Posts Tagged Edinburgh Fringe Festival

A Public Display of Affection: Jonathan Wilson on Memory, Survival and Quiet Rebellion

Click on image to buy ticket

Jonathan Wilson arrives at the Fringe with A Public Display of Affection, a piece that slips between testimony, memory, and performance with the ease of someone who has lived every inch of the story he’s telling. Rooted in Toronto’s queer history of the 1970s and ’80s, the show doesn’t behave like a museum piece. Instead, it breathes—funny, dangerous, tender, and defiantly ordinary in all the ways queer life has always been. Wilson begins as the “queer elder” at the lectern, but the façade doesn’t last long. What follows is a reckoning with survival, desire, chosen family, and the quiet rebellions that once made even holding hands feel like an act of resistance.

As he brings the work to Edinburgh, Wilson isn’t simply exporting a Canadian story. He’s returning to the country his parents once called home, folding questions of belonging, memory, and inheritance into a performance that refuses nostalgia and insists on truth. In an intimate space like Gilded Balloon’s The Snug, the show becomes less a lecture and more a conversation—one that asks younger queer audiences to imagine their own futures while remembering the people who never got the chance.

This interview explores how the piece evolved, what histories risk being erased, and why Wilson believes humour, imperfection, and community are as essential to queer survival as any political victory. Counter Culture asked him to explain.

You’re bringing a critically acclaimed Toronto production to the Fringe. What shifts when a show rooted in 1970s and ’80s Toronto queer history suddenly meets an Edinburgh audience with a completely different cultural memory?

I’ve learned that although the street names change, the emotions and the struggles are the same. Edinburgh audiences probably haven’t heard of Yonge Street or the St. Charles Tavern in Toronto, but they understand first love, shame, chosen family, and trying to build a life when the world keeps suggesting you shouldn’t exist.

The piece begins as a formal “queer elder” talk and then unravels into something far more intimate and dangerous. Was that structural rupture always part of the concept, or did it emerge as you explored how testimony differs from nostalgia?

It wasn’t planned at all. It happened organically when I discovered I was a terrible historian. The play began as a series of readings for students studying queer history, and I felt an unspoken pressure to be a “good” example. Thankfully, the darker, funnier, and more truthful stories of my friends kept interrupting. The moment I stopped trying to be an authority and started becoming a witness, the play finally knew what it wanted to be.

The press release describes the show as a journey through love, loss, lust, and survival. Which of those threads proved hardest to balance without tipping the piece into sentimentality?

Survival. It’s very easy to turn surviving into a sort of sainthood, but of course we weren’t saints. We were messy, funny, horny, selfish, generous, frightened kids trying to get through another day. But we weren’t simply surviving. We were falling in love, dancing until sunrise, making terrible fashion choices, flirting outrageously, and creating families from scratch.

You chart moments where even holding hands felt like rebellion. How do you stage that kind of quiet defiance in a way that lands with audiences who’ve grown up in a more visible, though still imperfect, queer landscape?

By resisting the urge to make it look heroic. Holding someone’s hand shouldn’t be brave. The tragedy is that it was. It should be gloriously ordinary. I hope younger audiences don’t leave thinking, How courageous they were. I hope they leave wondering why something so beautifully mundane was ever considered dangerous. So much queer history is presented as a warning. I want this show to be an invitation to imagine a long life and an earned elderhood.

Critics have called the show “a forgotten slice of Toronto LGBTQ history brought to life.” What part of that history do you feel is most at risk of being rewritten or erased today?

The ordinary lives. The street kids I loved. My chosen family. The young people on the margins who can still disappear, even within a so‑called respectable queer history. We remember the marches, the police persecution, and the court victories, as we should. But we forget the shared rooms, the back‑alley bars, the friendships, the first kisses, the tacky wallpaper, and the people who never became famous enough to be remembered.

You blend razor‑sharp humour with devastating honesty. Given your background in Second City, improvisation, and comedy, how did you decide where humour helps the story, and where it would undermine it?

Laughter opens us up to hear truth — but importantly, the laughter isn’t there only to soften the truth. It is part of the truth. Queer people have always laughed at funerals, flirted in impossible circumstances, and found joy where no one expected it. That’s an important part of our history too.

Your past work includes My Own Private Oshawa, The Normal Heart, and The Lion King. How does A Public Display of Affection sit alongside those roles in terms of emotional weight and personal investment?

There’s nowhere to hide. When you’re playing Ned Weeks in The Normal Heart or Timon in The Lion King, someone else has written the words. This time, every laugh, every silence, and every difficult memory belongs to me. It’s easily the most exposing thing I’ve ever performed. Even my earlier solo work reflected the version of myself I was capable of sharing in my thirties. This show is what that story looks like after another thirty years of living.

Bringing the play to Scotland feels less like exporting a Canadian piece than finally bringing my own family story home. My parents left Scotland for Canada in the early 1960s, so growing up, Scotland was always referred to as “home.” I’ve written some of that tension into this new version of the show, and it has taken me somewhere even more personal than I expected. Because of course… there’s no place like home.

The show insists on remembering at a moment when queer histories risk disappearing beneath progress and assimilation. What’s the one memory you felt absolutely had to remain unfiltered?

The feeling that disappearing was always a possibility. Not in some abstract political sense. Literally. Friends vanished. Spaces vanished. Entire generations vanished. The danger isn’t forgetting the dates. The danger is forgetting what it actually felt like to be alive.

Gilded Balloon’s The Snug is an intimate space. How does that closeness shape the performance, especially when the material moves between humour, danger, and testimony?

You can’t fake intimacy in a space like The Snug. There’s nowhere to perform at people. I’m simply with them. Some nights it feels less like theatre and more like a conversation that’s wandered somewhere unexpectedly honest. Those are usually the best nights.

If you could speak directly to younger queer people encountering this history for the first time, what’s the one uncomfortable truth you hope the show gives them permission to hold onto?

You don’t owe anyone perfection. Every generation inherits unfinished work. You’ll make mistakes. You’ll disagree with the generation before you. One day you’ll probably horrify the generation after you. Welcome to the club. But don’t confuse having more rights with no longer needing each other. Community isn’t something history gave us. It’s something every generation has to build again.

Click here to buy tickets

 

Leave a Comment

Patient 13: A Darkly Funny Journey Through Illness, Independence and Magic Mushrooms

Click on image to buy tickets

Patient 13 is  a story that starts in a hospital ward, detours through a psychedelic clinical trial, and somehow lands in a place that feels both devastating and oddly hopeful. It’s the kind of show that makes you rethink the neat narratives we build around illness, independence, and the people we let close enough to hurt us.

Talking to Gail, you get the sense she’s spent years turning chaos into clarity — not by sanding down the rough edges, but by holding them up to the light. The humour is sharp, the honesty disarming, and the reflections feel lived‑in rather than curated. What follows is a conversation that moves between trauma, mushrooms, medical authority, dating, and the strange business of becoming a new version of yourself while the old one is still watching.

“I got rid of all the toxic people and there was no one left.” Were you laughing at the absurdity of that line, or grieving the truth inside it?

Both, the line exposes the nuance and extremes of human relationships: isolation v independence; trust v self care. As a “chronically” independent person, my impulse is to retreat when I feel I can’t trust someone. Sometimes that is the right decision, sometimes not. In the real events of Patient 13, I struggled to find the balance. What are the right boundaries? What happens when “there is no one left?” I had to ask myself if I went too far. After all, no one is perfect. We can’t do everything alone and it is possible to grow in a relationship.

Your cancer diagnosis pushed you into a clinical trial involving magic mushrooms. What was the moment you realised this experience was theatrical?

The psychedelic trip (or the dosing, as the doctors call it) was an intense download of epiphanies — one was that I missed performing and that I should write jokes again. Years later, when I returned to NYC storytelling stages, the first story I told was one called “The Dosing.” The audience loved it, so that was encouraging. Several people have told me that it was the best performance of a psychedelic trip they’d ever seen. And it’s accurate because the doctors made me write everything down. And now it’s in the play!

The show is darkly satirical, but the trauma underneath is real. How do you protect yourself emotionally while performing something so close to the bone?

The play goes by much faster than the real life events and now I already know the ending is happy, so that’s a plus.

There’s a line in the play that also reflects my pragmatic approach, then and now: “there’s no time to cry, I’m CEO of Gail’s biggest decision ever.” So, even back then, there was/is a breakneck urgency to move forward, to deal with the decisions, the treatments and still have some fun. I’ve always tried to approach life as an adventure, even in tough times. This will make more sense when you see the show.

As an author, the experience has transformed into emotional beats, a complete narrative. While there is some trauma and sadness, it feels like I’m reliving and sharing personal growth, as lessons are learned and action is taken. Overall it’s an empowering and joyful tale, an adventure. The humor is constant, so we’re laughing together at the absurdity of life. I like to say that the show helps me do the show.

I expect that performing almost every day for 23 days in Edinburgh may present a different challenge. I plan to sit in the meadows, hug a tree, find a yoga class or a fellow human to ground me.

You describe yourself as fiercely independent. What did psychedelics reveal about the version of yourself you’d been clinging to? As I mentioned above, I may have gone too far in my independence, especially post cancer treatment. It’s not easy to return to “normal life” after facing mortality and being treated for cancer. For me at least, I wanted to have deep conversations, not just get back to the mundane routine of living. And I think I judged certain people who didn’t behave the way I thought they should. The psychedelics helped me see the bigger picture.

The psychedelics reminded me that we’re all doing our best. And that we are all connected, like it or not. This is a lesson I still have to remember. It’s been long enough that I can slip back into old patterns. Doing the show feels a bit like tripping as the profound truths need to be repeated. It’s fun and enlightening for me and the audience.

The play is also about dating while your identity is shifting. What did illness change about intimacy and desire?

Hmm. I was raised in Oklahoma, in an environment where I was taught to suppress my own feelings, to always put other people first. Over time, this manifests as being a “people pleaser,” which can lead to personal neglect and shame. So, I haven’t always been good at standing up for myself or even recognizing that I should defend my own feelings.

However, facing mortality offers a certain immediate clarity. Suddenly, I had to put myself first — it was literally life or death. Suddenly, I had to ask “is this person good for me?” rather than “how do I make them happy?” The illness forced me into a dramatic self-love that was long overdue. It also turned me into a bit of an introvert, a better listener, and a philosopher. I love this new version of myself and want to keep those elements.

You’ve said you think of your audience as “close friends.” What does friendship mean in this context?

It means we can trust each other. I’m honest about my experience, sharing my vulnerabilities, mistakes, and lessons. In the play, my audience (aka my friends) often see my mistakes before I do. Like life. As their friend, I’m warm and welcoming, protecting them from trauma by adding humor to the “scary” parts. It’s like we are living the events together. What’s more fun than hanging out with friends?! In this case, I get to do all the talking, but it’s not considered rude. When I’ve hung out with the audience after, I joke that it’s their turn to talk for an hour.

Dan Oliverio talks about institutionalised fear and loneliness. What fear felt institutional to you, and what fear felt entirely your own?

The institutional fears that I deal with in Patient 13 are things like questioning the medical authority, power figures. For example, I faced an arrogant doctor who didn’t listen, and seemed to want to scare me into following a healthcare protocol generalised to fit the masses rather than an individual.

On a more personal level, I was fearful due to the uncertainty of a contradictory diagnosis, with treatment supervised by a doctor that I didn’t trust. The question became, do I have to do everything that an authority tells me to do? I was suspicious of his bravado and condescending demeanour. It didn’t feel like I was a person to him. I was more afraid of chemo and radiation than of psychedelics.

Patient 13 arrives as the UK debates psychedelic treatment. How does it feel to have your story intersect with a political turning point?

It feels fantastic to share my story at a time when it can be most useful. It’s synchronicity, a happy accident to be relevant. I hope that the Patient 13 show helps UK audiences see one example of how psilocybin treatment might work. There are documentaries out there, but this play enables people to take a real life journey with me as a patient. Beyond entertainment, I want the show to be a service, such that it helps the audience find more clarity in their own lives and decisions.

When I participated in the study, most people in the US were skeptical about psychedelic therapy. The stigma was so strong that the hospital had a hard time finding cancer patients to participate. Perhaps the UK debate is at that stage now. So again, happy relevance.

The show grew from storytelling nights in New York. What stayed from those early versions?

The early versions were merged into a greater narrative arc. Many little situational jokes stayed, because I know they work. But the endings were cut and reshaped. Beginnings were expanded. The transitions were fun and tedious to write to ensure that they pulled the separate pieces together in a bigger story. This experience has helped me grow as a writer and performer.

If the version of you who first received the diagnosis could watch Patient 13 today, what do you hope she’d recognise?

First off, Version One of Gail would be relieved that I/we survived. Secondly, I think she’d be thrilled and impressed that the New Version Gail managed to follow through with this project and that it is entertaining and helping people. She’d like me to get rid of some toxic people.

Version One Gail would like the jokes. Even in the midst of trauma, she saw the funny. She’d like that New Version now shares that sense of humor with a broader audience. After the diagnosis and during treatment, she never wanted pity and still wanted to be a normal person who has fun. New Gail continues that tradition, which I think people can relate to on multiple levels.

Both Versions believe that you don’t stop living just because you think you might die. Sometimes “healthy” people can be inadvertently condescending to people who are fighting an illness. It’s a weird division. Patient 13 brings light to these nuances. Version one of Gail would be proud.

Click here to buy tickets

 

Leave a Comment

Jenny Gorelick on SORRY: Dating Apps and Apology Culture

Jenny Gorelick

Jenny Gorelick’s SORRY is one of those Fringe shows that arrives already vibrating with cultural voltage — a comedy about dating apps, apology culture, female shame, and the absurdity of modern romance that somehow manages to be both riotously funny and quietly devastating. Gorelick has turned her personal chaos into a kind of survival manual for the rest of us, drawing on experiences that range from the bleakly hilarious (“run it back?”) to the genuinely tragic (“my work crush got struck by lightning and died”).

SORRY isn’t just a show about dating — it’s about accountability, gendered guilt, the loneliness economy, and the stories women tell themselves to stay alive in a world that keeps demanding they apologise for existing. It’s sharp, self‑aware, and uncomfortably relatable. And, in true Fringe fashion, it’s also very, very funny.

1. Your show starts in the dating apps — that strange digital swamp where hope, delusion and red flags all blur together. What’s the moment on Hinge that made you think, “Right, this has to go in a show”?

Recently I got a like on Hinge from a man I had already dated. Who had already dumped me. It just said “run it back?” He is mentioned by name on the first page of my book about red flags. Like, page one. The Book of Red Flags. No. We will not be running it back.

2. You dated a man with “sorry mom” tattooed on his body who still couldn’t apologise. What did that relationship teach you about the apology gap — and about the men who think remorse is a personality trait?

Women will apologize for everything. We say sorry for saying sorry too much. And I’m sorry I said that about all women. But it seems like it would genuinely kill a man to apologize for one single thing. I’ve had men say “sorry you feel that way” — putting it right back on me!

But this relationship taught me something important: if I’m hurt, I can write about it. And it can be published in the New York Times. If you break my heart, it is the news!

3. SORRY digs into how women are conditioned to apologise for simply existing. When did you first realise you were saying sorry for things that weren’t your fault?

I’m still doing it. I feel sorry and guilty every single day of my life for every mistake I’ve ever made. I wish that weren’t true! And I think it goes all the way back to Eve. Women feel shame…biblically, because Eve is blamed for all of human sin. Even though all she did was have a healthy snack. It’s really not fair.

4. You’ve written about dating disasters for the New York Times and Cosmopolitan. What’s the story you still can’t believe happened — even though you lived it?

My work crush — a very sweet, cute, and tall guy I worked with — got struck by lightning and died. On a work trip. Which is the most tragic thing that has ever happened. He wasn’t doing what he loved. He was doing what he had to do — for health insurance. Because America. He never knew I had a crush on him. And now he never will.

Which is why you need to live out loud. You could be struck by lightning. And I mean that literally.

5. You made more money posting “tasteful thirst traps” on OnlyFans than writing your book. What did that reveal to you about the male loneliness economy — and the value men place on attention versus accountability?

What’s so interesting about “my guys” — which is what I lovingly call the men who pay money to see me in a bathing suit on OnlyFans — is that they could just go to a public pool. For free. I do worry about their finances. I don’t think it’s money they technically have, it is certainly not cash on hand, and if it weren’t going to me, it would be going to Polymarket. So honestly, I’d rather they spend their fake money on me than on sports betting. I’m a real girl. I need it more.

6. Your book The Book of Red Flags is basically a survival guide for modern romance. Which red flag do you think people ignore the most — even when it’s screaming in their face?

I hate to say it, but if it doesn’t feel like he likes you and you feel confused — he probably doesn’t like you. And if he’s being super attentive and communicative and complimentary? He still might not like you. That might just be love bombing. You have to wait a month to really know. It’s exhausting. I’m sorry.

7. You talk about confidence, shame, and the pressure on women to be endlessly likeable. What’s the moment in your life when you stopped performing likability and started performing honesty?

I’m afraid you’re overestimating me. I still need everyone to like me. One bad review might actually kill me, so let’s all just light a candle, charge our crystals (if you’re that kind of person), and pray for me.

8. Dating apps often feel like a sociological experiment. What did mapping America’s political divide through men‑with‑boats teach you about the country — and about dating?

If they own a boat, they’re Republican. If they don’t have their political affiliation listed on their profile, they’re Republican. And if they’re writing a fantasy novel in the style of Dune in their notes app — Libertarian.

9. You’ve turned personal chaos into comedy across stage, screen and print. What’s the line between oversharing and storytelling — and how do you know when you’ve crossed it?

Storytelling is oversharing. Some people are not going to like it (my younger brother). Some people are going to have to learn to be okay with it (my dad). And others are going to feel completely seen and heard (my fans). I’m doing it for them, but also for me. Am I crossing a line? Probably! But who gets to decide where the line is? My exes?!

I do feel terrible anytime anyone is upset with me — including the man with the ass tattoo who stood me up. But at the end of the day, he stood me up. And it is okay for me to turn that into art. That’s actually the best case scenario…maybe even better than if he’d actually shown up on the date.

10. At the heart of SORRY is the question of accountability. What do you hope audiences walk away reconsidering — about apologies, about dating, or about the stories we tell ourselves to survive modern romance?

I hope women leave feeling like they don’t need to be so hard on themselves. I hope men leave wanting to do better. And I hope everyone goes home and takes some amazing nudes for their grandchildren.

Jenny Gorelick: SORRY performs at Edinburgh Festival Fringe from 3rd – 30th August 2026. : Buy tickets here

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 14–20 March 2026

A soaring vulture against a blue sky, with bold text reading 'CULTURE VULTURE' above and event details below.

Spring is beginning to stir in the cultural calendar, and this week’s television and film schedule offers a characteristically eclectic mix. Hollywood glamour arrives with the live broadcast of the 98th Academy Awards, while BBC Four revisits the influential 1990s drama This Life. Cinema lovers are also spoiled with everything from Cold War espionage to space survival, via musicals, psychological thrillers and one of the most extraordinary war films ever made.

What’s striking about this week’s selection is the sense of historical reflection. Several programmes look back at pivotal cultural moments—the making of The Graduate, the archaeological race to uncover ancient Egypt, and the enduring legacy of classic theatre through Hedda Gabler. At the same time, contemporary documentaries such as Inside the Rage Machine examine the forces shaping the modern world, particularly the influence of social media on public debate.

Among the highlights this week are Francis Ford Coppola’s mesmerising Vietnam epic Apocalypse Now, the joyous political drama Pride, and the always watchable spectacle of the Oscars themselves. Whether your tastes lean toward classic cinema, thoughtful documentaries, or intelligent drama, there is plenty here to explore. Selections and previews and reviews are by Pat Harrington.

🌟 Highlights

🌟 Apocalypse Now — Film4, Friday 20 March
🌟 Pride — BBC Three, Tuesday 17 March
🌟 The Oscars Live — ITV1, Sunday 15 March


Saturday 14 March

The Race for Ancient Egypt in Colour — Channel 4, 7.15pm

This visually striking documentary revisits the great archaeological race to uncover the secrets of ancient Egypt, using colourised archival imagery to bring early discoveries vividly to life. The programme explores the rivalries between pioneering archaeologists and the international competition to uncover spectacular treasures buried for millennia.

The film is alert to the politics of excavation as well as its romance. It traces how European powers and their favoured scholars treated tombs and temples as trophies in a wider contest for prestige, often sidelining local voices and custodians in the process.

By foregrounding these tensions, the documentary quietly interrogates the colonial assumptions that shaped early Egyptology. It asks who gets to tell the story of a civilisation, and whose labour and knowledge are written out of the official record.

The colourisation work is more than a gimmick: it restores texture to images that have long circulated in monochrome, making the dust, stone and fabric feel newly present. That visual immediacy helps bridge the distance between the early twentieth century and now, reminding viewers that these were living landscapes, not just museum backdrops.

By combining historical insight with modern technology, the documentary offers a fresh perspective on one of humanity’s most enduring fascinations. It’s a thoughtful watch for anyone interested in how the past is constructed—and contested—in the present.

Queen Victoria and the Groomsman — Channel 5, 9.15pm

Few monarchs have inspired more speculation about their private lives than Queen Victoria. This documentary examines her famously close relationship with the Highland servant John Brown, a friendship that scandalised the Victorian court.

The film sifts through letters, diaries and contemporary accounts to separate gossip from evidence. What emerges is less a royal scandal than a portrait of mutual dependence: a widowed queen clinging to the one person who treated her as a human being rather than an institution.

Court insiders’ discomfort becomes a story in itself. Their snobbery and suspicion reveal how rigid class hierarchies struggled to accommodate a bond that crossed both rank and national identity, with Brown’s Scottishness coded as unruly and improper.

Visually, the programme leans into the contrast between Balmoral’s rugged landscapes and the suffocating etiquette of Windsor and London. That tension mirrors Victoria’s own divided existence, torn between duty and the desire for unvarnished companionship.

The result is a revealing portrait of Victoria not as an imperial symbol but as a grieving woman navigating loneliness after the death of Prince Albert. It’s a reminder that even the most mythologised figures are, at heart, people trying to survive their own losses.

Lies: A Truly Terrific Absolutely True Story — BBC Two, 9.15pm

This intriguing documentary explores the strange cultural territory between truth and invention. From elaborate hoaxes to embellished memoirs, it examines why audiences are often drawn to stories that later unravel as fiction.

The film is less interested in catching liars than in understanding believers. It shows how charisma, repetition and the desire for a neat narrative can override basic scepticism, especially when a story flatters our existing worldview.

Through case studies ranging from literary frauds to viral internet myths, the documentary maps the emotional rewards of being “in on” a compelling tale. It suggests that the shame of being duped often keeps people clinging to discredited narratives long after the evidence has collapsed.

In an age of viral misinformation, the film feels particularly relevant, asking how easily belief can be manipulated. It also raises uncomfortable questions about the media ecosystems that profit from outrage and sensation, even when the facts are shaky.

By the end, the documentary leaves viewers with a useful unease: a sense that critical thinking is not a luxury but a civic duty. It’s a brisk, engaging watch that lingers longer than its playful title suggests.

Sweet Charity (1969) — BBC Two, 12.05pm

Bob Fosse’s exuberant musical showcases Shirley MacLaine as Charity Hope Valentine, an optimistic dancer whose romantic dreams repeatedly collide with disappointment. The film balances dazzling choreography with moments of poignant vulnerability, revealing the loneliness beneath its showbiz sparkle.

Adapted from the stage musical (itself based on Fellini’s Nights of Cabiria), Sweet Charity relocates the story to New York’s dance halls and city streets. Fosse uses angular choreography and inventive camera work to turn musical numbers into psychological x‑rays, exposing Charity’s hopefulness as both her superpower and her Achilles heel.

MacLaine’s performance is the film’s beating heart. She plays Charity as a woman who knows she is being underestimated and patronised, yet refuses to surrender her belief that something better might be around the corner. That tension between self‑awareness and romantic delusion gives the film its bittersweet charge.

The supporting cast—including Chita Rivera and Sammy Davis Jr.—add texture and bite, particularly in set‑pieces like “Hey Big Spender” and the cult and my personal favouritefavourite “The Rhythm of Life” sequence. Fosse’s staging here feels like a bridge between classic Hollywood musical grammar and the more fragmented, modern style that would define the 1970s.

Visually inventive and emotionally engaging, Sweet Charity remains one of the most distinctive musicals of the late 1960s. It’s a film about a woman who keeps getting knocked down by a city that barely notices her—and about the stubborn, fragile courage it takes to keep getting back up.

The Ipcress File (1965) — BBC Two, 2.45pm

Michael Caine’s Harry Palmer offered a refreshing alternative to the glamorous spies of the era. A working‑class intelligence officer navigating Cold War intrigue, Palmer operates in a world of bureaucracy, suspicion and psychological manipulation.

Where James Bond swans through casinos and tropical islands, The Ipcress File traps its hero in fluorescent‑lit offices, grimy London streets and anonymous warehouses. The film’s espionage is rooted in paperwork, petty rivalries and the grinding paranoia of a state that barely trusts its own operatives.

Director Sidney J. Furie’s inventive camerawork reinforces that atmosphere of unease. Off‑kilter angles, obstructed frames and claustrophobic compositions make the audience feel as surveilled and disoriented as Palmer himself, particularly during the film’s brainwashing sequences.

Caine plays Palmer with sardonic understatement, his dry humour and culinary hobbies undercutting the genre’s usual macho posturing. He’s a civil servant who happens to carry a gun, not a fantasy of imperial swagger, and that groundedness has helped the film age remarkably well.

Intelligent and stylish, The Ipcress File remains one of the finest British espionage thrillers. It’s a reminder that the Cold War was as much about paperwork and psychology as it was about gadgets and glamour—and that the people caught in its machinery were often as expendable as the files they handled.

Little Big Man (1970) — Film4, 6.05pm

Arthur Penn’s revisionist western follows the extraordinary life story of Jack Crabb, played by Dustin Hoffman, who claims to have witnessed some of the most famous events of the American frontier. Blending satire with tragedy, the film dismantles traditional western mythology and exposes the violence behind the conquest of the West.

Framed as the testimony of a 121‑year‑old man, the film moves episodically through Jack’s shifting identities: white settler, adopted Cheyenne, scout, conman and reluctant participant in key historical atrocities. That structure allows Penn to puncture the heroic myths of frontier expansion from multiple angles.

The depiction of Native American characters, particularly Chief Old Lodge Skins (Chief Dan George), is more humane than many contemporaries, though still filtered through Jack’s perspective. The film acknowledges the genocidal violence inflicted on Indigenous communities and treats their culture with a respect largely absent from earlier Hollywood westerns.

Tonally, Little Big Man walks a tightrope between broad comedy and devastating horror. Its humour—often at the expense of pompous cavalry officers and hypocritical preachers—makes the eventual eruptions of violence all the more shocking, underlining how quickly ideology can turn lethal.

It stands as a landmark of the New Hollywood era, when filmmakers began re‑examining America’s historical myths. Watching it now, the film feels like an early attempt at the kind of reckoning that is still very much unfinished.

Cabaret (1972) — BBC Two, 10.55pm

Bob Fosse’s dark musical masterpiece captures the decadence and political tension of Berlin in the early 1930s. Liza Minnelli’s unforgettable performance as Sally Bowles anchors a story set against the rising tide of Nazism.

The film cleverly confines almost all musical numbers to the Kit Kat Club stage, turning the cabaret into a kind of Greek chorus. As the songs grow more menacing and the audience more uniformed, the club becomes a barometer of a society sliding into authoritarianism while insisting it’s all just a bit of fun.

Minnelli’s Sally is a study in self‑invention and denial, a woman who performs her own life as relentlessly as she performs on stage. Her refusal to look beyond the next party or romance is both understandable and damning, a microcosm of a wider culture’s wilful blindness.

Fosse’s direction is razor‑sharp, using mirrors, tight framing and choreographed chaos to suggest a world where everyone is watching and being watched. The famous “Tomorrow Belongs to Me” sequence, set outside the club, lands like a slap—a reminder that the real danger is gathering in the daylight.

Stylish, unsettling and brilliant, Cabaret remains one of cinema’s greatest musicals. It’s a film about the stories people tell themselves to avoid seeing what’s coming—and about the terrible cost of that evasion.

New York, New York (1977) — BBC Two, 12.55am

Martin Scorsese’s ambitious homage to the Hollywood musical pairs Robert De Niro and Liza Minnelli as volatile lovers navigating the post‑war jazz scene. The film blends stylised studio sets with the emotional intensity typical of Scorsese’s work.

On one level, New York, New York is a love letter to the MGM musicals of the 1940s and 1950s, with its painted backdrops, big band numbers and heightened artifice. On another, it’s a bruising portrait of a relationship corroded by ego, insecurity and the unequal space afforded to male and female ambition.

De Niro’s Jimmy is a gifted but deeply self‑absorbed saxophonist, while Minnelli’s Francine is a singer whose talent threatens his fragile sense of self. Their clashes over career, control and compromise feel painfully contemporary, even as the film wraps them in old‑Hollywood gloss.

Scorsese’s decision to let scenes run long, with overlapping dialogue and messy arguments, sometimes jarred audiences expecting a tighter, more conventional musical. Yet that looseness is part of the film’s power: it insists that emotional realism can coexist with stylised fantasy, even when the combination is uncomfortable.

Though divisive on release, New York, New York has since gained admiration for its bold ambition and unforgettable title song. It’s a film about how hard it is to share the spotlight—and about the cost, and freedom, of walking away from someone who can’t bear to see you shine.


Sunday 15 March

The Oscars Live — The 98th Academy Awards — ITV1, 10.15pm 🌟

Hollywood’s biggest night returns with the annual celebration of cinematic achievement. From glamorous red‑carpet arrivals to emotional acceptance speeches, the Oscars remain one of the entertainment industry’s grandest rituals.

While debates about winners and snubs are inevitable, the ceremony offers a fascinating snapshot of the year’s most influential films and performances. It’s also a barometer of industry anxieties and aspirations, from diversity pledges to the uneasy coexistence of streaming and theatrical releases.

For all its self‑importance, the Oscars still produce moments of genuine surprise and vulnerability: a veteran finally recognised, a newcomer overwhelmed, a speech that cuts through the platitudes. Those flashes of sincerity are what keep the ceremony compelling, even for viewers sceptical of awards culture.

The telecast is also a reminder of how globalised film culture has become. International nominees, transnational productions and worldwide audiences mean that the stories being honoured—and the politics around them—are no longer confined to Hollywood’s backyard.

For film lovers, it remains irresistible theatre: a flawed, overlong, occasionally chaotic ritual that nonetheless captures something of cinema’s enduring pull on the collective imagination.

Planes That Changed History: The Spitfire — National Geographic, 9pm

This documentary explores the design and impact of the legendary Spitfire fighter aircraft. The plane became a symbol of Britain’s resistance during the Second World War, particularly during the Battle of Britain.

By examining its engineering and wartime role, the programme reveals why the Spitfire remains one of aviation’s most iconic machines. It looks at how its elliptical wings, powerful Rolls‑Royce Merlin engine and manoeuvrability gave RAF pilots a crucial edge in the skies.

The film also pays attention to the human stories behind the hardware: the pilots who flew the aircraft, the ground crews who kept it operational, and the civilians who watched dogfights unfold above their homes. That blend of technical detail and personal testimony keeps the documentary grounded.

Archival footage and modern air‑to‑air photography work together to show the Spitfire in motion, emphasising both its elegance and its lethality. The programme doesn’t romanticise war, but it does acknowledge the emotional charge this particular machine still carries in British memory.

For viewers interested in military history or engineering, it’s a satisfying, accessible watch—and a reminder that technology is never neutral, but always entangled with the stories nations tell about themselves.

Janet Suzman Remembers Hedda Gabler — BBC Four, 10pm

followed by Hedda Gabler — 10.15pm

Janet Suzman reflects on her celebrated performance in the BBC’s 1972 adaptation of Henrik Ibsen’s classic play. The drama itself remains a powerful portrayal of psychological conflict, centred on one of theatre’s most complex female characters.

The reminiscence programme offers a rare glimpse into the craft of serious television drama at a time when the BBC was still regularly adapting canonical plays for the small screen. Suzman’s recollections of rehearsal processes, directorial choices and the constraints of studio shooting add texture to the archive footage.

Hedda Gabler, with its tight focus on a woman trapped by social expectations and her own corrosive impulses, feels eerily modern. The production leans into the play’s claustrophobia, using close‑ups and confined sets to underline Hedda’s sense of entrapment.

Together, the documentary and drama provide a fascinating glimpse into the history of serious television theatre. They also invite viewers to consider how rare such ambitious, text‑driven productions have become in today’s schedule.

For anyone interested in performance, adaptation or the evolution of British TV drama, this double bill is a quietly precious opportunity to revisit a landmark role and the infrastructure that made it possible.

Howards End (1992) — Film4, 3.50pm

This elegant adaptation of E.M. Forster’s novel examines class divisions in Edwardian England through the lives of three interconnected families. Emma Thompson’s Oscar‑winning performance anchors a story rich in social insight and emotional depth.

Directed by James Ivory and produced by Merchant Ivory, the film is a masterclass in controlled emotion and meticulous period detail. It uses houses, gardens and city streets as extensions of character, with the titular Howards End standing in for a more humane, if fragile, vision of Englishness.

The clash between the idealistic Schlegel sisters, the pragmatic Wilcoxes and the struggling clerk Leonard Bast lays bare the hypocrisies of a society that talks about culture and charity while preserving its own comfort. The film never lets its genteel surfaces obscure the economic brutality underneath.

Thompson’s Margaret Schlegel is the film’s moral centre, negotiating loyalty, compromise and self‑respect in a world that expects women to smooth over men’s damage. Her performance, alongside strong turns from Anthony Hopkins, Helena Bonham Carter and Samuel West, gives the film its emotional heft.

Beautifully crafted, Howards End remains one of the finest literary adaptations of the 1990s. It’s a film about who gets to inherit not just property, but the future—and about the quiet revolutions that happen in drawing rooms as well as on picket lines.

Single White Female (1992) — Great TV, 9pm

A tense psychological thriller about a woman whose new roommate develops an increasingly disturbing obsession with her. The film captures early‑1990s anxieties about identity, privacy and urban life.

Bridget Fonda plays Allison, a New Yorker whose attempt to start afresh after a breakup leads her to share her flat with Jennifer Jason Leigh’s initially shy, then increasingly unhinged Hedy. The film mines the intimacy of shared domestic space for maximum unease, turning everyday objects into potential threats.

Leigh’s performance is the standout: she makes Hedy’s neediness and rage feel rooted in profound loneliness rather than mere genre villainy. That complexity gives the film a queasy empathy even as it leans into its more lurid set‑pieces.

Viewed now, Single White Female can feel dated in its treatment of mental illness and queer coding, but it remains a fascinating time capsule of pre‑internet fears about stolen identities and blurred boundaries. The idea that someone could quietly remake themselves in your image still lands, even if the technology has changed.

Stylish and unsettling, it has become a cult favourite. It’s best approached as both thriller and social artefact: a reminder of how cities, and the people who move through them, can be both refuge and threat.

The Martian (2015) — BBC Two, 10pm

Ridley Scott’s gripping survival drama follows an astronaut stranded on Mars who must rely on science and ingenuity to stay alive. Matt Damon brings humour and determination to the role, turning a desperate situation into a puzzle to be solved.

Adapted from Andy Weir’s novel, the film leans into the practicalities of survival: growing food in Martian soil, jury‑rigging equipment, calculating trajectories. That focus on problem‑solving gives the story an unusually optimistic tone for a space disaster movie.

Damon’s Mark Watney narrates much of his ordeal through video logs, which allows the film to balance technical exposition with characterful asides. His gallows humour and flashes of vulnerability keep the audience invested even when the narrative is essentially one man in a habitat tinkering with machinery.

Back on Earth, NASA’s attempts to rescue Watney provide a parallel story about institutional risk, public image and international cooperation. The film’s depiction of scientists and engineers as capable, fallible and fundamentally collaborative feels quietly radical in a culture that often sidelines such work.

Thrilling and optimistic, The Martian celebrates human resourcefulness in the face of impossible odds. It’s a rare blockbuster that makes you want to Google orbital mechanics afterwards, not because you have to, but because the film has made curiosity feel heroic.


Monday 16 March

Inside the Rage Machine — BBC Two, 9pm

Journalist Marianna Spring investigates how social media algorithms amplify anger and division online. The programme examines how digital platforms reward provocative content, often pushing users toward increasingly extreme viewpoints.

By talking to both platform insiders and people radicalised or harassed online, the documentary traces how design choices—what is promoted, what is hidden, what is monetised—shape the emotional climate of public debate. It makes clear that “the algorithm” is not a neutral force but a set of decisions with real‑world consequences.

The film also looks at the toll this environment takes on those working within it, including moderators and journalists who spend their days wading through abuse and disinformation. Their testimonies underline that the rage machine chews up workers as well as users.

It is a timely exploration of the forces shaping modern political discourse. Crucially, it resists the temptation to individualise blame, instead asking what regulatory, cultural and technological changes might be needed to dial down the temperature.

For anyone who has ever wondered why their feeds feel angrier than their real‑world conversations, this is essential, sobering viewing.

Imagine… Tracey Emin: Where Do You Draw the Line? — BBC Four, 10pm

This edition of the long‑running arts series explores the life and work of controversial British artist Tracey Emin. Her deeply personal artworks have provoked both admiration and outrage, raising questions about vulnerability and artistic confession.

The film traces Emin’s journey from Margate to international galleries, revisiting key works such as My Bed and her neon text pieces. It situates her within the Young British Artists generation while also acknowledging how singular her voice has remained.

Interviews with Emin are characteristically frank, touching on trauma, illness and the costs of turning one’s own life into material. The documentary doesn’t try to sand down her edges; instead, it lets her contradictions stand, trusting viewers to sit with the discomfort.

The programme also includes perspectives from critics and fellow artists, some admiring, some sceptical. That plurality of voices prevents the film from becoming hagiography, instead framing Emin as a lightning rod for debates about taste, class and what counts as “serious” art.

The result is a revealing portrait of one of Britain’s most distinctive contemporary artists. It’s particularly valuable for viewers who know the headlines but not the work, offering a chance to look again and perhaps see more.

Emin & Munch: Between the Clock and the Bed — BBC Four, 11.20pm

This programme explores the artistic dialogue between Tracey Emin and the Norwegian painter Edvard Munch. Despite their different eras and styles, both artists draw heavily on emotional intensity and personal experience.

Structured around an exhibition that placed Emin’s work alongside Munch’s, the film shows how themes of desire, loneliness, illness and mortality echo across their canvases and installations. It’s less about influence than resonance.

By juxtaposing Munch’s paintings with Emin’s drawings, sculptures and neons, the documentary invites viewers to consider how similar feelings find different formal expressions. The result is a kind of cross‑generational conversation about what it means to make art from pain.

The film offers a thoughtful meditation on how artists transform private feeling into universal expression. It also quietly challenges the idea that confessional art is somehow less rigorous or serious than more “distanced” work.

For those who have ever dismissed either artist as too melodramatic, this is a persuasive argument for looking again, more slowly.

The Secret Sex Lives of Tyrants — Sky History, 10pm

This provocative documentary series explores the private lives of history’s most notorious rulers. By examining rumours, relationships and scandals, it attempts to understand how power shaped their personal behaviour.

The series walks a fine line between prurience and analysis. At its best, it uses intimate histories to illuminate broader patterns: how authoritarian leaders treat bodies—especially women’s bodies—as extensions of their own entitlement and control.

There is, inevitably, a risk of sensationalism, and some viewers may find the tone too playful for the subject matter. Yet the programme does gesture towards the ways in which private abuses of power foreshadow or mirror public atrocities.

The result is an unusual blend of political biography and psychological speculation. It’s not definitive history, but as a starting point for thinking about the entanglement of sex, power and violence, it’s unsettling in useful ways.

Best watched with a critical eye and, ideally, a good history book within reach.

American Fiction (2023) — BBC Two, 12am

A sharp satire about a writer who becomes unexpectedly famous after producing a deliberately stereotypical novel. The film skewers cultural expectations within the publishing industry while exploring the contradictions of its protagonist.

Based on Percival Everett’s novel Erasure, American Fiction follows Thelonious “Monk” Ellison, a frustrated Black author whose serious work is ignored while a clichéd, trauma‑laden manuscript he writes in anger becomes a runaway success. The premise allows the film to take aim at a market that demands certain kinds of “authenticity” while flattening the people it claims to champion.

The satire is at its most biting when it shows well‑meaning white gatekeepers falling over themselves to praise Monk’s parody, missing the joke entirely. Yet the film is equally interested in Monk’s own blind spots, particularly around his family and his reluctance to engage emotionally.

Witty and provocative, it offers a rare blend of comedy and cultural commentary. It asks who gets to define what counts as “Black literature” and at what cost, without pretending there are easy answers.

For viewers who enjoy their social critique with a side of awkward laughter, this is a smart, layered watch that lingers long after the credits.

Far from the Madding Crowd (2015) — BBC One, 12.05am

This adaptation of Thomas Hardy’s classic novel follows Bathsheba Everdene and the three very different men who fall in love with her. The film captures Hardy’s themes of pride, independence and romantic misjudgement against the landscapes of rural England.

Carey Mulligan’s Bathsheba is a quietly radical figure: a woman determined to run her own farm and make her own choices in a world that expects her to be ornamental. The film honours her complexity, allowing her to be wrong, selfish and brave by turns.

Director Thomas Vinterberg leans into the sensuality of the countryside—the wind in the barley, the creak of barns, the brutality of storms—to underline how closely human fortunes are tied to the land. That physicality keeps the romance from floating away into abstraction.

The three suitors—steadfast shepherd Gabriel Oak, impulsive Sergeant Troy and reserved landowner Boldwood—embody different models of masculinity, each with its own dangers and consolations. The film is clear‑eyed about the power imbalances at play, even when it indulges in swoon‑worthy imagery.

Romantic without becoming sentimental, it is a thoughtful literary adaptation. It’s particularly satisfying for viewers who want their period drama to acknowledge that desire and economics are never entirely separable.


Tuesday 17 March

Wild Rose (2018) — Film4, 9pm

Jessie Buckley shines in this moving drama about a Glasgow woman determined to become a country music star. The film balances humour with emotional honesty as its heroine struggles to reconcile ambition with family responsibilities.

Buckley’s Rose‑Lynn has just been released from prison when we meet her, ankle tag still visible as she dreams of Nashville from a Glasgow council estate. The film refuses to tidy her up: she is selfish, charismatic, often thoughtless, and utterly convincing.

Her relationship with her mother (a superb Julie Walters) provides the film’s emotional core. Their clashes over childcare, work and what constitutes a “realistic” dream speak to generational divides and the quiet heroism of women who stayed put so their children could imagine leaving.

The country music itself is not a joke but a lifeline. The film takes the genre seriously, showing how its stories of heartbreak, graft and redemption resonate far beyond the American South. When Rose‑Lynn finally sings in full flight, the catharsis feels earned rather than engineered.

A heartfelt and uplifting story anchored by Buckley’s remarkable performance, Wild Rose is a reminder that chasing a dream doesn’t always mean abandoning where you’re from—but it does require telling the truth about who you’ve hurt along the way.

Pride (2014) — BBC Three, 10.10pm 🌟

This joyful British film tells the true story of an unlikely alliance between LGBTQ activists and Welsh miners during the 1984 strike. By highlighting solidarity across cultural divides, the film captures the spirit of collective activism that defined the era.

Director Matthew Warchus and writer Stephen Beresford take what could have been a worthy history lesson and turn it into something far more alive: a comedy‑drama that understands both the absurdity and the necessity of coalition‑building. The culture clash between London activists and a small Welsh village is played for laughs without ever sneering at either side.

The ensemble cast—including Ben Schnetzer, George MacKay, Imelda Staunton, Paddy Considine and Bill Nighy—gives the film its warmth. Each character is allowed a small arc of courage, whether that’s coming out, standing up to neighbours or simply dancing in a working men’s club for the first time.

Pride doesn’t shy away from the brutality of the miners’ defeat or the looming shadow of AIDS, but it insists that joy and humour are part of resistance, not distractions from it. The scenes of shared singing and marching are as politically charged as any speech.

Warm, funny and deeply humane, Pride has become a modern British classic. It’s a film that leaves you with the sense that alliances are built not on abstract principles alone, but on cups of tea, shared jokes and the decision to show up for one another.

The Debt Collector (1999) — Film4, 1.10am

This gritty crime drama explores the shadowy world of professional debt collection. The film examines how financial desperation can push individuals toward morally ambiguous work.

Set in Glasgow, The Debt Collector follows a former law student who drifts into enforcing debts for a local hard man, discovering that the line between legal and illegal violence is thinner than he imagined. The city’s tenements and backstreets become a map of economic precarity.

The film is unsentimental about the damage inflicted on both sides of the door: the people being threatened and the men doing the threatening. It suggests that in a system built on inequality, brutality is not an aberration but a logical, if horrifying, outcome.

Bleak but compelling, it offers a stark portrait of life on the margins of legality. There are no easy redemptions here, only small, compromised choices about how much of one’s conscience can be salvaged.

For late‑night viewers with a taste for morally knotty crime stories, it’s a tough, worthwhile watch.


Wednesday 18 March

Daniela Nardini Remembers This Life — BBC Four, 10pm

followed by This Life — 10.15pm

Daniela Nardini reflects on the influential BBC drama that captured the chaotic lives of young professionals in 1990s London. When it first aired, This Life broke with television conventions through its candid portrayal of relationships and ambition.

The reminiscence programme revisits how the series’ handheld camerawork, overlapping dialogue and frank treatment of sex, drugs and sexuality felt genuinely radical at the time. Nardini’s memories of playing Anna, and of the show’s cult following, underline how rare it was to see messy, recognisably flawed twenty‑somethings on British TV.

Revisiting the series reveals how profoundly it influenced modern British drama, from Skins to Fleabag and beyond. Its focus on friendship groups as surrogate families, and on work as both identity and trap, still feels painfully current.

For viewers who grew up with This Life, this double bill offers a hit of nostalgia with teeth. For newcomers, it’s a chance to see where much of today’s “edgy” drama learned its tricks.

Nobody (2021) — Film4, 9pm

Bob Odenkirk plays a seemingly ordinary suburban father whose violent past resurfaces after a home invasion. The film combines dark humour with explosive action sequences.

Directed by Ilya Naishuller and written by John Wick co‑creator Derek Kolstad, Nobody takes the “retired assassin” template and injects it with a weary, middle‑aged absurdity. Odenkirk’s Hutch is less sleek killing machine than man who has spent years pretending to be harmless—and is slightly alarmed to discover how much he enjoys dropping the act.

The action set‑pieces, particularly an early bus fight, are choreographed with bone‑crunching clarity and a streak of slapstick. The film never quite lets you forget that bodies break and bleed, even as it revels in the choreography.

There’s a faintly reactionary fantasy at work—the emasculated dad reclaiming his potency through violence—but Odenkirk’s self‑deprecating performance and the film’s willingness to laugh at its own excesses keep it from curdling.

Lean and entertaining, Nobody offers a fresh twist on the revenge thriller. It’s the rare action film that understands the comic potential of a man carefully putting on his reading glasses before a brawl.

Beast (2017) — Film4, 10.50pm

Set on the island of Jersey, this atmospheric thriller follows a troubled young woman drawn into a relationship with a man suspected of murder. The story keeps viewers uncertain about guilt and innocence until the very end.

Jessie Buckley (again proving she’s one of the most interesting actors of her generation) plays Moll, whose suffocating family life makes the dangerous freedom offered by Johnny (Johnny Flynn) all the more intoxicating. The island’s cliffs, fields and isolated lanes become extensions of her psyche: beautiful, treacherous, hard to escape.

Director Michael Pearce uses the murder investigation less as a whodunnit than as a pressure cooker for questions about female anger, class and the stories communities tell about “good” and “bad” women. Moll’s own capacity for violence complicates any easy victim/perpetrator divide.

Moody and psychologically complex, Beast is a striking debut feature. It’s the kind of film that leaves you arguing with yourself about what you’ve just seen—and about how much you wanted certain characters to be innocent, regardless of the evidence.

For viewers who like their thrillers morally murky and thick with atmosphere, this is a must.


Thursday 19 March

Classic Movies: The Story of The Graduate — Sky Arts, 9pm

This documentary revisits the making of the 1967 classic that captured the restless spirit of a generation. Through interviews and archival material, it explores how director Mike Nichols transformed a modest novel into a cultural landmark.

The film digs into casting battles, studio nerves and the creative decisions that gave The Graduate its distinctive tone: part satire, part melancholy coming‑of‑age story. Dustin Hoffman’s unlikely leading‑man status and Anne Bancroft’s iconic Mrs Robinson are treated as the risks they were at the time, not the inevitabilities they now seem.

The documentary also considers the film’s use of Simon & Garfunkel’s music, which helped cement the idea of pop songs as emotional commentary rather than mere background. The way “The Sound of Silence” and “Mrs. Robinson” interact with Benjamin’s drift through post‑college ennui still feels sharp.

The film’s themes of alienation and rebellion continue to resonate decades later, and the documentary doesn’t shy away from asking how its gender politics and racial blind spots play now. That willingness to re‑interrogate a classic is part of what makes the programme worthwhile.

For cinephiles, it’s a satisfying blend of behind‑the‑scenes gossip and serious analysis; for casual viewers, it may well send you back to the original with fresh eyes.

Ad Astra (2019) — Film4, 6.40pm

Brad Pitt stars in this introspective science‑fiction drama about an astronaut searching for his missing father at the edge of the solar system. Director James Gray blends space spectacle with philosophical reflection.

Ad Astra imagines a near‑future where the solar system has been partially colonised, yet human emotional dysfunction remains stubbornly unresolved. Pitt’s Roy McBride is a man prized for his calm under pressure, whose emotional detachment is both professional asset and personal wound.

The journey outward—to the Moon, Mars and beyond—mirrors an inward excavation of grief, anger and inherited masculinity. Tommy Lee Jones, as Roy’s absent, obsessive father, embodies a particular kind of patriarchal scientist‑explorer who sacrifices everything, and everyone, to the mission.

Visually stunning and emotionally reflective, the film is less interested in hard science than in the loneliness of men raised to see vulnerability as failure. Its set‑pieces—a lunar rover chase, a distress call gone wrong—are thrilling, but the moments that linger are quieter: a recorded message, a hand on glass.

For viewers expecting a conventional space adventure, Ad Astra may feel slow; for those open to a more meditative orbit, it’s a haunting, oddly tender experience.


Friday 20 March

Blanca — More4, 9pm

This stylish Italian detective drama centres on a blind consultant whose heightened senses help solve complex cases. The series combines strong character development with compelling mysteries.

Blanca avoids turning its protagonist’s blindness into either a superpower or a tragedy. Instead, it treats her as a fully rounded character whose disability shapes her experience without defining her entirely, weaving in questions of access, prejudice and autonomy alongside the procedural plots.

Atmospheric and intelligent, it continues the tradition of sophisticated European crime drama. For viewers who enjoy character‑driven mysteries with a strong sense of place, it’s well worth sampling.

The Small Back Room (1949) — Talking Pictures, 10.40am

Powell and Pressburger’s wartime drama follows a troubled scientist working on bomb‑disposal technology during the Second World War. The film focuses on psychological pressure rather than battlefield spectacle.

David Farrar’s Sammy Rice is a limping, alcoholic boffin whose work on defusing new German booby‑traps is complicated by bureaucratic interference and his own self‑loathing. The film is unusually frank, for its time, about disability, addiction and the corrosive effects of feeling surplus to requirements.

Quietly powerful, it reveals the emotional toll of war behind the scenes. A bravura sequence in which Sammy attempts to defuse a bomb on a shingle beach is as tense as any frontline combat scene, precisely because it is so stripped of spectacle.

For those who know Powell and Pressburger mainly for their Technicolor fantasies, this is a darker, more subdued but no less distinctive work.

In Camera (2023) — BBC Two, 11.10pm

A striking drama about a struggling actor navigating the brutal realities of the audition process. The film explores identity, ambition and the emotional cost of constant rejection.

In Camera follows Aden, a British‑Iraqi actor whose attempts to secure work are repeatedly derailed by typecasting, microaggressions and the industry’s hunger for “authentic” trauma. The film uses surreal, looping audition scenes to convey how dehumanising it can be to perform versions of yourself for other people’s approval.

Sharp and unsettling, it offers a fresh perspective on the performing profession. It’s less about the glamour of acting than about the psychic wear and tear of being looked at, judged and found wanting.

For anyone who has ever sat in a waiting room rehearsing a version of themselves they hope will be acceptable, this will land with particular force.

Apocalypse Now (1979) — Film4, 11.10pm 🌟

Francis Ford Coppola’s extraordinary Vietnam War epic follows Captain Willard on a surreal journey upriver to confront the rogue Colonel Kurtz. Inspired by Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, the film becomes a haunting meditation on power, madness and the moral chaos of war.

From its opening montage of napalm and The Doors’ “The End”, Apocalypse Now announces itself as something more feverish than a conventional war film. The further upriver Willard travels, the more the narrative fragments into set‑pieces that feel like stations on a descent into collective insanity.

Visually spectacular and philosophically unsettling, the film uses light, shadow and sound to create a sense of dislocation that mirrors the soldiers’ own. Helicopters swoop to Wagner, flares turn night into hellish day, and the jungle seems to close in as both setting and metaphor.

The film has rightly been criticised for centring American anguish while rendering Vietnamese characters largely voiceless. Yet as a portrait of an imperial power losing its mind, it remains devastatingly effective, particularly in its depiction of how violence becomes both banal and sacred to those who wield it.

Apocalypse Now is one of the most powerful films ever made not because it offers answers, but because it refuses to pretend that war can be neatly understood. It leaves you with images and sounds you can’t quite shake—and with the uneasy sense that the river it charts runs through more than one conflict, and more than one century.


Streaming Choice

Netflix — Beauty in Black (Season 2 Part 2)

Available Thursday 19 March

Tyler Perry’s Beauty in Black returns with the second half of its second season, continuing the saga of Kimmie, an exotic dancer whose life becomes entangled with the powerful Bellarie cosmetics dynasty. Now married to patriarch Horace and installed as a senior figure in the family business, Kimmie must navigate shifting alliances, corporate power struggles and the fallout from a devious trafficking scheme that has shadowed the family’s rise. The new episodes promise more boardroom manoeuvring, family betrayal and hard‑won self‑assertion as Kimmie fights to protect her loved ones and claim her place in a world that never expected her to survive, let alone lead.

Netflix — The Plastic Detox

Available Monday 16 March

The Plastic Detox is an environmental documentary series that looks at how deeply single‑use plastics have infiltrated everyday life, from supermarket aisles to bathroom cabinets. Each episode follows households, businesses and communities as they attempt to reduce their reliance on plastic, revealing both the structural obstacles and the small, practical changes that can add up to meaningful reductions. Expect a mix of scientific explanation, consumer‑level advice and a clear‑eyed look at how much responsibility can realistically be placed on individuals versus corporations and policymakers. It’s a quietly galvanising watch for anyone who has ever stood in front of a recycling bin wondering how much difference their choices really make.

Paramount+ — The Naked Gun

Available Sunday 15 March

The Naked Gun remains one of the great anarchic spoof comedies, following Leslie Nielsen’s magnificently inept detective Frank Drebin as he stumbles through a plot to assassinate the Queen during a visit to Los Angeles. The film’s barrage of sight gags, deadpan one‑liners and cheerfully stupid set‑pieces still lands, not least because Nielsen plays it all with the gravity of a man in a serious thriller. Beneath the chaos, there’s a surprisingly affectionate send‑up of cop‑show clichés and American pomp. For anyone in need of something silly, tightly paced and blissfully uninterested in good taste, it’s a welcome addition to the streaming line‑up.

Prime Video — Prey

Available Tuesday 17 March

Prey is a lean, gripping reinvention of the Predator franchise, set in the early 18th century and centred on Naru, a young Comanche woman determined to prove herself as a hunter. When an otherworldly predator begins stalking the plains, her skills and instincts are tested against a foe far beyond anything her community has faced. The film’s commitment to Indigenous casting and perspective, its use of landscape, and its stripped‑back storytelling make it feel both fresh and rooted in a specific cultural context. It’s a rare franchise entry that deepens the original premise while standing confidently on its own.

Fringe 2026: The First Rumblings Begin

Even though it’s only March and Edinburgh is still wrapped in its late‑winter grey, the first tremors of Fringe season have already begun. The 2026 festival runs 7–31 August, but—as ever—the city’s venues don’t wait for summer to start beating the drum. Announcements are landing in careful waves, each one sketching the early outline of what August might become. We’ve already begun our coverage with the new Night Owl Shows at theSpace, and with Summerhall’s first salvo of international, politically alive work. What’s emerging is that familiar, thrilling sense of a festival waking up: artists clearing their throats, programmers placing their early bets, and audiences beginning to imagine the shape of the month ahead. It’s the long runway before the annual take‑off, and it’s always one of the most revealing parts of the year.

Advert

Cover of the novel 'Better Than The Beatles!' by Anthony C. Green, featuring a blue abstract design and the text 'BUY NOW'.

Leave a Comment

Immerse Yourself in Caledonia’s Vibrant Folk Tradition

Five black stars on a light background, representing a five-star rating.
Artwork featuring the title 'Caledonia' with various musical instruments including a violin, pipes, guitar, and accordion, representing Scottish folk and traditional music.

Caledonia is a warm rush of Scottish air. theSpace @ Surgeons’ Hall suits it. The room feels close. The music fills it. Elsa Jean McTaggart is mesmerising. She sings with poise. She moves between violin and pipes with ease. It’s beautiful to hear and to watch. Gary Lister’s vocals blend well. His playing gives the songs weight and swing. You feel the ceilidh spirit in the room. Old tunes meet fresh arrangements. Stories stitch it all together. Footage of the islands deepens the mood. You can almost smell the peat smoke.

This is folk as living culture, not museum piece. The set is tight. The pace is kind. You leave lighter, and a little prouder of Scotland’s songbook. Forty-five minutes pass in a blink.

Reviewed by Jacqueline Sharp

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

Fringe Review: Iago Speaks

Five black stars on a white background, indicating a high rating or review.

Iago Speaks is a riotous, resonant post-Othello two-hander that gives voice to one of Shakespeare’s perpetual shadows: the jailer. A stock figure who lingers at the edges of tragedy—arriving too late, speaking too little—he’s reimagined here as a philosophical clown, a reluctant midwife to Iago’s final confession. Daniel Macdonald’s script is both homage and critique: it honours the Bard’s architecture while gleefully dismantling its hierarchies.

Promotional image for the play 'Iago Speaks,' featuring two male actors in vibrant costumes, with bold text overlay displaying the title and a review highlight.

Joshua Beaudry’s Jailer is the soul of the piece. He stumbles, cajoles, philosophizes, and—at one point—professes love to a bewildered audience member, a moment that had me laughing out loud. His register shifts are dazzling: Shakespearean gravitas one moment, crude vernacular the next, always with a glint of mischief. He’s one of “the others” in Shakespeare—the unnamed, the unacknowledged—and his growing awareness of this status gives the play its emotional charge. He’s not just comic relief; he’s a someone developing an understanding of power in society.

Skye Brandon’s Iago is true to form: a master manipulator whose weapon is language. In Othello, he engineers tragedy through insinuation and rhetorical sleight of hand—planting the handkerchief, whispering doubts, and coaxing Othello into murderous certainty. Here, he remains coiled and calculating, his silence broken not by remorse but by provocation. Brandon plays him with snake-like charm—amiable on the surface, but always circling the truth with menace.

The language play is exquisite. Macdonald’s script gallops through slapstick, existential dread, and dramatic irony, never losing its rhythm. It’s a world where words are weapons, lifelines, and punchlines—and the audience is invited to wield them too.

Whether you’re a Shakespeare devotee or a Fringe wanderer, Iago Speaks is a must-see. It’s funny, philosophical, and fiercely original—a celebration of the overlooked, the absurd, and the power of words and their danger.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

More information and tickets here

Read our interview with Daniel Macdonald here

Leave a Comment

Abhorrent Little Scrotum – Edinburgh Fringe Review

Fragen Network’s Abhorrent Little Scrotum is a surreal, darkly comic cyber-thriller that slips between physical theatre, psychological depth, and the destabilising hum of digital disorientation. It’s a tight, intense piece that asks what happens when technology not only rewrites reality, but rewires the self.

We meet Jack, a hacker in freefall after a personal collapse, who dives into “The Experience”—a shifting, hallucinatory mindscape—to save her friend Dari (Angel Lopez-Silva) from a mental virus. The rescue mission is part friendship, part obsession. Dari’s grip on reality is slipping, but so is Jack’s. As the hunt deepens, what’s real, what’s virtual, and what’s imagined blur until they’re indistinguishable. The piece thrives on this instability, using movement, sound, and fractured dialogue to immerse the audience in a space where betrayal feels inevitable and identity is never fixed. Some of the physicality is deliberately unsettling—stabbing, strangulation, and sudden bursts of violence punctuate the action, reinforcing the sense of threat and instability.

The tone is part neo-noir cyberpunk fever dream, part intimate character study. Fragen Network’s trademark high-energy movement and razor wit—seen in Blush of Dogs and Hell Yes I’m Tough Enough—is sharpened here into something more personal. It’s a complex, demanding show that requires the audience to think hard about what it’s depicting. At times it’s more thought-provoking than entertaining, and its ambiguity will frustrate some while fascinating others. The performers are an ensemble cast, the role of Dari is performed by Anastasiya Zinovieva. ,Angel Lopez-Silva plays Brittl Hardware, who is working with Jack (whose alter-ego Herbert is helping him get into the Experience, played by Zaza Bagley. They deliver layered, committed performances that ground the surreal visuals and shifting realities in raw, emotional truth. This is theatre that keeps you guessing—sometimes uncomfortably so—long after you’ve left the theatre

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

More information and tickets here

Read our interview with the Director, Roland Reynolds here

Leave a Comment

Echoes of Nüwa: A Chilling Reflection on Humanity’s Flaws

Five black stars arranged in a row on a light beige background, representing a rating or review.

Echoes of Nüwa: The Last Human Project
theSpace Triplex (Studio), 10:00 daily until 23 August
50 mins | Devised storytelling | Muddy Lolos (Chia-Yi Chan, Jinyu Dan, Qianyi Wang) 442 words, 2 minutes read time.

When the Chinese Goddess Nüwa first shaped humanity from clay, she believed joy and harmony would flow forever. Armed with five-coloured stones, she repaired the shattered sky and staved off the great Catastrophe—certain her work was done. Yet millennia later, humanity’s own greed and rage led to its undoing, and Nüwa never returned. Instead, she left behind her three devoted minions, the Muddy Lolos, to reclaim her promise and refashion humankind from mud and memory.

A collage featuring a woman expressing various emotions, with images of figures in water and the text 'Echoes of Nüwa: The Last Human Project' prominently displayed.

In this subtle retelling, Chan, Dan and Wang become both sculptors and chroniclers. Each human prototype is born in their hands—first infused with desire, then anger, then imagination—only to reveal that every gift carries its shadow. Desire blooms into jealousy and unrest; anger ignites cycles of violence; imagination births both wonder and illusion. With each experiment, the question deepens: how do we build leaders who serve rather than subjugate?

The power of Echoes of Nüwa lies in its deliberate sparseness. A handful of stones, a swath of earth-coloured fabric, and three bodies in communion are all that’s needed. Through delicately calibrated movement, the performers summon entire courts of tyrants and trenches of rebellion. Their faces speak volumes—eyes widening in hope, brows furrowing in dread, lips parting in hesitant resolve—reminding us that emotion is the raw material of history.

War and greed pulse at the piece’s core, manifesting in sudden bursts of choreography that crackle with tension. A raised fist and a sharp pivot can conjure battle lines; a hesitant hand reaching for more clay summons the glimmer of avarice. Yet the Muddy Lolos never slip into didacticism. Instead, they hold a mirror to our own impulses, inviting us to witness how the lust for power fractures community and how cycles of violence echo across time.

By the final tableau, the studio feels sacred—a space both mournful and expectant. The Muddy Lolos stand among scattered mud figures, their shoulders heavy with the weight of failure and possibility. Nüwa’s absent voice resonates in the silence: can we undo our worst instincts and craft a future worthy of repair?

This is more than a show; it’s an elegy and a challenge. With minimal artifice and maximal heart, Echoes of Nüwa asks us to confront our compulsion toward greed and tyranny—and dares us to imagine another way.

Would you like a capsule version for listings or social media? I can distil these ideas while preserving their emotional core.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

Sister Prudence: A Journey of Faith and Identity

Five black stars on a white background representing a perfect five-star rating.

Prudence Play (or Sister Prudence is NOT Gay) 481 words, 3 minutes read time.

In her dreams, Sister Prudence is wearing a sparkly little black dress and tap-dancing to Britney Spears. It’s a contrast from her boring, regimented life as a Catholic nun. Now and again, however, the nuns go on vocational visits to St Augustine’s school in a bus. There she sits next to her friend, another sister, who tells her about a ‘hot priest’ she’d seen in Fleabag on a sabbatical visit to her family. In this one-woman show, the author and performer, Caroline Dunn, uses a handheld mask when she plays the other sister.

Prudence has grown up with a fear of eternal punishment. She learned from a very young age that you go to hell if you don’t watch your step. She tries to be like her name, prudent, careful with decision making, careful with sin. Becoming a nun was her ‘get outta hell backup plan.’

She lies to herself and the school kids, ‘I’m so at peace. Jesus called me since I was a little girl,’ but in the confession, she admits this lie, but still tries to convince herself that she only admires the other sister as ‘a friend, a friend. She’s got nice hair. A nice face. God blessed her with this. Sure, ‘there’s nothing wrong with admiring a friend, right?’

The action switches between Sister Prudence thinking aloud, Prudence in the confessional and in conversations with the attractive sister. She goes to the fish fry – she hates fish – ‘just to socialise.’ She tries to deny the blatantly obvious, that her friendly thoughts and admiration for the other sister are much more than that.

Just hanging out, having great craic with the the other sister, Prudence gathers her courage and recalls a summer when she was about 12-13 when she spent a whole summer with another girl of the same age. She blurts out, ‘you remind me of her. I love you.’ Suddenly a door slams in her face.  ‘Shut up! Stop! You should not have told me. You need to talk to the priests, to the Superior and about your history’ and she gives out the old line about hating the sin and loving the sinner. The other sister grasses her up. How will she cope with the truth? How will she deal with the betrayal of her confidence? What would you do in her circumstances?

This insightful production brings to life the internal struggles of many gay people of faith as they try to reconcile what they’ve been taught with who they are. The probing, intrusive questions of the investigating priest, Father Moriarty, and the use of shame to bring her back in line all ring true. With good humour, Caroline Dunn’s powerful, haunting script throws a spotlight on the mental conflict conservative religious teachings impose on gay people.

Reviewed by David Kerr

More information and Tickets here

Leave a Comment

The Lost Priest: A Journey Through Jewish Identity

Four black stars representing a rating or review

Gabe Seplow enters the stage, lights a candle, and recites a prayer in Hebrew. He muses on the history of his people. How many times has he heard the, ‘You’re the first Jewish person I’ve met’ or ‘you’re the first Jew I’ve ever met.’ He notes that the single syllable – ‘Jew’ – bites in a way that ‘Jewish person’ does not.

A man walking with a shadow projection of his face, overlaid with Hebrew text.

He’s not particularly proud of his religious heritage, but he’s not not proud either. He’s inherited a story passed down for many decades. He recollects how others have perceived his people as lesser breeds; Hitler in 1936 and Shakespeare in 1596 when he wrote The Merchant of Venice.

Despite Seplow’s misgivings about his inherited faith, his refusal to go through a bar mitzvah at the age of 13, (and his lack of horns and a tail) he continues to recite Hebrew prayers. He knows loving and laughter and playing. He’s coming to terms with his identity. Like Shylock, in Shakespeare’s play, he declares aloud, ‘I am a Jew!’

This is a fine, reflective piece of writing. In a world where accusations and assumptions fly like missiles, it’s worthwhile to stand aside and listen. Seplow allows you to do just that.

Reviewed by David Kerr

More information and tickets here

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »