Posts Tagged Mick Jagger

Performance (1970): A Controlled Explosion of Identity, Sex and Violence

832 words, 4 minutes read time.

Performance isn’t a film that was made so much as summoned. It came out of the restless mind of Donald Cammell — a painter and dabbler in the occult with aristocratic roots and a taste for provocation. When he teamed up with cinematographer Nicolas Roeg, Warner Bros. expected something vaguely in the style of A Hard Day’s Night, especially with Mick Jagger in the lead. What they got instead was something murky, psychedelic, violent, and deeply unsettling.

The film was shot in 1968 but shelved for two years. Studio bosses were horrified by what they saw — not just the sex and violence, but the overall tone: disjointed, claustrophobic, and morally ambiguous. Footage was cut or lost, and what finally made it to cinemas in 1970 had already been through a long battle behind the scenes.

For years it was seen as a curiosity — a film that didn’t quite belong anywhere. But as time passed, it grew into something else: a kind of underground classic, passed between those who recognised it as one of the most radical pieces of British cinema ever made.

Plot and Performances

The story, on paper, is simple. Chas (James Fox) is a brutal London gangster who’s fallen out with his bosses and is on the run. He hides out in a crumbling Notting Hill house occupied by Turner (Mick Jagger), a faded rock star who’s retreated into a fog of drugs, sex, and mysticism. The two men come from completely different worlds, but as the film goes on, they start to blur into one another.

Fox is convincing as Chas — all cold eyes and repressed fury. He reportedly spent time with real gangsters to prepare, and it shows. Jagger, by contrast, plays Turner as a mercurial figure — part shaman, part clown, part seducer. His performance is slippery, deliberately hard to pin down. He teases Chas, mocks him, tempts him. Their scenes together are charged with tension, both violent and erotic.

Also in the mix are Anita Pallenberg and Michèle Breton as Turner’s companions. The atmosphere inside the house is one of louche decadence — baths, mushrooms, mirrors, music. Reality bends. At a certain point, it’s no longer clear where one man ends and the other begins.

Themes and Style

The film is obsessed with identity — what it is, how it shifts, what’s underneath it. Chas arrives in Turner’s world with a firm sense of self: he’s a hard man, he’s dangerous, he knows who he is. But in that strange, enclosed space, the boundaries begin to dissolve. There’s sex, but there’s also role-play, theatre, transformation. Everyone is performing, all the time.

Cammell and Roeg reflect this in how they shoot the film. It’s full of sudden cuts, overlapping images, repeated motifs. Scenes don’t unfold so much as echo and reverberate. There’s a dream logic to it all — or maybe a nightmare one. At one point, Jagger’s character performs a musical number dressed as a gangster, while Fox seems to lose his grip on time altogether. It’s disorientating by design.

This isn’t just style for the sake of it. The editing, the pacing, the visuals — they’re all part of the film’s central idea: that identity is unstable, that we are shaped by those around us, that slipping into someone else’s skin is both seductive and terrifying.

Legacy and Influence

When it was finally released, Performance was met with confusion, disdain, and a bit of quiet admiration. It didn’t fit the usual categories, and most people didn’t know what to do with it. But gradually, its reputation grew. Today, it’s widely seen as a landmark — a film that broke rules, ignored convention, and got away with it.

It’s influenced everything from British gangster films to music videos. Directors like Danny Boyle, Jonathan Glazer, and Nicolas Winding Refn owe it a debt, whether they admit it or not. You can feel its fingerprints on Trainspotting, Sexy Beast, Under the Skin. Its use of sound, music, and fractured narrative was years ahead of its time.

For Jagger, it remains a career high point — not in terms of popularity, but in how close it got to the myth of who he was: not just a rock star, but a kind of cultural shape-shifter. Fox, too, gave something rare — after this role, he took a long break from acting, shaken by the experience.

Performance isn’t an easy film. It resists interpretation. But for those willing to go with it, it offers something that very few films do: a genuine sense of danger. It’s a film that stares into the void — and smiles.

By Pat Harrington

🎬 Available Editions

  1. Criterion Collection 4K UHD + Blu-ray (UK Only)
    • Click here to buy
    • Description: This edition includes a 4K digital restoration approved by producer Sandy Lieberson, with uncompressed monaural original-UK-version soundtrack. It also features several documentaries and special features, such as Donald Cammell: The Ultimate Performance and Influence and Controversy: Making “Performance”.
  2. Standard DVD Edition
  3. Click here to buy
  4. Description: This is a standard DVD release of the film.

Leave a Comment

Lyrics to Live By Keys to self-help – notes for a better life

IT’S often said that the best ideas are the simplest. And this is certainly the case with the idea behind Lyrics to Live By. Indeed, I’d go as far as saying that the idea behind the book is so simple it’s absolutely brilliant.

So what’s the idea, what makes it so simple and why is it literally a stroke of pure genius?

The idea’s so simple because it relates to something that we probably do every time we hear a song – and that’s to sing along to it and wonder what some of the lyrics actually mean.

This basic query about the meaning of the lyrics can also generate many other questions. For instance, how did the song come about, how long did it take to write, what is the writing process and what’s the idea behind the song? Why use the particular set of lyrics that appear? How personal is the song – and does it contain any hidden or subliminal messages?

With this in mind, the publisher of Lyrics to Live By has asked Tim Bragg to interpret the lyrics of a dozen songs. Ten songs were provided by the publisher whilst Tim chose Paul Simon’s Slip Slidin’ Away and one of his own compositions, Some Answers.

LyricstoLiveByAdamazonuk

For those who don’t know, Tim Bragg is a multi-instrumentalist and a writer of songs, novels and short stories. Indeed, he has several albums and books to his name. He also has a deep interest in English and green politics and is the founder of English Green – https://www.facebook.com/groups/167522623276444/?ref=br_rs – which describes itself as ‘a group interested in ecology and its relationship with all aspects of human activity. How we co-exist with the flora and fauna and how we conduct ourselves in an ecologically healthy manner and how we achieve a spiritual and material well-being are of particular interest’.

Tim is also a really deep thinker – he describes himself as “the eternal outsider” and has been described as “a provocative intellectual renegade”. He is also interested in issues relating to free speech and English culture, previously describing Stratford-upon-Avon as his “spiritual home”.

In his Foreword, Bragg sets the scene by highlighting the importance of music:

‘But we are drawn to particular songs and musicians who seem to speak to us. They really do help guide us through life and come to our aid when most needed. At our lowest, a song can be played over and over, and this repetition seems to heal. When we are blue a blues song seems to do the trick. And the very personal nature of a song makes it effective for our own personal situation – bad/good or otherwise. I am thankful to the musicians who wrote songs that helped me through difficult times: the end of a love affair … for instance’.

I’m sure we’ve all wondered, why certain lyrics have the ability to strike a chord deep inside us. Indeed, every reader could probably suggest the lyrics of several songs which have really touched them – almost in a spiritual way. To me, it simply illustrates the beauty and power of song. However, has it always been like this – and will it be like this forever?

The lyrics Tim comments on are really varied – they include those from Hey Jude, Stairway to Heaven, Wicked Game and Big Yellow Taxi. The musical genres covered are also fairly broad. Writers include Mick Jagger and Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones, John Lennon and Paul McCartney of the Beatles, David Bowie, Bob Dylan and Joni Mitchell.

I’m not going to give you any details of what he makes of any of the lyrics (and I know that this is extremely strange for a review!) as I want to encourage readers of Lyrics to Live by to really think for themselves. That’s because we live in a world where all sorts of information is readily accessible and Wikipedia is king. Such easy access to information is very much a double-edged sword. On the positive side it enables folks to learn about more-or-less anything under the sun. On the negative side, I fear that many folks are – or have – lost the ability to question information and think for themselves.

Earlier I mentioned that Tim is a very deep thinker, and this is certainly borne out in how he interprets the lyrics. I must admit that I’d often sing along to a song and spend a few minutes contemplating what the lyrics mean. But to actually sit down and to probably spend hours really analysing the lyrics is probably an art form in itself!

This is the first time I’ve read an examination of lyrics to such a high level. Indeed, Tim noted that the process was ‘almost as if meditating’. I really do think that most people will be in awe of (or even shocked at) the depth of thinking employed here. Whether you agree with Tim is open to debate. However, it would really be interesting to know what readers think of his in-depth interpretations.

Lyrics to Live by also poses many questions in itself. I’m not too sure if this was the original intention or simply a by-product of the subject matter?

For instance, I’d particularly like to know how and why the particular songs – and more importantly, the individual lyrics – were chosen by the publisher? I also wondered if there was any sort of thread linking the artists? I presume they must mean something to the publisher, but what? Are they in some way personal, or do they contain any hidden or subliminal messages? Indeed, does Tim’s interpretation of the lyrics match those of the publisher, or are they wildly different? Furthermore, I found it interesting that Tim looked at the lyrics of one of his own songs – I wonder if this was therapeutic in any way?

The Foreword mentions Tim’s admiration for Phil Lynott and Van Morrison, who ‘have certainly helped me through my life’s journey’. Yet neither of them feature in the book. This got me wondering what artists would any of us choose to analyse– and why?

A couple of other things also came to mind whilst reviewing the book:

Firstly, Tim Bragg is a multi-instrumentalist and is comfortable with different genres of music. With this in mind, I presume that a Heavy Metal singer would be more at home looking at the lyrics of a Heavy Metal song. The same would presumably go for a Folk musician with Folk lyrics. However, what would happen if you gave the Heavy Metal and Folk singer the lyrics to a Country and Western song? Would the change of genre completely throw them – or would they both apply the same thought process, successfully analyse the lyrics and manage to overcome the change in musical style?

Secondly, this review has thrown up many unique and interesting ideas and questions. They all lend themselves to a series of books looking at various lyrics and their meanings. I’d love to read the thoughts of other artists – and, in particular, independent artists – in the very near future. Here’s hoping that the first follow-up book is at the planning stage already.

Reviewed by John Field

Lyrics to Live By is available as a Paperback or E-book from all Amazon stores

Comments (1)