Posts Tagged Feminism

Mrs Playmen: A Drama of Power and Morality in 1970s Italy

FROM NOVEMBER 12 ONLY ON NETFLIX 

A sharp, grounded Netflix drama, Playmen follows editor Adelina Tattilo as she takes control of a scandal magazine and fights censors, creditors, and bad actors—keeping consent, context, and truth at the centre.

There’s a very specific charge running through Mrs Playmen: that feeling of being inside a newsroom where every headline, phone call, or envelope from the authorities might spell either triumph or disaster. Rather than giving us a single “hero” narrative, the series embraces the logic of the newsroom itself—collective, contested, and combustible. It’s an ensemble piece, and part of its sophistication lies in allowing each character to carry a different facet of Italy’s argument with itself during the 1970s. Moralists, libertines, Fascists, conservatives, feminists, cynics, workers, victims, and opportunists all occupy the same frame, each pulling the story’s moral centre of gravity in a different direction.

This breadth gives Mrs Playmen its richness. Far from being a linear rise-to-power drama, it shows how fragile progress is when surrounded by old systems determined to hold the line.


An ensemble cast shaped by conflict

Carolina Crescentini remains the anchor, playing Adelina Tattilo with that quietly decisive energy of someone who has had to learn her authority the hard way. But the show only works because she is surrounded by a full constellation of characters, each of whom personifies a pressure point of the time.

Francesco Colella’s Saro Balsamo—the husband who appoints her Editor in Chief and then abandons her to avoid legal consequences —represents the vanishing patriarch: all authority in the abstract, none in the moment of need. His storyline cuts straight into the hypocrisy of state “moral guardianship”: the same authorities who eagerly hunt for obscenity in magazines shrug at his domestic abuse. By including him, the show broadens its canvas from editorial battles to the broader culture of male impunity.

Filippo Nigro’s Chartroux, the closeted gay, intellectual (former?) Fascist: a fixer who keeps things functioning, gives the series ballast.

Giuseppe Maggio’s Luigi Poggi, the reckless and ambitious photographer, becomes the exhibition of what happens when creative aspiration slides into exploitation. Francesca Colucci’s Elsa, the young woman betrayed by Poggi’s misuse of her trust, becomes the human core of the show.

But the surrounding ensemble matters just as much:

A feminist critic, Marta Vassalli (portrayed by Elena Radonicich), adds another layer. She is fiercely opposed to Playmen on principle—yet respects Adelina as a woman surviving in a man’s world. Their exchanges are some of the best in the series: tense, challenging, thoughtful. Marta isn’t an antagonist; she’s the moral conscience reminding the viewer that liberation and exploitation often travel in dangerously close company.

This wider cast turns the series into a mosaic—one in which every character represents the Italy Adelina is pushed to navigate.


A world built on pressure

The structure remains the same: we begin in 1975, with Adelina celebrated for reshaping Italy’s conversation, before being yanked back to 1970 to watch her endure the trenches that made that moment possible. But the ensemble deepens the effect. Each secondary character adds their own form of pressure—legal, personal, ideological, or emotional.

Few shows have captured the mechanics of censorship so accurately. Here we see repression not as a dramatic knock on the door but as the dull throb of bureaucracy—seizures, missing shipments, mysterious delays in distribution. What’s powerful is how the ensemble cast mirrors these pressures: each character is another system Adelina must navigate, negotiate with, or resist.

The series also evokes the look and feel of the early to mid‑1970s, the period in which most of the story unfolds exceptionally well. The production nails the era’s visual texture — the cars, the fashion, and the interiors all feel convincingly of their time — from wood‑paneled living rooms and patterned upholstery to period‑correct tailoring, hairstyles and dashboard layouts. Those details do more than decorate the set: they ground the characters and their choices, making the world feel lived‑in and historically specific while quietly amplifying the drama.


Consent as the real battleground

The Poggi–Elsa storyline still sits at the heart of Playmen, but with the expanded cast, the show creates a fuller map of how consent is eroded across the culture.

Chartroux’s struggle with his sexuality adds another dimension, illustrating how the denial of consent (in all its forms—sexual, economic, political) is not isolated but part of a broad pattern of silencing and control.

Adelina’s response is the moral hinge: she insists on context. She refuses to treat women’s bodies as décor or women’s pain as currency. In an industry built on sensation, her commitment to meaning becomes a kind of rebellion. Though at times she falters or mis-steps.


Seven episodes of building—and buying—freedom

The expanded cast makes Adelina’s victories feel earned. She’s not fighting a single antagonist but a culture: the Church, the police, weak men, predatory men, ideological opponents, victims in need of care, and allies who are vulnerable in their own ways.

The effect is cumulative. Each episode broadens the stakes. Each character contributes to the sense that freedom—editorial or personal—is never given; it is constructed, bargained for, and defended daily.


Verdict

Mrs Playmen becomes far more than a period drama. It’s a story about how societies police desire and punish honesty. It’s about who gets to define “public morality” and whose suffering is quietly excluded from that definition. And it’s about the possibility of decency within an indecent system.

The ensemble cast elevates the series: Crescentini leads with quiet steel; Colella embodies the negative partriachal male; Nigro steadies the ship; Maggio exposes the dangers of unchecked ambition; Radonicich’s feminist critic keeps the questions sharp.

Through all of this, the show returns to one principle—Adelina’s principle:

Run the picture. Tell the truth.

In 1970s Italy, that was radical.
In many ways, it still is.

Reviewed by Maria Camara

Leave a Comment

Women in Revolt! Art and Activism in the UK 1970–1990

518 words, 3 minutes read time.

“Women in Revolt! Art and Activism in the UK 1970–1990” at Tate Britain is a ground-breaking exhibition that offers a transformative journey through the history of feminist movements in the United Kingdom. Spanning two decades, the exhibition celebrates the radical ideas, rebellious methods, and invaluable contributions of over 100 women artists who challenged societal norms amidst significant social, economic, and political change.

The exhibition contextualizes its narrative within the pivotal 1970 National Women’s Liberation Conference, from which emerged a rich tapestry of artistic expression. These artists harnessed their lived experiences to create powerful forms of art, spanning painting, photography, film, and performance, becoming a potent force for change. Central to the exhibition are fanzines and newsletters, grassroots publications that provided alternative platforms for expression. As an ex-fanzine producer, I was particularly drawn to the vibrant DIY culture of these publications, which served as vital tools for amplifying voices, challenging norms, and celebrating resilience.

Among the compelling artworks featured, “Mother and Child” by Maureen Scott (1970) stands out starkly, challenging the cosy view of motherhood. This piece, along with others, underscores the multifaceted nature of women’s experiences and the complexities inherent in societal expectations.

The early ’70s witnessed an explosion of creativity and experimentation, with artists shaping a movement that intersected with key events like the opening of the first women’s refuge and the emergence of the British Black Arts Movement. Despite their significant contributions, many of these artists were overlooked in dominant artistic narratives until now.

Divided into thematic rooms, the exhibition explores key issues such as the Women’s Liberation Movement, maternal and domestic experiences, punk and independent music, Greenham Common and the Peace Movement, and the visibility of Black and South Asian women artists. With over 630 artworks and archive items, including films and audio, visitors are immersed in a politically engaged community that reshaped British culture.

The exhibition highlights significant moments like the Grunwick Strike, where mostly female immigrant workers fought for trade union recognition and equal pay, echoing broader struggles across the nation. Through the lens of a Bermondsey metal box factory, visitors gain insights into the everyday challenges faced by female workers, underscoring the significance of legislative measures like the Equal Pay Act of 1975.

But “Women in Revolt!” extends beyond individual narratives, embracing the broader spectrum of feminist movements that reshaped Britain. From the Wages For Housework campaign to Reclaim the Night marches, activists contributed to pivotal changes for women, leaving an indelible mark on society.

As visitors navigate through the exhibition, they are invited to reflect on the progress made and the ongoing journey towards a more just and equitable society. “Women in Revolt!” celebrates the unwavering resilience of those who challenged the status quo, weaving together stories of work, family, and activism in a vibrant tapestry of empowerment and change.


Women in Revolt! Art and Activism in the UK 1970-1990
 is at Tate Britain, London, until 7 April 2024. It will then transfer to National Galleries Scotland: Modern, Edinburgh, 25 May 2024 to 26 January 2025 and the Whitworth Art Gallery, Manchester, 7 March to 1 June 2025

By Patrick Harrington

Leave a Comment

Unveiling Female Sexuality: The Piano’s Cinematic Exploration

A Timeless Exploration of Feminism and Female Sexuality

467 words, 2 minutes read time.

Set against the backdrop of 19th-century New Zealand, the movie intertwines a narrative of feminism and female sexuality. Starring Holly Hunter, Harvey Keitel, and Sam Neill, The Piano presents a powerful exploration of a woman’s journey towards self-discovery and autonomy.

Central to the story is the character of Ada McGrath, portrayed brilliantly by Holly Hunter. Ada, a mute, piano-playing woman, is sent from Scotland to New Zealand for an arranged marriage. Through Ada’s journey, the film unfolds as her piano becomes both a means of expression and a source of empowerment. Her muteness serves as a metaphor for the societal constraints placed on women during the era, highlighting their limited ability to voice their desires and experiences.

The film adeptly explores the feminist undertones as Ada struggles for agency and autonomy within a patriarchal society. Navigating the constraints imposed by her arranged marriage to Alisdair Stewart (Sam Neill), Ada’s piano becomes her voice, a symbol of resistance against societal expectations. The film skillfully portrays how Ada’s musical talent becomes a form of rebellion, allowing her to reclaim control over her own narrative and desires.

Furthermore, the themes of female sexuality and sexual awakening are intricately woven into the narrative, particularly through Ada’s complex relationship with George Baines, played by Harvey Keitel. Baines, a neighbor with a deep appreciation for Ada’s piano playing, enters into a complex and nuanced relationship with her. The film portrays Ada’s sexual awakening as a gradual and empowering process, breaking away from conventional portrayals of female sexuality in cinema.

The cinematography by Stuart Dryburgh enhances the film’s visual allure, capturing the lush landscapes of New Zealand and infusing the narrative with a sense of poetic beauty. The use of the piano as a symbolic motif is not only central to the story but also contributes to the film’s immersive and evocative atmosphere.

Jane Campion’s direction is nothing short of masterful, as she navigates the complexities of the characters’ emotions and societal expectations. The Piano stands as a testament to Campion’s ability to bring forth nuanced portrayals of women’s experiences, challenging traditional gender norms and offering a poignant commentary on the struggles faced by women in the 19th century.

The Piano is a cinematic masterpiece that transcends its period setting to deliver a timeless exploration of feminism and female sexuality. Holly Hunter’s powerful performance combined with Campion’s directorial vision creates a film that resonates on multiple levels, offering a profound reflection on the strength, resilience, and sexual autonomy of women in the face of societal constraints. The Piano remains a landmark achievement in cinema, leaving an indelible mark in the exploration of female identity and empowerment.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Picture credit

The Piano (1993)
May be found at the following website: https://www.filmaffinity.com/en/filmimagesnojs.php?movie_id=601157, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=34788954

Comments (1)

Barbie 2023: Self-Realization and Individualism in Society

⭐⭐⭐⭐

I find myself quite perplexed about this movie, which I believe is a sentiment shared by many. On one hand, I found myself laughing heartily. I hadn’t experienced this with a movie in quite some time. The movie’s overall vibe is incredibly appealing, drawing you in. Yet, on the other hand, while not overtly anti-men, the movie aims for a profound message. It occasionally veers into what feels like a tantrum.

Media figure Jack Posobiec described Barbie as a “man-hating Woke propaganda fest.” He criticized the film for portraying the Kens as less intelligent than the Barbies. He also criticized its themes about rising up against the patriarchy.

Posobiec also tweeted a clip of Gosling’s “I’m Just Ken” song from the film. In the clip, the character laments his “blond fragility.” Posobiec called it “possibly the most anti-male film ever made.”

Elon Musk also ridiculed the film’s approach to patriarchal themes. He tweeted: If “you take a shot every time Barbie says the word ‘patriarchy’, you will pass out before the movie ends.”

I would not go as far as some of these critics. The way it presents its feminist ideas can sometimes feel a bit off. It strives to deliver a meaningful discourse but teeters close to sounding like hate speech and mockery. I say “close” because much of this is presented in a humorous context. When it’s not humorous, while not great, it isn’t downright terrible.

Amidst the film’s exploration of feminist themes, its dance sequences emerge as both humorous and impeccably choreographed. These scenes infuse a delightful sense of light-heartedness into the story. They effectively lift the mood. They also showcase the characters’ comedic prowess on the dance floor.

The film’s set design is genuinely impressive. The creative team behind the movie has constructed visually captivating settings that enhance the storytelling. These sets are more than mere backdrops. They become integral to the narrative. They offer a vibrant and immersive backdrop against which the characters’ journeys unfold. The meticulous attention to detail and imaginative design choices contribute to a world that feels oddly authentic and engrossing.

The set design for the film “Barbie” was created by production designer Sarah Greenwood and set decorator Katie Spencer. They are long-time collaborators known for their work on period dramas like “Atonement” and “Anna Karenina”1. Their preparations for “Barbie” started simply: With the purchase of a Barbie Dreamhouse. Their goal was to discover how a person plays with the house, Greenwood tells TODAY.com. From there, they intended to make a physical space that represented how moviegoers may have interacted with their own dolls.

Greenwood and Spencer created an entire Barbie world with minimal CGI. The set had to be made in 3D at the London studio where the movie was filmed. All this was done while obeying the rules and strictures of Barbie Land1. For example, Barbie has lights — but she doesn’t have electricity. Meanwhile, the ocean is made of plastic — but Ryan Gosling’s Ken swims in the sea. “This film, for us, was the most philosophical, intellectual film we’ve ever done,” Greenwood says. “But I think you can completely believe that when you put it against, it’s a Greta Gerwig film. Why would it be any different?”

As they started their plans for “Barbie,” Greenwood and Spencer say they didn’t look to one Dreamhouse in particular. They did not focus on the decades-long evolution in Barbie style and architecture. Instead, they purchased for the latest model, as the film is set in the present. They also didn’t set out to re-create any specific toy that exists on the market. While some of the dolls are perfect imitations of dolls from history — including discontinued dolls. The set was filled with an “interpretation” of a Dreamhouse, rather than a “replication,” Spencer explains. This gave them the freedom to “cherrypick” from across the Barbie anthology. They focused on creating an overall feeling rather than scaling up an existing product.

The movie does not centre around any couple. I only noticed one actual couple in the whole film. The film intentionally spotlights the concept of personal self-discovery and identity separate from romantic relationships. It takes a notable stance by portraying Ken’s inability to win Barbie’s affection, deliberately avoiding the conventional relationship trope. The storyline develops as Ken comes to grasp his own autonomy. He learns the importance of finding fulfilment independent of a partnership. The central message emphasizes that Ken’s inherent value isn’t linked to his relationship with Barbie. He is valuable just as “Ken,” without the need for attachment. This departure from the norm becomes obvious as the film challenges conventional relationship expectations and underscores the significance of self-realization.

However, this leads us to an intriguing question. Is self-realization and an emphasis on the self, as opposed to partnerships, truly beneficial for the individual? Is it beneficial for society as a whole? While the film carries a feminist undertone, its exploration of self-fulfilment extends beyond gender roles and relationships. It raises the broader consideration of whether a society that glorifies individualism and solitude could be beneficial or detrimental.

On one hand, advocating for personal growth and self-awareness can empower individuals to better understand themselves and their aspirations. It promotes the idea that one’s worth isn’t solely tied to their relationship status or societal expectations. This can foster a sense of independence and resilience, enabling individuals to navigate life’s challenges with confidence and autonomy.

Nevertheless, taken to an extreme, a societal shift towards prioritizing self above all else might lead to isolation and detachment. It could even result in psychological alienation. Human connections and relationships play a vital role in fostering empathy, cooperation, and emotional well-being. An overemphasis on individualism could potentially erode these connections. This could result in a society marked by emotional distance and a lack of collective support.

Moreover, the movie’s message hints at a vision of society where being alone is not only acceptable but desirable. While independence is crucial, the notion of total isolation may inadvertently undermine the importance of community and shared experiences. Healthy partnerships and relationships can contribute to personal growth and offer a support network that enhances well-being. On this level Barbie is strangely philosophical.

The movie’s exploration of self-realization is thought-provoking. Its emphasis on the self over partnerships raises questions about the balance between individualism and societal interconnectedness. It goes beyond its feminist message to show a vision of society where being alone is not necessarily negative. As we ponder these concepts, it’s essential to consider how such a shift in perspective might impact individuals. We must also think about how it might affect the broader social fabric.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Picture credit

By Carolina Cinemas, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72508674

Film credits

Director
Greta Gerwig
Writers
Greta GerwigNoah Baumbach
Stars
Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling, Issa Rae
Certificate
12A

Comments (1)