Posts Tagged science fiction

Exploring ‘Creation of the Humanoids’: A 1962 Sci-Fi Classic

1,523 words, 8 minutes read time.

It’s always a pleasant surprise to discover an unexpected vintage Science Fiction gem that’s free to watch online.

And a gem this most certainly is, providing me with one of the most thought-provoking eighty minutes or so I’ve spent looking at a screen in ages.

I found it through a short YouTube video on ‘Banned Science Fiction Movies of the 1960s’, link at the bottom of the article, although most of the films featured were only banned for a time in some of the outer reaches of the American Evangelical Bible belt. But other movies on the list also sound worth twenty minutes of your time.

Creation of the Humanoids sounded the most intriguing of all, and I was delighted to find the full movie available to watch on YouTube. A link to the best-quality version I could find is also provided at the bottom of the article.

Even by the standards of the time, this is clearly a low-budget film, which takes place in a small number of indoor locations that do little to hide the fact that they are sound stages, with screens and curtains used to conceal the film crew and other artefacts that need to remain invisible.

The sets are, however, strikingly colourful, inventive, and very sixties. I also loved the look of the pale-blue-skinned, bald-headed, metallic-eyed humanoid robots who, aside from their skin colour, put me in mind of Marshall Applethwaite (AKA ‘Do’), the leader of the UFO cult Heaven’s Gate, who committed suicide along with many of their members in 1997.

The same make-up artist who worked on the original, definitive, 1931 Universal version of Frankenstein was involved in creating the look of the titular Humanoids.

The eerie electronic soundtrack is also resonant of great Science Fiction films of the period, such as Forbidden Planet and The Day The Earth Stood Still.

There are no special effects and very little action, save for a couple of shootings and stabbings, with the story relayed almost totally through characterisation, dialogue and exposition. This, plus the limited settings, gives the film the feel of a stage play, and, indeed, it would work very well as such.

The dialogue is snappy, intelligent and, in the context of the story, believable, with a small number of cast members about whom you grow to know and care for almost immediately.

The premise of the plot is that, following a nuclear war at some unspecified point between unspecified powers, the human population of our planet was reduced by 92%. To survive and maintain civilisation, the survivors turned to the creation of increasingly sophisticated robots.

The first prototypes, the R1’s, which we see at the start of the movie, are clunky metallic efforts of the type that will be familiar to all who have delved into the world of cinematic SF between the 1940s and 1960s, as well as low-budget TV SF such as my beloved Doctor Who through the 1970s’80s.

But, as their development has progressed, with each new successive creation given an ‘R’ number, R1, R2, R3 and so on, up to the R90’s we have reached at the time the film is set, in the Twenty Third Century, with the R100 as the now within reach ultimate, thanks largely to the work of the scientist Doctor Raven (Dan Doolittle).

The Humanoids have developed to the point that they far surpass mere humans in intellectual and physical capability, and this allows what remains of the human race to live a life of leisure at a high standard of living, without the need to work, save for those directly involved in the design, development and manufacture of the Humanoids.

The hero of the story is Captain Kenneth Cragis, played by Don Magowan. The film features many actors whose names you won’t know, but whose faces you will, and this is true of both Magowan and Doolittle.

One after-effect of the nuclear war was increasing infertility amongst those of the human race who survived, with the birth rate having plunged to 1.4%, well below replacement level and, interestingly, about the same rate we have reached in our own most advanced, industrialised nations, those comprised primarily of European or Southeast Asian stock, today.

Cragis is a leading figure in an organisation called The Order of Flesh and Blood, which regards our low birthrate, coupled with the level of development the Humanoids as an existential threat to the human race. Members of the Order are pledged to resist this.

There are very few online reviews of this film, but I did find one that noted the Confederate-like uniforms of the Order, and the similarity of the nickname they use for the Humanoids, ‘Clickers’, to a certain ‘N’ word, concluding that it was essentially a fascistic ‘hate’ group.

In reality, different factions exist within the organisation of varying degrees of radicalism. Cragis is something of a moderate who believes that the Humanoids are necessary tools for our survival, but wishes to tighten controls on their further development to maintain the specificity of humanity.

He is, however, horrified to discover that his sister is cohabiting with a Humanoid. The used is ‘In Rapport’ with, which involves humans voluntarily subjecting themselves to a process by which their minds can be merged with a Humanoid of their choice, so that the Humanoid can service their desires without even needing to be asked. It seems that there is no physical component of ‘Rapport’, though the theme of sexual relations between man (and woman) and machine is certainly present in the movie.

The scene at Cragis’ sisters’ apartment put me in mind of the SF/Horror classic The Stepford Wives, though this film was made a decade before the novel upon which that later movie was written.

It was also in this scene that Cragis meets his own love interest. This plays an important role in the further development of the story.

The film could be seen as another example of the ‘Cold War paranoia’ flick of which The Invasion of The Body Snatchers is perhaps the most famous example.

But that would be a far too simplistic reading. To our modern eyes, it can better be understood as concerning itself with our fears at the increasing use, development and sophistication of Artificial Intelligence, and ultimately to the threat/possibility of Transhumanism, a complete merger between organic and non-organic life forms.

Another idea for consideration, particularly when considering the birthrate issue, is to see the movie as a metaphor for the fear, which is expressed by an increasing number in the West, that our failure to reproduce, globalist interconnectivity, increasing migration and our apparent dependence on foreign labour could lead to the complete disappearance of distinct national identities and cultures.

In addition, the film deals with some of the deep philosophical questions addressed in many of the novels of the great Philip K Dick. In particular, the question of what it means to be human.

For instance, if a being of artificial design looks like a human, feels like a human, thinks like a human, can love and hate like a human, the point we are about to reach as the movie draws to a close, in what sense are they distinguishable from humans, especially if they have now become unaware of their synthetic origins?

The film also addresses religious questions. The Humanoids are fast developing a quasi-religion of their own, referring to the master computer that’s ultimately responsible for their development as ‘Mother-Father’ and the charging station to which they must periodically repair if they are to remain functional as the ‘Temple’.

We humans of a religious persuasion are also invited to entertain the question of whether these ‘machines’, that meet all of the human requirements listed above, have a soul?

The possibility that, upon death, we can be replicated as humanoid beings who retain the same individual memories, interests and predilections we developed as fully organic beings also opens up the possibility of immortality. Should we, would we, then, as one of the advanced Humanoids suggests, welcome this development?

The film puts an interesting twist on Isaac Asimov’s famous Prime Directive, the idea that artificial intelligence should be programmed in such a way that it can never intentionally harm humans. Here, the idea has been rebranded as the ‘First Directive,’ and, though it is true, as the members of the Order suspect, that the Humanoids do plan to supplant us completely, they genuinely believe that this is in the best interest of humanity, merely the latest step in a long process of species-evolution, and thus not in conflict with their ‘do no harm’ directive.

In that sense, this is not a film of black and white, right or wrong and easy answers, but shades of grey and moral ambiguity. It’s a movie without villains, and all the better for it.

It might seem unnecessary to worry about spoilers as regards a film that’s over six decades old. But, it will be a more rewarding viewing if watched without knowing its resolution. There is also a nice twist in the very last shot.

I loved this film.

Anthony C Green, July 2025   

Leave a Comment

Doctor Who Season 2 Episode 2 Review: Lux Analysis

2,251 words, 12 minutes read time.

A critic asked to summarise Lux in two sentences, at some unspecified point in the future might write, ‘It was ambitious and innovative, had loads of potential, retains many good points, but, like almost every episode from the ‘RTD 2 era’, it is an incoherent, unsatisfying mess. Lux is remembered primarily for one ‘Meta’ scene that both referenced and hastened the show’s long hiatus.’

Plot

After last week’s more traditional Science Fiction season opener, The Robot Revolution, we’re back to the Pantheon of Gods, which Russell T Davies (RTD) first introduced us to in The Giggle, the last of the three Sixtieth anniversary specials in late 2023.

This time in the spotlight, almost literally, we have Lux, the God of Light, who manifests in the form of a traditional, old-school Disney-type animated character, Mr. Ring-a-Ding, in a cinema in Miami, Florida, 1952. Breaking free of the cinema screen, he imprisons fifteen local cinema goers within the frames of celluloid film.

The Doctor and Belinda, as part of the ongoing season arc of attempting to return the new companion home to England on the date she left, May 24th this year, find themselves in Miami and begin to investigate the disappearance of the ‘Miami 15’. In their interactions with the lead villain, they too find themselves trapped within celluloid, briefly turned into animated form themselves, before finally escaping by smashing through a modern flat TV screen into a British living room where they interact with ‘Doctor Who fans’. These three fans advise on how to defeat Lux. Returning to Miami, our heroes follow this advice, and with the help of Mr. Pye, the cinema projectionist, who sacrifices himself with the help of his dead wife by setting alight to the many rolls of film, burning down the cinema. This exposes Lux to outside sunlight, an influx of light so great that he begins to grow, to lose his animated form, ultimately merging to become ‘all light’. The missing fifteen walk free from the cinema, seemingly unharmed.

That’s a simplified version, and much else happens along the way, but that’s essentially it.

Positives

It looks great. Miami, 1952, at least an idealised, Disney-fied version of it, is very well realised, the cars, the clothes, the gaudy neon signs, the diner, the ‘picturehouse’…

An early shot of one of the ’15’ screaming out from the frames of film looks genuinely terrifying. The animations of Mr.-Ring-a-Ding and of the Doctor and Belinda were impressive and, based on my admittedly limited knowledge in this area, looked appropriate to the period. Close to the end of the episode, the distorted image of Lux as he began his transformation away from his animated Mr Ring-a-Ding manifestation towards infinity was also impressively horrifying.

Even the ‘fourth wall’/Meta-break is visually striking.

Ncuti Gatwa continued the improvement seen in his portrayal of the Doctor in last week’s season opener. Arguably, he even finally had his proper ‘Doctor moment.’ This was in the diner when he had been explaining to a shocked Belinda that they were at a point in history when segregation was still in place in America. He responded to her incredulity that he wasn’t as outraged as she was about this fact by saying, ‘I’ve toppled worlds. Sometimes I wait for them to topple themselves.’ I shine.’ Good lines, well-delivered, which could have come from the mouth of any of the modern Doctors not played by Jodie Whittaker.

Grudging credit must be given to Davies for his tackling of the segregation theme in general. We might have expected him to go to town on this, but, for once, he showed restraint. Or, maybe, as I mentioned in my review of The Robot Revolution, much work was put into post-production and re-editing in response to criticisms of last year’s series. Of course, there was no necessity to set the episode in segregation era America in the first place, either, and it could be argued that the contrast between the restraint displayed here and the histrionics on race-related issues at the end of Dot and Bubble shows an inconsistency of characterisation. True, characters should grow and develop over time, but that was a mere five episodes ago, and the Doctor was, supposedly, no less a Time Lord then than he is in Lux.

Sadly, though not unexpectedly, Ncuti’s good work was undercut by his usual array of campy posturing, with no consideration given by Davies to how adding such flamboyant characteristics, clothes and modes of speech (‘honey,’ ‘babes’) to his skin colour would likely have been received at this time, in this place.

Gatwa’s threads look very nice, but once again, he’s deprived of a recognisable ‘Doctor costume’ which immediately signals to the viewer that this is the character he is portraying.

Verada’s Sethu’s Belinda was a much more engaging character here than in the season opener, with less moaning and ‘pushing back’ against the Doctor and more entering into the spirit of being a companion at the beginning of what ought to be a series of epic adventures through space and time.

There was some good dialogue and banter between Doctor and companion, and other characters, and some good one-liners from Mr Ring-a-Ding (‘I never should have learnt perspective!’), and it’s probably a bit late in the day to be mentioning how superbly voiced the ‘villain’ was by Alan Cummings. I believe he does this sort of thing for a day job, and you can see, or at least hear, why. 

Negatives

As much more of a Science Fiction than a Fantasyfan, I’m not greatly impressed by the move in this direction since Davies once more took over as showrunner. I can certainly appreciate the genre in the hands of masters such as Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Ursula Le Guin, and even J.K. Rowling. But these writers spent decades, a lifetime in the case of the former, building complex, internally consistent worlds full of characters who are believable in the context of those worlds. RTD is no Tolkien. As far as I know, he has no track record of writing Fantasy, and I have no sense of him believing in his ‘Pantheon of Gods’ to the extent of being able to stand even a few minutes of questioning concerning the nature of these ‘Gods’ and how they relate to one another. For Davies, it seems the ‘Fantasy’ tag is merely a convenience that frees him from the need to write plots that make sense to anyone other than himself.

In addition, as Brendan, host of my favourite Doctor Who podcast (‘Sense Sphere’) puts it, ‘These Gods are crap!’ turning up in random places which may or may not be related to the Doctor turning up at the same place and time, and then being quickly and easily defeated after causing harm to a limited number of people for a while or, this case, maybe not defeated, because becoming at one with all light is presumably where Lux as the God (or ‘a’ God?) of Light, started from before randomly manifesting as a cartoon character in a cinema because of a chance occurrence (moonlight reflected from a spoon).

I also don’t feel invested in the Belinda ‘Journey home narrative’. It worked fine with Ian and Barbara in the early days of the show, because it was clear at that point that the Doctor had no control of where and when the Tardis materialised.

But here?

As I understand it, the Tardis can’t land on the target date of May 25th, so the Doctor has built a gadget, the Vortex Indicator (Vindicator), which, in theory, could, by getting somewhere (and somewhen) in the right vicinity, drag the Tardis to the desired destination. In which case, why are they in Miami in 1952? It would make sense for the Doctor to at least attempt to materialise on May 24th and, if successful, take Belinda to one of his favourite clubs for a few hours until the clock strikes midnight and, voila, it’s the 25th. She can say a quick ‘Hi,’ to celloist mum and karaoke dad (new information gained in Lux. What a surprise that it’s only the mum who is given a proper career), have a few hours’ sleep and be at the hospital in time for her 2-10 shift preventing the NHS from collapse.

Job done.

Such things are logistic plot-point problems writers can easily deal with, explaining away as necessary, if they are aware of them. But that will often require an editor with the confidence and authority to read through their work and drop them a friendly email saying ‘Very good, but…’

Pacing

Like so much of this incarnation of the show, the actual plot is slight and could be raced through in much less than its forty-five-minute time allocation. But telling it in such a way that it doesn’t strain the viewer’s credulity, at the same time as peopling it with believable characters we feel we’ve come to know and have grown to care about, can’t be. So, that early image of the character we saw screaming from within a celluloid frame was never capitalised upon, because we never saw this character again until he miraculously walked free from the cinema at the end. He didn’t even have a name (only Tommy Lee, son of one of the characters at the diner, had that), so why should we feel relieved that he’s been rescued from his horrifying ordeal?

A lack of consequences is another big problem with the show in its current run. Almost every major character was dissolved into dust early in the season one finale The Empire of Death. By the end, they’d all been resurrected. Similarly, Mr. Pye was the only character who died in Lux.

Linus Roche, a fine character actor in his own right as well as the son of William Roche (Ken Barlow in Coronation Street), deserves a lot of credit for his portrayal of the projectionist. But he got no more than a few minutes of screen time, so, again, why should we care?

***

Over the last week, I’ve watched the latest run of six Black Mirror episodes on Netflix, and this set me thinking that, in at least one future world, Doctor Who could be improved if it could be detached from the BBC completely (as far as new content is concerned). The move from Channel Four to a fully streamed service allowed Black Mirror to achieve what Davies had said was his ambition for Who, to take it from being a niche British show to a truly global phenomenon which enjoys both public and critical acclaim. Netflix provided Black Mirror with a much bigger budget than could have been imagined during its first two series, which were funded by and shown only on Channel Four. But, more importantly, the move freed it from forty-five to fifty-minute episode time constraints. Stories now take as long as the show creator and writer, Charlie Brooker (sometimes with co-writers), feels are needed to tell them. I’d recommend watching, back-to-back, the season four episode, USS Callister and its new season seven sequel USS Callister: Into Infinity, both feature-length, both incredibly tightly written, working on several levels, including meta-Star Trek parody, but managing to incorporate genuinely thrilling SF adventures with real consequences for believable characters who viewers have formed a relationship with.

It helps that Brooker is a brilliant writer, and even his early, time-constrained episodes stand up well. But he would never have been able to produce something this ambitious within the parameters of British network television.

And Doctor Who could never attempt to emulate it, no matter how many billions Disney, or anyone else, throws at it while it remains tied to BBC television scheduling.

The ‘Meta’ Scene

I intended to say more about the ‘scene with the fans’ than I will, because it remains to be seen if this will have a significance in the series beyond Lux, in the season climax as, I think, is strongly suggested by Mrs Flood’s nod and wink references at the end of the episode. I’ll provisionally stick to three short points: 1) It put a break on the story, adding to the pacing problems 2) If the show does end up on ‘indefinite hiatus’ then, as I indicated at the beginning of the review, this is the scene that everybody will remember it for, irrespective of its many good qualities. 3) It’s the sort of indulgence that a show can perhaps get away with when it’s at the top of its game and is still clearly beloved. I doubt many Buffy fans rewatch the musical episode often, but they can forgive and even admire its existence. In a show that is haemorrhaging viewers (I’ll talk more about ratings in a future review, but a 23% drop in the overnight figures from The Robot Revolution to Lux can’t be spun in a positive direction, and now even the pretence of pretending all is well is falling away) it risks further alienating loyal viewers, whether it was affectionately stereotyping Doctor Who fans or not, as well as being incomprehensible to new viewers.  

If the show is cancelled, what photo-still from its illustrious sixty-two-year history will accompany the headlines? I’ll take a wild stab that it’ll be of Ncuti Gatwa and Veranda Sethru standing, with three cosplaying ‘fans’, next to a television screen upon which are displayed the ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘BBC’ logos as well as the legend #RIPDoctorWho.

Anthony C Green, April 2025

Leave a Comment

Doctor Who: Season Two, Episode One, Robot Revolution, Reviewed

845 words, 4 minutes read time.

Initial Impressions

Well, knit me a skirt and call me Susan Foreman. The first episode of the new series of Doctor Who was… good.
At least on first viewing.

On second watch, my opinion dipped slightly—and I expect a third will lower it further. But it remains the most enjoyable episode since Ncuti Gatwa officially took over in the 2023 Christmas Special.

I’ve deliberately avoided other reviews, much like Bob and Terry dodging football results in Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads?—so what follows is purely my take.

The State of the Show

The RTD2 Era So Far

Fandom has rarely been so united in criticism as it has with Russell T Davies’s (RTD’s) second stint as showrunner, starting in 2022. Once the hero who brought Who back in 2005, RTD returned to a franchise weakened by the Chibnall/Whittaker years, with high hopes buoyed by Disney’s reported $100M partnership.

Those hopes were misplaced.

His Children in Need short undermined Davros with ill-advised political revisionism. The 60th anniversary specials, despite the return of David Tennant and Catherine Tate, fizzled rather than soared. Ncuti Gatwa’s debut, in The Giggle, saw the first use of ‘bi-generation’—leaving Tennant’s Doctor bizarrely alive and semi-retired with a working TARDIS.

Season One: A Litany of Missteps

  • Opening Disaster: Space Babies—arguably the worst Who episode ever.
  • Immediate Follow-Up: The Devil’s Chord, offensive to Beatles and Doctor Who fans alike.
  • Lazy Writing: With six episodes penned by RTD himself, most felt like first drafts.
  • Rare Bright Spots: Only Boom (written by Steven Moffat) stood out as complete and coherent.
  • Musical Numbers: Overused gimmicks (The Goblin’s Song, There’s Always A Twist…) quickly wore thin.
  • Unconvincing Relationships: Ruby Sunday and the Doctor’s bond felt forced and underdeveloped.
  • Weak Finale: Empire of Death left major questions unanswered or resolved them with laughable twists.

Sutekh—once a terrifying god-like villain—was reduced to a cartoonish giant dog, ultimately defeated with a magic rope. It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.

The Doctor and the Gatwa Problem

Gatwa’s Doctor still lacks a defining moment. He changes outfits constantly (so no iconic look), cries often (up to five times per episode), and seems more human than alien. His sexuality was foregrounded—fine in principle, but clumsily executed in Rogue, where he ditched Ruby for a romantic rendezvous with a near-stranger.

Worst of all, the Doctor rarely saves the day anymore. The “male saviour” trope appears to have been shelved—at the expense of the show’s storytelling.

Culture War Fallout

The show’s shift from story to message has not gone unnoticed. Political soapboxing—on gender, race, reparations—has replaced the sense of wonder. RTD and Gatwa’s response to criticism? Blame the fans—accusing them of bigotry rather than acknowledging creative decline.

Robot Revolution: A Ray of Hope?

What Worked

Surprisingly, a lot:

  • The Concept: A star named after a girlfriend leads to her being abducted by giant robots years later and crowned their queen. Classic Sci-Fi hook.
  • Aesthetic Style: Ray-gun robots, 1950s rocket ships, and space cityscapes—this looked like real Doctor Who.
  • Pacing and Visuals: It didn’t drag. The time fracture effects were trippy. Disney’s budget might finally have shown up.
  • Restraint from Gatwa: Fewer manic outbursts, just one single tear (still too many), and toned-down antics helped. Post-production may have removed the worst.
  • A Solid Companion Setup: Belinda Chandra has potential—feisty, capable, but not yet loveable.

But There Were Issues…

  • The Message: Toxic masculinity was this week’s villain. The metaphor was belaboured—Alan’s marriage proposal came with weird conditions (no tight clothes, no texting after 8 PM), and Belinda’s “Planet of the Incels!” line felt jarringly on-the-nose.
  • Shaky Character Beats: Belinda was indifferent to the death of a cat and quite rude to Alan. Not ideal for a new character intro.
  • Gloating Doctor: The Doctor’s smugness at Alan’s fate was disquieting. Classic Doctors showed compassion even toward enemies.
  • Convenient Tech: The robots’ inability to process every ninth word let the Doctor and Belinda speak in code—a clever but fragile plot device.

The Bigger Picture

Despite RTD’s promise of a darker Doctor, what we got was a confused one—part clown, part political commentator. Robot Revolution hints at a course correction, but it’s not yet the show many of us fell in love with.

Moffat’s fingerprints—nonlinear storytelling, callbacks to Boom, the wordplay—were everywhere. Even Belinda’s jab at “timey-wimey” felt like a meta-apology for narrative fatigue.

The big question remains: Is there a future for this version of Doctor Who?

Rumours swirl of Disney pulling out after The War Between The Land and the Sea. Gatwa’s departure seems imminent—potentially without a replacement announced, a first since Patrick Troughton’s exit.

Final Verdict

“Better than Space Babies” is a low bar, but Robot Revolution clears it with ease. In fact, it’s probably better than anything from last season. It feels like Doctor Who again—if only faintly.

Guarded optimism replaces despair. I’m even looking forward to Lux.

Low expectations, it turns out, can be a gift.

Anthony C Green, April 18, 2025.

A promotional image for 'The Angela Suite' book by Anthony C. Green, featuring a close-up of bare feet resting on a surface, alongside a radio or speaker and a backdrop of an urban skyline.

Leave a Comment