Click on image to buy tickets
★★★★ Albert Pierrepoint remains one of the most unsettling yet compelling figures in British criminal history, and Pierrepoint: The People’s Hangman approaches him with a seriousness that suits the subject. Rather than sensationalising his work or turning him into a caricature of grim authority, the production attempts something far more ambitious: it invites us to see the world through the executioner’s eyes.
Pierrepoint served as Britain’s principal hangman for roughly twenty‑five years, executing an estimated 435 people between the 1930s and 1950s. His career intersected with some of the most notorious murderers of the era — John Haigh, the Acid Bath Killer; Ruth Ellis, the last woman hanged in Britain; and John Reginald Christie of 10 Rillington Place, whose crimes form the backbone of this production.
The show’s strongest material lies in its treatment of Christie. Rather than presenting him simply as a monster, the production dissects his crimes with forensic clarity, exploring not only what he did but how he came to be standing on Pierrepoint’s trapdoor. Christie’s murders — committed in the suffocating confines of 10 Rillington Place — are examined with a clinical, unsettling intimacy. We see the bureaucratic machinery of justice grinding forward, and Pierrepoint positioned at its final, irreversible stage.
Professionalism, Precision, and a Missing Piece
One of the most compelling aspects of Pierrepoint’s life — and something the production hints at but never fully explores — is his almost mathematical approach to execution. He believed deeply in the dignity of his work and the necessity of performing it with precision.
Pierrepoint openly criticised the Americans for their botched hangings of Nazi war criminals after the Nuremberg trials. In his autobiography, he described their methods as clumsy, miscalculated, and needlessly cruel, with several condemned men taking far too long to die because the drop lengths were wrong.
This detail is not included in the production, but it would have enriched it enormously. It illustrates Pierrepoint’s broader philosophy: if the state is to take a life, it must do so swiftly, cleanly, and without unnecessary suffering. Including this would have given audiences a clear example of his professional ethos.
A Family Business
One of the surprises in the show — and a detail that many will not know — is that Pierrepoint came from a long line of executioners. His father Henry began in 1901, his uncle Thomas in 1906, and Albert himself took up the role in September 1932. This wasn’t a macabre calling; it was, in a very real sense, the family trade. The production handles this well, and it adds a fascinating layer to Pierrepoint’s character: he was stepping into a legacy as much as he was taking on a job.
The Challenge of a One‑Hour Biography
This is where the production struggles. A one‑hour Fringe slot is a notoriously tight container for a life as complex as Pierrepoint’s. Choices must be made about what to include and what to sacrifice. Here, the balance tilts too heavily toward the criminals he executed — Christie in particular — at the expense of exploring Pierrepoint’s own motivations, philosophies, and contradictions.
The result is a show that is fascinating, but not fully balanced. The narrative structure is clear, but the weighting of material feels slightly off. Pierrepoint’s inner world, his moral evolution, and his reflections on capital punishment deserve more space. That imbalance is the reason this review lands at four stars rather than five. The script simply needs fine‑tuning.
Potential, Audience Appetite, and the Ongoing Debate
The Fringe is the perfect environment for a show like this. Productions can evolve rapidly in response to audience and critical feedback, and this one has all the ingredients to become a truly exceptional piece. With some structural refinement, it could easily reach five‑star territory.
There is also a substantial audience for this kind of work. True crime has become a cultural phenomenon; dramatizations of cases like Ruth Ellis continue to draw viewers decades later. Pierrepoint himself is strangely under‑examined in modern media, despite his central role in some of the most infamous cases of the 20th century.
And, of course, the debate around capital punishment is far from settled. Today, support for the death penalty often comes not from belief in deterrence but from a visceral desire for retribution, particularly in cases involving children. The show touches on this, but could go further — and doing so would deepen its relevance.
Verdict
Pierrepoint: The People’s Hangman is a thought‑provoking, tightly performed, and quietly unsettling piece of theatre. It neither glorifies nor condemns Pierrepoint; instead, it presents the contradictions and lets them breathe. With a more balanced script — one that gives equal weight to the man and the crimes that defined his career — this could become one of the standout productions of the Fringe.
For now, it is a strong four‑star show, rich with potential and already one of the most intriguing pieces of the year.
Leave a Reply