Archive for Feminism

Juliette Burton Rewrites the Rules in Villain Era

Juliette Burton. Photo: Steve Ullathorne

What’s striking about Villain Era is how sharply it understands the women it’s speaking to — and the ones it’s speaking for. Juliette Burton, the writer and performer behind the show, doesn’t approach villainy as a gimmick or a costume; she treats it as a lens, a challenge, and sometimes a liberation. Her work has always wrestled with identity, power, and the stories women are handed, but here she pushes further, pulling apart the myths that shape us and the rules we’re expected to obey.

Talking with Juliette, you feel that mix of mischief and seriousness immediately. She’s funny, sharp, and unafraid to sit with the uncomfortable bits — the rage, the conditioning, the cultural policing — and then flip them into something joyful, defiant, and deeply human. Villain Era isn’t just a show; it’s a reclamation. And Juliette is the one steering it, inviting audiences into a world where women get to be complex, loud, powerful, silly, sexy, nerdy, and unapologetically themselves. Find out more at the Fringe website.

 Villainous Women — Fiction’s “bad girls” often carry the truths polite society can’t handle. Which villainess taught you the most about power, and what did she give you that the so‑called heroines never could?

Coming to the show you will step into the world of fictional villainous and morally grey women including: Poison Ivy, Harley Quinn, Catwoman, Rogue, Emma Frost, Goblin Queen, witches like Agatha Harkness or Scarlet Witch, Greek Goddesses, and Yennefer of Vengerberg.

She starts life powerless, unwanted and dismissed, then stops trying to be “good” and starts owning who she is. That was a revelation for me. Heroines are often rewarded for being selfless; villainesses are punished for being powerful.

Rogue is the other key one for me. My favourite comic book character began as a villain in the comic books in the 1980s. In the X-Men, she begins as a villain who absorbs the power and psyche of Carol Danvers aka Captain Marvel aka the most powerful Avenger and is terrified she can’t contain it. That fear that embracing your power might make you dangerous, felt familiar to me. Now I realise it only makes you dangerous who people who benefit from you being weak or controlled.

Fearing for her sanity Rogue turned to Professor Xavier for help. When I feared for my own sanity, I too turned to a bald man – Bill Bailey. He inspired me to get into stand up and just like Rogue became a leader in the XMen I also lead people… astray.

One of the things comic book villains and heroes like the XMen taught me is that power isn’t zero-sum. My power doesn’t diminish anyone else’s, it can highlight and sharpen it. The real shift happens when we stop seeing each other’s strength as a threat, and start learning how to exist alongside it in harmony.

If we can do that – personally, culturally, collectively – we don’t just survive each other’s differences but we become stronger because of them. That feels, to me, like the most hopeful “Villain Era” there could be.

Then there are witches like Agatha Harkness and Wanda Maximoff, who show that women’s power often grows with age which is exactly why we’re encouraged to disappear as we get older. Not me. I’m determined to get louder, prouder and embrace my power.

And Dark Phoenix, who taught me that the problem isn’t our innate power itself, but other people’s inability to cope with it.

It’s not even a case of ‘step into your power’ – we always had it. But now, we’re remembering our power and becoming it.

 

• Good Girl Conditioning — You describe yourself as a former “good girl”. What’s the most insidious part of that conditioning that you had to unlearn to step into your Villain Era?

The most insidious part of “good girl” conditioning is how deeply it ties identity, worth and safety to being agreeable, pleasing and non-disruptive. I learnt early that taking up space, having opinions, changing my body or challenging other people all come with social punishment. So I ended up chasing an impossible version of myself that was never meant to be achievable.

And even when I thought I’d attained it, I wasn’t allowed to veer from it even for a moment. You’re punished if you veer off the course that’s set and you’re punished if you achieve it – just look at women in the spotlight, allowed a brief stint there before they’re torn down one way or another.

And I think a lot of those “goals” are deliberately unattainable, set by systems and industries that profit from you feeling like you’re not enough. Comedy helped me unpick that, because it isn’t built on perfection or pleasing everyone. It’s built on truth, risk and joy. And there’s very little profit in joy, just freedom.

 

• Nerd Culture Politics — Nerd culture loves a redemption arc but fears female rage. How much of Villain Era is you reclaiming a space that was never built with women in mind?

Nerd culture has often been gatekept by people who frame it as “us vs them”, scarcity vs belonging, and who can be very attached to clear binaries of good and bad. It’s interesting, because on the surface nerd culture may love a redemption arc… but underneath that is the question: why do we need redemption at all and who decided someone was “beyond it” in the first place?

A lot of nerd storytelling, especially in comics, is basically modern mythology. The X-Men are essentially Greek gods in cool jackets. They constantly wrestle with identity, power and belonging, and just like ancient gods and goddesses we can turn to each of them to help us through an aspect of being human that we might be wrestling with at any given time in our lives. And I think the most compelling stories are the ones where hero and villain aren’t fixed states, but internal struggles.

The idea that nerd culture “fears female rage” is partly true in some spaces, but not all. I’ve also seen it be one of the few places and people that properly welcome, encourage and embrace powerful, complex women – women who are allowed to be messy, angry, moral, immoral, all of it.

What fascinates me most is the idea that society has to exist as if there’s a “them versus us”, eg men versus women, or nerds versus jocks, or old fans versus new fans, or an old franchise version versus a new franchise version/spinoff. It’s bizarre to me considering that so much of comic books and nerd culture is supposedly about wrestling with unity. The X-Men wrestle with the idea that they are inherently born different and so, do they use their powers to help protect those who would seek to persecute them? Or is tolerance extinction? For either ‘them’ or ‘us’?

The very fact that the nerd culture communities are aware of these conversations makes me feel safer in nerd culture than in other spaces in society right now, purely because we’re having those conversations, albeit via the prism of comic book lore.

All my shows are me reclaiming space… being on stage an inviting people into my world for an hour is my favourite place to be – I get to set the tone and invite people in. No gatekeeping, all inclusive… I wish that meant your food and drink was free but sadly just the joy.

 

• Sexy vs Silly — Your show promises to be “very silly, very sexy, incredibly nerdy”. Where do you think humour and sexuality meet, and why do British audiences still get twitchy when women mix the two?

Humour and sexuality have always been intertwined for me, they’re both about timing, truth, and not taking yourself too seriously. It still makes me laugh that when I came out as queer, my friends said, “we thought you already knew.” Apparently I was the last to know.

I also think we often confuse sexuality with sensuality and eroticism, and then immediately panic about what women are “allowed” to be in public. There’s still discomfort—particularly in British culture around openly sexual women who are also funny, clever, nerdy, or self-aware. It can disrupt the very tidy Madonna/whore boxes people would prefer to keep us in.

Adding in ‘funny’ confuses those who benefit from forcing women into polarised identities because humour empowers, laughter unites and brings us together, it breaks down pretty little lies about who we are, who we can be and what our roles are.

But the truth is women aren’t one thing. We’re allowed to be silly and sexy and ridiculous and powerful all at once. And if that makes people twitchy, I think that says more about their conditioning than it does about us.

 

• Rage as Fuel — You’re tackling inequality, bad sex lives, and the cultural policing of women’s behaviour. What role does anger play in your writing — ignition, compass, or something more dangerous?

Anger is definitely the ignition point for my writing. If something makes me angry, it usually means there’s a crack in the system somewhere and that’s where the comedy lives. Big things, small things, bad sex, inequality, cultural policing of women’s behaviour… it all starts with that moment of “hang on, why is this just normal?”

I used to be quite afraid of my anger. Therapy taught me that holding onto it was like holding hot stones except the only person getting burned was me. And that’s still true… if you just sit in resentment. But anger handled properly isn’t destruction, it’s information. It tells you what matters, what’s wrong, and what needs changing.

I’m angry about inequality, I’m angry about the amount of mediocre sex women are expected to quietly accept, and I’m very angry about how tightly women’s behaviour is still policed. But I don’t think anger is my compass, that’s a steadier commitment to belief we can do better. Anger is the spark, not the map.

Anger only becomes dangerous when it’s misused to divide people or distract from where the real power sits. In comedy, I try to aim it somewhere more useful: at the absurdity of the rules themselves. And ideally, we get to laugh at them while they fall apart.

 

• Queerness and Power — The press release hints at queerness as part of the journey. How does stepping into a “villain” identity open up new ways of talking about desire and identity?

When you’re raised in a culture where female desire is suppressed – whether that’s appetite, sexuality, difference, or queerness – it can start to feel like anything outside the “acceptable” script is automatically wrong. Even just wanting too much, or wanting differently, can get framed as selfish or even villainous.

So stepping into a “villain” identity becomes strangely freeing. It allows you to question who decided the rules in the first place, and why honesty about desire has to be punished. Whether that’s queerness, polyamory, or just forms of attraction and romance that don’t fit neatly into a norm, it all gets labelled as deviation from a story someone else wrote.

But “villainy” is really just perspective. It’s narrative. Good and bad aren’t fixed states – they’re labels we’ve inherited. And once you start pulling at that thread, the whole idea of what’s “normal” or “acceptable” starts to flip upside down in an exciting and liberating way.

 

• Fantasy Armour — You mention armour made of “hard truths, high fantasy and hilarious punchlines”. What’s the piece of metaphorical armour you didn’t realise you needed until you wrote this show?

Every woman needs a sword right now. That’s just a fact. But since actual armour isn’t exactly socially acceptable in most day-to-day situations, I think what I didn’t realise I needed was a full emotional breastplate – something that lets you walk into the world slightly more protected, but still very much a woman in power.

Or, you know… just better boundaries and less apologising. That too.

 

• Nerdgasms — You promise “live nerdgasms”. For the uninitiated: what exactly constitutes a nerdgasm, and how do you engineer one onstage without breaking Fringe fire regulations?

A nerdgasm is a kind of euphoric nerd peak—the tingle of recognition, like Spidey sense kicking in, when you feel completely seen by others who accept you, get you, understand your niche references, share your passions – whether that be for a fandom, for a passion or for challenging the status quo. It’s that moment of shared joy when a niche detail suddenly becomes a communal experience.

A nerdgasm happens when fandom, humour, sexuality and storytelling all collide in one room. Because the best nerdgasms aren’t solo, they’re collective. Multiple nerdgasms, if you will.

This cannot be engineered. A nerdgasm in the wild can only happen naturally, organically and only if we give ourselves permission to feel safe and lean in together. All I can do is create the conditions: honesty, play, a bit of chaos and a lot of love and respect. The rest is chemistry.

And if the fire alarm goes, well, we’ve clearly made the show incredibly hot.

 

 

• Villain Era Ethics — Every villain thinks they’re the hero of their own story. What’s the ethical line you refuse to cross, even in your Villain Era?

You can be a baddie, just don’t be a dick.

My “Villain Era” reign holds no cruelty or destruction. Just integrity, honesty, agency and refusing to shrink myself to make other people comfortable.

I’ve been the villain in other people’s stories for long enough that I’ve stopped trying to to be the “hero”. Instead, I’m leaning into the villain they’ve already decided I am. At least I look good in black. That doesn’t mean I wish them harm, I just wish them well while I live my life in the fullest, darkest, most powerful way possible. When you embrace your shadow self, turns out the team up is a power up.

That, to me, is the ethical line: don’t lose your humanity while you’re realising your power.

 

• Cultural Rebellion — Counter Culture readers love a rebellion. Do you see Villain Era as a personal metamorphosis, a cultural protest, or a gleeful act of mischief aimed at the patriarchy?

Villain Era is all of the above and more. Just like a woman, this show is multifaceted and is many things all at once.

Villain Era is all of the above and more. Like most women, it refuses to be just one thing at a time.

It’s a personal metamorphosis, because it’s been shaped by unlearning who I was told to be.

It’s a cultural protest, because so much of what I’m talking about – gender, power, sexuality, identity – doesn’t exist outside of politics, whether we name it or not.

And it’s a gleeful act of mischief aimed at the patriarchy because sometimes the best response to absurd systems that seek to control us is to laugh at them.

But underneath all of that, Villain Era is joyful, silly and fun. It’s a reclamation. It’s permission for me and for the audience to take up space without asking nicely.

Click here to buy tickets

Advert

Leave a Comment

Interview with Gwen Coburn of Sad Girl Songs

Pat Harrington interviews the Comedian, Writer and Performer Gwen Coburn about her Fringe show Sad Girl Songs

1. Connecting Myth to Modern Reality

Sad Girl Songs explores how women have been punished for men’s wrongdoings from Ancient Greece to today, including Medusa’s story. What inspired you to connect your own experience to figures like Medusa, and how do these myths help shine a light on modern gender violence?

A woman with purple-highlighted hair sits at a keyboard, looking thoughtfully upwards, in front of a blue wall adorned with cartoon-like raindrops and the title 'Sad Girl Songs' above.

I was diagnosed with PTSD a few years back, and suddenly all these patterns started clicking into place – not just in my own life, but everywhere I looked. I kept hearing variations of the same story from women around me: we get hurt, we speak up, and somehow we become the problem. Then I started reading about Medusa with fresh eyes, and I realized she wasn’t the monster – she was the victim who got turned into a monster for what happened to her. That’s when I understood that these myths aren’t ancient history; they’re the blueprint we’re still following. Medusa gets assaulted in Athena’s temple, and Athena punishes… Medusa. It’s like the world’s oldest victim-blaming story, and we’re still telling it every day.

2. A Different Ending

You’ve said that your story “isn’t unique” but that this version “ends differently.” Without spoiling anything, how does Sad Girl Songs subvert the old narrative of women bearing the consequences of men’s actions?

Without giving too much away, I’ll say this: in the old stories, women like Medusa are gorgons whose visage will turn you to stone. But what if that’s not where the story ends? What if we look anyway?

3. Influences and Comparisons

Your show has been compared to performers like Hannah Gadsby, who blend raw honesty with comedy. How do you feel about those comparisons, and did any particular artists influence your style of turning personal trauma into something both funny and challenging?

Being compared to Hannah Gadsby is incredibly flattering – Nanette changed how I saw comedy and my ability to exist in it. I think we’re both interested in the idea that comedy doesn’t have to just make people laugh; it can make them think, make them uncomfortable, make them reconsider things they thought they knew. I’ve definitely loved the work of Rachel Bloom for her discussion of mental health and exploration of musical genre. I also just love watching people tell earnest stories through their craft, whether that’s comedy, circus, magic, or theater.  On an unrelated note Hannah Gadsby is the reason I got my CPAP machine for sleep apnea, so lots to be grateful to them for. 

4. From #YesAnd to #MeToo

The show is rooted in your experience of an abusive relationship with your improv teacher — when “#YesAnd becomes #MeToo.” What made you decide to transform that painful time into a comedy show?

First, I had to deal with it every other way I could. Therapy, journaling, medication, screaming into pillows – all important steps. But what made me want to write about it was seeing other women who had left comedy having had a similar trauma. Comedy was the only thing that felt like it could take this isolating experience and turn it into something that could connect people. Plus, I had already used jokes to survive through it, I wanted to write new jokes on the other side of it. And a thoughtful, dark joke can be wildly empowering. There’s something about being funny about things that aren’t supposed to be funny. 

5. The Aftermath of Speaking Out

Beyond the abuse itself, your story also focuses on what happens after. You’ve spoken about a “functional exile” you faced after coming forward. What do you want audiences to understand about the reality for survivors who speak up, especially in creative industries?

The thing nobody tells you about speaking up is that it’s often just the beginning of the story. After I came forward, I lost work, lost friends, lost opportunities – not because anyone explicitly said “we can’t hire her,” but because suddenly I was “difficult” or “dramatic” or “a liability.” What audiences need to understand is that real change requires reparative justice, which is a much larger commitment than most organizations are willing to make. It’s not enough to just remove the abuser and call it solved. You have to rebuild trust, address the systems that allowed abuse to happen, and actually repair the harm done to survivors – which means ongoing support, career rehabilitation, and structural changes. But reparative justice is expensive and complicated and requires admitting that the whole system was broken, not just one bad actor. Most places would rather just quietly shuffle people around and hope the problem disappears.

6. Navigating PTSD

You’ve been open about being diagnosed with PTSD. How did that shape the show’s development and your approach to comedy? How did you move from using comedy as armor to using it as a genuine tool for healing and connection?

Getting diagnosed was this weird relief, like finally having a name for why my brain was doing what it was doing. Before that, my comedy was very much about deflecting, keeping people at arm’s length, being funny so I didn’t have to be vulnerable. I was writing satirical songs about feminist issues I deeply cared about, but I was couching them in a “Sad Girl” character that punched down at myself. As if to say, “no worries though, I’m sorry I brought it up.” The PTSD diagnosis forced me to get real about what I was feeling and why I was mocking myself onstage. I realized I didn’t want to just survive my trauma; I wanted to transform it into something useful. So I had to learn how to be funny in a way that invited people in instead of pushing them away. It’s scarier, but it’s so much more meaningful.

7. Being Brutally Honest

You describe Sad Girl Songs as “brutally funny and brutally honest.” How do you protect yourself emotionally when you’re sharing your own trauma on stage? Were there boundaries you set for what to include or not include?

Writing and performing a piece about my own PTSD experience definitely comes with challenges – honestly, acting in general can be tricky with PTSD, so I have specific routines and tools to help me recenter after shows. I also made sure not to write anything into the show that I hadn’t already worked through in therapy, so I can feel safe genuinely connecting with my audience without worrying about re-traumatizing myself. At the end of the day, this is a story of hope and empowerment, and I love being able to share that with people.

8. Finding Humor in the Dark

How do you find humor in dark places? Can you share an example of how you turned a particularly painful moment into a comedic one that audiences really respond to?

I have one song called “Thank You For Not Murdering Me” which is about that thing all women do where we assess what our risk of being murdered is in a situation, or assess after the fact how a situation could have turned out differently and more murdery. Audiences recognize that feeling even if they’ve never articulated it, and there’s this laughter of horror but also relief. The humor comes from naming the absurd reality we’re all living in but pretending is normal. 

9. Musical Comedy

Songs like “You Should Know Where the Clit Is” and “Daddy Issues Boyfriend” stand out for their cheeky, satirical bite. What role does music play in getting your message across — does it soften the blow, or make it hit harder?

Your girl loves a genre. Music gives an extra element to a joke, it’s an added aspect to subvert or emphasize an expectation. I love that extra layer it adds and how that expands the horizons for jokes. Plus this way I can tell my parents I AM using my graduate music degree after all. 

10. Bumble Songs

You also turn real-life dating app profiles into songs. What made you want to include these, and what do they reveal about modern dating and gender expectations?

I love these songs. During the pandemic I used to take the aggressive or absurd dating profiles sent to me by friends and make them into songs to post- complete with my terrible home-made drag outfits. I put them in the show because they make me laugh, and also because underneath the silliness there’s often a threat (some more explicit than others) that these men are making to women publicly. 

11. Mythology and the “Sad, Sexy Baby” Venus

You set your personal story against figures like Medusa and Venus. What do these ancient icons mean to you, and why bring them into a modern feminist comedy?

We tell women these mythological stories about women that sexualize them, shame them, and scare them. We tell these stories TO CHILDREN, and we gloss over the deeply harmful messaging embedded in calling Ovid’s Medusa a monster, or in Botticelli’s bodacious Venus skipping from birth right into sexy womanhood. That’s wild to me. 

12. Working with an Intimacy Coordinator

Your director, Kayleigh Kane, is also an intimacy coordinator. How did that shape the creative process, especially when handling such sensitive material?

Working with Kayleigh has been incredible because she’s a super collaborative director, and she’s also an intimacy coordinator. She understands consent and boundaries in this really deep, practical way. We worked together on rewrites of the script, design, even the practices of getting into and out of Sad Girl Songs mode before and after shows. She helped me figure out what parts of my story the show actually needed versus what parts of my life weren’t necessary to tell this particular story honestly. There’s a difference between being authentic and putting every detail of your experience on stage – we’re telling a specific story that serves a purpose, we’re not sharing everything that ever happened to me.

13. Audience Reactions

How have audiences responded to the mix of raw honesty and dark humor? Have any reactions surprised you, or stuck with you?

The responses have been incredible. I’ve had people come up after shows and share their own stories, both of similar relationships, reporting in the workplace, or developing PTSD. One guy told me he realized he was going to evaluate how to better address power dynamics in his relationship. That’s the dream response – when comedy actually changes how people think and behave. The fact that people leave wanting to be better humans is everything I could ask for.

14. Shared Experiences

So many people can relate to stories like yours. Have audience members shared their own experiences with you after the show?

All the time, and it’s both heartbreaking and incredibly validating. What I’ve realized is that almost everyone has some version of this story; I think of it a bit like a feminist everyman story. Maybe it’s not exactly the same, but they understand what it feels like to blame themselves for their own hurt, or to have their reality questioned, or to feel like they have to protect other people from their own trauma. The conversations I have after shows remind me what my hope was when crafting the show – that people feel that their stories are being seen and heard. 

15. What’s the Takeaway?

What’s the one thing you hope people take away from Sad Girl Songs? What conversations do you hope they’re having on the way home?

I want people to leave feeling less alone. Whether they’ve experienced something similar or they’re just trying to understand the world we’re all navigating, I want them to feel like we’re in this together. The conversations I hope they’re having are about consent, about how we support survivors, about what stories we tell and what stories we believe. But honestly, if they just leave feeling like they’ve been seen and heard and entertained, that’s enough. Sometimes helping someone feel less alone is the most radical thing you can do.

16. Comedy as Education

Some of your songs, like “You Should Know Where the Clit Is,” are both funny and educational. Do you see comedy as a tool for sex ed or myth-busting too?

Absolutely. Comedy is one of the most effective teaching tools we have. Plus, if I can leave audiences humming the anatomical parts of the clitoris, why wouldn’t I?

17. Humor and Trauma

You’ve said before that your comedy has been described as “genuinely upsetting, in a good way.” Why is that the vibe you embrace — and how do you balance making people laugh while sitting with uncomfortable truths?

Did I choose the vibe, or did the vibe choose me? Idk man, but it’s a pretty accurate description of how I come off. I think the best laughs come from when we’re brave enough to sit with the truth. I don’t look for uncomfortable avoidance-laughter, I look for the jokes and laughs that come when you break the tension of avoidance. 

18. Creating Safer Spaces

What changes would you like to see in the comedy world — or the wider performing arts — to better protect people from abuse and support survivors?

We need systemic change, not just individual actions. That means clear reporting structures, restorative justice practices, and support systems for survivors that don’t require them to be “perfect victims.” It means believing people when they come forward, and not making them prove their trauma to access help. But it also means understanding that when someone reports, they need ongoing support – people with trauma and PTSD have access needs that organizations need to take seriously. Asking someone who’s already been traumatized and afraid to share their story to sign an NDA in exchange for being heard only retraumatizes them. If we’re serious about creating safe and fair spaces, we need to spend more time thinking creatively about new solutions instead of defaulting to the same broken systems. 

19. Bringing It to the Fringe

This is your first Edinburgh Fringe. How does it feel to bring such a deeply personal, American story to an international audience? What are you most excited — or nervous — about?

I’m excited to see how the show translates across cultures. I suspect the themes do, because patriarchy is pretty universal. I’m nervous about whether British audiences will get my references or find me funny, do you all know what Trader Joes is or should I say Tescos? Please advise.  I’m also curious about what conversations this might start in a different context. The story might be specifically American in some ways, but the underlying issues about consent, trauma, and survival are everywhere. Plus, I’m really looking forward to discovering the coziest bookstore and tea shop in Edinburgh, if you see me give me your recs!

20. What’s Next?

After Edinburgh, what’s next for you and Sad Girl Songs? Do you want to keep touring it, record it, or move on to new projects that push these ideas even further?

I’m definitely interested in recording it at some point, I think it could reach people who might not be able to see it live. I’m also slowly getting the songs produced and recorded, which is exciting! I love writing plays and comedy – last year I wrote an award-winning fake Tennessee Williams play set in a Quiznos- and I hope I’ll meet people at Fringe who like the same sort of jokes I do.  But for the meanwhile, I’m just focused on telling this story as well as I can, as many times as it feels useful. If it keeps starting conversations and making people feel less alone, I’ll keep doing it. That’s what matters most to me.

You can buy tickets for Sad Girl Songs here

Leave a Comment

Lee 2024: Capturing the Legacy of Lee Miller

723 words, 4 minutes read time.

“Lee 2024” is a film that attempts to capture the essence of Lee Miller. She was a woman whose life was as multifaceted as it was fascinating. The film is directed by Ellen Kuras. It delves into the period of Miller’s life where she was most visibly in the public eye. This period was as a war correspondent during World War II. Yet, the film’s focus on this intense decade of her life leaves one yearning for more about her beginnings. It also leaves one yearning for the rich tapestry of experiences that shaped her.

Lee Miller’s journey began long before the war, in the glittering world of fashion. Discovered by Condé Nast, she became a celebrated model, gracing the pages of Vogue in the 1920s. Her beauty and charisma led her to become a muse. She collaborated with some of the most iconic artists of the time, including Man Ray and Jean Cocteau. She was not just a passive figure in these circles. She was an active creator. She developed her own surrealistic photographic style. This style remains influential to this day.

The film, while an important work, does not sufficiently credit Miller’s significant contributions to fashion photography. It also underrates her role as a muse and friend to the elites of the art world, including Picasso. It’s a narrative that I came to know through an ex-girlfriend. She was a photographer and feminist. She enlightened me about Miller’s remarkable life and work. This personal connection to Miller’s story heightened my awareness of the gaps in the film’s portrayal.

Miller says “I was good at drinking, having sex, and taking pictures, and I did all three as much as I could.” This sets the tone. It presents a character who lived life unapologetically. She lived on her own terms. It’s an attitude that resonates deeply with me and many others who admire Miller’s unabashed and rebellious approach to life. It’s perhaps, what enabled her to find ways to bypass blocks on her. She was banned from press conferences simply because she was a woman. She sneaked in. The British military wouldn’t send her to the frontline. The Americans would so she used her American citizenship to go with them. This admirable woman would not take ‘No’ for an answer!

However, the film falls short in conveying the depth of trauma that Miller chose to witness and document. These include the piled-up bodies at concentration camps. They also included the treatment of French collaborators and the horrific injuries of wounded US servicemen. These were events that left indelible marks on her psyche. Yet, the film does not delve into the why behind her willingness to endure seeing and recording such horrors.

Kate Winslet’s journey to bring the story of Lee Miller to the screen showcased her dedication. It also displayed her passion for the project. As both a star and producer of the film “Lee,” Winslet faced the challenge of portraying the complex war journalist. She portrayed the photographer with authenticity and depth. Her role as a producer allowed her to shape the film’s narrative. She ensured that Miller’s story was told with the respect and attention it deserved. Winslet’s performance was lauded for its fiery intensity. It captured the headstrong fervour of Miller’s character. It also portrayed the gentleness she exhibited post-war. Winslet faced struggles translating such a multifaceted life to film. Her commitment to the project was unwavering. She worked closely with writers and the director. She steered the film away from being a mere biopic. Instead, it became a more nuanced exploration of Miller’s day-to-day struggles as an artist and wife. The on-set atmosphere was one of camaraderie. Winslet’s collaborative spirit fostered this atmosphere. It it contributed to the film’s dynamic and authentic portrayal of Miller’s life.

“Lee 2024” is a film that, despite its shortcomings, remains an important piece of cinema. It brings to light the life of an incredible character, Lee Miller. Her contributions to art, photography, and journalism during one of history’s darkest periods should not be forgotten. It scratches the surface of a complex woman whose legacy deserves to be explored in even greater depth. Kate Miller’s efforts in creating this film are praiseworthy. The film serves as a crucial reminder of the extraordinary life of Lee Miller, a true renaissance woman.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Comments (1)

Katie Folger’s Hilarious Comedy Show: Getting in Bed with the Pizza Man

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

325 words, 2 minutes read time.

“Getting in Bed with the Pizza Man” is a one-woman show by Katie Folger. The performance is a masterful blend of comedy and physical theatre. It has audiences buzzing—and for good reason.

From the moment she steps into the spotlight, Folger’s dynamic stage presence electrifies the room. Her seamless fusion of physicality and humour is both impressive and engaging, drawing the audience in with every move. One standout moment is her monologue on self-love and body positivity. She humorously reflects on what a great arse she has. This leaves the audience in fits of laughter. When she describes a sexual encounter she changes position to punctuate the story. Very funny!

Folger’s physical comedy is perfectly paired with her quick-witted, observational humor. She moves across the stage with a grace that complements her sharp wit, effortlessly connecting with the audience. Her humor is refreshingly relatable. It touches on everyday situations. These situations resonate with anyone who has ever found themselves in bed with a metaphorical ‘pizza man.’

The show could be described as “racy.” Katie offers honest accounts of the highs and lows of her sex life. She uses candid, direct language. Yet, beneath the laughs, the show grapples with serious questions about societal expectations of women and what women truly want. It’s noteworthy that many young women in the audience were enjoying the performance. They were also clearly identifying with its themes.

“Getting in Bed with the Pizza Man” is a testament to how comedy can be both light-hearted and deeply thought-provoking. It’s a reminder that the Edinburgh Fringe offers performances that entertain while also challenging you to think and feel. If you want laughter, this show offers it. It also provides a reflective look at the human experience. If you want laughter, this show offers it. It also provides a reflective look at the human experience. You shouldn’t miss this show.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Till the 17th August 2024, 23.10 Tickets here

Leave a Comment