Posts Tagged a24

Can Love Survive the Truth? Insights from ‘The Drama’

Kristoffer Borgli’s The Drama opens with a deceptively simple question: how well can you ever really know the person you love? I found myself wrestling with that from the first act, mostly because Charlie—despite Robert Pattinson’s sharp, twitchy performance—remains a strangely opaque figure. He’s compelling to watch but difficult to understand, and at times downright frustrating. That slipperiness becomes part of the film’s texture, though not always in ways that feel intentional.

A wedding invitation featuring two smiling individuals in formal attire, set against a floral backdrop. The text includes the names 'Zendaya' and 'Robert Pattinson,' along with the title 'The DRAMA' and details about the film's release.

The story begins with a meet‑cute that’s more clumsy than charming. Charlie spots Emma in a coffee shop, fakes having read her book, and stumbles through a conversation she can’t fully hear. It’s a flimsy foundation for a relationship, and Borgli seems aware of that; the cracks are already visible before the plot applies any pressure.

Once the film shifts into the week leading up to their extravagant wedding, the tone tightens. A casual dare among friends—confess the worst thing you’ve ever done—becomes the spark that blows the group’s equilibrium apart. Mike and Rachel offer up their own unsettling stories, but Emma’s admission is something else entirely, a revelation that instantly reshapes how everyone in the room sees her. From that moment on, the film becomes a study in spiralling perception: affection turning brittle, fear masquerading as morality, and judgment spreading through the group like a fever.

Zendaya anchors the film with a quiet, wounded performance that communicates more through posture and silence than dialogue. She plays Emma as someone who has spent years learning how to fold herself into the smallest possible shape, only to be thrust into the harshest possible light. Pattinson, meanwhile, gives Charlie a jittery, anxious energy that hints at depth the script never fully explores. That gap—between what the actor suggests and what the writing delivers—is part of why he feels so hard to pin down. Many viewers have echoed this: Charlie’s motivations shift, his reactions wobble, and his emotional arc never quite coheres. Some see that as a flaw; others see it as a portrait of a man who doesn’t know himself well enough to be understood by anyone else.

Borgli’s direction leans into disorientation. Abrupt sound cuts, jagged flashbacks, imagined scenarios bleeding into reality—these choices sometimes sharpen the film’s tension, and sometimes feel like noise. The satire, aimed at moral panic and performative outrage, lands unevenly. There are moments of real bite, but also stretches where the film seems to gesture at big ideas without fully committing to them.

Yet beneath all the provocation, the film keeps circling a quieter, more unsettling idea: can a relationship survive the parts of ourselves we bury just to keep it intact? The Drama suggests that even the person you plan to marry remains partly unknowable, a shifting landscape of past choices and private fears. By the time the story reaches its final stretch, nothing is neatly resolved. Instead, Charlie and Emma are left in a fragile new space—still tethered to each other, but stripped of the illusions that once made their love feel effortless. It’s not comforting, and it’s not meant to be.

What stayed with me wasn’t the twist everyone keeps whispering about, but the film’s insistence that intimacy is always a gamble. You never truly know the person standing across from you at the altar. You only know the version of them you’ve been allowed to see. And sometimes, as The Drama makes painfully clear, that’s enough to unravel everything—or to force you to decide whether love can survive the truth.

By Pat Harrington

Picture credit: By A24 – http://www.impawards.com/2026/drama_ver2.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81801916

Leave a Comment

Unsettling Portrayal of Chaos: ‘Civil War’ (2024) by Alex Garland

A disturbing, harrowing film whose characters lack a moral compass

518 words, 3 minutes read time.

“Civil War,” directed by Alex Garland, immerses viewers in a chilling alternate future where the United States grapples with a devastating conflict. The film unfolds against the backdrop of a civil war between secessionist states, primarily Texas and California. It follows the harrowing journey of four journalists who risk their lives to capture the chaos unfolding on the frontlines.

The premise of the film raises thought-provoking questions about the fragility of societal cohesion and the potential consequences of unchecked division. In this alternate reality, racial tensions and deep-seated grievances have erupted into open conflict, resulting in a nation torn apart by violence and unrest.

One of the most striking aspects of “Civil War” is its portrayal of the journalists’ relentless pursuit of breaking news amidst the chaos of war.

Garland said in an interview with the Financial Times (6 Aptil 2024): “The film acknowledges that journalist can be conflicted or compromised as individuals, and we can have all sorts of strange motivations. But, under all that stuff, there’s an ideology. They are all there to report. One of them says at one point: ‘We do this so other people can make their inferences.”

However, while the film delves into the adrenaline-fueled world of war correspondents, it falls short in providing adequate context for the conflict itself. The lack of backstory leaves viewers craving a deeper understanding of the political, social, and economic factors that led to the outbreak of war.

Moreover, “Civil War” raises timely questions about the potential for a civil war in a future United States, particularly in light of ongoing racial divisions and tensions. The film doesn’t explicitly explore this theme. Instead the factions are secessionist Sates (California and Texas) against the Federal government. Its portrayal of a nation torn apart by internal strife, serves, however, as a sobering reminder of the importance of addressing societal rifts and fostering unity.

However, for some viewers, including myself, the film was disturbingly violent and lacked a moral compass. The relentless portrayal of brutality and chaos may have been the film’s point, highlighting the horrors of war and the ethical dilemmas and lack of morality which can ensnare journalists. Nevertheless, the absence of a clear moral stance leaves the audience grappling with the film’s unsettling themes and unsettling violence.

Despite its shortcomings, “Civil War” offers a unique perspective on the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists in conflict zones and serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of division and extremism. With its intense action sequences and thought-provoking premise, the film is sure to spark conversations about the fragility of democracy and the consequences of unchecked polarization.

In addition to its compelling premise, “Civil War” boasts a diverse ensemble cast that brings the film’s gripping narrative to life. Characters like Lee, Joel, Jessie, Sammy, and Anya navigate a fractured nation torn apart by violence and unrest, capturing the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists in conflict zones. Their interactions and individual journeys contribute to the film’s thought-provoking premise.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Picture credit: By https://a24films.com/films/civil-war, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=75518807

Leave a Comment