 1960s, so growing up, Scotland was always referred to as “home.” I’ve written some of that tension into this new version of the show, and it has taken me somewhere even more personal than I expected. Because of course… there’s no place like home.

The show insists on remembering at a moment when queer histories risk disappearing beneath progress and assimilation. What’s the one memory you felt absolutely had to remain unfiltered?

The feeling that disappearing was always a possibility. Not in some abstract political sense. Literally. Friends vanished. Spaces vanished. Entire generations vanished. The danger isn’t forgetting the dates. The danger is forgetting what it actually felt like to be alive.

Gilded Balloon’s The Snug is an intimate space. How does that closeness shape the performance, especially when the material moves between humour, danger, and testimony?

You can’t fake intimacy in a space like The Snug. There’s nowhere to perform at people. I’m simply with them. Some nights it feels less like theatre and more like a conversation that’s wandered somewhere unexpectedly honest. Those are usually the best nights.

If you could speak directly to younger queer people encountering this history for the first time, what’s the one uncomfortable truth you hope the show gives them permission to hold onto?

You don’t owe anyone perfection. Every generation inherits unfinished work. You’ll make mistakes. You’ll disagree with the generation before you. One day you’ll probably horrify the generation after you. Welcome to the club. But don’t confuse having more rights with no longer needing each other. Community isn’t something history gave us. It’s something every generation has to build again.

Click here to buy tickets

 

Leave a Comment