The Havering Post. Double-sided A4. Colour. March 2019. Available in pdf form from Facebook/Independent Havering: https://www.facebook.com/groups/499768197023360/
THE HAVERING POST is a local publication produced in support of several Residents Association groups & independent parties in the London Borough of Havering. Havering would have been part of Essex before it was transferred to London by the London Government Act 1963. This same act effectively created what is now known as Greater London as it abolished the administrative county of Middlesex and also absorbed parts of Kent, Surrey and Hertfordshire.
The Facebook site of Independent Havering – https://www.facebook.com/groups/499768197023360/about/ – informs us that it is ‘a pressure group campaigning to maintain and improve our borough’s quality of life. It aims to lobby and hold national and, especially, local Government and bodies to account for their actions. In the event of a future independent/RA Council it would aim to work closely with them to ensure promises are delivered but also have their ‘back’ if so.’
The Independent Havering group appears to be very well organised with lots of local ‘grassroots’ support. In fact, the last local council elections (held in May 2018) nearly saw them sweep away 17 years of Tory rule in the borough. Bizarrely four Residents Association councillors, who were elected on a anti-Tory ticket, later jumped ship to support the Tories. One later went on to join the Tory Party itself. Even more bizarrely, all Labour councillors seem to support the Tory administration!
It should come as no surprise then, that issue 1 of the Havering Post (HP) examines the question of ‘democracy denied’ at both a local and national level. Refreshingly, however, as well as pointing out how democracy can be turned on its head, it also notes that future issues will ‘look at Proportional Representation, a ‘None Of The Above’ (NOTA) option on ballot papers, Referendums, Preferendums and Voter Recall.’
As noted above, the Havering Post (which is written to a Daily Mail standard) looks at national and local cases whereby the electorate has been cheated.
As its national example it cites the case of what used to be known as The Independent Group (TIG). It was founded earlier this year when disgruntled pro-EU Tory and Labour MPs quit their respective parties. Counter Culture readers may recall that, at the time, these MPs came across as very ‘high and mighty.’ However, as the HP notes, despite being elected as Labour or Tory candidates they ‘all refused to resign their seats and intend to stand as candidates for TIG in any subsequent by-elections. In doing so, they have shown that they have no morals or honour.’
The paper then looks at the denial of democracy in Havering itself. As described earlier, several Residents Associations (RA) and Independent groups had united under the ‘Independent Havering’ banner and were really giving the Tories a run for their money. Thus began the political shenanigans. As the Havering Post notes:
‘Things were so tight that the local Tories had do some horse trading. It appears that some Residents Association and Independent councillors were approached by the Conservative Party and were offered positions to help them to set up a Havering Council Administration. In the event, four of them jumped ship. Known as the ‘Back Stabbers’, they are Michael-Deon Burton (who even joined the Tory Party), Brian Eagling, Martin Goode and Darren Wise.’
The rather thoughtful (and insightful) remarks of one local voter are also quoted. In part, he or she declares that:
“It’s not like they defected half way through their term, but on the first day. This cannot continue – some judicial review needs to be put in place to stop councillors swapping sides. I am totally disgusted. They have no morals.
I find it a personal insult to hear that some people in the RA and Independent coalition feel it is OK to lie to us, your electorate, by way of selling their soul to the Conservatives, just so they can form a majority party to lead our council.
I can assure you I will personally do my best to make sure that the people in those wards know full well what they voted for. If we the electorate wanted to be lied to, we would vote Labour or Conservatives.’”
The idea of some legislation being brought into place (to stop elected officials jumping ship) is interesting. The HP declares that those who switch sides ‘are guilty – at the very least – of betrayal and bad faith. Some may say that they’re also guilty of deliberately deceiving voters.’
Whatever the case, those with honour ‘would do the right thing’ and promptly resign their seat and fight a by-election under their new colours. To date, none of the Havering ‘Back Stabbers’ nor the TIG MPs have done so. Depending on the circumstances, it sadly doesn’t really say much for the calibre of those elected officials who turn their backs on their policies, manifestos and the people who campaigned so hard to get them elected. Is it any wonder why so many people feel disconnected from the political system?
To sum up, the Havering Post provides a robust defence of real democracy. It highlights the failings of democracy (giving local and national examples) but presents a well-argued case for more – and not less – democracy. This is particularly apt given present circumstances whereby the establishment ignores the democratic will of the people, if it goes against the interests of the establishment – à la Brexit!
Hopefully issue 2 will be in the offering soon. No doubt it’ll concentrate on local affairs, but as stated earlier, future issues ‘of the Havering Post will examine other ways in which we can make both national and local politics more representative of the people. Thus we’ll look at Proportional Representation, a ‘None Of The Above’ (NOTA) option on ballot papers, Referendums, Preferendums and Voter Recall.’ What’s being proposed here seems to be a purer form of democracy based on participation as opposed to representation. Here, popular participation (a form of personal self-determination whereby voters exercise action and responsibility) will replace the current system of handing over power and responsibility to others. With the political air full of doom, gloom and negativity, it’ll be refreshing to read something that’s extremely positive and forward looking.
Reviewed by John Jenkins
Counter Culture 