10/06/26 – Counter Culture – Midweek Song List (152)

“Rain, rebellion, synthesisers and Southern swagger — your midweek cultural tonic.”

Many people regard June as the start of Summer, but so far the weather has been so relentlessly wet that even the ducks are filing formal complaints. The fish are threatening industrial action. And last week’s joke about Christmas stock appearing in Home Bargains? We said “August” — but given the rumours that they’re planning to rescue Denby pottery, perhaps we’ll forgive them if the baubles come early. If a major British ceramics brand and hundreds of jobs can be saved, that’s a Christmas miracle we’ll happily take in June.

 

But enough meteorology and retail speculation. Time to turn to the real business of the week: music.

This edition takes us from the snarling birth of punk to the shimmering synths of early New Wave, from Southern rock swagger to Californian sunshine pop, from communal singing to glam-rock provocation. A proper Counter Culture spread — eclectic, historically grounded, and always with an eye on the cultural currents beneath the tunes.

Let’s dive in.


GNARLS BARKLEY – Crazy

When Crazy landed in 2006, it felt like a song that had always existed — a modern standard arriving fully formed. CeeLo Green’s soulful, wounded vocal sits atop Danger Mouse’s cinematic production, built around a haunting sample from Gianfranco Reverberi’s 1968 spaghetti‑western score Nel Cimitero di Tucson. The track became the first ever UK No.1 based solely on downloads, signalling a shift in how music would be consumed.
It’s a song about losing your grip on reality, yet it’s delivered with such swagger that it feels liberating rather than despairing — a rare trick.


THE BEACH BOYS – Fun, Fun, Fun

Released in 1964, this is the Beach Boys at their most effervescent: teenage rebellion, fast cars, and harmonies so bright they could power the national grid. Brian Wilson’s arrangement is a masterclass in controlled exuberance — the opening guitar lick nods cheekily to Chuck Berry, while the vocal stack is pure California sunshine.
It’s also a sly little morality tale: girl borrows car, girl misbehaves, girl loses car. But with harmonies like these, who cares?


CHOIR! CHOIR! CHOIR! – Zombie

The Canadian collective Choir! Choir! Choir! specialise in turning pop songs into communal acts of catharsis. Their take on The Cranberries’ Zombie is especially powerful — a massed choir reclaiming Dolores O’Riordan’s protest song about the Troubles and the human cost of political violence.
What was once a howl of grief becomes, in their hands, a shared lament and a reminder of how music can bind people together in the face of tragedy.


ELTON JOHN & DUA LIPA – Cold Heart

A clever, shimmering hybrid: Pnau splice together fragments of Elton’s back catalogue (Rocket Man, Sacrifice, Kiss the Bride) and build a sleek, modern disco track around them. Dua Lipa’s cool, crystalline vocal contrasts beautifully with Elton’s warmth.
It’s a reminder that pop history isn’t a museum — it’s a living archive, constantly being reinterpreted and re‑energised.


GARY NUMAN – My Name is Ruin / Are Friends Electric?

Numan’s 2018 Old Grey Whistle Test performance is a fascinating bridge between eras. Are Friends Electric? (1979) was one of the first major UK hits built almost entirely on synthesizers — a stark, dystopian track that helped define early New Wave and electronic pop. Tubeway Army may have dissolved, but Numan’s influence only grew.
My Name is Ruin shows the evolution: darker, heavier, industrial‑tinged — and featuring his daughter Persia, whose ethereal high notes add an eerie, almost ritualistic quality. A family affair in the best possible way.


LYNYRD SKYNYRD – Sweet Home Alabama

A cornerstone of Southern rock, released in 1974 as a response to Neil Young’s critiques of the American South. The track’s breezy feel — those instantly recognisable opening chords — belies the cultural debate it sparked.
Musically, it’s irresistible: triple‑guitar attack, swaggering rhythm section, and Ronnie Van Zant’s laid‑back vocal. Whatever your view on the politics, it remains one of rock’s most enduring anthems.


MAGAZINE – Shot By Both Sides

Howard Devoto left the Buzzcocks because he wanted to explore something more angular, more cerebral — and Magazine was the result. Shot By Both Sides (1978) is a post‑punk landmark: jagged guitars, paranoid lyrics, and a sense of intellectual unease that set the template for countless bands to come.
It’s punk with a library card — and all the better for it.


MORRISSEY – The Monsters of Pig Alley

A later‑period Morrissey track that leans into noirish atmosphere and cinematic tension. The title references the 1912 D.W. Griffith film, one of the earliest gangster movies. Musically, it’s brooding and muscular, with Morrissey’s vocal weaving between menace and melancholy.
Whatever one thinks of the man, his ability to conjure mood remains intact.


ELVIS PRESLEY – Girl of My Best Friend

Recorded in 1960, this is Elvis in his early post‑Army period — smoother, more mature, and leaning into the pop‑ballad tradition. The song itself dates back to the late ’50s and has been covered many times, but Elvis gives it a tender, almost conversational quality.
It’s a snapshot of a transitional moment: the raw rock ’n’ roll rebel evolving into a polished mainstream star.


SEX PISTOLS – Pretty Vacant

If punk had a mission statement, this might be it. Released in 1977, Pretty Vacant is less overtly confrontational than God Save the Queen, but its sneer is just as potent. Steve Jones’ guitar is a wall of sound, Paul Cook’s drumming is tight and propulsive, and John Lydon’s vocal — especially the infamous pronunciation of “va‑CUNT” — is pure provocation.
It’s not just a song; it’s a cultural rupture. A reminder that punk wasn’t merely a genre — it was a demolition job on the complacency of the era.


THE STONE ROSES – I Am the Resurrection

The closing track of their 1989 debut album, and one of the great codas in British rock. The first half is a swaggering kiss‑off; the second half dissolves into a euphoric, extended instrumental jam that feels like a premonition of the Madchester rave‑rock fusion to come.
It’s the Roses at their most transcendent — a band briefly touching the divine.


SWEET – Blockbuster (Uncensored Version)

Ah, Steve Priest. Glam rock’s resident agent provocateur. His Top of the Pops appearance — Prussian helmet, swastika armband, silver platform boots, fake toothbrush moustache — was designed to wind up the BBC establishment, and it succeeded magnificently.
Today, in our era of humour‑averse pearl‑clutching, the clip is labelled “Uncensored Version,” which tells you everything about the cultural shift.
It raises a serious question: should artistic expression be constrained because someone, somewhere, might take offence?
Counter Culture’s answer is simple: art must be free to provoke, unsettle, and challenge — otherwise it’s not art.


AND FINALLY…

If you enjoy the Midweek Song List, remember we also produce:

 

And of course, you can follow us on X


Leave a Comment

The Devil Wears Prada 2: A Sequel Crying Out for the Old Miranda

Twenty years after leaving Runway, Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) has built a respectable career in journalism — right up until her entire newsroom is laid off by text message during an awards gala. At the same time, Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) faces a crisis of her own: a sweatshop scandal involving a major advertiser gives corporate owner Irv Ravitz (Tibor Feldman) the excuse he’s been waiting for to interfere. Runway publishes what should have been a glossy, harmles puff piece  on a major fashion brand — only for that brand to be exposed days later for using sweatshop labour. Without Miranda’s consent,  Irv hires Andy as Runway’s new features editor, a move that lands like a diplomatic incident.

Miranda, once the terrifying high priestess of fashion, now finds herself hemmed in by HR briefings, “tone workshops,” and a younger staff who don’t instinctively recognise her authority. Print is shrinking, advertisers are restless, and the magazine is being pushed toward cheap digital churn. Andy tries to uphold real journalism, but her long‑form pieces barely register in a world ruled by algorithms.

Andy reunites with Emily Charlton (Emily Blunt) — now a high‑powered executive whose company’s aggressive pricing strategies symbolise the industry’s moral drift. Meanwhile, tech investors circle Runway, including the serenely confident mogul Evan Roth (played with icy charm by an actor clearly enjoying himself), who sees the magazine not as a cultural institution but as an underperforming asset. As the pressure mounts, Andy becomes central to Miranda’s survival strategy — not as an assistant this time, but as someone who understands both the old world and the new.

The men orbiting Miranda and Andy remain so resolutely beige they could be painted directly onto the set. Kenneth Branagh, as Miranda’s latest husband, drifts through scenes like a distinguished but faintly bewildered museum patron — present, polite, and utterly incapable of matching her gravitational pull. Peter Brammall, playing Andy’s boyfriend Peter, fares no better: a man so gently supportive and narratively weightless he feels less like a romantic partner and more like a well‑meaning flatmate who occasionally remembers they’re dating. And then there’s Stanley Tucci, returning as Nigel, the lone male presence with actual flavour — sharp, warm, and effortlessly charismatic, reminding you how much more alive this world becomes when someone on screen has a pulse stronger than chamomile tea.

Themes: What the Film Tries to Say — and How Well It Says It

The film is preoccupied with change — who drives it, who benefits from it, and who gets crushed beneath it. It contrasts Miranda’s old‑world authority with the frictionless, jargon‑heavy ideology of modern tech.

The “techno‑manosphere” is embodied in nepo‑CEO Jay Ravitz (B.J. Novak) and Emily’s boyfriend Benji Barnes (Justin Theroux), a mash‑up of Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg. They spout shibboleths about “cutting expenses” (meaning people) and the inevitability of technological “progress.” Benji’s mantra — “You just have to get out of the way” — is the distilled essence of their worldview: change as inevitability, disruption as moral good, efficiency as destiny.

A critical planning session with a dozen consultants takes place, improbably, in the packed company cafeteria. When Jay invites Miranda, she asks, with surgical disdain, “Do we have one of those?” It’s one of the few moments where the film remembers who she is.

But the film’s biggest misstep is Miranda herself. The original Miranda was frightening because she embodied taste, hierarchy, and institutional authority at their most refined and ruthless. Here, she has been softened into something almost unrecognisable — tidy, tamed, and constantly shadowed by the moral anxieties of 2026. When we see Miranda struggling to hang up her own coat it’s clear that something has changed. And the dialogue tells us she no longer throws her coat at assistants due to HR complaints. The film seems more interested in showing a tamed Miranda than in understanding why she worked in the first place. The result is not growth; it is defanging.

And yet, the film does land one thematic point beautifully: tech’s victory is not inevitable. Without spoiling anything, the final movement hints at a future shaped not by dashboards but by people who still believe in the value of craft. It’s a quiet, almost stealthy note of hope.

Cameos and Watchability

Despite its flaws, the film is undeniably watchable. The cameos — designers, editors, influencers, and a few sly nods to real‑world fashion royalty — give it a fizzy, knowing energy. Lady Gaga’s brief appearance is a highlight: funny, pointed, and perfectly calibrated.

The film moves briskly, the locations are gorgeous, and the cast is uniformly committed. Hathaway remains a compelling centre of gravity; Blunt steals every scene she’s in; Streep, as Miranda, even in a softened register, still radiates authority. Even the tech bros are entertaining in their buffoonery.

It’s not the sharp, cruel, diamond‑cut satire of the original — but it’s never dull.

Would I See The Devil Wears Prada 3?

Absolutely.

And I’d like to see it go further.
I’d like the PC guff — the HR euphemisms, the corporate tone‑policing, the algorithmic hand‑wringing — to be presented as outdated. I’d like a return to mean Miranda, not just as a bully, but as a woman whose authority comes from taste, judgement, and the ability to see what others can’t.

If this sequel is about the world outgrowing its monsters, the third film should be about the world realising it still needs them. Because the truth is that industries don’t collapse from cruelty; they collapse from complacency. Prada 2 imagines a landscape where the sharp edges have been sanded down, where Miranda’s authority is treated as an embarrassing relic, and where institutions believe they can replace vision with workflow and taste with metrics. But the absence of monsters doesn’t create harmony — it creates drift. Standards loosen, identities blur, and the centre of gravity shifts from people who know what they’re doing to people who know how to present what they’re doing. A third film should confront that reckoning head‑on: the uncomfortable but necessary realisation that the figures once dismissed as tyrants were often the ones holding the whole thing together. Not because they were kind, or gentle, or easy, but because they cared enough to demand more than the world found convenient. We need the monsters and we need to learn how to deal with them.

By Pat Harrington

 

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 6th–12th June 2026

The countdown to the World Cup continues, and football runs through this week’s selections like a thread stitched into the cultural fabric. From 1966: The World Cup Final in Colour and Lionesses: How Football Came Home to Gareth Southgate’s thoughtful exploration of modern masculinity and Kevin Bridges’ search for the soul of the beautiful game, television seems determined to remind us why football remains far more than a sport. It is memory, identity, aspiration and sometimes national therapy.

Away from the pitch, there is plenty to tempt the curious viewer. Ken Loach reflects on a lifetime spent chronicling working-class Britain, Steven Spielberg offers perhaps his most personal film in The Fabelmans, while science fiction enthusiasts are spoiled with everything from Blade Runner 2049 and Ex Machina to documentaries tracing the genre’s history from Mary Shelley to Isaac Asimov. Add in ancient Greece, Constantine the Great, James Dean, Clint Eastwood, Billy Idol and Muhammad Ali, and the result is one of the most varied weeks of the year so far.

As always, Culture Vulture’s aim is not simply to recommend programmes but to encourage exploration. The best television and cinema take us somewhere unexpected. This week, whether that journey leads to a football stadium, a distant galaxy, an Alpine village or the Roman Empire, there are plenty of worthwhile destinations.

Saturday 6th June

The Longest Day (1962) – Film4, 1:10pm

There’s a kind of architectural grace to The Longest Day — a film built not for spectacle but for endurance. Every sequence feels placed with deliberation, every perspective a brick in a vast, collective structure. It doesn’t chase emotion; it constructs it, piece by piece, until the enormity of D‑Day becomes something you can inhabit rather than merely watch.

What’s remarkable is its refusal to narrow the lens. Instead of a single hero’s journey, we get a mosaic of nationalities and motives, each fragment carrying its own rhythm. The film’s scale becomes human precisely because it’s broken into smaller, comprehensible acts — soldiers crossing fields, commanders weighing impossible decisions, civilians caught in the undertow of history.

Shot in stark black and white, it has the clarity of reportage. There’s no glamour in the mud, no romanticism in the chaos. Even the grand set‑pieces feel matter‑of‑fact, as if the camera were recording rather than interpreting. That restraint gives the film its moral weight: it honours the event by refusing to simplify it.

What lingers is the design — the sense that you’re watching not just a film but a reconstruction of memory itself. It may lack the visceral immediacy of modern war cinema, but its precision and quiet authority have aged beautifully. The Longest Day endures because it understands that history, like architecture, is built to last.

Prometheus (2012) – 5Star, 9:00pm

Few films divide opinion quite as consistently as Prometheus, and perhaps that is part of its appeal. It is a work that reaches, sometimes beyond its grasp, but always with an evident seriousness of intent. Ridley Scott returns to a universe he helped define, yet seems determined not to repeat himself.

What emerges is less a horror film than a meditation—albeit an uneasy one—on origins and belief. The questions it raises are large, almost unwieldy: who made us, and why? And more importantly, what does it mean if the answers are not comforting?

Visually, it is often extraordinary. Scott’s control of space, light and texture transforms even the simplest scenes into something imposing. The environments feel simultaneously alien and strangely recognisable, reinforcing the film’s central unease.

Yet the narrative resists coherence at times. Characters behave unpredictably, motivations blur, and the plot occasionally strains under the weight of its ideas. But even these flaws feel oddly consistent with the film’s ambition—it is less interested in tidy storytelling than in provocation.

For all its imperfections, Prometheus remains compelling. It is a film that invites interrogation rather than passive viewing, and that alone makes it worth revisiting.

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) – Channel 4, 9:00pm

At its core, Bohemian Rhapsody is not a biography in the strict sense, but a celebration—one that occasionally sacrifices nuance for momentum. It moves briskly through familiar milestones, selecting moments that reinforce its central narrative of rise, fall and triumphant return.

Where it falters, it does so through simplification. Complex relationships are streamlined, tensions softened, contradictions smoothed over. But the film seems unconcerned with precision. Its priorities lie elsewhere.

Those priorities become clear in its musical sequences. Here, the film shifts register entirely, allowing performance to take precedence over narrative. The energy becomes infectious, the pacing more assured, the purpose more focused.

The Live Aid reconstruction is the culmination of that approach. Meticulously staged and emotionally calibrated, it is less a re-creation than a kind of cinematic homage. It works not because it is perfect, but because it understands what the moment represents.

In the end, it is a film that succeeds through feeling rather than detail. And while it may not satisfy every expectation, it is difficult to deny its impact.

Vermiglio (2024) – BBC Four, 9:20pm

Vermiglio unfolds with remarkable patience, allowing its world to emerge gradually rather than assert itself. Set within an isolated mountain community, it captures not just a place but a way of life that feels quietly on the verge of transition.

The pacing is deliberate, almost meditative. Moments are allowed to breathe, conversations linger, silences carry weight. There is little sense of urgency, yet a subtle tension runs beneath the surface.

Visually, the film is striking in its restraint. The landscape is not presented as spectacle, but as presence—constant, watchful, shaping the lives within it. Interiors are equally carefully composed, each frame suggesting relationships before they are spoken.

What gives the film its depth is its attention to detail. Small gestures, fleeting glances, everyday routines—these become the building blocks of something much larger. It is observation elevated into storytelling.

By its conclusion, Vermiglio does not so much resolve as settle. It leaves behind an impression rather than a statement, and that impression stays with you.

Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – BBC One, 10:20pm

Sequels often struggle under the weight of expectation, but Blade Runner 2049 approaches its inheritance with unusual confidence. Rather than attempting to replicate the original, it expands upon it—both visually and philosophically.

Villeneuve’s direction is precise, almost measured. Scenes unfold with a calm assurance that allows the ideas to surface naturally. There is no rush to explain, no urgency to conclude. The film trusts its audience.

Visually, it is extraordinary. Every frame feels composed, every environment carefully realised. The scale is vast, yet the focus remains intimate. This balance between spectacle and introspection is rare, and here it is sustained throughout.

Thematically, it deepens the original’s concerns with identity and memory. What does it mean to be human? And perhaps more intriguingly, what does it mean to believe that you are?

There is a quiet melancholy running through the film, a sense of distance that never fully resolves. It gives the narrative its emotional core, even when the plot becomes secondary.

The result is a sequel that feels both respectful and independent—a continuation that justifies its own existence.

BlackBerry (2023) – Channel 4, 11:35pm

BlackBerry approaches its subject with an unexpected lightness of touch. What might have been a straightforward corporate drama instead becomes something more agile—part satire, part character study, part cautionary tale.

The story of rapid ascent is handled with energy. Innovation, ambition and a certain degree of naïveté drive the early stages, creating a sense of inevitability that feels almost exhilarating.

Then, almost imperceptibly, the tone begins to shift. Success becomes pressure, growth becomes instability, and the cracks begin to show. The transition is gradual, which makes it all the more convincing.

Performance plays a central role here. The characters are drawn with enough specificity to feel real, yet broad enough to capture the wider themes. There is humour, but also tension.

What the film ultimately captures is not just the rise and fall of a company, but the fragility of success itself. It is as much about timing as it is about innovation.

Sunday 7th June

Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) – BBC Two, 1:00pm

Adapted from Tennessee Williams, the film retains much of the play’s theatrical intensity while opening it out just enough for the screen. The result is a chamber piece charged with emotional pressure.

The performances are central. Elizabeth Taylor and Paul Newman bring a volatile chemistry that never quite settles. Their exchanges carry a sense of unfinished business, of things left unsaid.

Beneath the surface lies a network of tensions—family, identity, expectation—that never fully resolve. The film thrives on this instability.

Dialogue does much of the work, but it is supported by careful staging and pacing. Scenes are allowed to unfold without interruption, creating a sense of accumulation.

It is a film that operates as much in what it withholds as in what it reveals.

The Beautiful Game (2024) – Channel 4, 3:35pm

Football provides the framework, but the film’s interests lie elsewhere. It uses the sport as a means of exploring dignity, resilience and the possibility of redemption.

The narrative is straightforward, but effective. Each character brings a different perspective, allowing the themes to emerge organically rather than being imposed.

There is a warmth to the storytelling that carries it through its more predictable moments. It never feels cynical, even when it leans towards sentiment.

Visually, it keeps things grounded. The emphasis remains on people rather than spectacle.

By the end, it is less about victory than about recognition—of self, of worth, of possibility.

Unforgiven (1992) – BBC Two, 10:45pm

Unforgiven dismantles the mythology of the western with quiet precision. It does not reject the genre outright, but it questions its assumptions at every turn.

Eastwood’s performance is central to that process. His character carries the weight of history—both personal and cinematic. Every action feels deliberate, considered.

Violence is presented without glamour. Its consequences are immediate and lasting, stripping away any sense of heroism.

The film’s pacing reflects its themes. It moves slowly, allowing tension to build without release.

What remains is something far more complex than a traditional western. It is a reflection on memory, regret and the stories we tell ourselves.

The Damned United (2009) – BBC One, 11:30pm

At first glance, it looks like a football film — the dugouts, the touchline fury, the familiar choreography of triumph and disaster. But The Damned United is really something narrower and far more revealing: a character study disguised as a sports drama. Brian Clough isn’t presented as a legend in waiting but as a man caught between swagger and self‑doubt, ambition and insecurity. The film is less interested in what he won than in what it cost him to want it so badly.

Michael Sheen captures that contradiction with unnerving precision. His Clough is magnetic one moment and brittle the next, a man who performs confidence because he cannot bear to show how fragile he feels underneath. Sheen plays him as someone who needs the room to love him but fears the moment they stop. It’s a performance built on tension — the kind that flickers behind the eyes rather than erupts in speeches.

The film’s structure helps enormously. By focusing on a single, disastrous chapter of Clough’s career, it avoids the sprawl of the traditional biopic. Instead, it becomes a study in pressure: the Leeds job as crucible, as mirror, as trap. The narrowness gives it clarity. We’re not watching a life; we’re watching a moment that defines one.

There’s humour here — sharp, needling, often at Clough’s expense — but it’s threaded with discomfort. The film refuses to indulge in easy admiration. It understands that charisma can be corrosive, that brilliance can shade into self‑destruction, and that the line between confidence and delusion is thinner than most of us would like to admit.

In the end, The Damned United is as much about failure as success, and that’s what makes it compelling. It’s a portrait of a man who wanted greatness so fiercely that he almost broke himself chasing it — and a reminder that sometimes the most interesting stories are the ones where things fall apart.

Monday 8th June

Bridge of Spies (2015) – Film4, 8:00pm

Spielberg treats the Cold War not as spectacle but as moral geometry — a landscape of lines, boundaries and quiet negotiations. The film moves with deliberate calm, its tension drawn from the spaces between words rather than the explosions that usually define the genre. It’s a story about decency under pressure, and the courage required to remain ordinary when the world demands extremes.

Tom Hanks anchors it with a performance of quiet conviction. His character, James Donovan, is not a man of grand gestures but of steady principles. In a world of paranoia and posturing, his restraint becomes radical. Hanks plays him as someone who believes that fairness is not naïve but necessary — that the law, even when inconvenient, is the last defence against chaos.

Visually, the film is composed like a negotiation itself: muted tones, careful framing, the chill of divided Berlin rendered with painterly precision. Spielberg’s camera doesn’t shout; it listens. Every shot feels weighed, every silence deliberate. The result is a film that trusts its audience to feel the gravity of diplomacy without the need for spectacle.

All of Us Strangers (2023) – Channel 4, 10:00pm

All of Us Strangers moves like a dream you’re not entirely sure you want to wake from — drifting between memory, imagination and lived experience with a kind of emotional weightlessness. It resists the usual scaffolding of narrative, choosing instead to follow the currents of feeling: uncertain, searching, unresolved. The film’s pacing mirrors its themes, as if time itself were hesitating.

The performances carry the film’s emotional charge. There’s a vulnerability here that never feels engineered — a kind of openness that allows the smallest gestures to land with surprising force. Andrew Scott, in particular, plays grief as something porous, a state that leaks into everything without ever announcing itself.

Relationships are drawn with unusual care. Nothing is simplified, nothing forced into neat arcs. Instead, the film allows complexity to emerge gradually, like a photograph developing in slow motion. The connections feel fragile but real, shaped as much by what is unsaid as by what is spoken.

Visually, the film walks a delicate line between realism and abstraction. Interiors glow with a soft, uncanny warmth; exteriors feel slightly out of reach, as though the world were being remembered rather than observed. It’s a film that understands how memory distorts even as it preserves.

All of Us Strangers doesn’t tie its threads together; it lets them drift, trusting that the audience will feel the shape of what can’t quite be articulated.


Tuesday 9th June

The Fabelmans (2022)

Film4, 9:00pm

Spielberg turns the camera on himself — or at least on the emotional terrain of his childhood. The Fabelmans is a film about the birth of an artist, but also about the fractures and loyalties of family life. It’s tender, painful, funny and occasionally startling in its honesty. What makes it so affecting is the way Spielberg balances the mythmaking of cinema with the messiness of real life. The film understands that art can be both an escape and a reckoning.

The performances are uniformly superb. Michelle Williams gives one of her finest turns as a woman torn between duty and desire, while Paul Dano brings quiet, heartbreaking dignity to a father who cannot quite understand the world his son is entering. The film’s emotional centre, though, is Gabriel LaBelle, who plays the young Spielberg with a mixture of vulnerability and fierce creative instinct.

What lingers is the film’s generosity. Even when depicting pain, it refuses to be cruel. It is a work of memory — imperfect, selective, but deeply felt. A late‑career masterpiece.

Muhammad Ali Night

BBC Four, from 10:00pm

A portrait of a man whose influence extended far beyond sport. Ali remains one of the most charismatic figures of the 20th century, and the documentaries capture both his brilliance and his contradictions. The programmes avoid hagiography, instead presenting a man who was equal parts poet, fighter, activist and showman.

Brexit: A Very British Civil War (Part Two)

BBC Two, 11:00pm

The conclusion of a story that continues to shape British public life. The documentary is clear‑eyed without being cynical, tracing the political and cultural fractures that remain unresolved.

Science Fiction in the Atomic Age: Mary Shelley to Isaac Asimov

Sky Arts, 11:00pm

A quietly absorbing journey through the roots of a genre that has always doubled as a cultural pressure gauge. What the programme understands — and articulates beautifully — is that science fiction isn’t really about the future at all. It’s about the present: the fears we can’t name, the hopes we barely admit, the technologies we suspect might outgrow us.

Tracing a line from Frankenstein to Foundation gives the documentary a pleasing sweep. Mary Shelley’s gothic anxiety about creation and responsibility sits surprisingly comfortably beside Asimov’s cool, rational visions of robotics and empire. The programme treats these works not as curiosities but as milestones in our evolving relationship with science — each one a marker of what humanity was afraid of, or yearning for, at a particular moment.

What makes it compelling is its refusal to flatten the genre into a single narrative. Instead, it shows how science fiction has always been a conversation: between writers and readers, between imagination and technology, between dread and possibility. The Atomic Age becomes a kind of crucible, where fear of annihilation and excitement about progress coexist uneasily.

By the end, you’re left with a sense of continuity — that the questions Shelley posed in the 19th century are still with us, simply wearing new clothes. The documentary doesn’t try to answer them. It just reminds us why we keep asking.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

ITV1, 11:00pm

Terminator 2 remains one of those rare sequels that doesn’t just outdo its predecessor — it redefines the terrain entirely. What James Cameron achieves here is a kind of muscular elegance: action cinema engineered with the precision of a machine and the emotional pulse of something unmistakably human. The film moves with propulsive force, yet never feels rushed; every set‑piece is earned, every beat calibrated.

What surprises, even now, is the emotional undercurrent. Beneath the molten steel, the chases, the relentless forward motion, there’s a story about connection — unlikely, fragile, and all the more affecting for it. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s T‑800, once a symbol of implacable threat, becomes a study in programmed compassion, while Linda Hamilton’s Sarah Connor is transformed into something fierce, haunted and utterly compelling.

Visually, the film still feels astonishingly modern. The liquid‑metal T‑1000 remains one of cinema’s great creations, not because of the effects alone but because of the cold, unsettling grace with which it moves. Cameron understands that technology is most frightening when it feels inevitable.

More than three decades on, T2 hasn’t lost its edge. It’s still the benchmark — the film that proved action cinema could be thrilling, intelligent and unexpectedly tender, all at once.

Mean Streets (1973)

Film4, 11:55pm

Mean Streets still feels like a live wire — raw, restless, and vibrating with the energy of a filmmaker discovering his voice in real time. Scorsese’s breakthrough isn’t polished; it isn’t meant to be. It moves with the jittery rhythm of the neighbourhood it depicts, a world where loyalty is currency and guilt is a constant, unpayable debt. You don’t watch it so much as get pulled into its orbit.

Harvey Keitel’s Charlie is the film’s uneasy centre of gravity, a man trying to balance faith, obligation and the gravitational pull of old streets that refuse to let him go. He’s torn between the life he wants and the life he owes — a tension Scorsese renders with a kind of bruised tenderness. Charlie’s moral compass spins, but never quite settles.

Then there’s De Niro’s Johnny Boy, a performance that still feels dangerous. He’s chaos in a leather jacket — charming, reckless, infuriating, and impossible to ignore. The chemistry between Keitel and De Niro is electric, the kind that suggests a lifetime of shared history even when the script leaves it unspoken.

What gives the film its enduring power is its authenticity. Scorsese isn’t mythologising the streets; he’s remembering them — the bars, the debts, the rituals of masculinity, the way violence can erupt from nothing and return to nothing just as quickly. It’s a portrait of a community that traps as much as it sustains.

Half a century on, Mean Streets still crackles. It’s messy, alive, and utterly sincere — a film that understands how hard it is to leave the places that shaped you, even when you know you should.


Wednesday 10th June

Constantine the Great

PBS America, 8:50pm

History on an epic scale as the life of the Roman emperor unfolds. The documentary traces Constantine’s rise with clarity and sweep, showing how one man’s political instincts and religious convictions reshaped the ancient world. It’s a reminder that empires turn on personalities as much as armies.

Riddick (2013)

Sky One, 9:00pm

Riddick is the franchise stripped back to its sinew — no prophecy, no operatic world‑building, just a man, a hostile planet and the stubborn will to outlive whatever wants him dead. It’s a return to the lean, survivalist instincts that made the character compelling in the first place. The film moves with a kind of simplicity, as if clearing its throat after the bloated mythology of Chronicles.

Vin Diesel slips back into the role with the ease of someone putting on a well‑worn jacket. His Riddick is still all gravel and glare, but there’s a sharper edge here — a sense of calculation beneath the brute force. The film gives him room to be cunning rather than merely indestructible, and that shift makes the action feel more grounded, more earned.

The setup is classic pulp: abandoned on a sun‑scorched world, hunted by mercenaries who underestimate him, and stalked by creatures that definitely don’t. But the execution has a pleasing clarity. Director David Twohy knows exactly what kind of film he’s making — a survival thriller with sci‑fi trimmings — and he doesn’t clutter it with unnecessary lore.

What emerges is a story that feels oddly refreshing in its directness. No grand destinies, no cosmic stakes, just a man trying to stay alive long enough to get off the rock he’s been left on. It’s not profound, but it is satisfying — a reminder that sometimes the most effective sequels are the ones that remember what worked in the first place.

Ken Loach Remembers

BBC Four, 10:05pm

A reflective, moving look back at a career spent chronicling working‑class Britain. Loach speaks with the clarity and compassion that have defined his work for decades. There’s a sense of summing up here — not nostalgia, but a quiet reckoning with the stories he felt compelled to tell.

The Old Oak (2023)

BBC Four, 10:20pm

The Old Oak feels like a final note held just a little longer than expected — quiet, steady, and full of the moral clarity that has defined Loach’s career. Set in a former mining town hollowed out by decades of loss, the film watches what happens when a community already on its knees is asked to absorb even more change. There’s no sentimentality here, just the hard, necessary work of people trying to live alongside one another.

Loach treats migration not as a political talking point but as a human encounter: awkward, fraught, hopeful, and often tender in ways that catch you off guard. The pub at the film’s centre becomes a kind of pressure chamber, a place where old grievances and new possibilities collide. It’s a setting Loach understands instinctively — the last communal room in a town that has lost almost everything else.

What gives the film its quiet power is its belief in connection. Not easy connection, not the tidy kind that resolves itself by the credits, but the slow, fragile kind built through shared meals, shared stories, and the recognition of mutual struggle. Loach has always been at his best when he shows solidarity not as a slogan but as a practice, and The Old Oak is steeped in that sensibility.

As a final chapter, it feels right. Not triumphant, not despairing — simply honest. A filmmaker taking one last look at the people he has spent a lifetime championing, and offering them, and us, a measure of hope.

Witches: Truth Behind the Trials

National Geographic, 10:00pm

An examination of fear, power and one of history’s most enduring moral panics. The documentary digs into the social and political forces that fuelled witch trials, showing how hysteria becomes a tool for control.

Up the Junction

BBC Four, 12:25am

Up the Junction still lands with the force of something freshly made — raw, unvarnished, and unwilling to soften its edges for comfort. It’s one of those rare pieces of television that feels like a rupture, a reminder of just how radical British TV once dared to be. The film’s honesty is almost abrasive: no sentimentality, no tidy resolutions, just the lived reality of working‑class women navigating a world that offers them little and judges them for taking even that.

What makes it endure is its refusal to look away. The performances have a documentary immediacy, the kind that makes you forget you’re watching actors at all. The social commentary isn’t delivered as message but as experience — embedded in the rhythms of daily life, the choices constrained by circumstance, the quiet tragedies that accumulate.

Half a century on, its power hasn’t dimmed. If anything, its clarity feels sharper now, a reminder of a time when television didn’t just reflect society but confronted it.


Thursday 11th June

The Making of King Arthur

BBC Four, 8:00pm

A thoughtful exploration of Britain’s most enduring legend — part history, part myth, part national mirror. The programme traces how Arthur has been reinvented across centuries, reflecting the hopes and anxieties of each era.

James Dean: The Emotional Man

Sky Arts, 9:00pmA portrait of a performer who seemed to burn from the inside out. James Dean’s career was brief enough to feel like a flash, yet the emotional afterglow has lasted decades — a mixture of youthful intensity, unresolved longing and that strange, magnetic vulnerability that made him look both invincible and breakable at the same time.

The documentary leans into that duality. It doesn’t try to tidy him into a myth, nor does it pretend the myth isn’t part of the story. Instead, it traces the tension between the boy he was, the man he was becoming, and the icon the world insisted on making him. You feel the fragility beneath the swagger, the ache beneath the cool.

What emerges is a study in contradictions: a performer who seemed to reveal everything while giving almost nothing away; a symbol of rebellion who was, in many ways, searching for connection; a star whose brief life became a template for a certain kind of cinematic longing.

It’s a reminder that some figures endure not because they were fully understood, but because they never quite were. Dean remains one of them.

Constantine the Great (Part Two)

PBS America, 8:35pm

The concluding chapter follows the emperor’s creation of Constantinople and the reshaping of an empire. A sweeping end to a story that still echoes through European history.

Ex Machina (2014)

Film4, 10:45pm

Ex Machina still feels like a shard of ice slipped under the skin — sleek, controlled, and quietly unnerving. Alex Garland builds his story with the precision of a psychological trap, letting tension accumulate in the pauses, the glances, the silences that stretch just a little too long. It’s science fiction pared back to its essentials: intelligence, power, desire, and the dangerous spaces where they overlap.

Oscar Isaac gives the film its swaggering volatility, a tech‑messiah with a god complex and a taste for manipulation. Alicia Vikander, by contrast, is all poise and ambiguity — a performance so finely calibrated you’re never entirely sure where the machine ends and the person begins. Their scenes hum with a kind of electric unease.

Visually, the film is immaculate. Glass, concrete, soft light, and the sense that every surface is observing you. Garland uses the environment like a second script, a place where transparency becomes its own form of menace.

And then there’s the final act — cold, precise, inevitable. It lands not with shock but with the quiet, devastating logic of a conclusion you should have seen coming all along.

Arena: Clint Eastwood – Out of the West

BBC Four, 11:05pm

A portrait of one of Hollywood’s last great auteurs — a filmmaker whose career spans genres, decades and cultural shifts. The documentary is affectionate without being fawning.

Clint Eastwood: American Filmmaker

BBC Four, 12:05am

The second part of an excellent Eastwood double bill, tracing the evolution of a director who has always been more complex than his public image suggests.

Little Richard: I Am Everything (2023)

Channel 4, 1:55am

A blast of colour, noise and unapologetic self‑invention, Little Richard: I Am Everything is as flamboyant and furious as the man himself. The documentary refuses to sand down the contradictions — the joy, the rage, the brilliance, the lifelong tug‑of‑war between identity and expectation. It understands that Little Richard didn’t just help invent rock and roll; he detonated it, reshaping the cultural landscape with a scream, a shimmy and a streak of eyeliner.

What the film captures so well is the emotional voltage behind the performance. The joy is real — ecstatic, liberating — but so is the fury, the sense of someone fighting to claim space in a world determined to shrink him. The archival footage crackles, the interviews deepen the portrait, and the whole thing moves with the rhythm of a man who refused to be quiet.

It’s vibrant, defiant, and impossible to ignore — just like Richard himself.


Friday 12th June

Hunting the Debt Predators

Channel 4, 8:00pm

Investigative journalism at its most urgent. A look at those who profit from financial hardship — and the people fighting back. The programme is angry, clear‑eyed and necessary.

Queer (2024)

BBC Two, 11:00pm

A bold, jagged adaptation of Burroughs that refuses to smooth the edges of the source material. Queer moves with a kind of raw, intimate unease — a film that sits inside longing, self‑loathing and desire without trying to tidy any of it into catharsis. It feels both anchored in its period and strangely unmoored from time, as if the emotional landscape hasn’t changed as much as we’d like to think.

The film leans into the book’s nervy, uncomfortable honesty. Relationships are sketched in quick, piercing strokes; the vulnerability is palpable but never overstated. What emerges is a portrait of a man circling his own loneliness, reaching out and recoiling in the same breath.

Visually, it balances grit with a kind of feverish lyricism — realism shading into hallucination, memory bleeding into the present. It’s a film that trusts atmosphere as much as narrative.

The result is unsettling, intimate, and quietly devastating. It doesn’t seek resolution; it simply sits with the ache.

Queen & Slim (2019)

BBC Two, 1:10am

Queen & Slim unfolds like a modern myth written on the move — a road movie where romance, tragedy and political urgency are braided so tightly they become inseparable. It starts quietly, almost tentatively, then gathers emotional force until it hits with the weight of something inevitable.

What makes it so powerful is the intimacy at its core. The relationship grows in the spaces between danger, in the glances and hesitations, in the way two people learn to trust each other while the world closes in. The film never rushes that connection; it lets it breathe, deepen, complicate.

Visually, it’s striking — bold compositions, saturated colours, a sense of America as both vast and claustrophobic. The landscapes feel mythic, yet the violence and injustice that shape the journey are painfully real.

By the end, the film leaves you with a mixture of ache and awe. It’s a love story, a protest and a lament.


Streaming Choice

Michael Jackson: The Verdict (Netflix)

All three episodes available from Wednesday 3rd June

A forensic, often uncomfortable examination of one of the most scrutinised trials in modern pop‑culture history. The documentary avoids sensationalism, instead laying out the legal, cultural and media forces that shaped the case. It’s sober, detailed and designed to provoke reflection rather than deliver easy answers.

USA 94: Brazil’s Return to Glory (Netflix)

Available from Sunday 7th June

A richly assembled look back at one of the World Cup’s most emotionally charged triumphs. The documentary captures both the tactical evolution of the Brazilian side and the wider cultural moment that surrounded their victory. For football fans, it’s a warm bath of nostalgia; for everyone else, it’s a reminder of how sport can become a national myth.

Daisy Jones & The Six (ITVX)

All 10 episodes available from Sunday 7th June

One of the finest music dramas of recent years. Adapted from Taylor Jenkins Reid’s novel, the series charts the rise and implosion of a fictional 1970s rock band with such conviction that it feels like a recovered piece of music history. The performances are magnetic, the songs are genuinely good, and the emotional fallout is handled with surprising delicacy. It first appeared on Prime, where I watched it, and I loved every episode.

The Score (ITVX)

Both episodes available from Monday 8th June

A taut, stylish two‑parter that blends crime drama with character study. The Score is less interested in the mechanics of wrongdoing than in the people who find themselves pulled into its orbit. Sharp writing and a lean runtime make it an easy, satisfying binge.

The Evil Lawyer (Netflix)

All seven episodes available from Thursday 11th June

A taut, stylish legal thriller with a decidedly dark streak, The Evil Lawyer takes the familiar architecture of courtroom drama and twists it into something sharper and more morally slippery. The series follows a defence attorney whose brilliance is matched only by his capacity for manipulation, and the result is a portrait of power exercised in the shadows — calculated, ruthless, and unsettlingly compelling.

What gives the show its bite is the way it treats the law not as a noble ideal but as a weapon, wielded by someone who understands exactly how to bend systems, people and outcomes to his will. The tension comes less from the cases themselves than from the psychological games surrounding them: alliances formed and broken, truths buried, motives obscured.

Across seven episodes, the series maintains a sleek, propulsive rhythm. It’s glossy without being hollow, cynical without losing its grip on character, and just heightened enough to feel addictive. Beneath the twists, there’s a clear fascination with the cost of ambition — and the ease with which morality can be traded away when winning becomes the only metric that matters.

Leave a Comment

MEET THE DEBUTS: Six New Voices Rewiring the Fringe 2026

Every Fringe season brings its share of debuts, but every so often a cluster arrives that feels less like a cohort and more like a cultural weather front — a shift in tone, form, and ambition. This year’s newcomers aren’t just telling jokes; they’re wrestling with identity, mortality, monstrosity, societal collapse, and the strange business of being seen. In other words: perfect Counter Culture territory.

Here are six debut hours that deserve your attention.


Aarian Mehrabani: How’s Your Head?
More information

Aarian Mehrabani walks into his debut hour with the kind of life story that would make most comedians quietly pack up their notebooks and go home. Blind, bisexual, brown, Iranian heritage — and then, as if the universe wanted to test the limits of narrative plausibility, an aggressive brain cancer diagnosis in 2024. But what makes How’s Your Head? compelling isn’t the biography; it’s the perspective. Mehrabani refuses to be anyone’s inspirational mascot. Instead, he turns his lived experience into something sharper, stranger, and far more politically charged.

As a co‑founder of FlawBored — the multi‑award‑winning theatre company behind It’s a Motherfking Pleasure — Mehrabani already has form in dismantling the narratives imposed on disabled performers. His debut stand‑up hour continues that project, but with a new intimacy. He weaves together STI clinic confessions, Persian identity crises, hospital‑bed absurdities, and the dark humour that emerges when your own brain becomes the antagonist. It’s bold, deeply personal, and delivered with a wit that’s both biting and disarmingly warm.

What’s striking is how Mehrabani handles the material: not as trauma porn, not as uplift, but as a reclamation. He treats his experiences as raw material for comedy, not a moral lesson. The result is a show that feels alive — a blend of theatrical intelligence, political awareness, and a refusal to let anyone else define the terms of his story.

Directed by Dec Munro and developed with support from The Lowry’s Developed With programme, How’s Your Head? marks the first time a member of FlawBored has stepped out with a solo work. It’s a milestone, and it shows. The craft is evident: tight writing, emotional clarity, and a sense of humour that can pivot from filth to philosophy in a heartbeat.

Mehrabani’s CV is already stacked. A graduate of the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama, he co‑founded FlawBored in 2021, won the Untapped Award, sold out the Fringe, transferred off‑Broadway, and is currently developing new work with the Royal Court. As an actor, he’s appeared at The Watermill, the Royal Exchange, and will soon feature in David Baddiel’s Channel 4 thriller Hunting Alice Bell. Critics have called him “pure genius,” “wincingly relevant,” and “ridiculously entertaining” — and for once, the hype feels justified.

How’s Your Head? introduces a vital new voice to the stand‑up circuit: irreverent, political, theatrical, and defiantly unpitying. It’s a show about identity, illness, desire, and the strange business of surviving your own story — and laughing at it anyway.


Harvey Cobb: Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet
More information

Harvey Cobb’s debut is what happens when a circus performer decides to stage an existential crisis in public — and juggle through it. Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet is part clown show, part performance art, part breakdown, and entirely Fringe. It’s a masterclass in absurdity: pink boot juggling, contemporary dance, ridiculous characters, silly songs, and one very opinionated sock puppet.

British‑born and Rotterdam‑based, Cobb brings the precision of a trained circus artist and the chaos of someone who’s realised that “serious art” might just be another form of self‑delusion. The show blurs the line between high art and cheap entertainment, between sincerity and satire, between the performer’s need to be applauded and his fear of being dismissed as novelty. It’s a meta‑theatrical tightrope walk — and Cobb never stops wobbling.

The conceit is deliciously self‑aware. Harvey presents himself as a pretentious artist, desperate to be taken seriously, only to be undermined by his tyrannical producer, his own insecurities, and the increasingly unhinged antics of Mr Sock. As the façade crumbles, the show becomes a study in vulnerability disguised as farce. Beneath the juggling and slapstick lies a quiet truth about the hunger for validation — and the absurdity of chasing it through art.

Cobb’s background gives the show its muscularity. A graduate of Codarts Rotterdam with a degree in Circus, he’s already won the BNG Circus Prize for Something About Pink, and his work carries the physical confidence of someone who can literally balance on anything. But what makes Pink Boots sing is its emotional balance: the tension between craft and collapse, between control and chaos.

The production’s international creative team — Matthias Romir, Pepijn Ronaldo, Captain Frodo, Yiorgos Bereris, Cahit Metin, Julia Gut, and Inge Den Adel — help shape a piece that feels both anarchic and meticulously designed. It’s a show that knows exactly what it’s doing, even when it pretends not to.

As De Volkskrant put it, Cobb is “a born performer, a funny and idiosyncratic improvisational talent.” At the Fringe, that translates into a debut that’s equal parts circus, confession, and catastrophe — a glitter‑streaked exploration of what it means to want to be seen.

Pink Boots and an Alcoholic Sock Puppet is chaotic, heartfelt, and quietly profound beneath the absurdity. It’s Fringe distilled to its purest form: a man, a sock, and the desperate, beautiful need to make art out of failure.


Mothman: A Romance Musical
More information

Some Fringe shows arrive with a premise so gloriously deranged that you can feel the cult status forming before the lights even go down. Mothman: A Romance Musical is one of those shows — a cryptid‑infused, B‑movie‑loving, queer‑coded fever dream from alternative comedians Alex Franklin and Nikola McMurtrie, who have already amassed awards, critical acclaim, and millions of online views. Now they’re bringing their collaborative debut to Edinburgh, and it’s exactly the kind of unhinged, big‑hearted chaos the Fringe was built for.

The set‑up is deliciously absurd: it’s 1943, the Nazis are winning, and America’s last hope is a super‑soldier experiment gone wrong because — of course — a moth got into the machine. Fast‑forward to 2024 and a trio of monster‑hunters stumble into the woods of West Virginia, only to find themselves entangled in forbidden cryptid romance, betrayal, cannibalism, and a Wisdom Tree. It’s a show that lovingly skewers the tropes of classic creature‑features while prancing through themes of identity, sexuality, and self‑acceptance with a sincerity that catches you off guard.

Franklin and McMurtrie write and perform alongside Alex Prescot and Hudson Hughes, creating a four‑person ensemble that feels like a Fringe supergroup: musical comedy finalists, award‑winners, drag‑adjacent chaos merchants, and performers who understand that the line between horror and heart is often thinner than a moth’s wing. Their world is one where camp meets earnestness, where the monstrous becomes desirable, and where the absurd becomes a vehicle for something unexpectedly tender.

What elevates Mothman beyond its delightful silliness is the emotional intelligence humming beneath the spectacle. Franklin — a trans, half‑Chinese musical comedian with a growing cult following — brings a sharp, self‑aware wit that turns even the most ludicrous moments into reflections on belonging. McMurtrie, a Scottish sketch and musical comedian with a background in dance and multimedia chaos, injects the show with physicality and ambition that borders on the operatic. Together, they create a piece that feels both anarchic and meticulously crafted.

The show has already previewed in London and Brighton, where it picked up a nomination for The Nest New Writing Award with Chichester Festival Theatre — a sign that beneath the cannibalism and cryptid lust, there’s real craft at work. Reviewers of their solo work have called Franklin “deeply affecting and incredibly funny” and McMurtrie “maniacally ambitious,” and Mothman looks set to combine the best of both.

This is the kind of Fringe musical that becomes a late‑night word‑of‑mouth obsession: camp, chaotic, queer, and unexpectedly moving. A romance musical about falling in love with a monster shouldn’t work — which is precisely why it does.. It’s camp, earnest, ridiculous — and taps into the desire to be loved for the parts of ourselves that feel monstrous.


Rob Preston: Amazing Global Solutions
More information

Rob Preston’s debut arrives with the confidence of a man who has stared directly into the abyss of the modern internet and decided to build a consultancy firm there. Fresh from the 2025 Fringe hit Brainsluts, Preston steps into the spotlight alone — or rather, accompanied by a gallery of grotesques who feel alarmingly familiar to anyone who has spent more than six minutes online.

Amazing Global Solutions is a rapid‑fire descent into the algorithmic psyche: bleak, bizarre, and blisteringly funny. Preston plays a consultant armed with the worst ideas the internet has ever produced — casually delivered with the breezy self‑assurance of a man who believes he can “fix mental health,” “dominate the content space,” and “bring lasting international peace to the entirety of the globe, globally.” It’s the kind of corporate nightmare where every buzzword is a threat and every solution is somehow more horrifying than the problem.

What makes Preston’s work sing is the accuracy. His characters — influencer‑bros, corporate stooges, privileged poshos, dog‑obsessed retirees — aren’t caricatures so much as exaggerated truths, the logical endpoints of a culture that has replaced empathy with engagement metrics. Through sharply observed vignettes rooted in the UK’s current socio‑political climate, he exposes how extremism, self‑help jargon, and moral bankruptcy can merge into something both hilarious and deeply unsettling.

Preston’s pedigree shows. Shortlisted for BBC New Comedian of the Year 2024 and Pleasance Reserve 2025, and a semi‑finalist in the Leicester Square Sketch Off, he’s already carved out a reputation for precision‑tooled character work. His writing has appeared on Radio 4 Extra, and his digital sketches have racked up over a million likes — proof that his brand of satire lands just as hard on a phone screen as it does in a theatre.

As a comic actor, he starred in Brainsluts at the 2025 Fringe, earning four‑star reviews from The Guardian, The Times, and The Stage. This year he also appears in Leo Reich’s Channel 4/A24 sitcom It Gets Worse — a title that feels like a mission statement for the world his characters inhabit.

Amazing Global Solutions is satire for the age of burnout, misinformation, and weaponised positivity — a show that understands the horror of modern life isn’t the chaos, but the people who insist they can optimise it.


Fanny Bleach: The Nearly Naked Show
More information

Fanny Bleach — the cult drag‑thing alter ego of Geordie theatre‑maker Emma Crowley‑Bennett — arrives at the Fringe with a debut that feels less like a comedy hour and more like a feral reclamation ritual. A member of the beloved sketch group Your Aunt Fanny and winner of Top of the Slops Season 3, Bleach brings a show that is part freak‑show fantasia, part drag séance, and part howl of defiance from the sticky floor of the patriarchy.

The Nearly Naked Show is a subversive, silly and surprisingly tender tour through the disgusting and the depraved — a carnival of characters dredged from the creepiest crevices of Bleach’s imagination. Mundane realities warp into surreal nightmares populated by bodily mutations, deviant behaviour, bad hags and kidney‑harvesting call‑centre workers. It’s grotesque, glittery, and gloriously unhinged: a fantasia of guts, gunk and glitter that refuses to apologise for the body’s unruly truths.

But beneath the filth and the physical comedy lies something sharper. The show grew out of Crowley‑Bennett’s own experiences navigating the power imbalances of early acting work and the dubious “training” environments that shape so many young women in the industry. The Nearly Naked Show becomes her way of taking the wheel back — a space where she calls the shots, owns her autonomy, and channels rage into laughter rather than silence. It’s a reclamation of the female body in all its gory glory, and a reminder that sometimes the most radical act is to be loud, lewd and entirely yourself.

Bleach’s background in physical theatre, drag and sketch comedy gives the show its muscularity: immersive monologues, rapid‑fire character work, shock humour and a kind of joyous theatrical chaos that feels both meticulously crafted and on the brink of collapse. Costumes by Freya Wright and creative support from Mizz Barber help build a world that’s as visually anarchic as it is thematically pointed.

As one reviewer put it: “A parade of chaos, craft and cntery… face acting heaven” — Narc* “Borders on being impossibly outrageous… an hour of sheer brilliance” — Broadway World

If the Fringe still has room for dangerous, disgusting, defiantly political drag — and it absolutely should — then The Nearly Naked Show is where you’ll find it.


Hudson Hughes: At Your Service
More information

Hudson Hughes arrives at the Fringe with a debut that feels like a séance conducted by a man who’s spent too long in the green room of daytime television. At Your Service is a silly, spooky, surprisingly tender horror‑comedy about a vicar who has outlived his cultural moment — and possibly his sanity. It’s the kind of show that takes Britain’s fondness for cosy clerical TV personalities and drags it, wheezing, into the age of burnout, branding, and supernatural interference.

For nearly two decades, the Reverend Derek Gritt has been a comforting presence in Britain’s living rooms — a soft‑voiced emissary of “holy vibes” and gentle moralising. But the world has moved on, and Rev. Gritt now finds himself banished to online obscurity, clinging to relevance with the desperation of a man who knows the algorithm is not on his side. His last shot at a comeback? Travelling to the quaint village of Godsby‑upon‑Treen to televise the funeral of his biggest fan, Jane Plemley. A simple gig, except for one small detail: Jane is definitely, absolutely, categorically not a witch. And the Reverend’s crippling vaping addiction isn’t helping.

What follows is a gloriously unhinged blend of satanic panic, career anxiety, and ecclesiastical slapstick. Hughes plays Gritt with a mix of Alan Titchmarsh wholesomeness and Beetlejuice‑adjacent chaos, creating a character who is both deeply silly and strangely sympathetic. The show elevates traditional character comedy with a barrage of gags, electronic props, original music, and a creeping sense that something very wrong is happening just offstage.

Hughes is no newcomer to Fringe mayhem. As the creator of the cult-hit gameshow Hot Rubber, a two‑time Sketch Off finalist, and a director for BBC’s Literally, he’s already carved out a niche as a performer who thrives in the space where absurdity meets craft. His previous Fringe work includes Gay Witch Sex Cult and the critically adored Dr Dolittle Kills A Man (And Reads Extracts From His New Book) — a show described as “a tiny miracle” and “a raging, manic mishmash of character comedy and anarchic jokes.” That lineage shows here: At Your Service is meticulously chaotic, gleefully theatrical, and powered by a performer who understands that horror and humour share the same nervous system.

With script editing from Aidan Pittman, music from Robbie Smith, and technical support from Anand Sankar, the show has the feel of a miniature gothic epic — a late‑night Fringe treat for anyone who likes their comedy with a side of occult bureaucracy.

At Your Service is what happens when Britain’s cosy clerical nostalgia collides with the existential dread of the digital age. Think Inside No. 9 meets The Exorcist meets a PR consultant who’s run out of ideas — and then imagine the whole thing performed by a man who looks like he’s been awake for three days trying to fix his own Wikipedia page.

A horror‑comedy for a country that no longer knows what it believes in.


Why These Debuts Matter

What links these six shows isn’t genre but intent. Each one is wrestling with something: identity, art, capitalism, mythology, the body, the self. They’re not just trying to make you laugh; they’re trying to make sense of the world — or at least make the chaos feel briefly coherent.

That’s the Fringe at its best.
And that’s Counter Culture’s sweet spot.

By Pat Harrington

Leave a Comment

04/06/26 – Counter Culture – Midweek Song List (151)

A smiling woman with long, wavy hair wearing sunglasses, holding a phone and headphones, with text overlay that reads 'MIDWEEK SONG LIST 4 June 2026'.

Welcome to the first Midweek Song List of June — that curious stretch of the calendar when the weather can’t make up its mind, the festivals begin to stir, and Home Bargains quietly prepares its first wave of Christmas stock. Brace yourselves.

As ever, today’s selection is gloriously eclectic. Only here would you find Motörhead rubbing shoulders with Mozart, or a Canadian post‑punk upstart sharing space with a 1960s dance‑floor classic. It’s the sort of musical chaos we’ve come to cherish.

Before we dive in, a quick thank‑you to the reader who sent us Home Front’s ‘Light Sleeper’ (above). They’re convinced the band is Canada’s next major export. We’re keeping an open mind — but the track certainly has a restless, synth‑driven energy that’s hard to ignore. Let us know what you think.


We’re long‑standing admirers of Blondie. ‘Denis’ (above) remains one of our favourites. A reimagining of Randy & The Rainbows’ ‘Denise’, it introduced Blondie to the UK in 1978. Deborah Harry even added a verse in French to justify the name and gender switch. Punk roots, new‑wave sheen — and, dare we say it, a whisper of glam. Not the glitter‑bomb kind, but something ineffable that made them stand out.

From there we shift to Green Day’s ‘Boulevard of Broken Dreams’, one of the defining tracks of American Idiot. It’s a lonely‑walk anthem wrapped in post‑punk melancholy — a song that captured the disillusionment of the early 2000s with a melody that still hits like a punch to the ribs.

We then head back to the 60s with Little Eva’s ‘The Loco‑Motion’. Joyous, bouncy, and utterly irresistible, it’s a dance‑floor classic whose hand‑clap rhythm and locomotive swing have kept it alive through countless revivals. If anyone has stories about seeing Little Eva live, we’d love to hear them.

Merle Haggard’s ‘America First’ brings us something more reflective. A late‑career track with Haggard’s trademark Bakersfield warmth, it’s understated, melodic, and plainspoken — a reminder of his ability to capture the mood of ordinary people with unvarnished clarity.

Then we slam the throttle forward with Motörhead’s ‘Bomber’ . Fast, loud, and unapologetically raw, it’s Lemmy and co. in full flight — a low‑flying riff that feels like it’s skimming the treetops.

From there, a sharp left turn into classical elegance with Mozart’s ‘Eine Kleine Nachtmusik’. Bright, precise, and instantly recognisable, it’s the musical equivalent of a perfectly cut diamond — timeless and sparkling.

Today also marks the end of our mini‑series commemorating the centenary of the 1926 General Strike. We close with ‘Solidarity Forever’ — not the Pete Seeger version, but the stark, resonant interpretation by The Nightwatchman, Tom Morello’s politically charged solo project. A fitting tribute to collective struggle.

Speaking of reinterpretations, have a listen to Wilson Pickett’s version of ‘Hey Jude’ The Beatles’ original is so familiar it’s practically part of our DNA, but Pickett drenches it in soul, pushing the song into raw, emotional territory. We’re torn — but what’s your verdict?

We also revisit Fergal Sharkey’s ‘A Good Heart’, an 80s pop gem powered by Sharkey’s unmistakable quiver of a voice. Glossy, heartfelt, and surprisingly bittersweet beneath the synth sheen.

From there, something more off‑kilter: The Smashing Pumpkins’ ‘Jellybaby’. A lesser‑known cut that blends fuzzed‑out guitars with dreamy sweetness — a glimpse of the band’s more playful side.

And finally, we close with The Undertones’ ‘Teenage Kicks’. Two minutes of pure pop‑punk perfection. Energetic, innocent, and bursting with adolescent longing, it remains one of the most beloved singles ever recorded — and John Peel’s all‑time favourite for good reason.


OTHER COUNTER CULTURE FEATURES

We’ve also begun producing Songlist Specials.
Our first celebrated the Old Grey Whistle Test.
Our second and third explored early West Coast punk.

Leave a Comment

West Coast Punk Songlist 2

In this second installment some more first wave West Coast punk, visiting LA, Portland, Bellingham, and Vancouver BC! From Bellingham Washington, it’s “Kill The Bee Gees” by The Accident – Fantastic musicianship and very entertaining video made at the time..capitalizing on the “Disco Sucks” movement fashionable at the time. On the vinyl 45 the opening line is “Is everybody around here REALLY a bunch of WIMPS??” Subreference listed in the youtube comments.

Nazi Training Camp by DOA Like the Dils and Wipers, a quality power trio – from way up north in Vancouver CA. Incredibly dynamic power trio with Chuck Biscuits killin’ it on the drums! Yeah.. they did “Disco Sucks” and had the preamble, “Is everybody around here a bunch of wimps?” Inside jokes, tongue in cheek and all that. From the live 12″ EP Triumph of the Ignoroids.

Messed Up Mixed Up by Sado Nation – Off of their debut album. With punk luminary Mish Bondaj on vocals. They did have an earlier single with an earlier singer which I’ll review later, and yet an ever earlier singer, John Shirley (look ‘im up!). More greatness from Portland, Oregon!

Square City – Flyboys. Their best known song, and a great single, very catchy – from LA – not hard core punk but super original and one of my favorite LA punk singles.

Alleycats – Too Much Junk. Super catchy single from an iconic 1st wave LA punk band. I saw them several times (another power trio!) and they were super nice people.

TAQN = The Eyes. Long form title is Take A Quaalude Now. Great very original sound. Incredibly catchy with lyrics that are both disturbing and humorous at the same time – that’s the LA think in the late 7Os: Be serious and have a sense of humor at the same time. These guys exemplify that ethic. On Dangerhouse – who else?

We Don’t Need The English – The Bags: A genuine diss on English first wave punk bands – but make no mistake about it – they ADORED their UK contemporaries. Really good musicianship. I saw them live and they were intense yet good players! On Dangerhouse of course!

Don’t Be Afraid To Pogo – The Gears: Again, are they serious or just poking fun at stuff? Yes! I sing this song often, in a lounge lizard fashion. Again, really good musicians – listen to their album Rocking At Ground Zero. These guys were a proto-surf-punk band.. but not the super hard core flavor yet.

By Jeff Williams

Advert

Leave a Comment

Review of ‘Last Stop Larimah’

There’s a kind of town you come across in the Northern Territory now and then. A pub, a few weather-beaten buildings, maybe a servo if you’re lucky, sitting alone beside the highway as if the rest of the country forgot about it years ago. Larimah is one of those places. Blink while driving north from Daly Waters and you’d miss it entirely. But after watching Last Stop Larimah, you’ll never forget it.

Promotional poster for the HBO documentary 'Last Stop Larrimah: Murder Down Under', featuring a central smiling man in a cowboy hat and various residents in front of Larrimah signs. Text includes release information and credits.

The film circles around the disappearance of Paddy Moriarty, a hard-drinking bush character who vanished one day in 2017 along with his little dog. In any ordinary town it would’ve been odd enough. In Larimah, where the population could nearly fit around a card table, it turned into something between a murder mystery and a bush ballad.

What makes the documentary work so well is that it understands the Territory instinctively. It doesn’t arrive with a clipboard and a superior attitude from Sydney or Melbourne. It lets people talk. It lets silences hang in the air and it understands that Territorians often say the funniest things completely by accident, and that half the truth out bush is hidden inside exaggeration, gossip and old grudges.

And Christ-on-a-Bike, there are grudges in Larimah.

The townsfolk eye each other off like characters from some subtropical western. Everybody’s got a theory about Paddy. Everybody’s got a complaint about somebody else. One woman keeps a collection of homemade dolls hanging from trees that would frighten the life out of you after dark. Another resident carries on like a frontier publican from 1953. There are barking dogs, rusted machinery, warm beer, old caravans and enough personal feuds to start a small war.

The remarkable thing is that none of it feels forced. Australians of a certain age will recognise these people instantly. Every small town had a few once upon a time. Blokes who’d gone north after marriages collapsed. Women tougher than wire. Old bush workers who drank too much, talked too loud and somehow survived everything the country threw at them.

The Territory itself hangs over every scene. Those huge empty distances. The glare coming off the road. The sense that civilisation is a very thin arrangement out there and could blow away in the dry season wind. The filmmakers are wise enough not to overdo it. They let the country speak for itself.

What stays with you afterwards isn’t really the mystery, though that’s compelling enough. It’s the feeling that you’ve glimpsed a fading Australia. Not the tourist-brochure version with infinity pools and sunset cocktails, but the old north where people could still disappear into the scrub and where communities ran on gossip, resilience and sheer bloody-mindedness.

There’s a sadness underneath it all. Larimah feels like the last flicker of a world built by fettlers, drovers, station hands and wanderers who preferred hard country to easy company. Towns like it are disappearing now. The highways got better, the traffic got faster, and modern Australia slowly flowed around them.

But for an hour and a half, Last Stop Larimah takes you back there. Back to the beer-stained bars and dusty verges of the old Territory. Back to an Australia that was eccentric, suspicious, hilarious and strangely free.

A wonderful documentary. Funny without trying too hard, unsettling without becoming morbid, and full of affection for the people of the north. Exactly the sort of story the Territory tells best.

By David Ironside

Available to view in the UK on Netflix.

Picture credit: By http://www.impawards.com/2023/last_stop_larrimah.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=78798121

Leave a Comment

Understanding the Themes in The Man in the High Castle Season 4

Warning spoilers! Season 4 of The Man in the High Castle arrives with the air of a regime in its final days: brittle, paranoid, and unable to sustain the weight of its own mythology. If the earlier seasons were about the seduction of authoritarian certainty, the final chapter is about its collapse — not in a blaze of moral clarity, but in a slow, grinding unravelling where every character is forced to confront the stories they’ve told themselves to survive. The show’s last movement is less a political thriller than a study in ideological entropy, where the Reich’s immaculate surfaces crack to reveal the rot beneath.

At the centre of this collapse stands John Smith, whose arc reaches its inevitable, devastating conclusion. Season 4 strips away the last of his rationalisations and exposes the truth we’ve been circling since Season 2: Smith is not a man corrupted by the Reich; he is a man who found in the Reich the perfect architecture for his own need for control. The multiverse — once a destabilising curiosity — becomes a mirror he cannot bear to look into. The sight of a world in which he remained an ordinary American, a man without power, is intolerable. His tragedy is not that he chose the wrong side; it is that he cannot imagine himself outside the machinery of domination. His final act, a suicide framed as a refusal to be captured, is less a moment of redemption than a last attempt to control the narrative. Even in death, he cannot relinquish authorship.

Juliana Crain, by contrast, becomes the show’s moral and metaphysical anchor. Season 4 completes her transformation from reluctant fugitive to a figure of radical possibility. She moves through the world with a clarity the Reich cannot comprehend: she understands that resistance is not merely political but ontological. The multiverse is not a plot device; it is a rebuke to totalitarianism itself. Where the Reich insists on a single, immutable truth, Juliana embodies the idea that reality can branch, fracture, and be remade. Her calm, almost spiritual presence in the final season gives the show its emotional ballast. She is not the hero because she wins; she is the hero because she refuses the seduction of certainty.

Around these two poles, Season 4 widens its lens. The BCR (Black Communist Rebellion) becomes the most grounded and politically coherent thread of the season. Their struggle is not abstract; it is material, lived, and rooted in the history of American resistance movements. The show finally acknowledges that liberation is not a philosophical exercise but a collective act, messy and imperfect. The BCR storyline gives the season a sense of urgency that the Reich’s metaphysical obsessions lack. It reminds us that while the multiverse may offer infinite possibilities, freedom must still be fought for in the world at hand.

Kido, too, receives a quietly powerful ending. His journey from rigid enforcer to a man haunted by the cost of obedience mirrors the show’s broader meditation on complicity. His final choices are not framed as redemption — the series is too honest for that — but as a recognition that the machinery he served has consumed everything he once valued. In a season filled with grand ideological gestures, Kido’s small, human moments land with surprising force.

But it is the ending that gives Season 4 its lasting resonance. The portal — long teased, often debated — finally opens, and people from other worlds begin to walk through. It is a strange, unsettling, almost dreamlike moment, and it reframes the entire series in a single gesture. Throughout The Man in the High Castle, the Reich has insisted on a closed universe: one truth, one history, one destiny. The portal’s opening is the ultimate act of defiance against that worldview. It is a literal rupture in the authoritarian imagination, a reminder that no regime, however totalising, can fully contain the human capacity for possibility.

The ambiguity is deliberate. We are not told who these people are, what they want, or what world they come from. They arrive without weapons, without explanation, without fear. In a show obsessed with surveillance, control, and the policing of identity, this final image is almost radical in its openness. It suggests that history is not a sealed vault but a permeable membrane — that trauma, hope, and resistance echo across realities. The Reich’s downfall is not framed as a victory of good over evil, but as the collapse of a system that cannot withstand the existence of alternatives.

For Juliana, the moment is a vindication of everything she has believed: that the world is not fixed, that choices matter, that reality can be remade. For Smith, it is the final horror — proof that the universe is larger than his authority, that he cannot control the narrative even in death. And for the audience, the ending functions as a quiet, subversive reminder that authoritarianism thrives on the illusion of inevitability. The portal shatters that illusion.

Season 4 is not perfect. Its pacing is uneven, and some narrative threads feel compressed. But as a culmination of the show’s thematic architecture, it is remarkably coherent. It understands that authoritarian regimes do not fall because the righteous triumph; they fall because they can no longer sustain the contradictions at their core. It understands that resistance is not a single heroic act but a series of choices made by people who refuse to accept the world as it is. And it understands that the most radical idea in a totalitarian universe is the possibility of another world.

The Man in the High Castle closes not with triumph but with rupture — a world breaking open, a story refusing to resolve neatly, a reminder that history is always unfinished. Season 4 honours the show’s central insight: that the struggle between domination and freedom is not a battle to be won once, but a condition of being human.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Advert

Leave a Comment

Review: Cabaret at the Playhouse (London)

Promotional image for the musical 'Cabaret' at the Kit Kat Club, featuring a performer with vintage styled hair and makeup, highlighted in gold lettering.

This production has a central insight: that the glitter and the terror of Cabaret are not opposites but dance partners. The Kit Kat Klub is both refuge and warning, a place where pleasure becomes a kind of defiance and denial becomes a kind of doom. This staging leans into that contradiction with confidence. It lets decadence and danger sit side by side until the audience can no longer tell where one ends and the other begins. The political becomes personal, the personal becomes political, and the entertainment becomes quietly, insistently unsettling.

The design does a great deal of this work. The Kit Kat Klub appears at first like a jewel — warm, golden, inviting — but the closer you look, the more you see the cracks. The circular stage, capable of rising and turning, creates a sense of perpetual motion, as if Berlin itself is spinning faster than its inhabitants can keep up. Musicians perched in balconies on either side of the Dress Circle add to the intimacy: the sense that the audience is not watching a performance so much as being folded into it. As the story darkens, the lighting shifts from amber glow to cold, surgical blues, guiding us through the slow descent without ever announcing it.

Into this world wanders Baker Mukasa’s Clifford Bradshaw, searching for inspiration and finding Eva Noblezada’s Sally Bowles — a woman who performs herself with such conviction that she almost believes the act. Their relationship becomes the show’s emotional axis, even as the world outside begins to tilt. This production honours the fluidity of Berlin’s social and sexual landscape. Cliff’s bisexuality, so often erased in adaptations, is acknowledged lightly but unmistakably: the flirtatious ease with Lucas Koch’s Ernst Ludwig, the MC’s insinuating presence, the staging of “Two Ladies” with its playful nod to a ménage à trois. It’s a Berlin where improvisation — sexual, social, moral — is simply how people survive.

Eva Noblezada’s Sally is all brittle glamour and bravado. Her costumes are less overtly sexual than in some productions, and that choice pays off: it reveals her fragility rather than her allure. She is a woman who performs even when no one is watching, because the performance is the only thing holding her together. Her abortion is handled with restraint and clarity — not sensationalised, not softened. It is the moment her fantasy of freedom collapses. She chooses the cabaret over domesticity, chaos over stability, the night over the morning after. Her final “Cabaret” is not a victory cry but a desperate insistence that she is still in control, even as the world closes in around her.

The quieter love story between Robert Hands’ Herr Schultz and Ruthie Henshall’s Fraulein Schneider becomes the production’s emotional anchor. Their romance is gentle, almost old‑fashioned, a fragile pocket of hope unfolding in the shadow of something monstrous. When Schneider decides not to marry Schultz, it is not hatred that drives her but fear — the small, frightened compromises ordinary people make when the world begins to harden. Henshall’s delivery of “What Would You Do?” becomes a lament for the way authoritarianism seeps into daily life, not through grand gestures but through the erosion of courage.

Lucas Koch’s Ernst Ludwig embodies that erosion. He begins as a charming, worldly traveller — the sort of man who seems to know everyone and everything. Cliff trusts him. The audience trusts him. And that is precisely the point. His eventual reveal as a Nazi organiser is not a twist but an inevitability. He represents the banality of extremism: the friendly man who helps you with your luggage may also be helping dismantle your society.

Hovering above all this is Reeve Carney’s MC, the production’s most visually striking presence. His costumes — one sharply sinister, one grotesquely clownish — capture his duality: playful on the surface, predatory underneath. His stamping on a glass, echoing the Jewish wedding tradition, during the attack on Herr Schultz’s property is one of the production’s boldest symbolic gestures. It is a moment where the cabaret’s illusions shatter.

Musically, the production is at its strongest when it uses the score to chart the emotional and political descent. “Mein Herr” is delivered with delicious cheek, the line about “crossing Europe man by man” landing with perfect comic timing. The choreography leans into humour rather than seduction, revealing Sally’s wit as armour. “Tomorrow Belongs to Me” appears twice — one as something almost pastoral, the other as something rigid and chilling. The contrast is devastating: the same melody, one seemingly innocent, one poisoned.

Fraulein Schneider’s “What Would You Do?” becomes the show’s heartbreaking centrepiece. It is not a political speech but a weary confession. She is not choosing fear over love; she is choosing survival over hope. The production gives her space, and the result is quietly shattering.

“If You Could See Her” is staged as a deliberate provocation. Without the film’s visual cue of a mocking Nazi audience, the anti‑Semitic punchline lands with a jolt. The production refuses to soften it. The ugliness is the point. It is the moment the cabaret’s humour curdles.

What this revival captures with unnerving clarity is the moment when the party finally ends — not with a crash, but with a tightening. The walls don’t slam shut; they inch inward. The audience feels it before the characters do. The Kit Kat Klub, once a sanctuary of permissiveness and possibility, begins to feel smaller, the air thinner. The decadence that once felt liberating now feels like a distraction — a glitter curtain pulled across a gathering storm.

And the tragedy, of course, is that most people inside the club don’t see it coming. Or rather, they see something, but they refuse to believe it is as bad as it looks. This production understands that authoritarianism rarely announces itself. It creeps. It flatters. It reassures. It tells you that everything is fine, that the ugliness is temporary, that the men in armbands are only keeping order. It tells you that you can keep dancing.

Fraulein Schneider embodies this perfectly. She is not naïve; she is frightened. She knows the world is changing, but she clings to the hope that if she keeps her head down, if she makes the “sensible” choice, the danger might pass her by. Her decision not to marry Schultz is not a capitulation to hatred but to fear — the quiet, corrosive fear that convinces ordinary people to make small compromises that become, in hindsight, catastrophic.

Ernst Ludwig’s unveiling is the clearest sign of how the walls close in. He doesn’t change; we simply see him more clearly. The genial traveller becomes the face of a movement that has been growing in plain sight. The production makes the point sharply: extremism does not arrive as a monster. It arrives as a neighbour.

Even the MC, once the embodiment of mischief and possibility, becomes a darker figure as the show progresses. Carney’s grin sharpens. His jokes curdle. His presence becomes less an invitation and more a warning. When he stamps on the glass, it is the moment the cabaret’s illusions shatter. The club is no longer a refuge; it is a mirror held up to a society that has already surrendered.

By the time Eva Noblezada sings “Cabaret,” toward the end, the party is already over. She is performing in the ruins, insisting she is fine because the alternative — acknowledging the collapse — is unbearable. Her defiance becomes a kind of denial, a refusal to look at the world as it is. And that, the production suggests, is how societies fall: not because no one sees the danger, but because too many people convince themselves it is exaggerated or won’t affect them personally.

The brilliance of this revival is that it shows how the collapse happens in increments. A joke here. A shrug there. A song sung in a different key. People tell themselves it’s not their problem, not their fight, not yet. They keep dancing because the music hasn’t stopped — and by the time it does, the exits are already blocked.

One of the evening’s unexpected pleasures was the strikingly young audience. Their presence gave the production an added charge. Cabaret has always been a warning as much as a story — a reminder of how quickly freedoms can erode. Seeing younger theatre‑goers respond so strongly to those themes made the political resonance feel sharper, more contemporary, more urgent.

This Cabaret understands the show’s political heart: that authoritarianism rarely arrives with a bang. It arrives with a shrug, a joke, a song sung in a different key. Societies collapse not through dramatic gestures but through small compromises, quiet fears, and the seductive belief that the party can go on forever. This production refuses that comfort. It shows us the party ending, the good times over.

By Pat Harrington

Advert

A vinyl record with the title 'Lyrics to Live By 2' displayed prominently, featuring a beige and black color scheme, accompanied by a description of further reflections, meditations, and life lessons. There is a 'Buy Now' button and the author's name, Tim Bragg.

Leave a Comment

Exploring ‘Once We Were Punks’: A Journey Through Rural Ireland’s Music Scene

The premise of Frank Shouldice’s film, Once We Were Punks might seem routine or clichéd, something we’ve seen a hundred times before; four lads who were in a band in the Eighties who get together again in middle age. Perhaps – up to a point – but this is a much richer and satisfying film than that brief sketch suggests.

Back in the 1980s, Justin Kelly the vocalist and lyricist, formed a band with his mates, David Meagher, Paddy Glackin, and Noel Larkin; The Panic Merchants. As the film opens, we see the former band members revisiting their old hometown, Baillieboro in County Cavan. Some fascinating archive footage shows how different rural Ireland was just forty-odd years ago.

The Panic Merchants never made the big time. Fame and fortune eluded them. Everyday life intervened. They went their separate ways. John moved to America. Paddy went to Australia. Then, 25 years later, they met up again at a funeral – common in Ireland – and decided to team up again.

The new band was named The Sons of South Ulster, taken from that marginalised part of Ireland, ‘the three counties the Brits didn’t want, and Ireland didn’t give a shit about’ as Justin puts it. The new band reaches audiences never dreamt of by the old one, with albums of raw unpolished songs deeply rooted in rural Co Cavan, songs referencing local places and characters, that capture a universal sense of loss.

As the calendar and the clock mark off the days and hours until a big live gig in the legendary Dublin music venue, Whelan’s, the lads and their family members open up in snatches of interviews with the producer. Justin was traumatised by the fate of his late father, a captain in the Irish Army who was thrown under the bus by senior politicians in a notorious arms dealing scandal in the early 1970s. Paddy moved to Australia to escape the homophobia then rampant in rural Ireland. Noel is quietly but defiantly living with cancer. Each of them is coming to terms with the reality of growing older. Their raging against the dying of the light packs a real emotional punch.

Noel’s cancer diagnosis gradually takes centre stage. He treats it bravely with a large measure of understatement, but his wife makes it clear to us that he is in the words of Irish singer Gloria, getting through it ‘one day at a time.’

This is a story of vulnerability, resilience, and endurance, Justin, David, Paddy and Noel are middle-aged men shaped by friendship, affection and love for one-another, shaped by their circumstances and most of all by their determination to complete their unfinished business.

Reviewed by David Kerr


Once We Were Punks
Director: Frank Shouldice

Runtime: 96 minutes. Ireland 2025.

Cover of the novel 'Better Than The Beatles!' by Anthony C. Green, featuring a blue book illustration and call-to-action to buy now.

Advert

Leave a Comment

« Newer Posts · Older Posts »