Posts Tagged Zendaya

Can Love Survive the Truth? Insights from ‘The Drama’

Kristoffer Borgli’s The Drama opens with a deceptively simple question: how well can you ever really know the person you love? I found myself wrestling with that from the first act, mostly because Charlie—despite Robert Pattinson’s sharp, twitchy performance—remains a strangely opaque figure. He’s compelling to watch but difficult to understand, and at times downright frustrating. That slipperiness becomes part of the film’s texture, though not always in ways that feel intentional.

A wedding invitation featuring two smiling individuals in formal attire, set against a floral backdrop. The text includes the names 'Zendaya' and 'Robert Pattinson,' along with the title 'The DRAMA' and details about the film's release.

The story begins with a meet‑cute that’s more clumsy than charming. Charlie spots Emma in a coffee shop, fakes having read her book, and stumbles through a conversation she can’t fully hear. It’s a flimsy foundation for a relationship, and Borgli seems aware of that; the cracks are already visible before the plot applies any pressure.

Once the film shifts into the week leading up to their extravagant wedding, the tone tightens. A casual dare among friends—confess the worst thing you’ve ever done—becomes the spark that blows the group’s equilibrium apart. Mike and Rachel offer up their own unsettling stories, but Emma’s admission is something else entirely, a revelation that instantly reshapes how everyone in the room sees her. From that moment on, the film becomes a study in spiralling perception: affection turning brittle, fear masquerading as morality, and judgment spreading through the group like a fever.

Zendaya anchors the film with a quiet, wounded performance that communicates more through posture and silence than dialogue. She plays Emma as someone who has spent years learning how to fold herself into the smallest possible shape, only to be thrust into the harshest possible light. Pattinson, meanwhile, gives Charlie a jittery, anxious energy that hints at depth the script never fully explores. That gap—between what the actor suggests and what the writing delivers—is part of why he feels so hard to pin down. Many viewers have echoed this: Charlie’s motivations shift, his reactions wobble, and his emotional arc never quite coheres. Some see that as a flaw; others see it as a portrait of a man who doesn’t know himself well enough to be understood by anyone else.

Borgli’s direction leans into disorientation. Abrupt sound cuts, jagged flashbacks, imagined scenarios bleeding into reality—these choices sometimes sharpen the film’s tension, and sometimes feel like noise. The satire, aimed at moral panic and performative outrage, lands unevenly. There are moments of real bite, but also stretches where the film seems to gesture at big ideas without fully committing to them.

Yet beneath all the provocation, the film keeps circling a quieter, more unsettling idea: can a relationship survive the parts of ourselves we bury just to keep it intact? The Drama suggests that even the person you plan to marry remains partly unknowable, a shifting landscape of past choices and private fears. By the time the story reaches its final stretch, nothing is neatly resolved. Instead, Charlie and Emma are left in a fragile new space—still tethered to each other, but stripped of the illusions that once made their love feel effortless. It’s not comforting, and it’s not meant to be.

What stayed with me wasn’t the twist everyone keeps whispering about, but the film’s insistence that intimacy is always a gamble. You never truly know the person standing across from you at the altar. You only know the version of them you’ve been allowed to see. And sometimes, as The Drama makes painfully clear, that’s enough to unravel everything—or to force you to decide whether love can survive the truth.

By Pat Harrington

Picture credit: By A24 – http://www.impawards.com/2026/drama_ver2.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81801916

Leave a Comment

Challengers (2024): A Gripping Ménage à Trois Drama Starring Zendaya, Mike Faist, and Josh O’Connor

Click on image for buying and renting options

571 words, read time 2-3 minutes.

In Luca Guadagnino’s latest film, “Challengers,” the court isn’t the only place where passions ignite. With a stellar cast led by Zendaya, Mike Faist, and Josh O’Connor, this movie serves up a gripping ménage à trois that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats.

In 2006, two high school best friends, Patrick Zweig and Art Donaldson, win the boys’ junior doubles title at the US Open. Their lives intersect with that of Tashi Duncan, a highly acclaimed young tennis prospect. Tashi becomes the focal point of their attraction.

As is only fitting with a ménage à trois the film’s focus is on the three central characters. Let’s look at each in turn.

Tashi (Zendaya):

Once a tennis prodigy, Tashi now coaches players. Her life takes an unexpected turn when she finds herself torn between two intense connections:
Art (Mike Faist): Her husband and a world-renowned grand slam champion. Their love, though stable, lacks the fire it once had.
Patrick (Josh O’Connor): Tashi’s ex-boyfriend and Art’s former best friend. Their chemistry crackles with unresolved feelings from the past.
Tashi grapples with loyalty to Art versus her undeniable attraction to Patrick.

Art (Mike Faist):

Art lives and breathes tennis, but his game is faltering. Performance anxiety gnaws at him. re-enter Patrick, disrupting Art’s focus. Jealousy flares as he senses the sexual tension between Tashi and Patrick. Art’s journey involves not only reclaiming his tennis prowess but also navigating the emotional triangle.

Patrick (Josh O’Connor):

Patrick harbours old wounds from Art’s betrayal. His return to Tashi’s life reopens those scars. His attraction to Tashi is undeniable, and he sees a chance to rekindle their romance. Patrick becomes the catalyst for change, pushing Tashi and Art to confront their desires and secrets.

The ménage à trois creates emotional turmoil. Tashi’s heart wavers, and Art seethes with jealousy. Forbidden attraction fuels the plot. Stolen glances and whispered confessions heighten the stakes. Each character grows through this complex relationship. They draw energy from each other. Betrayals and revelations keep viewers guessing.

I loved the soundtrack. Inspired by Berlin techno and ’90s rave music, the duo crafted a “very loud techno music” score for the film. The intention was to amplify the pace and high-stakes nature of the movie.

Critics have praised the soundtrack:
Ty Burr of The Washington Post called it “one of [Reznor and Ross’s] best to date.”

Max Weiss of Baltimore highlighted its freneticism that fuels the film and Maureen Lee Lenker of Entertainment Weekly likened it to “sonic riffs from Miami Vice” that evoke both tennis action and dance club vibes.

Reznor and Ross’s pulsating, synth-filled composition adds an electrifying dimension to the film, making it a memorable auditory experience on and off the court

The film employs various techniques to convey its story visually. These include camera angles, lighting, and composition. These elements work together to evoke specific moods and atmospheres, enhancing the overall cinematic experience.

The tennis matches themselves serve as powerful visual metaphors. The final game between Art and Patrick at the New Rochelle Challenger becomes more than just a match. Their intense volley back and forth reflects their complex relationship, fuelled by years of ill will. The tension on the court mirrors the emotional stakes in their personal lives.

Guadagnino masterfully blends tennis action with cinematic theory. The tennis court becomes a canvas for emotional exchanges, transcending mere words. The film’s visual language communicates themes of passion, rivalry, and catharsis, making it a compelling watch.

, “Challengers” weaves a captivating tale of desire, jealousy, and emotional turmoil. As Tashi grapples with loyalty and attraction, Art’s faltering game and Patrick’s return stir the pot. Stolen glances and whispered confessions heighten the stakes, while the pulsating soundtrack amplifies the film’s pace. Visually, Guadagnino’s masterful use of camera angles and lighting mirrors the emotional stakes on the tennis court. The film’s visual language communicates passion, rivalry, and catharsis, leaving viewers guessing until the end. And that final visual symbolism? It binds everything together, making “Challengers” a memorable cinematic experience. 

By Patrick Harrington

Comments (1)

Dune Part Two (2024): A Cinematic Odyssey Beyond Heroes and Myths


349 words, 2 minutes read time.

“Dune: Part Two” ventures deeper into the thematic complexities introduced in the first film, offering a cinematic experience that delves into intricate political and religious dimensions. Visionary filmmaker Denis Villeneuve masterfully combines immense production design with a cold-blooded portrayal of political manoeuvring, creating a harsh cosmos populated by overwhelmingly evil forces and Machiavellian power players. There is a notable absence of clearly defined forces worth rooting for and, the film challenges the conventional notion of “the triumph of good over evil,” presenting a narrative where heroism is viewed sceptically.

The movie unfolds as a unique take on the traditional “Hero’s Journey,” casting doubt on the archetypal heroism. Protagonist Paul is portrayed as both compelling and unsympathetic, leading the audience to question the very essence of heroism in the context of the story.

In exploring religious themes, “Dune: Part Two” sets itself apart from its sci-fi counterparts, especially the likes of “Star Wars.” While “Star Wars” celebrates the unequivocal triumph of good over evil, “Dune” adopts a more skeptical approach, critiquing Abrahamic-style faith. The narrative warns against the manipulation of people through messianic prophecies, emphasizing the enslavement that can result from such religious exploitation. Chani, a young Fremen woman, serves as a voice cautioning against blind faith and manipulation¹.

“Dune: Part Two” challenges the conventional mythos of heroism. Instead of a straightforward hero’s journey, the film introduces the concept of a Sympathetic Plot, adding layers of complexity to the protagonist’s journey. Paul’s visions of an impending holy war and his internal struggle to prevent it contribute to the depth of the narrative, offering a more nuanced exploration of the consequences of wielding power on a grand scale¹.

“Dune: Part Two” emerges as a thought-provoking exploration of political power, religion, and the profound repercussions of wielding power on a grand scale. Its critique of faith and scepticism distinguishes it from traditional sci-fi epics, providing audiences with a cinematic experience that challenges established norms and offers a more complex narrative landscape.

By Pat Harrington

For those interested in the political themes in Dune see here

Picture credit: By CineMaterial, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=73709643

Comments (1)