A week of craft, chaos, counterculture, and the quiet machinery of power

Some weeks arrive quietly; others feel like they’ve been stitched together with a kind of mischievous intent. This one belongs to the latter. Across seven days, the schedules offer a collision of noir, protest, mythmaking, and the strange ways people reinvent themselves when the world isn’t looking. From Altman’s social x‑ray to Hendrix’s sonic upheavals, from carnival grifters to political gardeners, the week asks the same question in different accents: who gets to write the story, and who gets written into it? Selections and writing is by Pat Harrington.

Before we dive in, here are the three programmes that define the week’s mood.

🌟 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE WEEK

1. Gosford Park — BBC4, Thursday 10.50pm

Altman’s masterpiece of class, cruelty, and quiet rebellion. A house full of secrets, a murder that barely matters, and a camera that catches everything people wish it wouldn’t.

2. Band of Gypsys — Sky Arts, Friday 9pm

Hendrix in transition: raw, searching, and on the cusp of a reinvention the world never got to see completed.

3. Storyville: André Is an Idiot — BBC4, Tuesday 10pm

A documentary that begins with a provocation and ends with something tender, complicated, and unexpectedly humane.

📅 SATURDAY 4 APRIL

10.00pm — Channel 5 Benny Hill — CANCELLED

There are cancellations that feel like bureaucratic reshuffles, and there are cancellations that land with the weight of a quiet cultural verdict. This one belongs firmly to the latter. Benny Hill isn’t just a relic of another broadcasting era; it’s a reminder of the elastic boundaries of humour, the ways societies once laughed, and the ways they now refuse to.

What’s striking is how little noise accompanies the decision. No grand announcement, no retrospective, no attempt to reframe the show as “of its time.” Just a silent excision from the schedule — the kind of administrative gesture that says more than any op‑ed could. It reflects a shift in sensibility: a recognition that comedy built on caricature, leering, and the easy objectification of women no longer passes as harmless nostalgia.

But there’s something more interesting beneath the surface. The cancellation isn’t about erasing the past; it’s about acknowledging the distance travelled. It’s a reminder that culture is not static — that what once drew mass laughter can, in hindsight, reveal the power structures and blind spots of its age. Channel 5’s quiet removal feels less like censorship and more like a society tidying away the artefacts it no longer wishes to celebrate.

In the end, the absence becomes the story. A gap in the schedule that marks a cultural turning point: the moment when a nation that once embraced Hill’s brand of cheeky irreverence decides, almost sheepishly, that it has outgrown him. Not with outrage, but with a shrug — which may be the most damning judgement of all.

10.50pm — BBC1 The Outfit (2022)

The Outfit is a chamber piece disguised as a crime thriller — a film that understands the power of a single room, a single night, and a man who has spent his life mastering the art of precision. Mark Rylance plays Leonard, a tailor (or “cutter,” as he insists) whose quiet shop becomes the pressure cooker for a gangland conspiracy. The film unfolds like a piece of bespoke tailoring: every line measured, every cut deliberate, every reveal stitched into place with care.

What makes the film so compelling is its restraint. Moore resists the temptation to expand outward into the wider criminal underworld; instead, he keeps us locked in the shop, where the walls seem to absorb every lie, every threat, every shifting allegiance. Rylance’s performance is a study in stillness — a man who has survived by observing, by listening, by never revealing more than he must. The tension comes not from gunfire but from the slow, methodical unravelling of secrets.

As the night spirals into violence, the film becomes a meditation on craft — the craft of tailoring, yes, but also the craft of survival. Leonard’s tools are scissors, chalk, and cloth, yet he wields them with the same precision the gangsters apply to their own brutal trade. The film suggests that everyone is cutting something: fabric, deals, corners, throats. And in the end, the question becomes not who is guilty, but who is the better craftsman.

12.00am — BBC2 The Beasts (2022)

Some films arrive like storms; The Beasts arrives like a pressure system — slow, tightening, and impossible to ignore. Rodrigo Sorogoyen builds his drama not from spectacle but from the quiet, grinding hostility that accumulates when a community decides that outsiders are a problem to be solved rather than neighbours to be understood. The Galician countryside is rendered not as pastoral idyll but as a landscape shaped by old resentments, economic precarity, and the kind of masculine pride that curdles into menace.

What makes the film so unsettling is its moral clarity. Sorogoyen refuses to romanticise rural life or demonise the couple at the centre of the story; instead, he shows how fear and frustration can metastasise into something far more dangerous. The conflict over land and wind turbines becomes a proxy for deeper anxieties — about belonging, about dignity, about who gets to decide the future of a place that has been shrinking for generations. Violence here is not an aberration but the logical endpoint of a community that feels cornered.

The performances are extraordinary in their restraint. Denis Ménochet plays Antoine with a kind of stubborn decency — a man who believes that reason, patience, and goodwill can overcome hostility, even as the audience senses the ground shifting beneath him. Opposite him, the brothers who torment the couple are not caricatures but wounded men, shaped by a lifetime of hard labour and harder disappointments. Their menace is intimate, almost familial; the kind that grows in the gaps where empathy should be.

When the film finally tips into open brutality, it feels both shocking and inevitable. Sorogoyen stages violence not as catharsis but as indictment — a reminder that communities can devour their own when fear becomes a form of identity. Yet the film’s final act, anchored by Marina Foïs, refuses to collapse into despair. Her quiet, relentless determination becomes the film’s moral centre: a testament to endurance in the face of cruelty, and to the possibility of reclaiming one’s story even after others have tried to write it for you.

By the end, The Beasts leaves you with the uneasy sense that the real horror isn’t the violence itself but the social conditions that make it seem reasonable to the people who commit it. It’s a film about borders — between locals and outsiders, pride and paranoia, survival and surrender — and how easily those borders can be crossed when no one is watching. Sorogoyen doesn’t offer comfort. He offers truth, and the truth here is as raw as the landscape that holds it.

12.55am — Channel 4 Nightmare Alley (2021)

Del Toro’s Nightmare Alley is a carnival of corruption — a noir soaked in sawdust, cigarette smoke, and the seductive promise of reinvention. Bradley Cooper plays Stanton Carlisle, a drifter who discovers that the line between showmanship and manipulation is perilously thin. The early carnival scenes are among del Toro’s richest work: a world of geeks, grifters, and broken souls who cling to illusion because reality offers them nothing.

The film’s second half shifts into the polished world of high‑society spiritualism, where the cons become more elaborate and the stakes more lethal. Cooper’s performance is a slow burn, a man who believes he can outsmart fate even as he walks straight into its jaws. Cate Blanchett, as the femme fatale psychologist, plays her role with a glacial elegance that suggests she has alreabedy read the final chapter of Stanton’s story.

What gives the film its power is its moral clarity. Del Toro is fascinated by the machinery of exploitation — the way people sell hope, fear, and fantasy to those desperate enough to buy them. The carnival and the city are mirrors of each other: one openly grotesque, the other politely monstrous. In the end, the film circles back to its opening question: what makes a man a geek? The answer lands with the force of inevitability.

📅 SUNDAY 5 APRIL

9.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers History: The Ancients

There’s a particular pleasure in watching a programme that refuses to treat the past as a museum exhibit. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Ancients does exactly that, rummaging through the intimate habits of early civilisations with a mixture of irreverence and genuine curiosity. It’s history told with a raised eyebrow, but never with contempt; the series understands that the strangeness of the past is often just a mirror held at an unfamiliar angle.

What gives the episode its bite is the way it punctures the myth of ancient societies as either prudish or perpetually orgiastic. Instead, it reveals a world where desire, ritual, power, and superstition were tangled together in ways that feel both alien and uncomfortably familiar. The humour works because it’s grounded in empathy — a recognition that people have always tried to make sense of their bodies, their urges, and the rules imposed upon them.

Beneath the jokes lies a quiet critique of how modern culture sanitises its own contradictions. The ancients may have carved their fantasies into stone or woven them into religious rites, but we’re hardly less conflicted; we’ve simply buried our anxieties under algorithms, etiquette, and the illusion of sophistication. The programme’s real achievement is showing that the past wasn’t “bonkers” so much as human — messy, inventive, and endlessly negotiating the boundaries between pleasure and propriety.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the distance between then and now is thinner than we like to pretend. The ancients weren’t strangers; they were us, just with different lighting and fewer inhibitions. And in its cheeky, good‑natured way, the episode invites us to consider what future historians will make of our own rituals — and whether they’ll laugh with us or at us.

10.00pm — BBC1 The Imitation Game (2014)

Some biopics polish their subjects until they gleam; The Imitation Game does something more interesting. It presents Alan Turing not as a saint or a martyr, but as a man whose brilliance was both his armour and his undoing. The film moves with the clipped urgency of wartime Britain, yet beneath the period trappings lies a quieter story — one about the cost of being different in a country that demands sameness.

Benedict Cumberbatch plays Turing with a kind of brittle precision, capturing the awkwardness, arrogance, and vulnerability that made him both indispensable and intolerable to the establishment he served. His work at Bletchley Park is framed not as a triumph of lone genius but as a fragile collaboration held together by necessity, secrecy, and the unspoken knowledge that the stakes were measured in millions of lives. The film understands that heroism often looks nothing like the myths we build around it.

What lingers, though, is the cruelty that followed. The state that relied on Turing’s mind to shorten the war later turned that same mind into a target, punishing him for the very identity it had quietly exploited. The film doesn’t sensationalise this; it lets the injustice sit there, cold and bureaucratic, a reminder that nations can be both grateful and merciless in the same breath. It’s a portrait of a society that feared what it could not categorise.

Yet the film also finds moments of grace — in Turing’s bond with Joan Clarke, played with understated strength by Keira Knightley, and in the fleeting glimpses of camaraderie among the codebreakers. These relationships don’t soften the tragedy, but they give it texture, showing the human connections that flickered even in the shadow of secrecy.

By the end, The Imitation Game becomes less a wartime thriller than a moral reckoning. It asks what a country owes to those who save it, and whether intelligence, difference, or queerness can ever be safely housed within institutions built to suppress all three. The answer, delivered with quiet devastation, is that history remembers Turing more kindly than the nation that destroyed him.

10.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers History: The Tudors

There’s something deliciously subversive about taking the Tudors — a dynasty obsessed with image, lineage, and the theatre of power — and examining them through the lens of intimacy. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Tudors does this with a kind of gleeful precision, peeling back the velvet curtains to reveal a world where desire was both a private indulgence and a public weapon. The result is a portrait of a monarchy that governed its bedrooms with the same paranoia it governed its borders.

What the episode captures so well is the contradiction at the heart of Tudor England: a society that preached piety while conducting its most consequential politics between sheets, confessionals, and whispered corridors. The humour lands because it’s rooted in truth — the Tudors were, in many ways, the architects of Britain’s long, uneasy relationship with sex, shame, and spectacle. Their scandals weren’t distractions from power; they were power, reshaping alliances, faiths, and the very structure of the state.

Yet the programme never slips into mockery. Instead, it treats the Tudors as deeply human — flawed, frightened, and often trapped by the very systems they built. Henry VIII’s marital chaos becomes less a punchline and more a study in insecurity; Anne Boleyn’s rise and fall reads like a cautionary tale about the dangers of being both desired and inconvenient. The episode’s irreverence is a way of cutting through the mythmaking, revealing the fragile bodies beneath the portraits.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the Tudors weren’t “bonkers” so much as emblematic of a nation learning to weaponise morality. Their anxieties echo into the present — the policing of desire, the obsession with reputation, the belief that private behaviour can justify public punishment. The episode invites us to laugh, but also to recognise the lineage of our own contradictions.

11.00pm — Sky History Sex: A Bonkers Histor:y The Georgians

If the Tudors gave Britain its taste for spectacle, the Georgians perfected the art of contradiction. Sex: A Bonkers History — The Georgians dives headlong into an era that preached refinement while indulging in excess, a society that built coffee‑house civility on top of a foundation of gossip, scandal, and the relentless policing of reputation. The episode treats the period with a kind of affectionate mischief, revealing a world where desire and decorum were locked in a perpetual duel.

What makes the Georgian instalment so compelling is its refusal to flatten the era into caricature. Yes, the wigs were absurd and the moralising loud, but beneath the powdered surfaces lay a culture grappling with modernity — urbanisation, print culture, new money, new freedoms, and new anxieties about who was allowed to enjoy them. The programme captures this beautifully, showing how sex became both a commodity and a battleground, a way to climb the social ladder or tumble spectacularly from it.

The humour works because it exposes the hypocrisy without sneering at the people trapped inside it. The Georgians weren’t uniquely “bonkers”; they were navigating a rapidly changing world with the tools they had — pamphlets, salons, clandestine clubs, and a legal system that punished the vulnerable while protecting the powerful. The episode’s irreverence becomes a way of cutting through the self‑mythologising, revealing the messy humanity beneath the brocade.

By the end, you’re left with a sense that the Georgians were less an aberration and more a prototype for the modern British psyche: outwardly restrained, inwardly chaotic, and forever negotiating the gap between public virtue and private appetite. The episode invites us to laugh at their contradictions, but also to recognise how many of them we’ve inherited — just with better plumbing and worse social media.

10.15pm — ITV1 Hot Fuzz (2007)

Some comedies wink at the audience; Hot Fuzz stares straight at you with a grin that knows exactly what it’s doing. Edgar Wright’s second entry in the Cornetto Trilogy is often remembered for its kinetic action and rapid‑fire jokes, but beneath the surface lies a surprisingly sharp dissection of English parochialism — the kind that hides its authoritarian streak behind hanging baskets and Neighbourhood Watch newsletters. It’s a film about the violence required to maintain the illusion of tranquillity.

Simon Pegg’s Nicholas Angel is the perfect outsider: competent to the point of discomfort, earnest enough to be mocked, and so committed to order that he becomes a threat to the cosy stagnation of Sandford. His arrival exposes the village’s central contradiction — that “the greater good” is often a euphemism for conformity enforced at knifepoint. Wright plays this tension for laughs, but the humour never fully masks the unease. The village’s obsession with perfection feels uncomfortably familiar in a country that still prizes appearances over accountability.

What makes the film endure is its affection for the very things it critiques. Wright understands the rhythms of rural life — the gossip, the rituals, the way everyone knows everyone else’s business — and he captures them with both satire and warmth. The partnership between Angel and Danny (Nick Frost) becomes the film’s emotional anchor: a friendship forged in the gap between idealism and reality, between the rules on paper and the messy humanity they’re meant to protect.

When the film erupts into full‑blown action pastiche, it does so with a kind of joyous inevitability. The gunfights and explosions aren’t just genre homage; they’re the logical endpoint of a community that has mistaken control for harmony. Wright’s brilliance lies in showing how easily the language of policing can slip into the language of purity — and how quickly a village fête can turn into a battleground when people cling too tightly to their myths.

By the end, Hot Fuzz has pulled off a rare trick: it delivers the pleasures of an action blockbuster while quietly interrogating the politics of small‑town respectability. It’s a film that laughs with you, then asks — gently, insistently — what exactly we’re laughing at. And whether the joke is really as harmless as it seems.

11.50pm — BBC2 Being There (1979)

Being There is a satire that feels eerily prophetic — a film about a man with no interior life who becomes a political oracle simply because he speaks in platitudes. Peter Sellers’ performance as Chance the gardener is a masterclass in understatement: a man who knows nothing, wants nothing, and yet becomes the blank screen onto which a desperate society projects its hopes.

Ashby directs with a light touch, allowing the absurdity to accumulate gradually. The humour is gentle but pointed, revealing how easily power can be seduced by simplicity — or what it mistakes for simplicity. Chance’s gardening metaphors are treated as profound wisdom, not because they are insightful but because people hear what they want to hear. The film becomes a study in the dangers of interpretation, of the human need to find meaning even where none exists.

What makes the film endure is its moral ambiguity. Chance is not malicious; he is simply empty. The satire is aimed not at him but at the world that elevates him — a world hungry for certainty, for clarity, for a voice that sounds authoritative even when it says nothing. The final image, often debated, feels less like a joke and more like a warning: in politics, gravity is optional.

📅 MONDAY 6 APRIL

12.50pm — Channel 5 Clash of the Titans (1981)

Some films stand as monuments to a particular moment in cinematic craft, and Clash of the Titans is one of them. It represents the final great flourish of Ray Harryhausen’s stop‑motion artistry — a handmade mythology constructed frame by painstaking frame, just before digital effects swept in and rewrote the grammar of fantasy cinema. There’s a tactile charge to the film, a sense that every creature has been coaxed into existence rather than rendered into it.

Harryhausen’s creations remain the film’s heartbeat. Medusa, in particular, is a masterclass in atmosphere: a creature of shadow, menace, and unnervingly deliberate movement. Her scenes feel carved out of darkness, lit by the flicker of torches and the tension of inevitability. The Kraken, too, carries a grandeur that owes everything to its physicality — a reminder that scale, when sculpted rather than simulated, has a weight that lingers.

The film’s English roots give it a distinctive texture. Shot partly at Pinewood Studios and anchored by Laurence Olivier’s imperious Zeus, it sits firmly within the tradition of British mythic storytelling — a lineage that treats folklore not as escapism but as cultural inheritance. There’s a theatricality to the performances, a sense of pageantry that feels closer to stagecraft than blockbuster bombast.

What makes Clash of the Titans important is not simply its place in Harryhausen’s career, but its position in film history. It marks the end of an era when fantasy was built by hand, when imagination was translated into miniature sets, armatures, and incremental gestures. Its imperfections are part of its power: evidence of human labour, ingenuity, and the belief that myth deserved to be made tangible.

Seen today, the film feels like a hinge — the last breath of one tradition and the quiet prelude to another. It endures not as nostalgia, but as testament: a reminder that cinema’s magic has many forms, and that some of the most enduring wonders were crafted one frame at a time.

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (1/3)

There’s a particular tension in watching a travelogue about a country that is both ancient and accelerating, both deeply rooted and relentlessly surveilled. China with Ben Fogle opens with that tension fully visible, and to its credit, the programme doesn’t try to smooth it away. Fogle steps into a nation where tradition, ambition, and state oversight sit side by side — sometimes harmoniously, sometimes uneasily, always revealing something about the forces shaping modern China.

What gives the episode its quiet power is Fogle’s instinct to observe rather than impose. He moves through landscapes where centuries‑old customs coexist with the architecture of a rising superpower, and the contrast is never treated as spectacle. Instead, it becomes a study in how people adapt: how communities negotiate the demands of progress, how individuals carve out pockets of autonomy within systems designed to watch, measure, and optimise their lives.

The programme doesn’t pretend to offer a definitive portrait — China is too vast, too contradictory for that — but it does capture the texture of a society in motion. Fogle’s encounters feel grounded, shaped by curiosity rather than judgement. The result is a portrait of a country where the past is never fully past, and where the future arrives with both promise and pressure.

By the end of the first episode, what lingers is not a single image but a mood: a sense of a nation balancing on the fault line between heritage and hyper‑modernity. Fogle’s journey becomes a way of tracing that line — and of asking, gently but insistently, what is gained and what is lost when a society moves at such velocity.

10.00pm — BBC2 Gosford Park (2001)

There are films that observe a society, and there are films that quietly prise it open. Gosford Park belongs to the latter category. Altman approaches the English country‑house murder mystery not as a puzzle to be solved but as a social autopsy, peeling back the layers of a world that survives on ritual, silence, and the unspoken understanding that some lives matter more than others. The camera glides like a rumour, catching the small betrayals that keep the machinery of class running.

What makes the film so quietly devastating is its refusal to grant the audience the comfort of a single villain. The cruelty here is structural, ambient — a kind of atmospheric pressure that shapes everyone inside the house, from the brittle aristocrats clinging to relevance to the servants who know the household’s secrets because they have no choice but to witness them. Altman shows how power is maintained not through grand gestures but through the daily choreography of deference and dismissal.

The murder, when it arrives, feels less like a rupture than an inevitability. It’s as though the house itself has exhaled after decades of holding its breath. Altman treats the crime not as a narrative climax but as a moral footnote — a reminder that violence is often the final expression of a system that has been quietly violent all along. The detectives, with their procedural fussiness, seem almost comic in their inability to grasp the deeper truth: the real crime is the hierarchy itself.

What lingers is the film’s compassion for the people trapped within these structures. The servants, especially, are drawn with a tenderness that never slips into sentimentality. Their solidarity is subtle, improvised, and often wordless — a shared understanding forged in the corridors and sculleries where the powerful rarely look. Altman gives them the dignity of interiority, of private griefs and small defiances.

By the time the credits roll, Gosford Park has done something rare: it has taken a familiar genre and used it as a Trojan horse to smuggle in a critique of class, complicity, and the stories a nation tells itself to avoid looking in the mirror. It’s a film that watches us watching it, quietly asking whether we’re any less entangled in these old hierarchies than the characters onscreen. The answer, of course, is the one we’d rather not give.

1.00am — Sky Arts Catching Fire: The Story of Anita Pallenberg

Some figures slip through the cracks of official history, not because they were insignificant, but because they were too disruptive, too magnetic, too unwilling to play the role assigned to them. Catching Fire: The Story of Anita Pallenberg understands this instinctively. It treats Pallenberg not as an accessory to the Rolling Stones’ mythology but as one of its architects — a woman whose presence shaped the band’s golden era as surely as any riff or lyric.

The documentary moves with a kind of smoky elegance, tracing Pallenberg’s life through the contradictions that made her so compelling: muse and maker, icon and outsider, adored and punished in equal measure. What emerges is a portrait of a woman who refused to shrink herself to fit the expectations of the men orbiting her. She wasn’t a footnote in rock history; she was one of its gravitational forces.

What the film captures beautifully is the cost of that defiance. Pallenberg lived in a world that celebrated rebellion while quietly enforcing its own hierarchies — a world where men could burn bright and be forgiven, while women were expected to glow decoratively and then disappear. The documentary doesn’t sanitise the chaos, but it refuses to let the chaos define her. Instead, it shows a life lived at full voltage, with all the danger and brilliance that entails.

There’s a tenderness to the storytelling, too. Interviews, archival footage, and Pallenberg’s own words create a sense of intimacy — as though the film is trying, at last, to give her the space she was so often denied. It’s a reclamation, not a eulogy. A reminder that behind the myth was a woman of sharp intelligence, creative instinct, and a refusal to be anyone’s ornament.

By the end, Catching Fire becomes more than a rock‑and‑roll documentary. It’s a study in agency, survival, and the price of living unapologetically in a world that prefers its women compliant. Pallenberg emerges not as a cautionary tale but as a necessary one — a figure who shaped a cultural moment and paid dearly for the privilege of being unforgettable.

📅 TUESDAY 7 APRIL

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (2/3)

If the first episode traced the tension between heritage and modernity, the second plunges straight into the circuitry of China’s technological future — a landscape where innovation and state power are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing ones. China with Ben Fogle steps into this world with a mixture of curiosity and caution, aware that the gleaming surfaces of progress often conceal deeper questions about autonomy, identity, and the cost of efficiency.

Fogle’s journey through China’s technological heartlands is framed not as a parade of gadgets but as a study in how a society imagines its future. He encounters cities built at astonishing speed, infrastructures that seem to rewrite the rules of scale, and communities whose daily lives are shaped by systems designed to monitor, optimise, and predict. The programme doesn’t sensationalise this; instead, it lets the viewer sit with the unease — the sense that convenience and control have become indistinguishable.

What the episode captures particularly well is the human dimension of this transformation. Fogle meets people who see technology as liberation, others who see it as inevitability, and some who navigate it with a quiet pragmatism born of living inside a system too vast to resist. Their stories reveal a country where ambition is both a national project and a personal burden, where the future arrives not as a choice but as an instruction.

By the end, the episode leaves you with a sense of a nation accelerating so quickly that even its own citizens struggle to keep pace. Fogle doesn’t pretend to resolve the contradictions — he simply illuminates them. The result is a portrait of a society where innovation is inseparable from oversight, and where the promise of progress is always shadowed by the question of who gets to define it.

10.00pm — BBC4 Storyville: André Is an Idiot

Some documentaries announce themselves with a thesis; this one begins with a provocation. André Is an Idiot uses its deliberately abrasive title as a kind of misdirection — a dare, almost — before unfolding into something far more humane, layered, and quietly disarming. What looks at first like a character study of a difficult man becomes, instead, a meditation on misunderstanding, vulnerability, and the stories we tell about people when we don’t yet know how to see them.

The film’s strength lies in its refusal to flatten André into a type. Instead, it traces the contours of a life shaped by frustration, miscommunication, and the small daily collisions that accumulate into reputation. The camera lingers not on spectacle but on the moments where dignity and exasperation meet — the pauses, the hesitations, the flashes of humour that reveal a person far more complex than the label pinned to him.

What emerges is a portrait of a man navigating a world that often feels ill‑fitted to his temperament. The documentary treats him neither as a saint nor a cautionary tale, but as someone trying — sometimes clumsily, sometimes defiantly — to assert his place in a society that prefers its people easily categorised. The tenderness comes from the film’s willingness to sit with contradiction, to let André be difficult without making him disposable.

By the end, the title feels less like an insult and more like a commentary on the way we rush to judgement. The film invites the viewer to reconsider the casual cruelty of labels, the speed with which we reduce people to their roughest edges, and the possibility that empathy begins where certainty ends. It’s a Storyville entry that starts with a jolt and ends with a quiet ache — a reminder that the most interesting stories are often the ones that refuse to behave.

10.10pm — BBC3 Misbehaviour (2020)

There’s a particular electricity to stories about disruption — not the grand, cinematic kind, but the small, strategic acts that tilt the world a few degrees off its axis. Misbehaviour captures that spirit with a lightness that never dilutes its politics. It retells the 1970 Miss World protest with wit, warmth, and a clear understanding that history often turns on the moments when ordinary people decide they’ve had enough of being politely ignored.

The film’s great strength is its refusal to flatten the event into a single narrative. Instead, it shows the protest as a collision of perspectives: second‑wave feminists challenging the commodification of women; contestants navigating the pageant as a rare route to opportunity; organisers clinging to a tradition they believe harmless. The result is a story where everyone is both right and wrong in ways that feel recognisably human. The politics are sharp, but the film never forgets the people inside them.

Keira Knightley and Jessie Buckley anchor the film with performances that capture two very different forms of rebellion — one methodical, one chaotic — while Gugu Mbatha‑Raw brings a quiet, devastating dignity to the role of Jennifer Hosten, the first Black Miss World. Her storyline becomes the film’s moral hinge, revealing how liberation movements can collide even when they share the same enemy.

What lingers is the sense of a world on the cusp of change. The protest doesn’t topple the patriarchy, but it cracks the veneer of inevitability that sustained it. The film understands that progress often begins with disruption that looks, at first, like mischief — a handful of women storming a stage, refusing to let the spectacle proceed as planned.

By the end, Misbehaviour becomes a celebration of the unruly, the inconvenient, and the politically impolite. It reminds us that history is rarely made by those who wait their turn. Sometimes it’s made by those who stand up in the middle of a live broadcast and decide the script needs rewriting.

10.40pm — BBC1 Brooklyn (2015)

Brooklyn is one of those rare films that understands the emotional architecture of leaving home — the way departure is never a single act but a series of small, accumulating ruptures. Saoirse Ronan’s Eilis moves through the story with a kind of luminous uncertainty, caught between the gravitational pull of Ireland and the intoxicating possibility of America. Crowley directs with a gentleness that never tips into sentimentality; he lets the silences do the heavy lifting, the pauses between words revealing more than any speech could manage.

What gives the film its quiet power is its attention to the textures of ordinary life. The boarding‑house dinners, the shop counter rituals, the tentative courtship with Tony — each scene is rendered with a tenderness that feels almost archival, as though the film is preserving a way of being that modern life has eroded. Yet beneath the softness lies something sharper: the guilt of leaving, the ache of belonging to two places at once, the knowledge that every choice closes a door behind you. Ronan captures this beautifully, her performance a study in the slow, painful process of becoming someone new.

The film’s emotional pivot arrives not with a dramatic revelation but with a return — a homecoming that feels both comforting and suffocating. Ireland welcomes Eilis back with open arms, but the embrace is too tight, too expectant, too eager to fold her into the life she might have lived. The tension becomes almost unbearable: the pull of familiarity versus the pull of self‑invention. Crowley refuses to villainise either side; instead, he shows how both can be true, how love can be both anchor and obstacle.

In the end, Brooklyn is a film about choosing the life you want rather than the life others imagine for you. It understands that identity is not a fixed point but a negotiation — between past and future, between duty and desire, between the person you were and the person you’re trying to become. It’s a film that lingers not because of its drama but because of its honesty. It knows that the hardest journeys are not across oceans but within ourselves.

📅 WEDNESDAY 8 APRIL

9.00pm — BBC2 Michael Jackson: An American Tragedy (1/3)

The first part of Michael Jackson: An American Tragedy approaches its subject with a forensic calm that feels almost clinical at first — but that restraint is precisely what gives the episode its power. Rather than indulging in the familiar spectacle of scandal, the documentary steps back and examines the machinery that built Jackson, shaped him, and ultimately consumed him. It treats his life not as a sequence of headlines but as a case study in what happens when extraordinary talent collides with extraordinary pressure.

What emerges is a portrait of a child who never had the luxury of being one. The film traces the early years with a kind of quiet dread, showing how discipline, ambition, and emotional deprivation fused into something both miraculous and damaging. Jackson’s genius is never in question, but the documentary is more interested in the cost of that genius — the way fame became both armour and prison, a place where he could hide and a place he could never escape. The contradictions pile up: adored yet isolated, powerful yet vulnerable, mythic yet painfully human.

As the episode moves into Jackson’s adulthood, the tone shifts from biography to pathology. The documentary doesn’t sensationalise; instead, it maps the pressures that accumulated around him like geological layers — the expectations of a global audience, the distortions of celebrity, the unresolved wounds of childhood. It becomes clear that Jackson’s life was shaped as much by the people who needed something from him as by his own choices. The tragedy is not a single event but a long, slow erosion.

By the end of the episode, what lingers is not judgement but sorrow. The documentary invites the viewer to consider Jackson not as an icon or a cautionary tale, but as a man caught in a system that rewarded his brilliance while exploiting his fragility. It’s a story of talent weaponised, innocence commodified, and a life lived under a microscope so bright it burned. The tragedy, the film suggests, is not simply what happened to Michael Jackson — it’s that no one ever allowed him to be anything other than Michael Jackson.

9.00pm — Channel 5 China with Ben Fogle (3/3)

The final episode of China with Ben Fogle takes us into the country’s so‑called “Silicon Valley,” a place where the future doesn’t feel like a distant horizon but something humming directly beneath your feet. Fogle moves through this landscape with a mixture of curiosity and caution, aware that the gleaming surfaces — the labs, the campuses, the frictionless digital systems — are only half the story. The other half is harder to see: the invisible circuitry of data, monitoring, and state‑sanctioned efficiency that underpins the entire ecosystem.

What the episode captures so well is the tension between aspiration and oversight. The young entrepreneurs Fogle meets speak the language of innovation — disruption, scale, global ambition — yet their world is bounded by a political architecture that watches as much as it enables. The documentary doesn’t sensationalise this; instead, it lets the contradictions sit quietly in the frame. A drone demonstration becomes a metaphor for the country itself: elegant, impressive, and always under control.

Fogle’s strength as a presenter is his ability to remain open without being naïve. He asks the right questions, not to provoke but to understand, and the answers he receives often reveal more in what is unsaid. The episode becomes a study in modern power: how it presents itself, how it justifies itself, and how it embeds itself in the everyday. The technology is dazzling, but the implications are unsettling — a reminder that progress and surveillance can grow from the same root system.

By the time the credits roll, the series has shifted from travelogue to something more reflective. Fogle leaves China with admiration for its ingenuity and unease about its methods — a duality the documentary refuses to resolve. The final impression is of a nation racing toward the future at extraordinary speed, but with a watchful eye on everyone running alongside it. It’s a conclusion that lingers, not because it offers answers, but because it understands the complexity of the questions.

9.00pm — BBC4 Building Britain’s Biggest Nuclear Power Station (1/2)

The first episode of Building Britain’s Biggest Nuclear Power Station opens with the kind of calm, methodical confidence that major infrastructure projects like to project — but beneath the polished diagrams and sweeping drone shots, there’s a hum of unease. Hinkley Point C is presented as both marvel and gamble: a cathedral of concrete rising out of the Somerset coast, built on the promise of energy security in a world that feels increasingly unstable. The documentary understands that this is not just engineering; it’s politics, economics, and national identity poured into a single, colossal structure.

What the episode captures so effectively is the sheer scale of the undertaking. Workers move like ants across a landscape reshaped by ambition, each task a tiny part of a machine so vast it’s almost abstract. The film lingers on the details — the rebar forests, the precision pours, the logistical choreography — but it also acknowledges the human cost. Deadlines slip, budgets swell, and the pressure on the workforce becomes its own kind of invisible infrastructure. The project is both triumph and burden, a symbol of what Britain wants to be and a reminder of what it struggles to deliver.

There’s a quiet tension running through the narrative: the sense that the future being built here is both necessary and precarious. Nuclear power is framed as a solution to the climate crisis, yet the documentary never lets the viewer forget the contradictions — the environmental trade‑offs, the geopolitical entanglements, the decades‑long commitments that outlast governments and public sentiment. The camera often pulls back to show the plant against the coastline, a visual reminder that this monument to progress sits on shifting ground.

By the end of the episode, the project feels less like a construction site and more like a national Rorschach test. Supporters see resilience, innovation, and long‑term thinking; critics see risk, overreach, and a future mortgaged to an uncertain technology. The documentary doesn’t take sides — it simply lays out the enormity of what’s being attempted and invites the viewer to sit with the complexity. It’s a portrait of a country trying to build its way out of vulnerability, one concrete pour at a time.

📅 THURSDAY 9 APRIL

10.30pm — BBC4 Helen Mirren Remembers Gosford Park

Mirren revisits Altman’s ensemble masterpiece with warmth and precision, reflecting on the film’s intricate upstairs–downstairs choreography and the quiet emotional intelligence that shaped her performance. Her recollections sharpen the film’s sense of lived‑in detail: the unspoken hierarchies, the subtle glances that carry whole histories, the way Altman’s roaming camera trusted actors to build worlds in the margins. It’s a gentle, generous remembrance that reaffirms Gosford Park as a rare feat of collective storytelling.

10.50pm — BBC4 Gosford Park (2001)

See Monday above for reviews.

📅 FRIDAY 10 APRIL

8.00pm — Sky Documentaries Kurt Cobain: Montage of Heck

Montage of Heck is less a documentary than a psychological excavation — a collage of home videos, journals, drawings, and audio fragments that mirrors the chaos and tenderness of Cobain’s inner world. Brett Morgen avoids the tidy arc of the traditional biopic, opting instead for emotional truth. The result is a film that feels intimate, unsettling, and deeply humane.

What stands out is the vulnerability. We see Cobain not as the reluctant spokesman of a generation but as a child trying to navigate a fractured family, a teenager searching for belonging, and an adult overwhelmed by the weight of expectation. The animation sequences, drawn from Cobain’s own artwork, feel like windows into a mind that never stopped buzzing — a place where beauty and pain coexisted uneasily.

The film doesn’t sensationalise Cobain’s struggles, nor does it romanticise them. Instead, it contextualises them — showing the pressures, internal and external, that shaped his life. Morgen allows the contradictions to stand: the humour alongside the despair, the creativity alongside the self‑destruction. It’s a portrait of a man who was both extraordinarily gifted and profoundly vulnerable.

9.00pm — Sky Arts Band of Gypsys

Band of Gypsys captures Hendrix at a moment of profound artistic transition — shedding the psychedelic iconography that made him famous and stepping into a rawer, more politically charged sound. There’s a sense of risk in every note, as though he’s testing the tensile strength of his own creativity. The film doesn’t try to mythologise him; instead, it shows the work, the sweat, the searching.

The interplay between Hendrix, Buddy Miles, and Billy Cox is electric. Miles’ drumming has a muscular, almost militant quality, grounding Hendrix’s improvisations in something earthy and insistent. Cox provides the stabilising centre, the gravitational pull that keeps the music from flying apart. Together, they create a sound that feels like a bridge between eras — the blues reimagined through the lens of civil rights, funk, and the gathering storm of the 1970s.

What’s striking is how loose the performances are, yet how intentional they feel. Hendrix bends the guitar to his will, coaxing out sounds that seem to come from some future he alone could hear. There’s a sense of possibility in the air, as though he’s on the cusp of reinventing himself yet again. The tragedy, of course, is that this reinvention was cut short. But the film stands as a document of what might have been — a glimpse into a new Hendrix, one we only met briefly

10.15pm — Sky Arts Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock

A performance that still feels like a cultural rupture: Hendrix bending the national anthem into a howl of protest, possibility, and psychic overload. The set remains astonishing not just for its virtuosity but for the way it captures a country tearing itself open—feedback as prophecy, improvisation as dissent. More than a historical artefact, it still vibrates with the shock of a new world being forced into existence.

11.30pm — Sky Arts Phil Lynott: Songs for While I’m Away

Emer Reynolds’ documentary approaches Phil Lynott with a tenderness that feels almost like a corrective. Too often, Lynott is remembered as a rock‑and‑roll archetype — the swaggering frontman, the leather‑clad poet. But Reynolds digs deeper, revealing a man shaped by contradictions: Irish and Black in a country that struggled to understand either identity; working‑class yet steeped in literature; charismatic yet profoundly private.

Through interviews, archival footage, and Lynott’s own words, the documentary paints a portrait of an artist who understood the power of myth but never fully believed in his own. His songwriting emerges as a form of self‑invention — a way of carving out space in a world that didn’t quite know what to make of him. The music becomes both shield and confession, a place where he could be larger than life and painfully human at the same time.

Reynolds avoids the easy tragedy narrative. Instead, she shows a man who lived intensely, loved fiercely, and left behind songs that still feel like letters addressed to the listener. The film acknowledges the darkness — the addiction, the pressures, the loneliness — but it never lets those elements define him. It treats Lynott not as a cautionary tale but as a complex, creative force.

STREAMING CHOICES

Netflix — Trust Me: The False Prophet (All four episodes, available Wed 8 April)

A chilling documentary series about a charismatic manipulator who builds a following through charm, coercion, and carefully crafted lies. Each episode peels back another layer of the persona he constructs to keep people close and compliant. A study in power, persuasion, and the human hunger for certainty.

Walter Presents — French Roulette (All four episodes, available Fri 10 April)

A sleek French thriller where chance, crime, and desire collide in unexpected ways. The series moves with the precision of a well‑loaded revolver — every click matters. Stylish, tense, and quietly seductive.

Disney+ — The Testaments (First three episodes, available Wed 8 April)

A return to Gilead that expands the world of The Handmaid’s Tale with new perspectives and deeper political intrigue. The series explores resistance, complicity, and the cost of survival under authoritarian rule. Visually stark, emotionally charged, and morally unflinching.

Marquee TV — Caravaggio: Exhibition on Screen (Available Mon 6 April)

A richly filmed exploration of Caravaggio’s turbulent life and revolutionary art. The documentary blends expert commentary with close‑up examinations of his canvases, revealing the violence and vulnerability beneath the chiaroscuro. A feast for anyone who loves art that stares back.

Disney+ — Star Wars: Maul — Shadow Lord (First two episodes, available Mon 6 April)

A dark, kinetic expansion of the Star Wars universe centred on one of its most enigmatic figures. The series traces Maul’s rise through betrayal, rage, and the seductive pull of power. Atmospheric, operatic, and steeped in the mythology of the Sith.