Archive for Film & DVD Reviews

Counter Culture: 14th – 20th February 2026

Welcome to this week’s Culture Vulture. Love and power. Empire and collapse. Romance, revenge, political reckoning. This week’s television and film schedule doesn’t just entertain — it excavates. It moves from the ashes of Vesuvius to the fallout of Iraq, from Valentine’s ballads to the moral ambiguity of espionage and ambition. Rome looms large, both as ancient superstructure and modern metaphor, while Britain turns again to one of its most divisive prime ministers, testing the stories it tells about itself.

A vulture in flight with mountains in the background, overlayed with the text 'CULTURE VULTURE' and details about an event titled 'Counter Culture' scheduled for February 14th to 20th, 2026.

Across the week, desire is set against duty, myth against memory, and private longing against public consequence. The programmes form a kind of emotional and political atlas: lovers separated by fate, leaders undone by their own certainty, rebels crushed or sanctified by history, and artists trying to make sense of the ruins left behind. Even the lighter offerings carry shadows — nostalgia threaded with unease, comedy edged with mortality, romance haunted by what it chooses not to say.

This is a schedule about reckoning: with power, with legacy, with the stories that survive us.

Selections and reviews are by Pat Harrington.

🌟 Highlights this week:

The Tony Blair Story (BBC Two / Channel 4) — political biography as national self-examination.

The Taste of Things (BBC Four) — sensual, slow cinema about love expressed through craft.

Bonnie and Clyde (BBC Two) — still electric, still destabilising American myth.

Saturday 14th February

Zulu Legend, 2:00pm

A siege film that helped crystallise Britain’s imperial self‑image, Zulu stages its drama with almost ritual clarity: red coats set against an immense, indifferent landscape; a tiny outpost bracing itself against a tide it cannot comprehend. The film’s power lies not only in its spectacle but in the way it frames discipline as both virtue and burden — a brittle shield held up against fear, doubt, and the sheer scale of the world beyond the mission walls.

Its visual command remains undeniable: the geometry of the defensive lines, the choreography of movement across open ground, the contrast between rigid military order and the fluidity of the Zulu forces. Yet the politics of its era sit heavily on the frame. You can feel the film straining to honour courage while avoiding the deeper truths of empire, creating a kind of mythic standoff where psychology matters more than context.

What lingers is the study of hierarchy under pressure. Officers and enlisted men negotiate authority in real time, their clipped exchanges revealing cracks in the Victorian ideal of composure. Watch how fear travels — not in grand gestures, but in glances, hesitations, and the way men cling to routine as if it were armour. The film becomes, almost inadvertently, a portrait of a system trying to hold itself together as the world presses in from all sides.

Wuthering Heights Sky Arts, 7:00pm

Emily Brontë without the drawing‑room varnish. This Bristol Old Vic staging tears away the polite Victorian framing and lets the novel’s raw weather in — the moorland wind, the ferocity, the ungovernable longing. What emerges is a story driven not by manners but by appetite, where Heathcliff and Cathy feel less like characters and more like forces of nature grinding against the limits of their world.

The production leans into obsession as a kind of inheritance: love as curse, memory as trap. There’s a physicality to it — bodies flung across space, emotions that refuse to be domesticated — that restores the novel’s original strangeness. These aren’t literary ornaments but volatile presences, shaped by cruelty, class, and the bleak grandeur of the landscape.

Watch how the staging treats the moors not as backdrop but as a psychological terrain. The wildness outside becomes the wildness within, and the result is a Wuthering Heights that feels closer to myth than melodrama: a storm given human form.

The Roman Empire by Train with Alice Roberts Channel 4, 9:00pm

Episode two takes Roberts south into the shadow of Vesuvius — Herculaneum’s petrified streets, Capua’s amphitheatre, and the lingering imprint of Spartacus. It’s a journey through the architecture of revolt, where stone and ash become a kind of forensic record. Roberts has a gift for making empire tactile: the weight of masonry, the scorch of history, the way rebellion leaves marks long after the bodies are gone. What emerges is a portrait of Rome not as abstraction but as lived environment — built, broken, and contested.

Sleepless in Seattle Film4, 9:00pm

Romance in its gentlest, most disarming form. Nora Ephron builds a world where connection travels by radio waves and longing feels both old‑fashioned and strangely modern. What stands out now is the film’s faith — almost radical in our era — that two people can find each other through sincerity rather than spectacle. Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan orbit one another with a kind of soft gravitational pull, their stories unfolding in parallel until destiny, or something like it, nudges them into alignment. It’s a film that believes in hope without embarrassment, and that’s its quiet power.

The Taste of Things 🌟BBC Four, 9:35pm

Cooking as devotion; intimacy shaped through ritual. Trần Anh Hùng’s film moves with a slow, confident breath, savouring texture, silence, and the unspoken language of people who understand each other through craft. Every dish becomes an act of care, every gesture a negotiation of love and longing. It’s a romance built not on declarations but on the choreography of a shared kitchen — a world where flavour becomes feeling and the work of creation is its own form of tenderness.

Bullet Train Channel 4, 10:00pm

Assassins, coincidence, and a streak of neon‑lit nihilism. David Leitch’s film is stylish, self‑aware, and relentlessly kinetic — a pop‑violence carousel where fate, bad luck, and competing agendas collide at 200mph. It’s less about plot than momentum, a candy‑coloured brawl stitched together with deadpan humour and an almost comic‑book sense of inevitability. The pleasure is in the choreography: blades, banter, and bodies ricocheting through a sealed metal world that refuses to slow down.

Love Songs at the BBC BBC Two, 10:00pm–12:00am

Three volumes of archival romance, stitched together from decades of studio sessions and televised longing. The BBC vaults open onto a parade of voices: Dusty Springfield giving heartbreak its velvet edge; Elton John turning confession into spectacle; Sade smoothing desire into something effortless; Annie Lennox making melancholy feel operatic. You get Motown polish, 70s soul, 80s synth‑soft yearning, and the kind of live‑room intimacy that modern pop rarely allows.

It’s love as broadcast history — a chronicle of how Britain has sung about devotion, disappointment, and the hope that someone, somewhere, is listening. The pleasure is in the shifts of tone: torch songs, power ballads, whispered promises, all preserved in the glow of studio lights. A reminder that romance, in all its forms, has always found its way onto the airwaves.

Fresh Film4, 11:10pm

Modern dating horror with a serrated satirical bite. Mimi Cave’s debut takes the rituals of courtship — apps, charm, curated vulnerability — and pushes them to grotesque extremes, turning intimacy into a literal transaction. What begins as a meet‑cute curdles into a study of power, appetite, and the commodification of bodies, all wrapped in a cool, stylish aesthetic that makes the brutality feel even more pointed. It’s a film that understands the anxieties of contemporary romance and exaggerates them just enough to feel uncomfortably plausible.

Mary Beard’s Ultimate Rome PBS America, from 1:00pm (back-to-back)

Empire examined through infrastructure, citizenship, and the long arc of decline. Beard moves through aqueducts, roads, forums, and frontiers with her usual forensic clarity, showing how Rome’s power was engineered as much as imagined. She strips away the marble‑and‑myth version of antiquity to reveal a society held together by bureaucracy, mobility, and the constant negotiation of who counted as Roman. Across these back‑to‑back episodes, grandeur becomes something lived rather than legendary — a system built by people, strained by ambition, and ultimately undone by its own scale.

Sunday 15th February

Lord of the Flies BBC One, 9:00pm

Episode two deepens the fracture: Jack hunts, order frays, and the island’s thin social contract buckles. Golding’s thesis — that civilisation is a fragile performance — remains unsettlingly durable. This version captures the escalation, though its polish sometimes blunts the book’s feral edge; the chaos feels curated when it should feel contagious. Still, the moral slide is unmistakable, and the boys’ drift toward violence lands with a familiar, queasy inevitability.

Cape Fear Legend, 9:00pm

Scorsese’s operatic revenge thriller, all sweat, dread, and moral corrosion. De Niro coils himself into a kind of biblical fury — a serpent‑like Max Cady whose righteousness curdles into something apocalyptic. The film plays like a nightmare in primary colours: thunder, neon, and the relentless pressure of a man convinced he’s an instrument of justice. It’s melodrama sharpened to a blade, a study in fear as performance and punishment.

Midnight Run Great TV, 9:00pm

A buddy movie with bruises and heart. De Niro and Grodin spar, bicker, and negotiate their way toward a reluctant respect that feels earned rather than engineered. Martin Brest keeps the pace loose but purposeful, letting the chemistry do the heavy lifting: one man running from his past, the other running out of patience. What emerges is a road‑movie fugue of bad luck, sharp dialogue, and the slow realisation that unlikely alliances can be the most enduring.

Newsnight – Interview with Gisèle Pelicot BBC Two, 10:00pm

A grave, necessary broadcast. Pelicot speaks in the long shadow of a case that shocked France, and the world — a story of manipulation, coercion, and institutional failure that forced a reckoning far beyond the courtroom. Her testimony has already reshaped public debate around power, consent, and the blind spots that allow abuse to flourish. What stands out is her bravery: the steadiness with which she recounts what happened, and the refusal to let silence protect those who harmed her.

Newsnight gives the space and seriousness the moment demands. Testimony as defiance; television as witness.

Crimes of the Future BBC Two, 11:55pm

Cronenberg’s surgical futurism at its most deliberate: a world where pain has vanished, bodies mutate as casually as ideas, and art becomes an incision. Crimes of the Future treats flesh as philosophy — organs as manifestos, performance as provocation — pushing its characters into a future where evolution and exploitation blur. It’s cool, clinical, and strangely mournful, a meditation on what humanity becomes when the body stops obeying the old rules.

A film that asks you not just to watch, but to contemplate what’s growing beneath the surface.

Queer BBC Three, 11:55pm

Burroughs’ longing rendered febrile, intimate, and slightly unmoored. This adaptation leans into the novel’s jittery interiority — desire without resolution, affection warped by self‑loathing, and the ache of wanting someone who can’t quite be reached. It’s a story built from glances, hesitations, and the restless drift of a man chasing connection across a landscape that keeps slipping from his grasp.

A fragile, hallucinatory portrait of yearning that refuses tidy catharsis.

Monday 16th February

Carry On Screaming Talking Pictures, 2:15pm

A slice of British comic history, delivered with the series’ trademark mix of innuendo, slapstick, and cheerful irreverence. The Carry On films occupy a peculiar but enduring place in the national imagination — low‑budget farces that began in the late 1950s as service comedies before mutating into a long‑running satire of British institutions, from hospitals to holidays to the police. What they lacked in polish they made up for in timing, ensemble chemistry, and a kind of bawdy resilience that carried them through two decades of cultural change.

Carry On Screaming is one of the more distinctive entries: a Hammer‑horror pastiche with fog, capes, and Kenneth Williams at his most gloriously mannered. It shows the series at a moment when it was experimenting with genre while still clinging to its familiar rhythms — double‑takes, misunderstandings, and jokes that land through sheer commitment. A reminder of how these films, for all their datedness, became part of Britain’s comic DNA.

Late Night with the Devil Film4, 11:05pm

A 1970s chat show becomes a séance, and the era’s hunger for spectacle curdles into something genuinely uncanny. The film plays with the grammar of live television — studio lights, audience patter, the illusion of control — and then lets the supernatural seep through the cracks. What begins as ratings desperation turns into a study of how far broadcasters will push the boundary between entertainment and exploitation.

Media spectacle meets the occult, and the result is a clever, creeping horror about the dangers of inviting darkness on air.

Tuesday 17th February

The Sting Legend, 2:30pm

A pair of small‑time grifters — a smooth hustler and a washed‑up old pro — team up to take down a Chicago crime boss after one of their own is killed. What follows is a long con built from false fronts, rigged bets, and a web of deceptions so intricate it feels like a stage play unfolding in real time.

Con artistry becomes choreography. Newman and Redford glide through the deception with an ease that borders on musical, every gesture part of a larger design. The film’s charm lies in its precision: the period detail, the ragtime swagger, the pleasure of watching two performers at the height of their powers outwit everyone in the room — including, occasionally, the audience.

Notorious Talking Pictures, 4:30pm

Hitchcock’s romantic espionage classic, where love and sacrifice knot themselves into something quietly devastating. Ingrid Bergman’s Alicia is recruited to infiltrate a Nazi circle in post‑war Rio, and Cary Grant’s Devlin becomes both handler and hesitant lover — a dynamic built on mistrust, longing, and the cost of duty.

The film sits at a pivotal moment in Hitchcock’s development: the shift from his British thrillers to the sleek, psychologically charged Hollywood style that would define him. Notorious blends suspense with emotional precision, showing how espionage corrodes intimacy and how devotion can become its own form of peril.

Love and sacrifice entwined, with the tension tightening frame by frame.

Renfield Film4, 9:00pm

Dracula reframed through dependency and dark comedy. Nicholas Hoult plays Renfield, the long‑suffering familiar who has spent a century fetching victims, cleaning up carnage, and absorbing the emotional shrapnel of serving the world’s most toxic boss. When he stumbles into a self‑help group for people trapped in abusive relationships, he begins to realise that his devotion to Dracula isn’t loyalty — it’s codependence weaponised.

The plot follows Renfield’s attempt to break free: moving into his own apartment, trying to form normal connections, and tentatively imagining a life not dictated by fear or obligation. But Dracula, played by Nicolas Cage in full theatrical relish, refuses to be abandoned. Cage leans into operatic menace — velvet‑lined ego, wounded pride, and a level of camp grandeur that makes every entrance feel like a gothic punchline.

As Renfield allies with a determined New Orleans cop, the film becomes a collision of genres: supernatural slapstick, action mayhem, and a surprisingly sincere story about reclaiming autonomy from someone who feeds on your weakness. Beneath the gore and gags sits a pointed metaphor about leaving controlling relationships — and the messy, exhilarating work of choosing yourself.

A horror‑comedy with bite, charm, and just enough sincerity to make the absurdity land.

The Tony Blair Story 🌟 BBC Two, 9:00pm – Episode 1 of 3, “Who Are You?”

The opening chapter revisits a leader who promised transformation and left behind a country still arguing over the bill. The programme charts Blair’s ascent through the language of modernisation — the smile, the spin, the centrist gloss — while quietly exposing how much of that project relied on presentation over substance. New Labour’s early triumphs are set against the machinery that enabled them: media choreography, ruthless message discipline, and a willingness to blur ideology in pursuit of power.

Reformer or war criminal? The question isn’t posed for shock value; it’s the unavoidable hinge of his legacy. This episode sharpens the contradictions rather than smoothing them: the peace‑broker who embraced interventionism, the communicator who mastered sincerity, the leader who rebranded Britain while deepening its fractures. A portrait of ambition that now reads as prelude to disillusionment — political biography as an autopsy of a project that remade the country and then lost its moral centre.

Bonnie and Clyde 🌟BBC Two, 11:00pm

A landmark of New Hollywood and the moment the old studio system finally cracked. Arthur Penn’s film detonated onto screens in 1967 with a mix of French New Wave cool, Depression‑era grit, and a level of violence that felt shocking not just for its bloodshed but for its beauty. Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway play the outlaw lovers as icons in the making — glamorous, reckless, and already half‑mythologised even as the bullets start flying.

The plot traces their rise from petty theft to folk‑hero celebrity, a crime spree reframed as a rebellion against a country failing its young. But the film’s real power lies in how it exposes the machinery of American mythmaking: the press that romanticises them, the public that cheers them on, and the violence that ultimately consumes them. Glamour fused with brutality; legend forged in real time.

A rupture moment — the point where American cinema stopped playing safe and started telling stories that bled.

Storyville – “The Darkest Web” BBC Four, 10:00pm

A documentary that begins with a simple premise — undercover officers entering encrypted criminal marketplaces — and quickly reveals the scale of what lies beneath the surface of the internet. The film traces how investigators embed themselves in darknet forums, posing as buyers, brokers, or facilitators, navigating spaces where anonymity is currency and every interaction could be a trap. What emerges is a portrait of a digital underworld built on encrypted messaging, cryptocurrency laundering, and the illusion of consequence‑free crime.

It also makes clear the human cost of this work. These officers are exposed to some of the most vile material circulating online, absorbing psychological damage so that ordinary people never have to see it. It’s a true sacrifice — a form of service that rarely receives public recognition, yet underpins every successful operation.

Surveillance in the fibre‑optic age means algorithms, metadata, and patient infiltration rather than stakeouts and wiretaps. The documentary captures both the ingenuity and the fragility of these operations — how a single slip can collapse months of undercover work, and how the border between observer and participant threatens to blur.

A sober, unsettling look at the hidden architectures of the internet, and the people trying to hold the line in a space designed to evade them.

Wednesday 18th February

Alice Roberts: Our Hospital Through Time Channel 5, 8:00pm

t Bartholomew’s Hospital as living institution — nine centuries of care layered into stone, wards, and ritual. Founded in 1123 by Rahere, a courtier‑turned‑cleric, Barts is the oldest surviving hospital in Britain, its history running from medieval charity through Reformation upheaval, Victorian expansion, and the birth of the NHS. The architecture reads like an archive: Wren’s eighteenth‑century buildings, the later surgical wings, the modern specialist units — each era leaving its own philosophy of medicine etched into the fabric.

Roberts traces how treatment, training, and public health evolved within these walls, showing how a hospital becomes a mirror of the society it serves. A story of continuity and reinvention, where the past is never quite past, and care is both a practice and a legacy.

The Tony Blair Story BBC Two, 9:00pm – Episode 2 of 3, “Iraq”

The episode tackles the decision that didn’t just define Blair’s premiership — it detonated it. The road to Iraq is laid out as a sequence of choices that look increasingly indefensible in hindsight: intelligence massaged into certainty, legal advice narrowed to a sliver, dissent sidelined, and a prime minister so convinced of his own moral clarity that he mistook conviction for evidence. The programme shows how the case for war was built on foundations that were, at best, wishful thinking and, at worst, wilfully misleading.

The critique lands hardest in the aftermath. The collapse of the WMD narrative, the civilian toll, the regional unravelling — all set against Blair’s insistence that history would vindicate him. Instead, the episode suggests a leader trapped by his own rhetoric, unable to acknowledge the scale of the catastrophe he helped unleash. Trust in government never recovered; neither did Britain’s foreign‑policy credibility. The political damage was immense, but the human cost — borne by Iraqis and by those sent to fight — is the indictment that lingers.

A scathing, unflinching account of a decision that turned a moderniser into a cautionary tale, and a premiership into a warning about the dangers of certainty unmoored from reality.

Breaking the Code BBC Four, 10:15pm (preceded by Derek Jacobi Remembers at 10:00pm)

Alan Turing’s brilliance and persecution — a story that only grows more resonant as Britain continues to reckon with how it treats those who serve it. The drama traces his codebreaking genius at Bletchley Park, the mathematical imagination that helped shorten the Second World War, and the private life the state chose to criminalise. It’s a portrait of a man who gave the country an incalculable gift and was repaid with cruelty.

The aftermath still stings: the investigation, the conviction, the forced hormonal “treatment”, and the quiet devastation that followed. I have a quaint belief that people who do good things for the country should be looked after — not hounded, humiliated, or destroyed. Turing’s fate remains a national shame, even if some steps have since been taken to acknowledge the wrong:

  • The 2001 statue in Manchester by Glyn Hughes, honouring Turing as a pioneer rather than a criminal.
  • The 2009 public apology from Prime Minister Gordon Brown, recognising the state’s “appalling” treatment of him.
  • The 2013 posthumous royal pardon, formally overturning his conviction.
  • The 2017 “Turing Law”, extending posthumous pardons to thousands of men convicted under the same discriminatory legislation.
  • His selection for the £50 note (issued 2021), placing his face — and his equations — at the centre of British currency.

These gestures don’t undo the harm, but they mark a slow, overdue shift in how the country remembers him.

A work of remembrance and indictment, carried by Jacobi’s precision and the moral clarity of a story Britain is still learning how to tell.

Sequin in a Blue Room Channel 4, 2:15am

A thriller‑tinged coming‑of‑age story set in the anonymous glow of hookup apps and private parties. Sequin, a sixteen‑year‑old drifting through desire and disconnection, slips into a world of coded invitations and shifting identities. After a chance encounter at the secretive “Blue Room” — a party where names are irrelevant and rules are few — he becomes fixated on finding a man he met only briefly. That search pulls him into a network of older men, blurred boundaries, and dangers he’s too young to fully read.

The film captures queer adolescence in transient digital spaces: the thrill of possibility, the ache of invisibility, and the way intimacy can feel both immediate and unreachable. Small scale, sharp emotion — a story about longing, risk, and the fragile hope of being truly seen.

Thursday 19th February

Ed Stafford: Right of Passage Discovery, 9:00pm

A series built around the rituals that mark the transition from youth to adulthood across different cultures, with Stafford stepping into ceremonies that are as much about identity and belonging as they are about endurance. Each episode follows him as he joins communities whose rites of passage still carry social, spiritual, or ancestral weight — from initiation rituals and tests of courage to symbolic acts that bind individuals to their people.

The programme treats these rites not as exotic trials but as living frameworks: ways of teaching responsibility, resilience, and communal duty. Stafford’s presence is less about proving toughness and more about understanding why these traditions endure, what they demand, and what they give back. The physical challenges — isolation, pain, fear, or ritualised hardship — are only part of the story. The deeper focus is on the values encoded within them: respect for elders, continuity of knowledge, and the moment a young person is recognised as someone who now carries part of the community’s future.

Rites of passage, seen up close, become a reminder that adulthood is not just something that happens to you — it’s something societies shape, test, and welcome.

The Tony Blair Story 🌟 Channel 4, 9:00pm – Episode 3 of 3, “The Loss of Power”

The final reckoning — not a gentle fade‑out but a slow, public unravelling. This episode charts the years when Blair’s authority drained away in full view: cabinet rebellions, backbench mutiny, a party that no longer believed its own leader, and a country that had stopped listening. The programme shows a premiership hollowed by Iraq, trapped in its own justifications, and increasingly defined by the gap between the rhetoric of moral purpose and the reality of political fallout.

The scathing edge comes from the portrait of a leader who mistook stubbornness for principle. Blair clung to the idea that history would vindicate him even as the evidence mounted that history was moving on without him. The episode lays bare the contradictions: a moderniser who became a liability to his own project, a communicator who lost the public, a strategist who could no longer read the room. By the end, the handover to Brown feels less like a transition than an evacuation.

Reputation calcifies; consequence settles in. Political biography becomes a meditation on what happens when power outlives trust — and when a leader cannot see that the story has already closed around him.

The Beguiled Legend, 9:00pm

A Civil War chamber piece where desire curdles into danger. Sofia Coppola pares the story down to its essentials: a wounded Union soldier taken in by a secluded girls’ school in Virginia, his presence unsettling the fragile equilibrium of women who have been living in enforced stillness. What begins as an act of mercy becomes a slow‑burn contest of attention, jealousy, and power, each character negotiating the boundaries between compassion and self‑preservation.

Coppola turns the house into a pressure cooker — lace curtains, whispered alliances, and the creeping sense that repression is its own kind of violence. The soldier’s charm becomes a catalyst, exposing rivalries and long‑suppressed desires, until the genteel façade gives way to something far more ruthless. Desire, repression, quiet poison. A story about what happens when the world outside collapses and the world inside turns feral.

Long Shot BBC Two, 11:00pm

A political rom‑com with media‑savvy charm, pairing Charlize Theron’s poised Secretary of State with Seth Rogen’s shambolic journalist in a story that plays sincerity against spin. The plot follows her presidential ambitions colliding with their unlikely reconnection, forcing both characters to navigate the gap between public image and private desire.

The film works because it understands the theatre of modern politics: the choreography of messaging, the compromises demanded by donors and optics, and the way authenticity becomes a performance in itself. Beneath the jokes sits a sharper question about what it costs to be principled in a system built to sand down edges.

A glossy, surprisingly warm satire about power, idealism, and the hazards of falling for someone who refuses to stay on script.

Friday 20th February

Lord Jim Talking Pictures, 1:55pm

Conrad’s great moral odyssey, rendered in widescreen. Peter O’Toole plays Jim, a young officer whose moment of cowardice during a crisis at sea becomes the wound he spends the rest of his life trying to cauterise. The plot follows him from port to port — a man in flight from his own shame — until he finds a remote community willing to see him as the hero he wishes he had been. That fragile redemption is tested by betrayal, violence, and the return of the past he thought he’d buried.

Honour, cowardice, redemption: the classic Conrad triad. The film leans into the novel’s central tension — whether a single failure defines a life, or whether a man can remake himself through courage, sacrifice, and the willingness to stand firm when it finally matters. A story about the weight of conscience and the cost of trying to live up to an ideal you once failed to meet.

A corrective to decades of rock history told through the wrong lens. Women Who Rock traces the lineage of artists who shaped the sound, style, and attitude of modern music, yet were too often sidelined in the official narratives. From blues matriarchs and punk pioneers to stadium‑filling icons and genre‑bending innovators, the series reframes women not as footnotes or muses but as architects — the people who built the foundations others stood on.

The programme digs into the erasures: the riffs borrowed without credit, the scenes built by women but branded by men, the industry gatekeeping that kept some of the most influential voices off the marquee. What emerges is a richer, truer history — one where creativity, defiance, and reinvention run through every era of rock, and where the artists who pushed the culture forward finally get the spotlight they always deserved.

Reclaiming rock history’s overlooked architects. A celebration, and a quiet rebuke.

The Myth of Marilyn Monroe Sky Arts, 3:00pm

A documentary that pulls apart the image to reveal the machinery behind it. Marilyn Monroe remains one of the most recognisable faces of the twentieth century, but the programme argues that the icon — the platinum hair, the breathy voice, the effortless allure — was both a shield and a cage. It traces how Norma Jeane was reshaped by studios, photographers, and public appetite into a symbol of desire, then held to the impossible standards of the fantasy she embodied.

The film moves through the key fractures: the early modelling years, the studio contracts that traded on her vulnerability, the battle for creative control, and the way fame magnified every insecurity. Interviews and archival material show how Monroe tried to reclaim her narrative — studying acting seriously, forming her own production company, pushing for roles with depth — even as the myth tightened around her.

Icon and vulnerability intertwined. Myth as prison and protection. A portrait of a woman who became larger than life and was diminished by it at the same time.

Lost Treasures of Rome National Geographic, 4:00pm

Pompeii’s villas and theatres reveal Rome’s wealth divide — a city frozen at the moment its social hierarchy was most exposed. This episode moves through the grand houses of the elite, where frescoes, gardens, and private bath suites advertised status as loudly as any modern luxury brand. These were spaces built for display: atriums designed to impress visitors, dining rooms arranged to showcase power, and art collections curated to signal education and taste.

Set against this are the more modest dwellings and public venues that tell a different story: cramped workshops, shared courtyards, graffiti‑lined walls, and the bustling theatres where ordinary citizens gathered for entertainment and escape. The contrast is stark. The same eruption that preserved marble colonnades also preserved the daily grind of those who served, laboured, and lived in the shadow of wealth.

The programme uses archaeology to map inequality with forensic clarity — who had space, who had privacy, who had beauty, and who had none of it. A reminder that Rome’s splendour was always built on a steep gradient, and that the ruins we admire today were once the backdrop to lives separated by status as much as by stone.

Green for Danger Talking Pictures, 6:10pm

A hospital‑set murder mystery where the antiseptic calm barely conceals the fractures of a country still reeling from war. Set in a rural surgical unit during the Blitz, the film begins with what appears to be a routine operation — until the patient dies on the table and suspicion settles over the medical staff like a fog. Each doctor and nurse carries their own secrets, resentments, and wartime exhaustion, and the operating theatre becomes a stage where professional composure masks private turmoil.

Enter Alastair Sim’s Inspector Cockrill, whose dry wit and eccentric manner cut through the veneer of civility. As he unpicks alibis and motives, the film reveals a world where trust is fragile, authority is strained, and the pressures of wartime service distort even the most disciplined environments. The clipped politeness of the staff only heightens the unease: beneath the starch and protocol lies fear, jealousy, and the sense that the war has frayed everyone’s nerves to breaking point.

A clever, atmospheric thriller where post‑war unease seeps into every corridor. Civility becomes a mask, and the hospital — supposedly a place of safety — turns into a crucible of suspicion.

The Damned United BBC Two, 11:00pm

Brian Clough as Shakespearean figure — a man of volcanic charisma, brilliance edged with insecurity, and a talent for turning every slight into a crusade. The film follows his ill‑fated 44 days at Leeds United, a club he loathed and a dressing room that never wanted him. What emerges is less a sports biopic than a character study of pride, obsession, and the way a leader can be undone by the ghosts he insists on wrestling.

Michael Sheen plays Clough with a mix of swagger and brittleness: the public bravado, the private doubt, the need to prove himself not just better than Don Revie but better than the version of himself he fears he might become. The plot cuts between his glory years at Derby — the rise, the trophies, the intoxicating sense of destiny — and the Leeds tenure, where every decision feels like a misstep and every room seems to shrink around him.

It’s a story about ambition curdling into self‑sabotage, about a man who could inspire loyalty in thousands yet alienate those closest to him. A football tragedy told with theatrical precision, where the pitch becomes a stage and Clough strides across it like a flawed king convinced the crown should already be his.

Red Joan BBC One, 12:35am

Espionage and late‑life reckoning. The film opens with Joan Stanley — a quiet, retired civil servant — arrested in her garden and confronted with the life she thought she had buried. Through interrogations and flashbacks, the story traces her transformation from idealistic physics student to reluctant spy, drawn into the world of atomic secrets during the Second World War. What begins as intellectual excitement becomes a moral crisis: should one country hold the power to annihilate the world, or is sharing knowledge a form of preventing catastrophe?

The plot follows Joan’s entanglement with a charismatic communist lover, her work on the British atomic programme, and the slow erosion of her certainty as she realises the stakes of the information she’s passing on. The film frames her actions not as simple treachery but as a collision between personal loyalty, political conviction, and the terror of a world on the brink of nuclear imbalance.

In the present day, the reckoning is quieter but sharper. Joan must explain to her son — and to herself — whether she acted out of idealism, fear, or self‑deception. Conviction versus betrayal. A life lived in the shadows finally dragged into the light, where the question of guilt becomes far more complicated than the headlines ever allowed.

Streaming Choices

Dangerous Liaisons Channel 4 Streaming – Season 1 available from Saturday 14th February

A lush, cynical prequel to the French classic, this tale of seduction and social warfare revels in manipulation and ambition. Alice Englert and Nicholas Denton bring sharp intelligence to a world where intimacy is currency and love is merely leverage.

Obsessed Walter Presents (Channel 4) – Series 1 available from Friday 20th February

A suburban fresh start turns sour in this tense French thriller. What begins as domestic renewal becomes psychological siege, with paranoia and proximity doing most of the dramatic heavy lifting.

Watching You Disney+ – All six episodes available from Friday 20th February

A one-night stand spirals into digital nightmare when hidden cameras expose more than intimacy. Slick and unsettling, this Australian thriller taps into modern anxieties about surveillance, shame and the illusion of privacy.

The Templars ITVX – All six episodes available from Thursday 12th February

Medieval spectacle meets existential crisis as an order of knights battles war, plague and political decay. Armour and intrigue abound, but the series is strongest when it questions faith and authority in collapsing times.

Love Me, Love Me Prime Video – Available from Friday 13th February

Glossy young-adult melodrama set against an elite Italian school. Love triangles, grief and reinvention collide in a sunlit coming-of-age romance that knows exactly which heartstrings it wants to pull.

56 Days Prime Video – All eight episodes available from Wednesday 18th February

A supermarket meet-cute gives way to suspicion in this sleek romantic thriller. As secrets surface, the series probes how easily intimacy can mask deception.

The Occupant Paramount+ – Available from Thursday 19th February

A survival drama with a psychological edge: stranded in frozen isolation after a helicopter crash, a geologist must rely on a mysterious voice over the radio. Tense, claustrophobic and morally ambiguous.

A week where empires fall, myths are dismantled, and love — in all its forms — is interrogated rather than assumed.

Advert

Book cover for 'The Angela Suite' by Anthony C. Green featuring a pair of feet and a city skyline in the background, with the text 'BUY NOW' prominently displayed.

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 7–13 February 2026

A soaring vulture against a blue sky, with bold text 'CULTURE VULTURE' above. Logo for 'Counter Culture' at the bottom and event dates '7-13 February 2026'.

This week’s Culture Vulture is shaped by ambition and aftermath. Ancient civilisations are rediscovered not as ruins but as living systems; technological dreams soar faster than politics can follow; and contemporary Britain is examined with uncomfortable honesty. Across film and television, there’s a recurring sense of limits — moral, social, environmental — and what happens when they’re tested. Selections and reviews are by Pat Harrington.

🌟 Highlights include Alice Roberts’ vivid return to Ancient Rome, a thoughtful two-part account of Concorde’s rise and restraint, and a late-night run of cinema that ranges from the hushed intimacy of Past Lives to the fevered excess of Babylon.

Saturday, 7 February

Lifeboat Film4, 11.00am

Hitchcock’s wartime chamber piece remains one of his most controlled exercises in tension. Stranded in the open Atlantic after a U‑boat attack, a handful of survivors are forced into a proximity that strips away every social comfort they arrived with. The boat becomes a floating tribunal: class, ideology, and personal grievance all jostling for space in a vessel barely big enough to hold them.

What unfolds isn’t simply a survival story but a study in moral drift. Hitchcock watches, almost clinically, as fear and necessity blur the lines between pragmatism and complicity. The film’s economy — a single location, no escape, nowhere to hide — sharpens every exchange. Power shifts by the inch. Trust becomes a rationed commodity. And the question of who counts as “enemy” becomes harder to answer the longer the boat stays afloat.

Eighty years on, its unease hasn’t softened. The film’s argument — that crisis exposes character more reliably than comfort — lands with the same cold clarity it did in 1944. Lean, tense, and still disquietingly current.

The Personal History of David Copperfield Film4, 4.30pm

Armando Iannucci approaches Dickens with a lightness that never tips into frivolity. His adaptation trims and reshapes the novel without losing its emotional through-line, treating Copperfield’s life not as a sequence of set pieces but as a continuous negotiation of identity, class, and belonging. The result is brisk, generous, and unusually clear-eyed about the chaos of growing up.

Dev Patel anchors the film with a kind of open-hearted intelligence — a David who observes as much as he endures. Around him, the ensemble leans into character without lapsing into costume-drama excess. Tilda Swinton, Hugh Laurie, Rosalind Eleazar, and Peter Capaldi all find the human pulse beneath the eccentricities, giving the film a lived-in texture that keeps its playfulness from floating away.

Visually, it’s a production that delights in invention: shifts in perspective, theatrical flourishes, and sudden intrusions of memory that feel true to the way a life story is actually pieced together. But beneath the wit sits a steady compassion for people trying to make sense of their circumstances — a quality that makes the film feel less like a reinterpretation and more like a conversation with Dickens across time.

Flash Gordon ITV4, 6.45pm

A technicolour blast of pulp bravado, still wearing its comic‑strip origins with total conviction. The plot is essentially an excuse for set‑pieces, matte paintings, and Queen’s operatic thunder, but the film’s real pleasure lies in how unabashedly it leans into its own excess.

Princess Aura — played by the very hot Ornella Muti — embodies the film’s flirtatious streak. Her scenes with Flash are pitched somewhere between seduction and power play, all heightened glances and deliberate provocation. It’s part of the film’s broader aesthetic: sexuality rendered as camp spectacle rather than realism, folded into the same register as the costumes, the colour palette, and the melodramatic line readings.

Nothing here is subtle, and that’s the point. The film operates on pure sensation: colour, sound, and a kind of theatrical earnestness that makes its silliness feel strangely coherent. Seriousness isn’t just absent; it’s actively banished, leaving behind a work that’s both self-aware and entirely committed to its own feverish universe.

A delirious, affectionate throwback — and still one of the most entertaining slices of sci‑fi excess ever put on screen.

Ancient Rome by Train with Alice Roberts Channel 4, 8.30pm 🌟

Episode 1 of 6: Pompeii – A City Alive

The series opens with a welcome shift in perspective. Instead of treating Pompeii as a static tableau of disaster, Alice Roberts insists on restoring its movement — the rhythms of work, trade, and domestic life that defined the city long before the ash fell. Using Rome’s transport networks as her spine, she traces how goods, people, and ideas circulated through the region, giving Pompeii a sense of lived continuity rather than archaeological stillness.

Roberts is a calm, precise guide: curious without theatrics, authoritative without overstatement. The production follows her lead, favouring clear explanation over spectacle. Streets, workshops, and homes are presented not as relics but as functioning spaces, each revealing something about how the city organised itself and how its inhabitants understood their place in the wider Roman world.

It’s history delivered with confidence and restraint — the kind of programme that trusts viewers to appreciate detail, context, and the quiet satisfaction of seeing a familiar site reframed with intelligence.

The Lighthouse Film4, 1.30am

Robert Eggers’ storm-lashed two-hander remains one of the most singular films of the past decade: a black‑and‑white fever dream where isolation, labour, and myth grind two men down to their rawest selves. Shot in a boxy aspect ratio that feels almost claustrophobic, the film traps Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson in a world of creaking timber, relentless weather, and rituals that seem older than either of them can articulate.

Dafoe leans into the role of the veteran keeper with a sea‑dog’s theatricality — part tyrant, part storyteller, part ghost. Pattinson matches him with a performance that flickers between resentment, yearning, and something more feral. Their exchanges have the rhythm of a curse being spoken and respoken, each encounter tightening the psychological noose.

Eggers threads folklore, maritime superstition, and half‑remembered nightmares through the film’s fabric, letting reality slip just enough to keep the audience unsteady. The result is hypnotic and punishing in equal measure: a descent that feels both meticulously constructed and instinctively unsettling.

Demanding, yes — but once seen, it’s difficult to shake.

Sunday, 8 February

Betrayal ITV1, 9.00pm Episode 1 of 4

The opener sets its terms quietly, favouring tension that seeps rather than strikes. Instead of the usual parade of tradecraft and gadgetry, the episode settles into the unease of people who no longer know where their loyalties sit — or who might be watching them recalibrate.

Relationships are the real battleground here. Marriages, friendships, and professional alliances all carry a faint charge, as if every conversation might be doing two jobs at once. The political backdrop is present but never overplayed; the danger feels as much emotional as geopolitical, rooted in the small betrayals that accumulate long before anyone crosses a line on paper.

It’s a restrained start, but the control is deliberate. If the series can maintain this level of psychological pressure — the sense that everyone is slightly out of step with themselves — it could build into something quietly gripping.

Emily BBC Two, 10.00pm

This reimagining of Emily Brontë sidesteps the usual period‑drama comforts in favour of something far more volatile. Frances O’Connor’s film treats Brontë not as a literary monument but as a young woman wrestling with desire, grief, and the sheer force of her own imagination. The moors aren’t scenic backdrops; they’re emotional weather, shifting with her inner life.

Emma Mackey gives the film its pulse. Her Emily is restless, sharp, and difficult in ways that feel entirely earned — a portrait of creativity as something closer to compulsion than accomplishment. The film leans into that intensity, allowing moments of tenderness, strangeness, and outright wildness to coexist without smoothing the edges.

Visually, it’s windswept and tactile, but the modernity comes through in its confidence: the refusal to tidy up the contradictions that shaped both the writer and the work she would eventually produce. It’s a film that understands the cost of making art, and the solitude that often comes with it.

Moody, immersive, and defiantly alive.

Past Lives BBC Two, 12.00am 🌟

Celine Song’s debut is built on the smallest of gestures: a pause held a beat too long, a glance that carries years of unspoken history, the quiet ache of paths not taken. What begins as a childhood connection stretches across continents and decades, reshaped by migration, ambition, and the slow realisation that intimacy doesn’t always resolve into romance.

Greta Lee and Teo Yoo give performances of remarkable stillness, letting the film’s emotional weight gather in the spaces between their words. John Magaro completes the triangle with a gentleness that refuses easy antagonism; everyone here is trying to do right by the life they’ve chosen, even as they feel the pull of the one they didn’t.

Song directs with exquisite restraint. Scenes unfold with the clarity of memory rather than melodrama, allowing the film’s questions — about identity, fate, and the stories we tell ourselves to keep moving forward — to surface naturally. Nothing is overstated, yet everything lands.

Quietly devastating, and all the more powerful for its refusal to force the moment.

Monday, 9 February

Knife Crime: What Happened to Our Boys? BBC One, 8.00pm

The programme takes a deliberately steady approach to a subject that’s too often reduced to headlines and panic. Instead of chasing shock value, it traces the long chain of decisions and omissions that shape young people’s lives: youth services stripped back to the bone, schools stretched beyond capacity, families left without support, and communities absorbing the consequences.

Interviews are handled with care. Parents, frontline workers, and young people themselves speak with a clarity that cuts through political noise, and the film gives them the space to articulate what’s been lost — not just lives, but trust, opportunity, and any sense of a safety net. The police presence is contextual rather than dominant; the emphasis is on prevention, not punishment.

What emerges is a portrait of systemic neglect rather than individual failure. The documentary doesn’t pretend there are easy answers, but it’s unflinching about the cost of looking away. Difficult viewing, but necessary if the conversation is ever going to move beyond rhetoric.

Concorde: The Race for Supersonic Channel 4, 10.30pm 🌟 Episode 1 of 2

The story of Concorde is often remembered as a sleek icon of national pride, but this opening episode digs into the far messier reality behind the silhouette. The Cold War sets the tempo: Britain and France pushing for a civilian aircraft that could outrun sound itself, while the United States and the Soviet Union pursued their own visions of the future. What emerges is less a straightforward technological triumph than a geopolitical gamble — a project driven as much by prestige and rivalry as by engineering ambition.

The programme captures the sheer audacity of the undertaking: the materials that barely existed when the plans were drawn, the political brinkmanship required to keep the partnership alive, and the constant sense that the whole enterprise might collapse under its own weight. Concorde becomes a symbol twice over — a marvel of design, and a reminder of how national identity can be welded to a machine.

Clear, confident documentary-making, and a strong start to a story that still feels astonishing in scale.

Concorde: The Race for Supersonic Channel 4, 11.30pm🌟 Episode 2 of 2

The second half of the story opens with Concorde triumphant: a machine that proved the sceptics wrong and briefly made the future feel airborne. But the victory is short‑lived. Environmental protests, sonic‑boom anxieties, and a patchwork of overland bans steadily shrink the aircraft’s usefulness, turning a technological breakthrough into a route map defined by political caution.

The documentary traces this narrowing horizon with a quiet, accumulating sadness. What began as a symbol of national ambition becomes a luxury service for the few, its engineering brilliance undermined by the world it was built to outrun. The tone shifts from exhilaration to something more elegiac, acknowledging both the achievement and the limits that ultimately grounded it.

A thoughtful conclusion — clear‑eyed about the compromises, and honest about the melancholy that clings to Concorde’s final years.

Tuesday, 10 February

The Secret Science of Sewage BBC Four, 10.00pm

A subject that rarely gets airtime is treated here with the seriousness it deserves. Sewage systems — usually invisible unless something goes wrong — emerge as one of the great, uncelebrated feats of modern civilisation. The programme traces how these networks protect public health, manage environmental pressure, and quietly absorb the consequences of population growth and climate volatility.

What could have been dry becomes unexpectedly absorbing. Engineers, microbiologists, and frontline workers explain the sheer complexity of keeping waste moving, treating it safely, and returning water to the environment in a condition that won’t cause further harm. The film is careful to show both the ingenuity and the fragility of the system: the innovations that keep it functioning, and the points where decades of underinvestment begin to show.

It’s a reminder that infrastructure is only “boring” until it fails — and that the pipes beneath our feet tell a story about priorities, resilience, and the hidden labour that keeps cities alive.

Deliverance BBC Two, 11.50pm

Boorman’s survival thriller still carries a charge that hasn’t dulled with time. What begins as a weekend adventure for four suburban men quickly unravels into something far darker, exposing the brittleness of the confidence they bring with them. The river becomes a kind of reckoning: beautiful, treacherous, and utterly indifferent to their attempts to master it.

The film’s most notorious moments tend to dominate its reputation, but the real unease lies elsewhere — in the way masculinity curdles under pressure, in the shifting power dynamics within the group, and in the dawning recognition that civilisation is a thin veneer when the landscape refuses to play along. Jon Voight and Burt Reynolds give performances that understand this fragility, charting the slow collapse of bravado into fear and improvisation.

Boorman shoots the wilderness with a clarity that feels almost accusatory. The forest is not malevolent, just unmoved by human drama, and that indifference is what makes the film so unsettling. Deliverance remains a study in control slipping away — from the environment, from each other, and from themselves.

A classic, and still a deeply disquieting one.

Wednesday, 11 February

3:10 to Yuma Film4 11.10pm

James Mangold’s remake pares the Western back to its essentials: two men, a journey, and a deadline that tightens with every mile. Christian Bale plays the rancher desperate enough — and principled enough — to escort a notorious outlaw to the waiting train, while Russell Crowe gives that outlaw a charisma that’s as dangerous as any weapon he carries.

What follows is less a chase than a moral negotiation. The film keeps circling questions of duty, temptation, and the price of doing the right thing when the world offers easier exits. Bale’s quiet resolve and Crowe’s seductive intelligence create a dynamic where every conversation feels like a test of integrity, and every pause hints at the possibility of betrayal.

Mangold shoots the landscape with clarity rather than romance, letting the dust, distance, and violence sit without embellishment. The tension builds not from spectacle but from the slow erosion of certainty — who these men are, what they owe, and how far they’re willing to go to hold their ground.

A lean, gripping Western that sharpens the genre’s ethical edge rather than polishing its myths.

Hunt for the Oldest DNA PBS America, 8.30pm

This documentary treats genetics not as a technical curiosity but as a frontier of human understanding. Researchers push the limits of what ancient material can reveal, extracting fragments of DNA from environments once thought too degraded to yield anything meaningful. The work is painstaking, often speculative at the outset, but the breakthroughs are startling: glimpses of ecosystems, species, and climates that predate human memory.

The programme balances the lab work with a sense of intellectual adventure. Field sites in permafrost and sediment cores become time capsules, each sample a chance to push the genetic record further back. Explanations are clear without being simplified, and the scientists’ excitement is grounded in the scale of what’s at stake — a deeper, more precise map of Earth’s past.

Absorbing, lucid, and quietly awe‑inspiring.

Thursday, 12 February

Becoming Victoria Wood You & Gold, 9.00pm

Rather than leaning on the familiar warmth of Victoria Wood’s greatest hits, this portrait looks at the machinery behind them: the discipline, structure, and sheer graft that shaped her voice long before fame arrived. The programme traces how she built her comic world from close observation and meticulous rewriting, turning everyday detail into something both precise and generous.

Colleagues and collaborators speak to the rigour beneath the charm — the way she shaped a line, tightened a rhythm, or reworked a sketch until it landed exactly as intended. The result is a portrait that honours her humour without flattening her into a national treasure, showing instead the ambition and intelligence that powered her work.

A clear‑eyed, quietly moving study of craft, and a reminder that brilliance rarely happens by accident.

Not Welcome: The Battle to Stop the Boats Channel 4, 10.00pm

Channel 4 approaches one of the most charged areas of British politics with a steadiness that cuts through the noise. Rather than amplifying slogans, the programme traces how policy, rhetoric, and electoral calculation collide with the realities faced by people on the move. Ministers, campaigners, and frontline workers all appear, but the emphasis remains on the human consequences of decisions made far from the shoreline.

The documentary is unflinching about the machinery behind the headlines: deterrence strategies that reshape lives, legal frameworks stretched to their limits, and a political climate in which migration becomes a proxy for broader anxieties. It’s a portrait of power under scrutiny, and the film refuses to sand down the contradictions or soften the impact.

Challenging, clear‑eyed, and committed to interrogating the gap between what is promised and what is lived.

Friday, 13 February

Nosferatu the Vampyre Talking Pictures, 10.10pm

Werner Herzog’s reimagining of Murnau’s silent classic is less a remake than a haunted echo — a film that moves with the logic of a fever or a half‑remembered nightmare. Klaus Kinski’s Count Dracula is not a suave predator but a lonely, plague‑ridden figure, his hunger bound up with despair as much as menace. Isabelle Adjani’s Lucy brings a kind of luminous fatalism to the story, her stillness as unsettling as any of the film’s gothic flourishes.

Herzog leans into atmosphere over shock. Landscapes feel abandoned by time, interiors seem drained of warmth, and the encroaching sense of sickness gives the film a slow, suffocating dread. Even the familiar beats of the Dracula story feel newly fragile, as if the characters are trapped inside a myth they can’t quite control.

It’s a work of mood and texture — eerie, mournful, and strangely beautiful — a vampire film that treats horror as a kind of existential condition rather than a genre exercise.

Babylon Film4, 11.45pm

Damien Chazelle’s Hollywood epic opens in chaos and rarely lets the temperature drop. Set in the industry’s transition from silent film to sound, it treats early Hollywood as a battleground of ambition, appetite, and sheer logistical madness. The parties, the sets, the disasters — everything is pitched at a scale that feels both exhilarating and faintly grotesque, a world fuelled by people who believe the future can be willed into existence through force of personality alone.

Margot Robbie and Diego Calva anchor the sprawl with performances that understand the film’s contradictions: the thrill of creation, the brutality of the system, and the way success can curdle into myth almost overnight. Chazelle isn’t interested in tidy nostalgia; he’s after the volatility of an industry reinventing itself in real time, and the casualties left behind when the machinery moves on.

The result is intentionally messy — a sensory overload that veers between brilliance and collapse, mirroring the world it depicts. Exhausting, often electrifying, and never less than confrontational about the cost of spectacle.

Queenpins Channel 4, 12.10am

A brisk, good‑natured crime caper built around a real coupon‑fraud scheme that ballooned far beyond its suburban origins. Kristen Bell and Kirby Howell‑Baptiste make a sharp double act, playing two women who channel boredom, frustration, and a talent for small‑scale hustle into something far more elaborate than they ever intended.

The film keeps its energy up without tipping into chaos. There’s a clear sense of how consumer capitalism — its loopholes, its absurdities, its endless promises of reward — becomes both the backdrop and the fuel for their operation. Paul Walter Hauser and Vince Vaughn, as the investigators circling the case, add a welcome deadpan counterweight.

It’s not trying to reinvent the genre, but it doesn’t need to. The pleasure lies in the pace, the performances, and the sly acknowledgement that ingenuity often flourishes where the system isn’t looking. A lighter, well‑judged note on which to end the week.

STREAMING CHOICES

Here are polished, expanded versions for each of your remaining listings — keeping your established tone, cadence, and editorial clarity. They sit naturally alongside the rest of your guide.


Lead Children

All six episdoes available from Wednesday 11 February 2026 on Netflix

A stark, unsettling documentary that refuses to look away from the long shadow of environmental contamination. Focusing on communities living with the consequences of industrial negligence, it traces how lead exposure shapes childhoods, futures, and entire neighbourhoods. The filmmaking is restrained but quietly furious, grounding its argument in lived experience rather than abstraction. Difficult viewing, but a vital reminder of how policy failures become personal.

Walter Presents: Lolita Lobosco (Series 3)

Series three available from Friday 13 February on Channel 4 streaming

Still one of Walter Presents’ most enjoyable imports, this third series returns to Bari with its trademark blend of sunlit charm and knotty crime. The cases remain sharply constructed, but it’s the offbeat humour, character detail, and sense of place that give the show its warmth. Lobosco herself continues to be a compelling centre — wry, capable, and never in a hurry to fit the mould. Crime drama with personality, and all the better for taking its time.

Speakerine

All six episodes from Thursday 12 February on ITVX

Set behind the scenes of French television’s golden age, Speakerine uses its glamorous surface as a foil for a more incisive story about ambition, gender, and institutional control. The period detail is elegant without tipping into nostalgia, and the drama understands how power operates quietly as well as loudly. Stylish, poised, and sharper than it first appears — a series that knows exactly what it’s saying.

Cross (Season 2)

Episodes 1-3 available from Wednesday 11 February

Season two pushes further into psychological territory, tightening its focus on obsession, trauma, and the cost of relentless pursuit. The series remains slick, but it avoids the trap of empty escalation by grounding its tension in character rather than spectacle. This early run of episodes suggests a show confident enough to deepen its themes rather than simply raise the stakes.

How to Get to Heaven from Belfast

All eight episodes available from Thursday 12 February on Netflix A darkly comic exploration of faith, guilt, and reinvention, blending Northern Irish wit with genuine emotional bite. The humour is sharp but never cruel, and the series knows when to let a joke land and when to step back. Beneath the comedy sits a thoughtful meditation on belief, belonging, and the stories people tell themselves to keep going. A smart, surprising piece of television that earns its shifts in tone.

Advert

Book cover for 'Better Than the Beatles!' by Anthony C. Green, featuring bold text and a colorful background. Text includes 'BUY NOW' to prompt action.

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture podcast 31 January to the 6th of February 2026

A podcast titled 'Culture Vulture' featuring an eagle in flight against a blue sky, with details about the event 'Culture Vulture (31 January - 6 February 2026)' and a colorful logo for 'Counter Culture'.

Welcome to the Culture Vulture podcast, where this week’s television schedule forms something like a cultural weather report — shifts in tone, pressure and temperature across romance, myth, satire, documentary and political inquiry. What emerges isn’t a single theme but a pattern: filmmakers wrestling with power, consequence and the fragile dignity of ordinary choice. Selections and writing are by Pat Harrington and we are voiced by Ryan.

At 11.05am on BBC Two, Powell and Pressburger’s I Know Where I’m Going! offers a different kind of awakening. Joan’s certainty is armour, and the Scottish landscape becomes her tutor. The weather, the sea, the sheer indifference of the world gently broaden her perspective rather than breaking it. It’s a romance built on humility rather than fate.

We begin on Saturday 31 January, when Roman Holiday airs on Film4 at 11.00am. It’s a film that endures because it refuses to confuse lightness with triviality. Hepburn’s princess isn’t rebelling against monarchy so much as the deadening choreography of duty, and her day in Rome becomes a quiet experiment in selfhood. Gregory Peck’s Joe, meanwhile, is a rare Hollywood lead whose arc is defined by restraint — by what he chooses not to take. The ending still aches because it honours adulthood: desire disciplined rather than denied.

Their audacious A Matter of Life and Death follows at 12.40pm on BBC Two, imagining love as a legal argument against death itself — Technicolor earth, monochrome heaven, and the insistence that imagination can be a moral necessity.

At 1.20pm on Film4, Local Hero unfolds with its feather‑light humour and deep moral intelligence. A corporate emissary arrives in a coastal village expecting a transaction; instead he encounters a community fluent in proportion. The landscape seduces him into recognising the thinness of his own certainties, and the ache of his return to Houston lingers long after the credits.

At 3.20pm on BBC Two, The Man Who Would Be King seduces with swagger before revealing its moral spine. Empire here is a confidence trick, built on borrowed rituals and belief in one’s own myth. Huston’s spectacle dazzles even as it indicts.

The tone shifts sharply at 9.30pm on Channel 4 with Cocaine Bear, a gleefully chaotic midnight movie that commits fully to its own absurdity. And at 11.00pm on BBC Four, Christian Petzold’s Afire burns quietly, its emotional combustion mirroring the wildfires approaching offscreen. Saturday closes with Just Mercy at 11.50pm on BBC One, a film that understands justice as labour rather than abstraction.

On Sunday 1 February, Jason and the Argonauts airs at 2.50pm on Film4, where Ray Harryhausen’s stop‑motion creatures still pulse with human ingenuity. Myth becomes a sequence of ordeals negotiated through collaboration rather than domination. At 9.00pm on GREAT! TV, Men of Honour charts Carl Brashear’s rise against institutional racism with sincerity and endurance. And at 10.00pm on BBC Two, Saltburn gleams like a polished mirror, reflecting decadence as both lure and indictment. Desire becomes strategy, sincerity becomes dangerous, and the chill beneath the glamour is the point.

On Monday 2 February, Arabesque airs at 3.40pm on Film4, a Cold War thriller that treats espionage as puzzle rather than paranoia. PBS America follows with Nixon in the Den at 7.40pm, a portrait of authority stripped of office, and Kissinger: The Necessity of Power at 8.50pm, which examines realpolitik with clinical steadiness, letting the machinery of influence speak for itself. At 9.00pm on BBC Two, Lover, Liar, Predator tackles coercive control with clarity and restraint. Chevalier airs at 10.55pm on Film4, restoring scale to Joseph Bologne — a prodigy constrained by the architecture of 18th‑century France. And at 11.55pm on BBC Two, Retreat turns isolation into a pressure chamber where paranoia becomes its own special effect.

On Tuesday 3 February, PBS America continues the examination of power with Kissinger: The Opportunist at 8.55pm, shifting from ascent to aftermath and refusing to tidy the ledger of achievement and devastation. At 10.15pm on BBC Three, Sin City: The Real Las Vegas punctures the myth of glamour, reframing excess as labour. Our Kind of Traitor airs at 11.25pm on Film4, a sleek, bruising Le Carré adaptation where ordinary people stumble into geopolitical undertow and betrayal becomes the currency of the realm. And at 12.45am on BBC Three, Bones and All offers a tender, horrifying romance where hunger becomes metaphor for connection.

On Wednesday 4 February, Reform: Ready to Rule? airs at 9.00pm on BBC Two, approaching the party not as a fixed project but as a weather system — volatile, affect‑driven, shaped by grievance and impatience. The documentary doesn’t deliver a verdict; it offers texture, showing a movement defined less by policy than by atmosphere. And at 9.00pm on PBS America, Massacre in Vietnam: My Lai reconstructs atrocity with gravity and restraint, holding nuance without surrendering moral clarity. Memory becomes an ethical obligation.

On Thursday 5 February, I Am Not OK airs at 9.00pm on BBC Two, a quietly devastating documentary following mothers raising autistic sons. It resists sensationalism, instead offering a grounded, humane portrait of care, exhaustion, advocacy and love. Its intimacy reveals the structural gaps families are forced to bridge alone. Later, at 10.55pm on ITV4, Reservoir Dogs still crackles with the thrill of a filmmaker announcing himself at full volume. Tarantino’s debut turns dialogue into weapon — jagged, swaggering, and far more dangerous than anything shown on screen. The violence is mostly implication, which only sharpens the tension.

And finally, Friday 6 February closes the week with Bohemian Rhapsody at 9.00pm on Film4, a biopic that succeeds in spite of its own caution. The narrative sands down the messier contours of Freddie Mercury’s life, but Rami Malek’s performance keeps breaking through the gloss, hinting at the stranger, richer story beneath. At 11.00pm on BBC Two, Silver Haze unfolds with emotional precision, refusing spectacle and honouring the uneven, circular nature of healing. Vicky Knight anchors the film with a performance that is raw without exhibitionism, luminous without sentimentality. And at 11.45pm on Film4, Verhoeven’s Benedetta ends the week on a note of glorious discomfort — a provocation where faith, power and sexuality collide and nothing is sacred.

Taken together, the week’s programming becomes a kind of cultural meteorology — sudden storms of feeling, long spells of clarity, and the reminder that television, at its best, doesn’t just fill time. It frames it.


Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture (31 January – 6 February 2026)

A week of television like this reminds you how elastic the medium still is. Between mid‑century romance, post‑war metaphysics, modern satire and bruising documentary, the broadcasters have accidentally programmed a syllabus on how moving images shape moral imagination. What emerges isn’t a theme so much as a pattern: filmmakers wrestling with power, consequence and the fragile dignity of ordinary choice.

A graphic design featuring the words 'Culture Vulture' with an image of a vulture in flight against a blue sky and mountains, alongside text promoting an event scheduled from January 31 to February 6, 2026.

Classic cinema here isn’t nostalgia but argument — Hepburn, Hiller and Harryhausen all insisting that lightness can carry weight. The contemporary work pushes in the opposite direction, stripping away comfort to expose systems, appetites and the stories institutions tell about themselves. Even the outliers — the anarchic, the pulpy, the unabashedly odd — earn their place by revealing what happens when restraint is abandoned.

Taken together, the week forms a kind of cultural weather report. Shifts in tone, pressure and temperature; sudden storms of feeling; long spells of clarity. It’s a reminder that television, at its best, doesn’t just fill time. It frames it. Selections and writing is by Pat Harrington.

Saturday 31 January 2026

Roman Holiday — Film4, 11.00am (1953)

Wyler’s Roman Holiday earns its reputation because it refuses to confuse lightness with triviality. What looks, at first glance, like a confection is actually a study in how people behave when briefly released from the roles that define—and confine—them. The film’s grace comes from its refusal to punish Ann for wanting air, or to reward Joe for wanting a story. Instead, it watches two people negotiate the limits of their own decency.

Hepburn’s princess is not rebelling against monarchy so much as against the deadening choreography of duty. The haircut, the gelato, the Vespa ride—none of these are framed as transgressions. They are small experiments in selfhood, the kind of choices most people take for granted. Wyler understands that the thrill is not in breaking rules but in discovering that one might choose differently, even if only for an afternoon. That’s why the film still feels modern: it treats autonomy as a quiet revelation rather than a manifesto.

Peck’s Joe, meanwhile, is a corrective to the usual Hollywood male lead. He is not a saviour, not a swaggering romantic, not even particularly noble at the outset. His arc is one of restraint—learning when not to act, when not to claim, when not to exploit. The film’s emotional intelligence lies in showing that his greatest gesture is the story he doesn’t write. In a lesser film, he would win the girl. In Wyler’s, he earns her respect, which is far more adult.

Rome itself becomes a kind of ethical terrain. Its piazzas and fountains are not postcard decoration but spaces where Ann tests the elasticity of her identity. Yet the city also reminds her—and us—that freedom borrowed must eventually be returned. The film never indulges the fantasy that she could simply stay. Instead, it honours the complexity of choosing duty after glimpsing another life. That choice, made with clear eyes, is what gives the ending its weight.

And then there is Hepburn’s final look: poised, bruised, and utterly truthful. It is the expression of someone who has grown in a single day without shedding the responsibilities that await her. No grand declarations, no melodrama—just a woman absorbing the cost of her own awakening. It remains one of cinema’s most mature romantic endings because it recognises that love, sometimes, is expressed through absence and memory rather than union.

Roman Holiday endures because it understands that adulthood is not the death of desire but the discipline of it. Wyler wraps that insight in charm, but he never hides the ache.

I Know Where I’m Going! — BBC Two, 11.05am (1945)

Powell and Pressburger’s I Know Where I’m Going! is one of those rare films that hides its sophistication behind a smile. It presents itself as a fable—windswept isles, ancient curses, stubborn heiresses—but what it’s really dissecting is the brittleness of certainty. Joan’s confidence is not arrogance so much as armour: a belief that life can be mastered through sheer clarity of intention. Hiller plays her with a flinty precision that makes the eventual unravelling feel earned rather than punitive.

What the film understands, and what gives it its quiet radicalism, is that the world has its own agency. The weather is not metaphor but character—an elemental veto on Joan’s plans. Chance encounters, local customs, and the sheer indifference of the sea all conspire to show her that intelligence is not the same as omnipotence. Powell and Pressburger treat this not as humiliation but as education. Joan is not broken; she is broadened.

The Scottish landscape becomes a philosophical tutor. Its beauty is rugged, its rhythms older than any human scheme. Against it, Joan’s determination looks both admirable and faintly absurd. The film’s generosity lies in allowing her to discover this herself. It never mocks her ambition; it simply places her in a world where ambition must coexist with humility.

Roger Livesey’s Torquil is the perfect counterweight—not a romantic conqueror but a man who has already made peace with uncertainty. His steadiness invites Joan to reconsider her own definitions of strength. Their connection grows not through grand gestures but through a series of small recognitions: that listening can be braver than insisting, that yielding can be a form of integrity.

By the time the film reaches its conclusion, the romance feels less like fate and more like a mutual decision to live with open hands rather than clenched fists. That’s why the compromise feels honourable: it isn’t capitulation but evolution. Powell and Pressburger craft a love story where the real triumph is not possession but perspective.

It remains one of cinema’s most quietly subversive romances because it trusts that adulthood is not about knowing where you’re going, but about being willing to revise the map.

A Matter of Life and Death — BBC Two, 12.40pm (1946) 🌟

Powell and Pressburger’s most audacious work imagines love as a legal defence against death itself. David Niven’s RAF pilot survives by mistake and must argue his right to live before a celestial court rendered in stark monochrome.

The contrast between Technicolor Earth and bureaucratic heaven is playful and philosophical. Love is not mystical escape but empirical proof, something observable, measurable and therefore defensible.

Emerging from wartime trauma, the film insists on imagination as moral necessity. Its emotional confidence remains astonishing.

Local Hero — Film4, 1.20pm (1983)

Forsyth’s Local Hero has only grown more resonant with time because it treats its premise—a corporate emissary descending on a coastal village—not as a battleground but as a gentle collision of worldviews. What begins as a straightforward acquisition trip becomes, almost imperceptibly, a study in how values are shaped by landscape, rhythm and belonging. The humour is feather‑light, but the film’s moral intelligence is anything but.

Mac, the oil executive, arrives fluent in the language of deals and deadlines, assuming that rural life is simply waiting to be priced correctly. What he finds instead is a community that recognises the utility of money without mistaking it for meaning. Forsyth never paints the villagers as innocents or holdouts from modernity; they’re perfectly willing to sell, but not at the cost of their own sense of proportion. Their calm, almost amused pragmatism becomes a mirror in which Mac sees the thinness of his own certainties.

The film’s refusal to polarise is its quiet triumph. Capitalism isn’t a villain so much as a system that forgets its own limits. Tradition isn’t a shrine but a lived texture. Even the prospect of industrial development is treated with curiosity rather than dread. Forsyth’s tone—wry, affectionate, observational—allows the contradictions to coexist without forcing a verdict.

And then there is the landscape, which functions as both seduction and rebuke. The wide skies, the tidal light, the sense of time moving at a human pace: these are not romantic clichés but the film’s argument. Mac’s gradual dislocation is not a punishment but an awakening. He discovers, almost against his will, that he has been living in a world too small for him, and that the village he came to purchase has quietly purchased him instead.

By the end, the ache is unmistakable. Mac returns to Houston with a longing he cannot articulate—a nostalgia for a place that offered him no promises, only presence. Forsyth captures this with extraordinary softness, trusting the audience to feel the loss without underlining it. Local Hero endures because it understands that home is not a transaction but a recognition, and that sometimes the richest thing a place can give you is the knowledge that you no longer belong anywhere else.

The Man Who Would Be King — BBC Two, 3.20pm (1975)Huston’s The Man Who Would Be King is one of those grand, old‑fashioned adventures that reveals its moral spine only after you’ve been seduced by its swagger. It opens with the intoxicating promise of empire—maps, mountains, treasure, two men convinced that audacity is a strategy—and then quietly dismantles the very mythology it deploys. Connery and Caine aren’t playing heroes so much as performers who have mistaken their own act for divine mandate.

What makes the film endure is its understanding that empire is always, at some level, a confidence trick. Danny and Peachy succeed not through military genius but through theatre: borrowed rituals, borrowed authority, borrowed divinity. Huston stages their ascent with such muscular assurance that you feel the pull of it, the way a story can become a structure, and a structure can become a trap. Connery’s drift into godhood is played with a kind of tragic exuberance—he believes because belief is the only thing holding the edifice together.

But the film’s grandeur is never uncritical. Every sweeping vista, every triumphant march, carries the faint echo of its own undoing. Huston knows that spectacle can be both seduction and indictment. The scale is thrilling precisely because it is built on sand. When the illusion falters, it does so with the inevitability of gravity: the people who once worshipped turn sceptical, the rituals lose their charge, and the empire collapses back into the dust from which it was conjured.

Caine’s Peachy, the survivor and witness, becomes the film’s conscience. His final, haunted narration reframes the entire adventure as a cautionary tale—ambition without humility, performance mistaken for truth, power built on borrowed myths. The film’s melancholy lands because it recognises that hubris is not a flaw of individuals alone but of systems that reward spectacle over substance.

Huston delivers an epic that dazzles even as it warns. The Man Who Would Be King understands that the most dangerous empires are the ones that believe their own stories, and the most sobering adventures are the ones that reveal the cost of believing them.

Cocaine Bear — Channel 4, 9.30pm (2023)

Elizabeth Banks’ film commits fully to its premise and little else. Inspired by a true story, it abandons plausibility early in favour of gore, chaos and darkly comic excess.

Characters are disposable, tone is gleefully unstable, and restraint is intentionally absent. The film’s success depends on its honesty about being ridiculous.

As midnight cinema, it functions as release rather than statement — anarchic, crude, and knowingly disposable.

Afire — BBC Four, 11.00pm (2023)

Christian Petzold’s Afire is a study in emotional combustion. Set during a heatwave as wildfires approach, it follows a blocked writer whose insecurity infects every interaction.

The threat remains mostly unseen, mirroring the character’s internal collapse. Silence, glances and withheld emotion generate tension more effectively than plot mechanics.

The film’s final movement reframes earlier cruelty as blindness. Afire burns quietly, but it leaves deep marks.

Just Mercy — BBC One, 11.50pm (2019)

Just Mercy follows lawyer Bryan Stevenson’s fight against racial injustice, focusing on process rather than spectacle. Michael B. Jordan plays restraint, while Jamie Foxx embodies quiet devastation.

The film’s power lies in accumulation. Small humiliations, delays and indifference expose a system designed to exhaust rather than correct.

It may be formally conventional, but its sincerity gives it weight. Justice here is labour, not abstraction.

Sunday 1 February 2026

Jason and the Argonauts — Film4, 2.50pm (1963)

Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts endures because it treats myth not as solemn scripture but as a playground for ingenuity. Every creature, every set‑piece, carries the unmistakable signature of human hands solving problems with creativity rather than computing power. The stop‑motion isn’t a limitation; it’s the film’s pulse. Those skeletons—jerky, balletic, unnervingly purposeful—still feel more alive than many digital armies because you can sense the labour behind every frame.

The film’s structure embraces the logic of legend. Jason’s journey unfolds as a sequence of ordeals, each one less about domination than about proving worthiness. He doesn’t bulldoze his way through the world; he negotiates it, relying on allies, improvisation and the occasional nudge from the gods. That humility gives the adventure its shape. In myth, survival is rarely a solo achievement, and the film honours that truth.

What’s striking, revisiting it now, is how confidently it trusts craft over excess. The spectacle comes from invention—how to make a harpy swoop, how to give a bronze giant weight, how to choreograph a fight between flesh and bone. There’s a generosity in that approach, an invitation to marvel at the process as much as the result.

Jason and the Argonauts stands as a reminder that fantasy doesn’t need to overwhelm to enchant. Sometimes the most lasting magic is the kind built frame by painstaking frame, where imagination is the real special effect.

Men of Honour — GREAT! TV, 9.00pm (2000)

This biographical drama charts Carl Brashear’s rise against institutional racism. It wears its inspiration openly, favouring perseverance over complexity.

The film benefits from strong central performances and an understanding of bureaucracy as quiet resistance.

Its emotional payoff is earned through endurance rather than surprise.

Saltburn — BBC Two, 10.00pm (2023) 🌟

Fennell’s Saltburn operates like a mirror polished to a blinding sheen: the more immaculate the surface, the more grotesque the reflection. It’s a film that understands decadence as both lure and indictment, inviting the audience into its gilded corridors only to make them complicit in the rot. The satire works because it never pretends to offer moral footholds. Everyone is performing, everyone is consuming, and everyone is being consumed.

Oliver’s ascent through the Catton household is framed not as seduction but as anthropology—an outsider studying a tribe whose rituals are built on inherited immunity. Yet the film refuses to romanticise his perspective. He is as hungry as they are careless, and the collision of those appetites becomes the engine of the story. Desire here is not erotic but strategic; intimacy is a currency traded with ruthless precision.

Fennell shoots privilege as spectacle, but never as fantasy. The excess is glossy, yes, but it has the coldness of a showroom—objects arranged for admiration, not use. The performances echo that artificiality: heightened, brittle, deliberately unrooted. No one speaks plainly because sincerity would break the spell. The result is a world where manipulation isn’t aberration but grammar.

What unsettles is the film’s refusal to moralise. It doesn’t diagnose, redeem or even condemn. It simply presents a closed ecosystem of want and waste, trusting the audience to feel the chill beneath the glamour. By the end, the emptiness is the point: a hollow centre around which beauty, cruelty and ambition orbit without ever touching meaning.

Saltburn provokes because it withholds catharsis. It exposes the machinery of privilege and desire, then steps back, offering no lesson beyond the discomfort it leaves behind.

Monday 2 February 2026

Arabesque — Film4, 3.40pm (1966)

Stanley Donen’s Cold War thriller is playful rather than paranoid. Gregory Peck navigates espionage as puzzle, not dread.

The film treats danger as choreography, turning intrigue into entertainment.

It’s stylish, disposable and charming, a reminder of lighter genre confidence.

Nixon in the Den — PBS America, 7.40pm

This documentary examines Richard Nixon’s post-presidential exile, revealing insecurity beneath authority.

Rather than rehabilitation, it offers exposure: a portrait of power stripped of office.

The result is quietly unsettling.

Kissinger: The Necessity of Power (1 of 2) — PBS America, 8.50pm

The documentary’s opening chapter approaches Kissinger with a kind of clinical steadiness, stripping away both hagiography and outrage to examine the machinery that produced him. Rather than reheating familiar moral verdicts, it traces the intellectual scaffolding behind his worldview: a belief in order over idealism, stability over sentiment, and influence as something engineered rather than inherited. The film’s restraint is its sharpest tool. By refusing to editorialise, it forces the viewer to sit with the uncomfortable truth that realpolitik is not an aberration but a philosophy with its own internal logic.

What emerges is a portrait of power as something constructed through study, strategy and an almost dispassionate reading of global behaviour. Kissinger’s ascent is shown not as inevitability but as the result of deliberate positioning—an academic who understood that ideas become force when paired with access. The documentary lingers on the tension between theory and impact, highlighting how intellectual frameworks, once applied, generate consequences far beyond their authors’ control.

The effect is quietly unsettling. By focusing on calculation rather than caricature, the film invites a more adult engagement with the nature of statecraft. It doesn’t absolve; it contextualises. And in doing so, it suggests that the most consequential figures are rarely accidents of history—they are architects, and the structures they build cast long shadows.

Lover, Liar, Predator — BBC Two, 9.00pm

This true-crime documentary examines coercive control with clarity and restraint. It centres victims without sensationalism, focusing on patterns rather than shock. Uncomfortable but necessary viewing.

Chevalier — Film4, 10.55pm (2022)

Chevalier approaches Joseph Bologne’s story with the urgency of a reclamation project, but it refuses to treat him as a symbol first and a person second. What emerges is a portrait of a man whose brilliance is undeniable yet perpetually constrained by the architecture of a society that cannot accommodate him. The film’s energy comes from that tension: the exhilaration of watching a prodigy claim space, and the ache of watching the world shrink it again.

Kelvin Harrison Jr. plays Bologne with a precision that mirrors the character’s own discipline—every gesture sharpened by the knowledge that perfection is his only permissible defence. The film understands that in 18th‑century France, talent is not a passport but a provocation. His virtuosity unsettles because it exposes the fragility of hierarchies built on birth rather than merit. Music becomes both liberation and liability, a stage on which he dazzles and a reminder of the rooms he will never fully enter.

Race and class are not treated as thematic add‑ons but as the gravitational forces shaping every opportunity and every humiliation. The salons, the opera houses, the courtly intrigues—all glitter with possibility while quietly enforcing their boundaries. Bologne moves through these spaces with the confidence of someone who knows he belongs and the caution of someone who knows he will be told otherwise.

The tragedy is not that he lacks power, but that he is allowed to stand so close to it he can feel its heat without ever being permitted to hold it. That proximity becomes its own form of cruelty: the promise of recognition dangled, deferred, withdrawn. The film’s emotional force lies in showing how a life of extraordinary achievement can still be defined by the doors that remain closed.

Chevalier succeeds because it restores scale to a figure history diminished. It recognises that erasure is not just forgetting but the refusal to acknowledge what someone threatened simply by being exceptional.

Retreat — BBC Two, 11.55pm (2011)

Retreat is one of those compact thrillers that understands the power of confinement. By stripping the narrative down to three people on an isolated island, it turns every silence into suspicion and every shift in the weather into a threat. The film’s modest scale becomes its advantage: without spectacle to lean on, it relies on mood, tension and the slow erosion of trust.

Cillian Murphy and Thandiwe Newton play a couple already frayed at the edges, and the arrival of Jamie Bell’s stranger doesn’t so much disrupt their equilibrium as expose how fragile it always was. The film’s real engine is uncertainty—about the outside world, about the intruder’s story, about the couple’s own capacity to cope. That ambiguity keeps the audience in the same psychological space as the characters, scanning for clues, doubting every reassurance.

The landscape does much of the heavy lifting. The island feels less like a setting and more like a pressure chamber, its isolation tightening around the characters until paranoia becomes the only rational response. Director Carl Tibbetts uses the environment with a kind of austere precision: the empty horizon, the battered cottage, the relentless weather. Everything conspires to make the world feel both vast and claustrophobic.

What makes the film effective is its refusal to overreach. It doesn’t try to reinvent the genre or inflate its stakes. Instead, it commits to atmosphere, to the slow drip of dread, to the unsettling possibility that the threat may be real or imagined—or both. In its restraint, Retreat finds a sharper edge than many bigger, louder thrillers manage.

Modest, yes, but quietly gripping, and proof that paranoia, when handled with care, can be its own special effect.

Tuesday 3 February 2026

Kissinger: The Opportunist (2 of 2) — PBS America, 8.55pm

The second instalment approaches Kissinger not as an enigma to be decoded but as a ledger to be examined—one in which achievement and devastation sit side by side without ever balancing out. By shifting its focus from ascent to aftermath, the documentary forces a confrontation with the long tail of policy: the alliances forged, the conflicts prolonged, the doctrines that outlived their architect.

What gives this chapter its uneasy charge is the refusal to tidy the narrative. Admiration for strategic brilliance is presented alongside the human cost of those strategies, and the film resists the temptation to adjudicate between them. Instead, it lets the contradictions stand, allowing viewers to feel the discomfort of a legacy that cannot be reduced to either triumph or indictment.

The documentary’s most pointed insight is its recognition that history is not a courtroom. Consequences accumulate, interpretations shift, and reputations are revised rather than resolved. Kissinger emerges not as a figure who can be neatly praised or condemned, but as someone whose influence continues to ripple outward, complicating any attempt at closure.

In the end, the film suggests that the reckoning with power is always provisional. Legacies like Kissinger’s don’t conclude—they linger, contested, unfinished, and instructive precisely because they refuse to settle.

Sin City: The Real Las Vegas — BBC Three, 10.15pm

This documentary punctures the Vegas myth. Excess is reframed as economy, and glamour as labour. The result is sobering rather than salacious.

Our Kind of Traitor — Film4, 11.25pm (2016)

Our Kind of Traitor takes Le Carré’s moral fog and gives it a contemporary sheen without losing the unease that defines his world. What begins as a chance encounter on holiday becomes a slow, tightening snare in which ordinary people find themselves negotiating with forces far larger and far colder than they imagined. The film’s elegance lies in its refusal to inflate its protagonists into heroes; they remain civilians caught in a geopolitical undertow, trying to do the right thing while never quite knowing what that is.

Ewan McGregor and Naomie Harris play the couple with a kind of bruised decency, their domestic fractures making them more susceptible to Dima’s desperate charm. Stellan Skarsgård, meanwhile, gives the Russian defector a tragic heft—half showman, half doomed patriarch—whose plea for help is both manipulative and sincere. That ambiguity is the film’s oxygen. Every alliance feels provisional, every promise double‑edged.

The British intelligence apparatus is rendered with Le Carré’s characteristic chill: procedural, pragmatic, and entirely willing to sacrifice pawns for position. Damian Lewis’s MI6 officer embodies that tension—principled enough to act, compromised enough to know the cost. The thriller’s propulsion comes not from action but from the steady erosion of trust, the dawning realisation that in this ecosystem, innocence is not protection but liability.

By the time the story resolves, the title feels less like a question and more like a diagnosis. Betrayal is not an aberration but the currency of the realm, and even the well‑intentioned are drawn into its logic. Everyone pays, as you say—some with their lives, others with the knowledge of what they’ve enabled.

It’s a sleek, quietly bruising adaptation, and one that understands that in Le Carré’s universe, clarity is the first casualty.

Bones and All — BBC Three, 12.45am (2022)

Luca Guadagnino’s cannibal romance is tender and horrifying. Hunger becomes metaphor for connection. It’s a love story that refuses reassurance.

Wednesday 4 February 2026

Reform: Ready to Rule? — BBC Two, 9.00pm 🌟

Kuenssberg’s film approaches Reform UK not as a fixed political project but as a moving weather system—shifting pressures, sudden gusts, and a great deal of atmospheric noise. Rather than treating the party’s ambitions as a settled programme, it frames them as an expression of national restlessness, a response to a political climate where frustration often speaks louder than policy.

What the documentary grasps, and what gives it its charge, is that Reform’s appeal is as much emotional as ideological. The interviews, the rallies, the off‑camera asides all point to a politics built on affect: grievance, impatience, the desire for rupture. Kuenssberg doesn’t flatten this into caricature. She observes it, tests it, and lets its contradictions sit in the open.

The volatility is the story. Leadership confidence coexists with strategic uncertainty; bold claims are paired with hazy detail. The film resists the temptation to declare whether the party is “ready” in any conventional sense. Instead, it shows a movement trying to convert momentum into structure, mood into machinery.

By the end, what lingers is not a verdict but a texture. Reform UK emerges as a party defined less by its documents than by its atmosphere—a reminder that contemporary politics often runs on feeling long before it reaches the page.

Massacre in Vietnam: My Lai — PBS America, 9.00pm

Massacre in Vietnam: My Lai approaches one of the darkest chapters of the war with the gravity it demands, refusing the comfort of tidy narratives or easy villains. Instead of sensationalising, it reconstructs the atrocity through testimony, context and the slow, painful accumulation of detail. The restraint is deliberate: the horror speaks for itself, and the film’s task is to ensure it is neither diluted nor abstracted.

What stands out is the documentary’s refusal to collapse complexity into excuse. It traces the chain of command, the climate of fear, the corrosive logic of dehumanisation—yet it never lets these factors dissolve accountability. The soldiers’ voices are presented alongside those of survivors, creating a dialogue that is less about reconciliation than about confronting the full weight of what happened.

The film treats memory not as a historical archive but as an ethical obligation. My Lai is shown as an event that continues to reverberate, shaping how nations understand war, how institutions handle truth, and how individuals carry guilt or grief across decades. By holding space for nuance without surrendering moral clarity, the documentary honours the victims by insisting that remembrance must be active, uncomfortable and ongoing.

It’s sober, yes, but also quietly insistent: some histories demand to be faced, not filed away.

Till — BBC Two, 11.30pm (2022)

Till approaches its subject with a discipline that feels almost radical. Instead of recreating violence for the sake of impact, it builds its power through what it withholds. The film understands that the horror of Emmett Till’s murder does not need cinematic amplification; it needs clarity, context and the unwavering gaze of a mother who refuses to let the world look away.

Danielle Deadwyler’s performance anchors everything. Her Mamie Till-Mobley is not framed as a saint or symbol but as a woman navigating unbearable loss with precision and purpose. The restraint in her portrayal is what gives it its force. She channels grief into articulation, insisting that the truth be seen, named and carried. The film honours that transformation without romanticising it.

Director Chinonye Chukwu keeps the camera attuned to the emotional cost rather than the spectacle of brutality. The result is a work that treats racial terror not as an event but as a system—one that shapes every interaction, every silence, every institutional response. The courtroom scenes, the public scrutiny, the private moments of collapse: all are rendered with a steadiness that refuses to let the audience retreat into abstraction.

What lingers is the sense of grief as agency. Mamie’s insistence on bearing witness becomes a form of resistance, a moral force that reverberates far beyond the film’s final frame. Till is restrained, yes, but never muted. Its quietness is conviction, and its impact comes from the dignity it restores to a story too often reduced to shorthand.

Public Enemies — Film4, 12.40am (2009)

Mann’s Public Enemies takes the familiar architecture of the gangster film and strips it of nostalgia, replacing the sepia glow of myth with the hard, hyper‑present texture of digital photography. That choice is not aesthetic indulgence; it’s argument. By shooting the 1930s with the immediacy of reportage, Mann collapses the distance between past and present, showing how celebrity and criminality have always been intertwined, each feeding the other’s appetite for spectacle.

Johnny Depp’s Dillinger is less a folk hero than a man performing the idea of one—aware of the cameras, aware of the crowds, aware that notoriety is its own kind of currency. Mann refuses to romanticise him. The charm is real, but so is the void behind it. The film’s coolness—its glassy surfaces, its precision, its refusal of sentiment—becomes a way of exposing the moral vacancy at the centre of the legend. Crime here is not rebellion; it’s branding.

Christian Bale’s Purvis is the mirror image: a lawman who mistakes efficiency for virtue, pursuing order with the same performative intensity that Dillinger brings to outlawry. Mann positions them as parallel figures shaped by the same machinery of attention. The FBI’s rise is depicted not as the triumph of justice but as the birth of a new kind of institutional theatre, one that understands the power of narrative as keenly as any gangster.

What makes the film so quietly subversive is its insistence that style is not decoration but diagnosis. The digital sheen, the abrupt violence, the refusal to linger on emotional beats—all serve to strip away the romance that usually cushions stories like this. Mann shows a world where image outruns substance, where fame is indistinguishable from infamy, and where the chase is more compelling than the cause.

Public Enemies is sleek, yes, but its sleekness cuts. It’s a gangster film that interrogates the very myths it inherits, revealing how easily charisma becomes camouflage and how eagerly a culture will embrace spectacle even when it leads nowhere.

Thursday 5 February 2026

Reservoir Dogs — ITV4, 10.55pm (1992)


Tarantino’s debut remains ferociously confident, a film that still feels like a manifesto. Dialogue becomes weapon: jagged, swaggering, and far more dangerous than anything shown on screen. The violence is mostly implication rather than spectacle, which only sharpens the tension. Three decades on, the warehouse standoff still crackles with the thrill of a filmmaker announcing himself at full volume.

I Am Not OK — BBC Two, 9pm


A quietly devastating documentary following mothers navigating the daily realities of raising autistic sons. It resists sensationalism, instead offering a grounded, humane portrait of care, exhaustion, advocacy, and love. The film’s strength lies in its intimacy: small domestic moments that reveal the structural gaps families are forced to bridge alone. Essential viewing for anyone interested in the lived experience behind policy debates.

Friday 6 February 2026

Bohemian Rhapsody — Film4, 9.00pm (2018)

Bohemian Rhapsody is the kind of biopic that succeeds in spite of its own caution. The film follows the familiar rise‑fall‑rise arc with almost dutiful obedience, sanding down the messier contours of Freddie Mercury’s life in favour of a cleaner, more digestible narrative. Yet within that conventional frame, Rami Malek delivers a performance so precise and so alive that it keeps breaking through the film’s limitations, reminding you of the volatility and vulnerability the script often sidesteps.

The structure does Mercury few favours. Conflicts resolve neatly, relationships are simplified, and the band’s creative tensions are arranged like stepping stones rather than fault lines. Complexity is flattened into clarity, and clarity into myth. But the film compensates by leaning into spectacle—concerts rendered with operatic scale, music treated as emotional shorthand, Live Aid staged as a kind of cinematic absolution. It’s unsubtle, but undeniably effective.

What lingers is the sense of a film torn between reverence and revelation. It chooses reverence, and the result is polished, accessible, and dramatically safe. But Malek’s performance keeps pushing at the edges, hinting at the richer, stranger story beneath the gloss. In the end, spectacle wins—but it wins because the music still does.

Silver Haze — BBC Two, 11.00pm (2023)

Silver Haze unfolds with the kind of emotional precision that refuses spectacle. Instead of amplifying trauma for dramatic effect, it sits with it—patiently, attentively—allowing the characters’ wounds to surface in gestures, silences and the fragile attempts at connection that follow catastrophe. The film’s intimacy is its integrity. It understands that pain is not a narrative device but a lived condition, shaped by class, family history and the uneasy space where desire meets self‑protection.

Vicky Knight’s performance is the anchor: raw without exhibitionism, guarded yet luminous. She carries the story with a physicality that makes every moment of vulnerability feel hard‑won. The film’s queer identity is not framed as revelation or crisis but as part of the emotional architecture—another layer of longing, another site where tenderness and fear coexist.

Director Sacha Polak keeps the camera close, but never predatory. The result is a portrait of trauma that honours complexity rather than mining it. Relationships fracture and reform, not for plot mechanics but because healing is uneven, often circular. The film’s quiet devastation comes from its refusal to impose catharsis. It recognises that some injuries don’t resolve; they reshape.

Silver Haze lingers because it treats survival not as triumph but as continuation—messy, tentative, and deeply human.

Benedetta — Film4, 11.45pm (2021)

Paul Verhoeven’s provocation explores faith, power and sexuality. Nothing is sacred, everything is political. It ends the week on a note of glorious discomfort.

Culture Vulture — Streaming Picks

The Lincoln Lawyer (Season 4) — Netflix, from Thursday 5 February

Mickey Haller returns to a world where success feels increasingly precarious. The show’s trademark Californian ease remains, but the moral temperature has risen: charm no longer guarantees absolution, and every victory carries a cost.
Season four leans into the tension between principle and pragmatism, asking what justice looks like when the system rewards those who bend rather than break. Confident, polished television that knows exactly how to keep its audience leaning forward.


Salvador — Netflix, all eight episodes from Friday 6 February

This Spanish thriller roots its unease in the resurgence of a neo‑Nazi network, treating extremism not as shock tactic but as a lived, organised threat. Salvador’s reappearance after years away destabilises a community already fraying at the edges.
The series is less concerned with twists than with the slow corrosion of radicalisation — how ideology seeps into families, institutions and loyalties long before violence erupts. Unsettling, tightly controlled drama that refuses to sensationalise what it can instead expose.


Arctic Circle (Series 4) — Walter Presents / Channel 4 Streaming, from Friday 6 February

The Finnish crime saga returns with its signature blend of icy landscapes and moral pressure. Series four pushes its characters deeper into the grey zones where duty, fear and loyalty collide.
Violence is rarely spectacle here; the cold is never just weather. The environment becomes a crucible, forcing choices that feel both inevitable and devastating. A thriller that trusts intelligence over noise, and earns its tension through atmosphere rather than excess.


The Nevers — ITVX, all 12 episodes from Sunday 1 February

This Victorian fantasy arrives in full, its world of “touched” women rendered with operatic ambition. Power here is both liberation and burden, and the series thrives on that contradiction.
Across twelve episodes, the show shifts shape — part conspiracy, part character study, part mythmaking — but its emotional core holds steady: extraordinary abilities don’t free people from society’s constraints; they illuminate them.
A flawed, fascinating epic that rewards attention and embraces scale without losing intimacy.


And On the Big Screen

Wuthering Heights — in UK cinemas from 13 February 2026

Emerald Fennell turns to Emily Brontë and finds, unsurprisingly, something feral. This new Wuthering Heights leans hard into obsession, class resentment and emotional extremity, treating the moors less as scenery than as a psychological weather system. Passion here isn’t romantic balm but corrosive force, grinding everyone it touches.

Fennell’s approach strips away heritage cosiness. The film pulses with physicality and menace, suggesting a world where love and cruelty are inseparable. This is not a story about yearning glances across hills, but about possession, rage and the refusal to be contained by social order.

Arriving just before Valentine’s Day, it feels almost provocatively timed. This Wuthering Heights doesn’t offer comfort — it offers intensity, and dares the audience to endure it.

Hamnet — in UK cinemas from 9 January 2026

Chloé Zhao’s Hamnet is an exercise in restraint and emotional precision. Rather than mythologising Shakespeare, it circles the quiet devastation of losing a child, allowing grief to ripple outward into marriage, memory and art. It’s a film that understands absence as a presence.

The performances are deeply internal, built from gestures rather than declarations. Zhao’s camera observes rather than intrudes, trusting the audience to sit with silence and unfinished feeling. There is no rush toward catharsis, only a slow, humane reckoning.

Hamnet feels less like literary adaptation than emotional archaeology. It uncovers the human cost behind genius, and in doing so becomes one of the year’s most quietly affecting films.

The History of Sound — in cinemas from 23 January 2026

This intimate drama traces a lifelong bond forged through music, memory and shared listening. Set across decades, The History of Sound uses folk song as emotional infrastructure, carrying longing, loss and connection across time.

The film’s great strength is its refusal to overstate. Relationships deepen through repetition and rhythm rather than plot mechanics, and sound itself becomes a narrative force. Music isn’t performance here — it’s communion.

There’s a melancholy confidence to the film, a sense that it trusts audiences to lean in. It’s reflective cinema, patient and resonant, rewarding attention rather than demanding it.

H Is for Hawk — now in UK cinemas

Adapted from Helen Macdonald’s memoir, H Is for Hawk explores grief not through therapy or confession, but through discipline and obsession. Training a goshawk becomes a way of surviving loss, replacing language with ritual and focus.

The film resists easy metaphor, instead allowing the hawk to remain both symbol and animal — beautiful, dangerous, and indifferent. Nature offers no consolation here, only intensity and presence.

This is inward-looking cinema, emotionally rigorous and deliberately unshowy. It asks the audience to slow down and inhabit a mind shaped by sorrow rather than resolution.

Is This Thing On? — in UK cinemas, early 2026

A lightly comic but emotionally alert film, Is This Thing On? plays with performance, self-awareness and the anxiety of being perceived. Its humour masks a deeper unease about communication in a culture obsessed with visibility.

The film’s charm lies in its looseness. Scenes breathe, conversations wander, and meaning accumulates rather than arrives on cue. It’s interested less in punchlines than in the awkward spaces between them.

This is the kind of film that thrives on word-of-mouth — modest, thoughtful, and quietly attuned to the rhythms of contemporary life.

No Other Choice — now playing in selected cinemas

This understated drama centres on moral pressure and the illusion of agency. Its characters are pushed into decisions framed as inevitable, raising uncomfortable questions about responsibility and consent.

The film avoids melodrama, opting instead for accumulation. Each compromise narrows the path ahead, until choice itself feels theoretical rather than real.

No Other Choice doesn’t announce its significance loudly, but it lingers. It’s reflective, unsettling cinema that trusts the audience to sit with ambiguity.

Cover image for the novel "Special" by Anthony C. Green featuring text that reads 'BUY NOW' with a dark corridor background.

Leave a Comment

No Other Choice: The Cost of Masculinity and Success

Man‑su, a once‑celebrated employee at Solar Paper, sees his comfortable life collapse after an American buyout triggers mass layoffs. As months of failed job applications erode his family’s stability, he becomes convinced that the only way to reclaim his former status is to eliminate the rivals standing between him and the few remaining industry jobs. Park Chan‑wook adapts Donald Westlake’s The Ax into a Korean satire of capitalism, blending slapstick menace with moral unease as Man‑su’s quest for security turns into a chilling, darkly humorous descent.

No Other Choice is a film that grips precisely because it refuses to reassure. From the outset it announces itself as something carefully made and intellectually controlled, but also deliberately amoral. It doesn’t guide the viewer toward judgement so much as leave them alone with the consequences of what they’re watching. That tension — between technical assurance and ethical unease — is what gives the film its bite.

Park Chan-wook frames the story as a dark comedy, and the balance is impressively judged. The humour is subtle rather than showy, threaded through situations that are already tense rather than imposed from above. Violence, when it comes, doesn’t feel gratuitous or out of place. Instead, it sits naturally within the logic of the film’s world, as though brutality were simply another available tool once social and economic pressure have narrowed the field of options. The laughs catch in the throat because they’re never far from recognition.

What gives the film its real resonance, though, is its treatment of work, masculinity and expectation. This isn’t satire floating above reality; it feels grounded in contemporary pressure, particularly the strain placed on men to perform stability, success and provision even as the structures that once supported those roles erode. The film understands that we like to tell ourselves we’ve progressed beyond rigid expectations, while continuing to enforce them in quieter, more insidious ways. Choice, here, is largely illusory — shaped and constrained by systems that punish failure mercilessly.

Lee Byung-hun’s performance anchors all of this. What stays with you is not rage or theatrical menace, but desperation: the sense of a man being steadily compressed by forces he can neither confront nor escape. His physicality communicates exhaustion and panic long before the plot demands it, and the dark comedy works because it is rooted in that pressure rather than played for release. You’re not invited to admire him, but you’re made to understand him.

The ending is where No Other Choice fully commits to its amorality. There is no reckoning, no moral correction. Against cinematic convention, the protagonist gets what he wants, and what’s more disturbing, that outcome is quietly accepted — even colluded in — by those closest to him. The film’s final sting lies in its observation that capitalism and technology, which initially displace him, are ultimately absorbed into his survival strategy. He compromises with the very systems that harmed him, and the film suggests this is not hypocrisy but adaptation. It’s an ending that lingers because it feels uncomfortably plausible, leaving the viewer not with outrage, but with recognition.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Picture credit: By CJ ENM – SBS, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=77609270

A promotional image featuring the title 'The White Rooms' by TP Bragg, with a 'Buy Now' button on a dark background and a blurred, illuminated area in the background.

Leave a Comment

Prestige vs. Purpose at the Oscars 2026

The 98th Academy Awards arrive on 15 March, and the nominations reveal an industry wrestling with itself — torn between genuine artistic ambition and the gravitational pull of familiar, self‑satisfied prestige. Some films earned their place through craft and conviction. Others coasted in on baseless reputation alone.

Two gold Oscar statues on display at an event, with crew members and equipment in the background.

There are years when the Oscars feel like a coronation, and years when they feel like a referendum. This year is the latter. The nominations read less like a celebration of cinema and more like a ledger of the industry’s anxieties: its hunger for relevance, its fear of risk, its reflexive deference to certain names and certain kinds of noise. And yet, buried within the usual awards‑season self‑regard, there are flashes of genuine artistic courage — films that remind you why the medium still matters.

At the centre of this tension sits Sinners, the year’s juggernaut with a record‑breaking sixteen nominations. It is the rare frontrunner that actually deserves its dominance. Ryan Coogler’s film is furious, muscular, and morally alive — a work that refuses to flatter its audience or sand down its edges. In a year defined by self‑congratulation, Sinners feels like a rebuke: a reminder that cinema can still be dangerous, still be political, still be art. Its success is heartening precisely because it wasn’t engineered for awards; it earned them.

The same cannot be said for One Battle After Another, a film so enamoured with its own cleverness it forgets to be anything else. Its thirteen nominations feel less like recognition and more like muscle memory — the Academy rewarding a certain kind of prestige object simply because it knows how to recognise one. It is a film that mistakes volume for depth, swagger for insight, and self‑importance for substance. That it has become an awards‑season darling tells you as much about the Academy as it does about the film itself.

Somewhere between these poles sits Marty Supreme, a nine‑time nominee and the year’s most unsettling character study. Josh Safdie’s film is a portrait of ambition as erosion — a man so convinced of his own exceptionalism that he hollows out everyone around him. Timothée Chalamet’s performance is a live wire, all momentum and self‑mythology, refusing to soften the character’s edges. It is the kind of nomination that feels earned, not inevitable.

The rest of the Best Picture slate — Frankenstein, Sentimental Value, Bugonia, Hamnet, The Secret Agent, Train Dreams — forms a constellation of the year’s preoccupations: grief, reinvention, political fracture, the search for meaning in a world that keeps shifting underfoot. Some of these films are muscular, some mannered, some quietly forgettable. Together, they map the contours of a film culture trying to decide what it wants to be.

The acting categories reveal similar tensions. Chalamet’s nomination is one of the few that feels genuinely necessary; Michael B. Jordan’s work in Sinners is another. But elsewhere, the Academy falls back on familiar instincts. Leonardo DiCaprio’s nomination for One Battle After Another is predictable in the way weather is predictable: a system too large and too habitual to resist its own patterns. The Best Actress field, by contrast, feels alive — Jessie Buckley and Renate Reinsve anchoring it with performances that understand the power of restraint, of emotional intelligence, of tonal precision.

Even the new Best Casting category tells a story. That Sinners, Marty Supreme, and The Secret Agent dominate here is no accident; these are films built from ensembles that feel lived‑in rather than assembled, worlds populated rather than decorated. It is a long‑overdue recognition of a craft that shapes the emotional architecture of a film more than any technical category ever could.

And then there is Documentary Feature, the category where the Academy traditionally performs its conscience. This year’s nominees — The Alabama Solution, Come See Me in the Good Light, Cutting Through Rocks, Mr. Nobody Against Putin, The Perfect Neighbor — form a chorus of political urgency. They are films about systems under strain and individuals pushed to the margins: the American justice system, authoritarian pressure, surveillance culture, the fragility of dissent. It is the most overtly political slate of the year, and perhaps the most honest.

What emerges from all this is a portrait of an industry in flux. The Oscars have always been a mirror — sometimes flattering, sometimes unkind — but this year the reflection is unusually stark. Hollywood wants to reward ambition, but it also wants to feel safe. It wants to champion new voices, but it cannot quite let go of the old ones. It wants to be relevant, but it cannot stop congratulating itself.

And yet, despite all this, there is something undeniably compelling about the contradictions. Sinners and Marty Supreme show what happens when filmmakers trust their audience and take risks. One Battle After Another shows what happens when the Academy mistakes noise for depth. The rest of the field reveals a year in which cinema stretched, stumbled, and occasionally soared.

Whatever happens on 15 March, the nominations alone tell us everything we need to know about where Hollywood is — and where it still refuses to go.

By Pat Harrington

Leave a Comment

Review: Marty Supreme— Ambition as Erosion

Some films announce their intentions loudly; others creep up on you, revealing their true shape only once the credits roll. Marty Supreme belongs to the latter category — a watchable, energetic character study that holds your attention through sheer force of personality, only to falter at the final hurdle. What begins as a sharp, unsettling portrait of obsession ends with an abrupt swerve that undermines the psychological logic the film has spent two hours constructing. It’s a shame, because until that point the film is doing something genuinely interesting: presenting a man who believes himself exceptional while quietly hollowing out everyone around him.

The film follows Marty Mauser (Timothée Chalamet), a hustler with delusions of entrepreneurial grandeur, as he claws his way through a series of self‑made schemes, humiliations, and half‑truths. He’s a man who believes destiny has singled him out, even as he leaves a trail of damaged relationships behind him. Early on, he declares, “I have a purpose. You don’t. And if you think that’s some kind of blessing, it’s not.” It’s a line that crystallises the film’s thesis: Marty’s belief in his own exceptionalism is both his engine and his undoing.

Marty is not a kind person, and the film never pretends otherwise. His confidence — or more accurately, his overconfidence — is the engine of the story. He moves through the world with a sense of entitlement so total it becomes its own form of charisma. You watch him not because you admire him, but because you can’t quite look away. He treats people as instruments, stepping stones, or obstacles, and the film’s refusal to judge him directly is part of its unsettling power. It simply presents him, unvarnished, and leaves the moral reckoning to the viewer.

That neutrality is what makes the moments of sympathy land so sharply. When Marty is sabotaged by his own family, the betrayal stings. When he is humiliated by the swaggering businessman Milton (Kevin O’Leary) in the now‑infamous public spanking scene, you feel the sting of degradation even as you recognise how much of it is self‑inflicted. It’s a moment so bizarre it borders on the surreal, yet it fits the film’s portrait of a man willing to debase himself if it gets him one inch closer to the success he believes he deserves.

And then there are the people caught in his orbit. His taxi‑driver friend Wally (Tyler Okonma) offers loyalty without receiving much in return. His pregnant girlfriend Rachel (Odessa A’zion) inspires a complicated sympathy — she has her own manipulations, her own survival instincts, but she is also swept up in the gravitational pull of Marty’s self‑mythologising. Meanwhile Kay Stone (Gwyneth Paltrow), the actress he sleeps with, is drawn in by his intensity only to be discarded when she no longer serves the narrative he’s writing for himself. These characters are flattened, yes, but not because the writing is thin. They are flattened because Marty flattens them. The film shows us the world as he sees it: a landscape of utility.

There is real energy in the filmmaking. Scenes move with a restless momentum that mirrors Marty’s own compulsive drive. The camera seems to chase him, as if trying to keep up with a man who refuses to slow down long enough to examine himself. The pacing, the performances, the tonal confidence — all of it works to create a portrait of ambition as a kind of erosion. Marty’s obsession doesn’t just consume him; it wears down the people around him, leaving them diminished, exhausted, or quietly broken.

And then comes the ending. It’s not simply that it doesn’t land — it actively contradicts the character the film has spent so long establishing. The shift is abrupt, unearned, and tonally discordant, as if the film suddenly decided it wanted to be about redemption or revelation without doing the work to get there. It’s a narrative rupture that pulls the rug out from under everything that came before, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of disappointment at the missed opportunity.

Yet despite that misstep, Marty Supreme lingers. It made me think about obsession — not the glamorous, aspirational kind that populates motivational posters, but the corrosive version that narrows a person’s world until only the goal remains. It made me think about the collateral damage of ambition, the people who get pulled into someone else’s gravitational field and find themselves bent out of shape by it. And it made me think about how easily confidence can tip into delusion when no one is willing, or able, to hold a mirror up to the person demanding to be seen.

Marty Supreme is flawed, but it’s not forgettable. It provokes, frustrates, and occasionally moves, even as it stumbles at the finish line. In its best moments, it captures something true about the way obsession distorts a life — not through grand tragedy, but through the slow, steady erosion of everyone who gets too close.

Reviewed by Pat Harrington

Picture credit: By A24 – impawards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80723175

Promotional image for 'Lyrics to Live By 2' featuring a vinyl record and text describing further reflections, meditations, and life lessons by Tim Bragg.

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 24 January – 30 January 2026

A large vulture soaring in the sky with mountains in the background, featuring bold text that reads 'CULTURE VULTURE' and a colorful design at the bottom indicating 'COUNTER CULTURE 24-30 January 2026'.

This is a rich, uneasy, and often politically charged week, one that swings confidently between moral reckoning, cultural memory, and late-night menace. Jonathan Glazer’s devastating vision of banality and evil sits alongside American political myth-making, industrial British history, and a run of films that interrogate violence, love, and survival from wildly different angles. Music lovers are spoilt too, with Dolly Parton, The Who, and Take That all taking their bows. Three selections stand out as essential viewing: 🌟 The Zone of Interest, 🌟 Boomtown: How Merthyr Made the World, and 🌟 Terminator 2: Judgment Day — works that remind us how power is built, maintained, and resisted. Selections and reviews are by Pat Harrington.

Saturday 24 January 2026

Glazer’s film remains one of the most quietly devastating works of the past decade because it refuses the easy route of spectacle. Instead of showing atrocity, it lets the domestic sphere do the talking: a garden wall, a breakfast table, a child’s bedroom. The banality is the point. Evil is not a rupture but a routine, and the film’s cold precision forces us to sit with that truth longer than is comfortable.

The sound design is the real moral engine here. Screams, machinery, and the dull thud of violence bleed into scenes of family life with a kind of dreadful inevitability. You’re left listening harder than you’re watching, which is exactly the trap Glazer sets. The horror is ambient, unavoidable, and structurally baked into the world these characters inhabit.

What lingers is the film’s trust in the audience — and its punishment of that trust. Glazer assumes we know the history, the context, the scale. He gives us the edges and expects us to fill in the centre. The result is a film that indicts not only its characters but the viewer’s own capacity to normalise what should never be normalised.

This portrait of Dolly Parton understands that she is both an open book and a master illusionist. The documentary treats her image not as a mask but as a tool — something she wields with precision, humour, and a kind of radical generosity. Dolly has always known exactly how she wants to be seen, and the film respects that intelligence.

What emerges is a woman who has turned vulnerability into a kind of armour. She speaks candidly about hardship, ambition, and the cost of being underestimated, but she never lets the narrative slip into pity. Instead, she reframes every setback as material — something to be repurposed, polished, and sung back to the world with a wink.

The warmth of the film lies in its refusal to flatten her. Dolly is canny, strategic, and fiercely controlled, but she’s also genuinely funny and disarmingly sincere. The documentary captures that duality without forcing a resolution. She remains, as ever, entirely herself.

Ron Howard’s drama about the Hunt–Lauda rivalry works because it understands obsession not as glamour but as corrosion. The film revels in the speed and spectacle of Formula One, but it never loses sight of the psychological toll. These are men who live on the edge because they don’t know how to live anywhere else.

Chris Hemsworth’s James Hunt is all swagger and instinct — a man who burns brightly because he doesn’t expect to burn long. His charisma is intoxicating, but the film is clear-eyed about the self-destruction beneath it. Hunt is compelling precisely because he’s so brittle.

Daniel Brühl’s Niki Lauda, by contrast, is the film’s anchor. His discipline, pain, and relentless logic give the story its emotional weight. The rivalry becomes a study in two forms of survival: one reckless, one methodical. Howard lets both men be flawed, brilliant, and human.

Dolly’s Glastonbury set has already passed into festival folklore, and revisiting it only confirms why. She walks onto that stage with the confidence of someone who knows she can win over 100,000 people with charm alone. No pyrotechnics, no theatrics — just presence.

What’s striking is how she smuggles country music into the pop mainstream without compromising a thing. She plays the hits, of course, but she also plays the crowd, leaning into the humour and the rhinestone sparkle while never letting the performance slip into parody. It’s a masterclass in reading a room the size of a small city.

The set becomes a reminder of Dolly’s unique cultural position: beloved across generations, genres, and politics. She unites the field not through nostalgia but through sheer craft. It’s crowd control as soft power.

This quiet, contemplative programme places Maya Angelou in conversation with Robert Burns, and the pairing is far more natural than it first appears. Both writers understood the power of plain language to carry profound emotional weight. Both wrote about belonging and displacement with a clarity that still resonates.

Angelou’s reflections on Burns become a meditation on exile — not just geographical, but emotional and cultural. She speaks about finding home in language, in rhythm, in the shared human experiences that poetry can hold. The programme gives her space to think aloud, and that space becomes its own kind of intimacy.

What’s most moving is how the film treats poetry as something porous, borderless. Burns travels to Angelou; Angelou travels back to Burns. The exchange feels less like analysis and more like kinship.

This savage little satire masquerades as a slasher, but its real target is the language of online performance. The film begins as a party game and spirals into a study of paranoia, privilege, and the speed at which trust collapses when everyone is performing for an invisible audience.

The script is razor-sharp about how young people weaponise vocabulary — “gaslighting,” “toxic,” “triggering” — not as tools for understanding but as ammunition. The characters speak in borrowed frameworks, diagnosing each other with the confidence of people who’ve read half a thread and think it counts as expertise.

By the time the bodies start dropping, the violence feels almost secondary to the social disintegration. The film’s final twist is both bleak and darkly funny, revealing just how fragile the whole edifice of self-awareness really is.


Sunday 25 January 2026

Steel Magnolias earns its reputation not through manipulation but through the sheer force of its ensemble. The film understands that grief and joy often sit side by side, and it lets its characters move between those states with a naturalism that still feels fresh.

The performances are the heart of it. Each actor brings a different shade of resilience, humour, and vulnerability, and the chemistry between them is what makes the emotional beats land. The film never rushes their relationships; it lets them breathe.

Decades on, the honesty still cuts through. The film’s sentimentality is grounded in lived experience, not cliché. It’s a reminder that melodrama, when done well, can be a form of truth-telling.

This documentary takes a sober, infrastructural look at Donald Trump’s return to political prominence. Rather than dwelling on spectacle, it traces the mechanics: the networks of grievance, media ecosystems, and memory politics that shape momentum in American public life.

The film is careful not to sensationalise. It treats Trump as a political actor within a broader system, examining how his messaging resonates with certain constituencies and how institutional dynamics respond in turn. The tone is analytical rather than breathless.

What emerges is a portrait of political re-emergence as a process rather than an event. The documentary invites viewers to consider not just the figure at the centre, but the conditions that make such a comeback possible.

RED is a film that knows exactly what it is: a playful action-comedy anchored by actors who could outclass the material but choose instead to revel in it. Bruce Willis leans into his weary charm, while Helen Mirren steals every scene with a kind of icy delight.

The joke, of course, is that retirement becomes a weapon. These characters are underestimated precisely because of their age, and the film has fun flipping that assumption on its head. Experience becomes both punchline and superpower.

It’s not deep, but it doesn’t need to be. The pleasure lies in watching great actors enjoy themselves, and the film delivers that in abundance.

De Palma’s elegiac crime drama remains one of his most emotionally resonant works. Carlito Brigante is a man desperate to outrun his past, and the film treats that desire with genuine tenderness. Pacino plays him with a weary hopefulness that makes the tragedy inevitable.

The film is drenched in atmosphere — neon, sweat, and the constant hum of danger. De Palma’s camera glides through this world with a sense of fatalism, as if the ending has already been written and the characters are simply catching up.

What makes the film endure is its understanding of how reputation traps people. Carlito wants redemption, but the world won’t let him have it. The heartbreak lies in how close he comes.


Monday 26 January 2026

Still the benchmark for blockbuster filmmaking, Terminator 2 fuses spectacle with genuine moral inquiry. Cameron treats action not as noise but as narrative — every chase, every explosion, every moment of tension is in service of a story about learning, care, and sacrifice.

The relationship between the T-800 and John Connor remains the film’s emotional core. Watching a machine learn empathy is one of cinema’s great paradoxes, and the film leans into that contradiction with surprising delicacy. It’s a story about what we choose to protect.

Three decades on, the film’s scale still feels earned. The effects hold up, the pacing is immaculate, and the emotional beats land with force. It’s a blockbuster with a soul.

This series grounds the history of the Troubles in personal testimony, allowing those who lived through it to speak with clarity, contradiction, and pain. The result is a narrative that resists neatness — and is stronger for it.

The documentary refuses to impose a single interpretation. Instead, it lets memories sit alongside each other, even when they clash. That tension becomes a form of truth in itself, reflecting the complexity of a conflict that shaped generations.

By the end, what stays with you is the humanity of the voices. The series honours their experiences without romanticising or simplifying them.

This Horizon instalment strips away the glamour of space travel and focuses on the discipline behind it. Tim Peake walks viewers through the training, the preparation, and the sheer physical and mental effort required to leave Earth.

The programme is methodical without being dry. It treats spaceflight as a craft — something learned, honed, and constantly refined. Peake’s calm, clear explanations make the complexity accessible.

What’s inspiring is the quietness of it all. No grandstanding, no myth-making — just the steady accumulation of skill. It’s a reminder that extraordinary achievements are built on ordinary, repeated effort.

This affectionate biopic about wrestler Paige works because it treats its subject with warmth and respect. Florence Pugh brings grit and humour to the role, grounding the film’s comedy in real family dynamics.

The film understands working-class ambition without condescension. It shows the sacrifices, the tensions, and the fierce loyalty that shape Paige’s journey. The wrestling world becomes a backdrop for a story about belonging.

It’s a feel-good film, but not a shallow one. The emotional beats land because they’re rooted in character, not cliché.

This late-night double bill frames space exploration as both triumph and risk. Eight Days to the Moon and Back reconstructs Apollo 11 with documentary precision, reminding viewers how much of the mission relied on human judgment under pressure.

Horizon: Man in Space widens the lens, tracing the history of our attempts to leave the planet. It’s a story of ambition tethered to fallibility — every breakthrough shadowed by danger.

Together, the two programmes create a portrait of exploration that is both awe-inspiring and sobering. Space becomes not a fantasy, but a frontier shaped by human limits.


Tuesday 27 January 2026

Welles’s feverish noir remains a masterclass in style as narrative. Mirrors, shadows, and disorienting angles fracture the story into something unstable and dreamlike. Betrayal becomes not just a theme but a visual language.

The plot is famously convoluted, but that’s part of its charm. Welles isn’t interested in clarity; he’s interested in mood. The film feels like a nightmare you can’t quite wake from, where every reflection hides another lie.

The hall-of-mirrors climax still dazzles. It’s cinema as sleight of hand — a reminder that Welles understood illusion better than almost anyone.

This documentary offers a sharp reassessment of Cromwell, treating him not as a villain but as a survivor navigating a lethal political landscape. Power here is transactional, fragile, and always provisional.

The programme traces Cromwell’s ascent with clarity, showing how intelligence and adaptability propelled him upward. But it also shows how quickly favour can evaporate in a court built on suspicion and ambition.

By the end, Cromwell emerges as a figure shaped by his environment — brilliant, ruthless, and ultimately doomed. The fall feels inevitable, but the path to it is fascinating.


Wednesday 28 January 2026

Sky Arts, 9.00pm / 10.00pm / 11.00pm

This triptych of programmes is deliciously provocative, exploring how art courts desire, fear, and taboo. Each instalment treats its subject not as shock value but as a lens through which to examine human preoccupations.

The erotic episode looks at how artists have depicted longing and intimacy, often pushing against the boundaries of their time. The horrific episode turns to violence and monstrosity, asking why we’re drawn to images that unsettle us. The satanic episode digs into the iconography of rebellion and transgression.

Together, they form a portrait of art as interrogation — a space where society tests its limits and confronts its shadows.

Film4, 11.05pm / BBC Three, 11.15pm / BBC Two, 11.30pm

Three films, three flavours of dread. The Last Jewel leans into crime and consequence, using genre to explore moral rot. Queen & Slim turns pursuit into a political fable, its beauty sharpened by anger. Relic dives into inherited trauma, using horror to articulate the slow erosion of identity.

Each film uses fear differently — as atmosphere, as metaphor, as emotional truth. What unites them is their refusal to treat genre as limitation. Instead, they use it to say something bruising and human.

It’s a late-night lineup that rewards attention. None of these films offer easy catharsis, but all of them linger.


Thursday 29 January 2026

This documentary explores the vast, intricate civilisation behind Angkor Wat, treating the site not as a ruin but as the centre of a thriving, sophisticated world. The programme blends archaeology with storytelling, revealing a city shaped by engineering, belief, and ambition.

The scale of the civilisation is astonishing — reservoirs the size of lakes, networks of roads and canals, and a cultural life that stretched across centuries. The documentary makes these achievements feel vivid rather than abstract.

It’s a reminder that history is often far more complex than the fragments we inherit. Angkor Wat becomes not just a monument, but a window into human ingenuity.

Theroux’s calm persistence is the film’s secret weapon. Rather than confronting power head-on, he lets it reveal itself through defensiveness, evasion, and overreaction. The result is both unsettling and darkly funny.

The documentary’s reconstruction scenes — actors re-enacting alleged incidents — become a way of exploring memory, control, and belief. They’re theatrical, but deliberately so, highlighting the performative nature of the institution itself.

What emerges is a portrait of power that is brittle rather than omnipotent. Theroux never claims to have the full picture, but he shows enough to make the gaps speak volumes.


Friday 30 January 2026

This superb documentary traces how Merthyr Tydfil powered the engines of global industrialisation, and it does so without slipping into nostalgia or civic boosterism. Instead, it treats the town as a crucible of labour, invention, and exploitation — a place where the modern world was forged in heat, noise, and human cost. The programme is unflinching about the brutality of industrial life, but it also honours the ingenuity and resilience that emerged from it.

What stands out is the film’s refusal to romanticise hardship. It shows how Merthyr’s workers lived, organised, and resisted, placing them at the centre of the story rather than as footnotes to industrial titans. The documentary draws a clear line between local struggle and global consequence, reminding viewers that the comforts of modernity were built on the backs of communities like this one.

By the end, Merthyr feels less like a historical curiosity and more like a key to understanding Britain’s present — its inequalities, its pride, its scars. The film’s achievement is to make that history feel urgent rather than archival.

Moo

Moon remains one of the most quietly affecting science‑fiction films of the century, a chamber piece disguised as a space thriller. Sam Rockwell’s performance — essentially a duet with himself — captures the loneliness of labour in a world that has automated empathy out of the equation. The lunar base becomes a metaphor for any workplace where a person is valued only for their output.

The film’s minimalism is its strength. Sparse sets, muted colours, and Clint Mansell’s haunting score create a sense of isolation that never feels contrived. Director Duncan Jones trusts the audience to sit with discomfort, to notice the small ruptures in routine that hint at something deeply wrong beneath the surface.

What lingers is the film’s moral clarity. Moon asks what happens when a corporation decides a human life is a renewable resource — and it answers with quiet, devastating precision. It’s a film that whispers rather than shouts, and is all the more powerful for it.

This performance captures The Who in a reflective but still muscular mode, revisiting their catalogue with the authority of a band that has nothing left to prove. The Electric Proms setting gives the concert an intimacy that suits them — less stadium bombast, more craft and connection.

Townshend’s guitar work has a wiry elegance, and Daltrey’s voice, though weathered, carries a depth that suits the material. The band leans into the emotional undercurrents of their songs rather than the sheer volume, and the result is unexpectedly tender.

It’s a reminder that longevity in rock isn’t about preserving youth but about transforming it. The Who play like men who know exactly what their music has meant — to them and to everyone else.

Townshend is a fascinating interview subject because he refuses to tidy up his own contradictions. He speaks about creativity as both compulsion and burden, tracing the emotional and intellectual currents that shaped his work. The programme gives him room to think, and that space becomes revealing.

What emerges is a portrait of an artist who has always been slightly out of step with the mythology surrounding him. Townshend talks about failure, doubt, and the uneasy relationship between personal history and public expectation. It’s disarmingly honest.

The episode works because it treats culture not as product but as process — messy, fraught, and deeply human. Townshend embodies that complexity.

This Glastonbury set is The Who in full festival-command mode, leaning into the anthems with a kind of weather-beaten swagger. They know exactly what the crowd wants, and they deliver it without cynicism. The field becomes a chorus.

The performance has a looseness that suits them. There’s no attempt to recreate the past; instead, they reinterpret it with the weight of decades behind them. The songs feel lived-in, reshaped by time.

It’s a testament to their endurance that the set feels celebratory rather than nostalgic. The Who aren’t preserving a legacy — they’re still performing it.

Bone Tomahawk is a brutal, slow-burning western that uses violence not as spectacle but as a test of moral fibre. The film’s pacing is deliberate, almost meditative, lulling the viewer into a false sense of security before plunging into horror. It’s a genre hybrid that refuses to soften its edges.

Kurt Russell anchors the film with a weary gravitas, playing a sheriff who understands that leadership often means walking toward danger you’d rather avoid. The supporting cast — Richard Jenkins in particular — brings warmth and humanity to a story that could easily have been nihilistic.

The violence, when it comes, is shocking precisely because the film has earned it. It’s a reminder that brutality is most disturbing when it disrupts a world that has been carefully, patiently built.

Chris Morris’s satire is bleak, sharp, and uncomfortably plausible. The film skewers state paranoia by showing how institutions manufacture threats in order to justify their own existence. It’s funny, but the humour has teeth.

The protagonist — a man whose delusions make him vulnerable to manipulation — becomes a tragic figure rather than a punchline. Morris treats him with compassion, reserving his scorn for the systems that exploit him. The comedy lands because it’s rooted in injustice.

By the end, the film feels less like satire and more like diagnosis. It exposes the machinery of fear with cold precision.

Streaming Choices

Walter Presents: The Pushover Channel 4 Streaming — all episodes from Friday 30 January

A tightly wound thriller that plays with the idea of complicity. The protagonist’s passivity becomes the engine of the plot, raising uncomfortable questions about how far someone can be pushed before they push back.

Burns Night Collection Channel 4 Streaming from Sunday 25 January

A varied, affectionate set of programmes celebrating Scotland’s national poet and the cultural orbit around him. Billy Connolly’s contributions in particular bring warmth and irreverence.

Die My Love MUBI, from Friday 23 January

An intense, intimate drama about motherhood, mental fracture, and the violence of expectation. It’s a film that refuses to look away.

Take That

Netflix — all episodes from Tuesday 27 January

A glossy, surprisingly candid look at one of Britain’s most enduring pop acts. The nostalgia is expected; the emotional honesty is not.

Leave a Comment

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

A brutal, theologically charged sequel that outstrips its predecessor, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple pushes the franchise into darker, stranger territory — blending ghoulish violence, sharp social commentary, and standout performances into what may be the series’ finest chapter yet.

This review is relatively spoiler-free.

The movie was filmed back-to-back with 28 Years Later,which was released last July. This meant a mere six-month gap between the two films, a big bonus if, like me, and most who have seen it, you’d liked that last film, the belated third instalment in the now four-film strong ’28…’ franchise. My review of that last movie can be found here Exploring Themes in 28 Years Later: Survival and Society , but I’ll add that it was one of the few films I’ve seen in the last year that I enjoyed almost as much second time around, on a much smaller screen in the comfort of my own home.

Although there is a clear thematic and chronological through-line that links last year’s movie to 28 Day Later and 28 Weeks Later released in 2003 and 2007 respectively, franchise creator and overall supremo Danny Boyle had been keen to stress that was also 28 Years Later wasintended to be the beginning of a whole new trilogy, with the making of the intended final part dependent on the success of the first two.

With this in mind, I’d been slightly concerned that Boyle had chosen to vacate the Directors chair for this latest outing. He’d sat out 28 Weeks Later too and, though still a decent movie that expanded the universe of the franchise, few would choose it over that very first film, a film that, for good or worse, had lifted the ‘Zombie’ sub-genre of horror out of the doldrums. Without 28 Days, no Walking Dead.

Nia Dacosta was handed the Director’s chair by Boyle for Bone Temple. I was not greatly familiar with his work, though I knew he’d done some well-regarded movies, notably Hedda. But his reputation had been somewhat sullied by the almost universally panned Superhero flick The Marvels.

Too factors eased my concerns about the effect this change of Director might have on the quality of this new film. Firstly, Alex Garland remained in place as screenwriter (he, along with Boyle, had been much missed in Weeks), and secondly, the third film in this trilogy, the fifth in the franchise as a whole, had already been green-lit in December, purely on the basis of audience approval at pre-release test screenings of Bone Temple.

To get my conclusion in early, I needn’t have worried. This film is every bit as good, and probably even better than last year’s offering.

Negatives

This will be a short section. The whole film was one big positive.

For the sake of having to say something, I suppose it could be argued that while last year’s film could be enjoyed with little to no knowledge of what had come before, this is not so much the case here. The new film begins almost at the point the last left off, with the introduction of the Savill-esque Sir-Lord Jimmy Crystal and his brutal seven-strong band of cult-like followers (an ending that bewildered some but was clearly a prelude to what was to follow). You could enjoy this for its own sake. But it would surely leave you wanting to immediately check out its predecessor, and probably the two older films too, so what’s the point? 28 Years Later is now readily available on disc or to stream, and I’d highly recommend checking out at least that one before tackling this.

Some have also pointed out that the choice Sir Jimmy Saville as a role model for Son of Satan Crystal is a strange one, because it doesn’t fit with real-world continuity. In universe, the Rage Virus first ravaged Britain in 2002. Saville’s role as Britain’s most notorious celebrity sex-abuser didn’t emerge until a year after his death, in 2012. Had the world of 28, a world where such things as televisions and newspapers have become an increasingly dimly remembered relic from before (and not even that for younger characters like Alfie and Jimmy Ink), then Saville’s crimes would never have been revealed.

But that world isn’t our world, and it’s probably better not to overthink such things. The film doesn’t explain Krystal’s attachment to Saville, and nor does it need to. But we can speculate that it was perhaps for his kitsch value, which would tie-in with another (for him) fondly remembered item of light entertainment, the children’s television show, The Teletubbies. If you wanted to go deeper, then perhaps Garland, or Boyle, was referencing Arendt’s famous formulation concerning The Banality of Evil, for never was a celebrity as banal nor, as it turns out, as evil as Saville.

As for the direction, perhaps Bone Temple suffers slightly from the absence of the experimental, mixed media approach of Boyle. Dacosta’s approach is much more direct. Whereas Boyle suggested patriotic olde-English, vaguely post-Brexit yearnings and religious themes symbolically, this is all much more on the nose here. But this isn’t really a criticism. The central character, Sir-Lord Jimmy, is almost literally setting himself up as the anti-Christ, perhaps the only sort of Christ which would make sense in such a post-apocalyptic Hell-scape. There’s no getting away from the fact that this is a deeply theological movie, and the direction had to reflect that. Sometimes, symbolism isn’t enough.

Positives

That the one-hundred-ten-minute length flew by is a testament in itself to how well this was directed, and Garland is a superb writer, with a knack for producing realistic dialogue in a fantastical world.

The acting was universally superb, a relatively small cast gelling superbly as an ensemble. We must particularly cite O’Connell for his skill in making in Crystal a believable character from what was essentially a deliberate caricature of a caricature. That he proved himself the equal of the great Ralph Fiennes, here reprising and adding further depth (and humour) to the Dr Kelson character introduced last time out, is a testament to his abilities.

The youthful Spike had a much less central, though still important, role in this film than the last. Alfie Williams had nailed the character in what had been his first appearance on film in Years, and he was excellent again here.  Particularly of note is the chemistry he exhibits with Erin Kellyman’s Jimmy Ink, in whom he finds an, at first, reluctant ally in his desperate bid to escape the brutal demands of the Clockwork Orange like cult in he’d unwillingly been press-ganged into.

Those who felt the last film lacked the necessary amount of blood and gore to qualify as a proper Zombie-horror movie, can rest safe in the knowledge that ghoulish violence has been notched up to Max here. 

That the majority, and most graphic of this violence is unleashed not by the Infected’ (to give the Zombies of this universe their proper name) upon survivors, or even survivors upon the Infected, though we get plenty of that too, but by one group of survivors, the Jimmy Cult against other survivors, any survivors who cross their path, all under the command of Crystal, and all in the name of administering his warped version of ‘charity.’ (the choice of this word, ‘charity’, is itself a no towards Saville. Our real-world Sir Jimmy, if course, hid his decades-long rampage of abuse in plain sight behind his tireless charity work).

I’m by no means squeamish, but the scenes that followed commands such ‘Take their shirts’ were hard to watch.

I don’t want to give away too many spoilers as regards the plot, but I will briefly mention my three absolute highlights in a movie of highlights.

The first concerns the relationship between Dr. Kerson (Fiennes) and the Alpha Infected Samson. Like Kelson, Samson is a returning character from last year’s film, but here the actor Chi Lewis Parry is given much more to do, and he does it superbly, almost without speaking a word.

The relationship has shades of that between Frankenstein’s Monster and the blind fiddler in the original, 1931 Universal version of Frankenstein. In that classic, the fiddler had accepted the unfortunate creature because he had been literally unable to see that it was a monster who had entered his humble home. Here, Kelson is only too aware of what he is dealing with, that this afflicted super-strength creature will rip his head from his shoulders and devour his brain without moral restriction. Yet, he is able to see beyond the infection to the human being that once inhabited this body and, perhaps, the human mind that still remains, but has been rendered dormant by the rage-virus. Through his compassion, his willingness to try and recover this latent humanity, and with more than a little help from the opiate narcotics he brews up in his private bone temple laboratory, partly in search of a cure for the virus and partly as a means of giving himself relief from the horror that surrounds him, he is able to forge between them an unlikely friendship and alliance.

My second highlight is the scene on the long derelict train when Samson, surrounded by the dead and the similarly afflicted, finds his dormant mind does indeed, in a tantalising, brief and sporadic manner, begin to flicker into life. The resulting glimpse of the mundane but magnificent world that once was, a world of rules, of attractive ticket collectors and passengers hiding behind newspapers, is almost as shocking to us as it is to Samson, and a reminder that only a fragile veneer separates our civilisation from barbarism. 

The highlight, the scene that is destined to be the scene that will be shown whenever this film, or the career of Ralph Fiennes, is a subject of online screen discussion, is the climax of the movie, the point at which the twin narratives of the rampage of the Jimmy’s and Alfie’s bid to escape it collides with that of the story of Kerson and his Temple, a macabre but magnificent monument, and perhaps the ultimate expression of Outsider Art, finally collide.

I won’t say any more about Fiennes’ ‘Old Nick’ routine, except to say that if Iron Maiden pass on the opportunity to re-release their song 666 The Number of the Beast, with this song as its accompanying video, then they are missing a superb career kick-starting opportunity.

Aside from Iron Maiden, we really must give a big shout out the musical accompaniment to the movie as a whole, both the original core by Hildur Guonadottir, and the selection of British eighties pop classics that Kelson manages to play on an old record player within his Bone Temple as another reminder, to him and to us, of the world that has been lost, are superb. 

At the very end of the film, we see the brief return of a character from way back at the beginning of the franchise. The appearance of Crystal and his followers at the end of 28 Years Later gave us a strong clue as to the main narrative drive of the next movie, and I suspect the return of the central character from 28 Days Later performs the same function here.

Conclusion

Probably a Masterpiece. 10/10. If the final movie is the equal of the last two, the 28 series will have a strong claim to be the greatest horror franchise of all time.

We’ll have to wait more than six months to find out what happens next, but Garland’s script is written and production is soon to begin, so it’s unlikely the gap will be anything like the eighteen years that separated Weeks from Years.

My money is on late 2027 but, whenever it happens, I’ll be there to see it.

Reviewed by Anthony C Green

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is in cinemas now.

Anthony C Green, January 2026

Picture credit: By Columbia Pictures – http://www.impawards.com/2026/twenty_eight_years_later_the_bone_temple.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80967111

Directed by Nia Dacosta

Written by Alex Garland

Produced by Danny Boyle

Key Cast:

Jack O’ Connell – Sir Jimmy Crystal, Ralph Fiennes – Dr Ian Kelson, Alfie Williams – Spike, Chi Lewis-Parry – Samson, Erin Kellyman – Jimmy Ink and Emma Laird – Jimmima. 

Cover image of the novel 'Better Than The Beatles!' by Anthony C. Green, featuring a blue abstract design and the text 'BUY NOW.'

Leave a Comment

Culture Vulture 17–23 January 2026

Image featuring a vulture in flight against a blue sky, with the text 'CULTURE VULTURE' prominently displayed above and a logo for 'COUNTER CULTURE' at the bottom, along with the date '17–23 January 2026'.

This week’s Culture Vulture moves restlessly between power and resistance, private obsession and public mythmaking. Across the schedule, institutions are questioned, reputations dismantled, and history revisited from oblique angles. 🌟 Highlights include Joanna Hogg’s haunted chamber piece The Eternal Daughter, Channel 4’s urgent Palestine Action: The Truth Behind the Ban, and the incendiary political cinema of How to Blow Up a Pipeline. Elsewhere, British independent film, classic Hollywood, prestige documentary, and cult spectacle reward curiosity and late nights. Reviews and selections are by Pat Harrington.

Saturday 17 January 2026

🌟 The Eternal Daughter (2022) BBC Two, 11:00pm

Hogg’s film feels like the moment a long‑shuttered room is finally opened: dust motes rising, air shifting, memory stirring in ways both tender and treacherous. In The Eternal Daughter, she pares her instincts down to their purest form, crafting a chamber piece where the walls themselves seem to listen. Tilda Swinton’s dual performance becomes a kind of living palimpsest—mother and daughter layered atop one another, indistinguishable at times, painfully separate at others. It’s not a gimmick; it’s the thesis.

What begins with the grammar of a ghost story—the creaking corridors, the watchful windows, the sense of a presence just out of frame—slowly reveals itself as something far more disquieting. Hogg isn’t interested in hauntings so much as the emotional residue we inherit, the unspoken debts and unexamined loyalties that shape us long after childhood has ended. The hotel becomes a psychological annex, a place where the daughter’s creative impulse collides with her filial guilt, and where the mother’s silence speaks louder than any apparition.

Hogg’s precision is almost forensic. Every pause feels intentional, every withheld revelation a reminder that the most devastating truths are the ones we circle rather than confront. The film’s quietude is not gentleness but pressure—an atmosphere thick with the weight of what cannot be said. By the time the emotional architecture finally reveals itself, the effect is less like a twist and more like a reckoning.

It’s a small film in scale, but not in consequence. Hogg gives us a story about the stories we construct to make sense of our parents, and the painful liberation that comes when those stories falter. The devastation is not loud; it arrives like a memory you’ve spent years avoiding, suddenly unavoidable, quietly rearranging the room around you.

Fergie and the Fake Sheikh Scandal Channel 5, 9:20pm

A tabloid-age morality tale examining how celebrity, deception, and entrapment culture collided at the turn of the millennium. Less interested in sensationalism than in the machinery behind it, the documentary exposes how reputations were engineered—and destroyed—by a media ecosystem that thrived on humiliation.

Obsession (1949) Talking Pictures, 9:00pm

There’s something almost surgical about Obsession—a film that slices cleanly through the polite veneer of post‑war Britain to expose the rancid underlayer beneath. It’s noir without the American swagger, a chamber drama where the shadows feel damp rather than stylish, and where the real violence is psychological, not ballistic. Edward Dmytryk, working in exile, brings a kind of outsider’s clarity to the material: he sees the brittleness of British respectability and taps it like a cracked teacup.

The result is a thriller that feels startlingly modern. The film’s emotional temperature is cold, its cruelty precise. There’s no romanticism in this portrait of obsession—no smoky seduction, no doomed glamour. Instead, we get a study in class resentment and the corrosive entitlement of a man who believes his status grants him moral exemption. The kidnapping plot becomes a pressure cooker, not because of what might happen, but because of what the characters reveal about themselves when the social scaffolding slips.

What lingers is the bitterness. The film seems to understand, long before British cinema was ready to admit it, that the war hadn’t purified the nation’s soul; it had merely rearranged the furniture. Beneath the clipped accents and tidy rooms lies a rot that feels eerily contemporary. Dmytryk doesn’t shout this; he lets it seep in, frame by frame, until the genteel façade collapses under its own hypocrisy.

It’s a lean, quietly vicious little masterpiece—one that reminds you how much menace can be conjured from a closed door, a polite smile, and a man who believes he’s been wronged.

Sunday 18 January 2026

🌟 How to Blow Up a Pipeline (2022)

Film4, 11:40pm

There’s a flinty directness to this film that feels almost shocking in an era of hedged statements and carefully triangulated messaging. It borrows the propulsive mechanics of a heist thriller—ticking clocks, tight crews, improvised logistics—but repurposes them into something far more volatile: a cinematic argument delivered with the clarity of a manifesto and the tension of a fuse burning down.

What makes it so bracing is its refusal to flatter the viewer. The film doesn’t offer the comfort of moral distance or the easy posture of condemnation. Instead, it forces you into the cramped, anxious spaces where its characters operate—young people who have concluded, with grim logic, that lawful protest has been absorbed, neutralised, and rendered decorative. Their plan is not framed as heroism, nor as nihilism, but as a response to a world in which delay has become its own form of violence.

The structure is deceptively simple: each character’s backstory arrives not as exposition but as justification, a ledger of harms that makes their radicalisation legible without insisting on your approval. The film’s power lies in this tension. It neither sermonises nor sensationalises; it simply refuses to pretend that the climate crisis can be met with polite incrementalism.

Stylistically, it’s stripped to the bone. No indulgent speeches, no swelling strings, no narrative hand‑holding. The urgency is baked into the form—lean, breathless, and morally abrasive. By the end, you’re left with the unsettling sense that the film hasn’t tried to persuade you so much as confront you, asking whether the ethics of waiting are still defensible when the clock is visibly, audibly running out.

It’s a rare thing: a thriller that treats its audience like adults, and a political film that understands the stakes well enough not to blink.

Four Kings – Rise of the Kings (1 of 4) Channel 4, 10:00pm

The first chapter of this landmark documentary doesn’t just revisit an era of British boxing dominance—it reopens a cultural archive the nation has never properly reckoned with. Rise of the Kings introduces the four men who reshaped British sport from the margins outward: Frank Bruno, Lennox Lewis, Nigel Benn, and Chris Eubank. All Black, all prodigiously gifted, all carrying the weight of a country that cheered them in the ring while questioning their belonging outside it.

What emerges is not a simple tale of athletic ascent but a study in how Britain constructs—and constrains—its heroes. The episode traces the early trajectories of these fighters with a forensic calm: the racism they absorbed, the class barriers they smashed through, the uneasy dance between public adoration and private cost. Each man becomes a case study in the contradictions of late‑20th‑century Britain: celebrated yet scrutinised, embraced yet othered, mythologised yet rarely understood.

The filmmaking is admirably unhurried. It lets the archival footage breathe, allowing the swagger, vulnerability, and sheer physical charisma of these boxers to speak for itself. But threaded through the narrative is a sharper argument: that these four athletes didn’t just dominate their divisions—they forced open cultural space for Black British identity at a time when the country preferred its icons uncomplicated.

By the end of the hour, you feel the stakes. This isn’t nostalgia; it’s reclamation. A reminder that the nation’s sporting mythology was built, in part, on the shoulders of men who were fighting more than opponents. They were fighting for recognition, for dignity, and for the right to define themselves.

If the series continues with this level of clarity and emotional intelligence, it won’t just document an era—it will correct the record.

Four Kings – The Battle for Britain (2 of 4) Channel 4, 11:00pm

Episode two plunges straight into the feverish heart of 1990s British boxing—a moment when four Black British fighters weren’t just dominating the sport, they were commanding the nation’s attention with a force that felt seismic. The Battle for Britain captures the week when everything converged: Benn vs Eubank, Lewis vs Bruno, millions watching, and the country briefly rearranging its cultural centre of gravity around the ring.

What the episode reveals, with a clarity that borders on uncomfortable, is how much pressure these men carried. The rivalries weren’t just athletic; they were racialised, politicised, and relentlessly commodified. Benn and Eubank’s animosity becomes a kind of national theatre—two men forced into archetypes they never asked for, their identities flattened into marketable conflict. Meanwhile, Lewis and Bruno shoulder the burden of representing a Britain that still struggled to imagine heavyweight greatness in a Black British body.

The filmmaking is sharp, almost prosecutorial. It lays out the stakes without melodrama: the injuries that threatened to derail the fights, the media circus that demanded spectacle, the promoters who understood exactly how much money could be made from pitting these men—and their public personas—against one another. Yet beneath the noise, the documentary keeps returning to the human cost: the discipline, the fear, the private negotiations with pain and expectation.

What lingers is the sense of a country watching itself through these fighters. Their success became a proxy for national pride, yet their failures were treated as personal betrayals. The episode doesn’t editorialise; it simply lets the archival footage and the testimonies speak, revealing a Britain that was both enthralled by and uneasy with the power of these Black champions.

It’s riveting, but also quietly damning. A portrait of a week when British boxing reached its commercial zenith—and when the men at its centre bore the weight of far more than belts.

Chris McCausland: Seeing Into the Future

BBC Two, 6:15pm

Blending humour with seriousness, McCausland explores disability, perception, and technology without sentimentality. Abstract ideas are grounded in lived experience, resulting in a thoughtful, humane documentary.

The Eyes of Tammy Faye (2021)

Channel 4, 2:15am

There’s a strange, irresistible shimmer to this film—a lacquered surface that initially feels like pure kitsch, only to reveal hairline fractures where something far more human leaks through. The Eyes of Tammy Faye understands that American televangelism was always theatre first and theology second, and it leans into that tension with a kind of fascinated precision. The result is a portrait of a woman who lived her life as both performer and believer, often unable to distinguish where one role ended and the other began.

What anchors the film is the central performance, which refuses to treat Tammy Faye Bakker as either punchline or martyr. Instead, we get a study in contradictions: a woman whose vulnerability was real, whose compassion was often ahead of her time, and whose capacity for self-deception was almost operatic. The film doesn’t excuse her complicity in the empire she helped build, but it does illuminate the emotional machinery that kept her smiling even as the walls buckled.

The glossiness is deliberate. The saturated colours, the immaculate wigs, the relentless cheerfulness—they’re all part of the ecosystem that made Tammy Faye both iconic and impossible to fully grasp. But beneath the glitter lies a more unsettling truth about the American appetite for spectacle, and the way faith can be packaged, monetised, and weaponised when charisma becomes currency.

What lingers is the sense of a woman who believed in love and forgiveness with a sincerity that outpaced her understanding of the system she was feeding. The film captures that duality with a steady hand: the calculation behind the camera-ready grin, and the genuine ache behind the mascara-streaked tears.

Monday 19 January 2026

The Terminator (1984) ITV4, 9:00pm

Cameron’s breakthrough still hits with the force of something forged under pressure—industrial, unadorned, and utterly sure of its purpose. What’s striking, revisiting it now, is how little fat there is on the film. Every scene feels sharpened to a point, every cut driving the story forward with the cold logic of the machine at its centre. It’s action cinema before the bloat set in, built on momentum rather than spectacle.

But beneath the propulsive surface lies a darker, more resonant architecture. The film channels the anxieties of its era—nuclear dread, technological overreach, the sense that humanity was sleepwalking into its own obsolescence—and distils them into a narrative that feels mythic in its simplicity. The Terminator isn’t just a villain; it’s an idea made flesh, the embodiment of a future that refuses to wait its turn. The slasher DNA is unmistakable: the unstoppable force, the final girl, the sense of being hunted by something that cannot be reasoned with. Yet Cameron threads through it a kind of bruised romanticism, a belief that resistance, however fragile, still matters.

What lingers is the film’s discipline. No quips, no narrative detours, no self-conscious winks. Just a relentless pursuit—of Sarah Connor, of survival, of a future that might yet be rewritten. In an age of maximalist blockbusters, The Terminator feels almost ascetic, a reminder that tension and meaning can be engineered with precision rather than excess.

🌟 The Souvenir (2019) BBC Two, 11:00pm

Hogg’s film unfolds with the delicacy of someone turning over a memory they’re not entirely sure they’re ready to revisit. It’s a coming‑of‑age story, yes, but one stripped of the usual narrative scaffolding—no grand revelations, no cathartic speeches, just the slow, painful accumulation of experience. What emerges is a portrait of a young woman learning to see clearly, even as the man she loves is committed to obscuring everything, including himself.

The emotional damage is observed with almost forensic restraint. Hogg refuses melodrama, which paradoxically makes the heartbreak sharper. The relationship at the film’s centre is defined by asymmetry—of class, of confidence, of emotional literacy. Julie’s privilege cushions her but also blinds her; Anthony’s charm masks a rot he cannot or will not confront. Their dynamic becomes a study in how power operates quietly, through tone, through implication, through the stories we allow others to tell about us.

What’s remarkable is how Hogg uses the act of filmmaking itself as both subject and method. Julie’s artistic formation is inseparable from her romantic entanglement; the camera becomes a tool for understanding what she couldn’t articulate in the moment. The film feels like a reconstruction of a wound—precise, atmospheric, and unflinchingly honest about the cost of loving someone who is disappearing in front of you.

The atmosphere is almost tactile: the muted rooms, the half‑finished student films, the sense of a life being assembled piece by tentative piece. Hogg lets class seep in at the edges, never lecturing but always aware of how it shapes who gets forgiven, who gets believed, who gets to make art from their mistakes.

By the time the film reaches its final, quietly astonishing gesture, you realise you’ve been watching not just a love story but the forging of an artist—through pain, through confusion, through the slow, necessary act of learning to trust one’s own vision. It’s devastating in the way real memory is: not loud, but lingering, impossible to shake.

What’s Love Got to Do with It (2022) BBC One, 11:40pm

A culturally alert romantic comedy that examines modern marriage through the lens of tradition and compromise, keeping character at its centre while engaging seriously with social expectation.

🌟 The Souvenir Part II (2021) BBC Two, 12:55am

Hogg’s follow‑up doesn’t behave like a sequel so much as an aftershock—quieter, more deliberate, but carrying a deeper, more resonant force. Where The Souvenir charted the bewilderment of first love and first loss, Part II turns its attention to what comes after the devastation: the long, uneven labour of rebuilding a self that no longer fits the world it once inhabited.

What’s remarkable is how Hogg refuses the easy arc of recovery. Grief here isn’t a narrative obstacle to be cleared; it’s a climate, a weather system Julie must learn to navigate. The film tracks her attempts to make sense of what happened not through confession or catharsis, but through the act of creation itself. The student film she struggles to complete becomes a kind of emotional archaeology—an attempt to excavate the truth from memory, performance, and the stories she once accepted without question.

The atmosphere is richer, more expansive than in Part I, yet the emotional precision remains razor‑sharp. Hogg lets the contradictions breathe: the way Julie’s privilege both cushions and distorts her experience; the way art can clarify and obscure in the same gesture; the way grief can sharpen ambition even as it hollows out certainty. The film becomes a meditation on authorship—of one’s work, one’s past, one’s identity.

Taken together, the two films form an unusually intimate diptych, one of the most quietly radical achievements in recent British cinema. They chart the formation of an artist not through triumph but through vulnerability, confusion, and the slow, necessary work of learning to see clearly. Part II doesn’t resolve the story; it reframes it, revealing that the real souvenir isn’t the relationship lost, but the self that emerges in its wake.

Panorama: Maxed Out – The Credit Card Trap BBC One, 8:00pm

A forensic examination of modern debt culture as interest rates rise and lenders shift risk onto consumers. Quietly furious, the programme exposes how systemic pressure is reframed as personal failure.

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms Sky Atlantic, 9:00pm

There’s a welcome shift in scale here—a retreat from the apocalyptic sweep of Game of Thrones toward something more intimate, almost pastoral, without losing the moral turbulence that defines Westeros. Set a century earlier, the story follows Ser Duncan the Tall and his young squire Egg, a pairing that feels deceptively simple until you realise how much of the realm’s future is quietly coiled inside their relationship.

What distinguishes this prequel is its refusal to chase spectacle for its own sake. Instead, it leans into character: the awkward decency of Dunk, a man whose honour is instinctive rather than performative; the sharp, watchful intelligence of Egg, whose identity carries implications neither of them can fully outrun. Their travels take them through a Westeros still recognisable but less ossified—its power structures in flux, its loyalties brittle, its violence more personal than operatic.

The tone is gentler than its predecessor, but no less pointed. The show understands that the moral uncertainty of this world doesn’t always announce itself with dragons or dynastic collapse. Sometimes it’s a question of who gets fed, who gets punished, who gets believed. Dunk and Egg move through these tensions with a kind of earnestness that feels almost radical in a landscape built on cynicism.

What emerges is a story about the small acts of integrity that shape history long before anyone realises history is being made. The stakes may be quieter, but they’re no less consequential. In its best moments, the series feels like a reminder that Westeros was always at its most compelling not when kingdoms fell, but when ordinary people tried—often clumsily, often at great cost—to do the right thing.

Tuesday 20 January 2026

The Fighter (2010) Legend, 9:00pm

A bruising, performance‑driven boxing drama that understands victory as something provisional, never permanent, always paid for in flesh and family. The film’s real contest isn’t in the ring but in the cramped Lowell living rooms where loyalty becomes both a lifeline and a trap. Every punch lands with the weight of obligation, every small triumph shadowed by the cost of carrying those you can’t quite leave behind. It’s a story of survival as much as sport, where the emotional stakes are as punishing—and as compelling—as the physical ones.

🌟 The Crying Game (1992) Film4, 11:30pm

A film that refuses to sit neatly in any genre box, its power drawn from the things it withholds as much as what it reveals. Jordan builds a world of secrecy and emotional dislocation where every gesture feels loaded, every silence edged with threat. The ambiguity isn’t a trick but a texture—an invitation to sit with uncertainty and let the unease accumulate. Decades on, it still has the capacity to unsettle, not through shock but through the quiet, lingering sense that something essential has slipped just out of reach.

🌟 The Piano (1993) BBC Two, 12:00am

ane Campion’s ferociously sensual drama turns silence into its own kind of speech, a language carved out of longing, resistance, and the brutal asymmetries of colonial power. Holly Hunter’s Ada communicates an entire inner world through gesture and breath, her piano becoming both sanctuary and weapon, the only place where desire can be articulated without permission. Campion frames the New Zealand landscape as something vast and indifferent, a terrain that exposes the characters’ vulnerabilities as sharply as it shapes them. What emerges is a story where intimacy is negotiated through touch rather than words, where autonomy is fought for in the smallest, most physical acts. It remains a film of startling emotional force, its quietest moments carrying the weight of a scream.

The Rosenbergs: Atomic Spies PBS America, 8:35pm

A sober reassessment of one of the Cold War’s most polarising cases, examining evidence, ideology, and hysteria with careful restraint.

Wednesday 21 January 2026

Goldfinger (1964) ITV4, 9:00pm

Goldfinger has always sat near the top of my Bond canon, not because it is the most sophisticated or politically comfortable entry, but because it crystallises the series at the exact moment it understood its own power. It’s the film where the franchise stops experimenting and starts declaring itself—stylised, swaggering, and utterly aware of the cultural machinery it’s building. Watching it now, you can feel the template locking into place: the cold open as miniature thriller, the villain as outsized industrialist, the gadgets as both spectacle and satire. It’s Bond becoming Bond in real time, and there’s something irresistible about that confidence.

What draws me back most is the film’s sense of texture—its unapologetic embrace of excess, glamour, and danger as intertwined forces. Goldfinger’s world is one where wealth is both intoxicant and weapon, where the sheen of luxury is always a little too bright, a little too brittle. The film understands that seduction and threat are two sides of the same coin, and it plays them with a theatricality that feels almost operatic. Even the colour palette seems to conspire in this: gold as fetish, gold as corruption, gold as the thing that blinds men to their own downfall. It’s a visual metaphor delivered with a wink and a razor edge.

Then there’s Sean Connery, at the height of his dangerous charm. This is the Bond who moves through rooms as if he owns them, who treats violence as an extension of wit, who understands that the performance of masculinity is half the job. Connery’s Bond is not yet weary or self‑aware; he’s a man who believes in his own myth, and the film lets us see both the allure and the absurdity of that. It’s a performance that feels carved from the era’s anxieties about power, sex, and national identity, even as it pretends to be nothing more than a stylish adventure.

Goldfinger himself remains one of the franchise’s most compelling antagonists precisely because he is not a shadowy ideologue but a businessman with delusions of grandeur. His plan is ludicrous, yes, but it’s rooted in a recognisable logic of accumulation and control. He’s the kind of villain institutions create when they mistake ambition for virtue. And Oddjob—silent, implacable, almost ritualistic in his violence—feels like the embodiment of that logic’s consequences. Together they give the film a weight that offsets its more playful instincts, grounding the spectacle in something darker and more systemic.

Ultimately, Goldfinger endures for me because it captures the Bond franchise at its most self‑assured and least apologetic, a moment when style, menace, and fantasy align with almost mechanical precision. It’s a film that understands the seduction of power while quietly acknowledging its rot, that revels in its own artifice while hinting at the costs beneath the surface. In a series defined by reinvention, Goldfinger remains the touchstone—the one that shows how the myth was built, and why it still holds such sway.

Victoria: A Royal Love Story BBC Four, 9:00pm

A portrait of monarchy that works from the inside out, tracing the contours of power not through ceremony or statecraft but through the fragile, private spaces where affection becomes a political force. The film understands that Victoria’s authority was never exercised in isolation; it was shaped, softened, and sometimes constrained by the emotional dependencies that defined her marriage and her court. What emerges is a study of a woman negotiating the impossible dual role of sovereign and spouse, where vulnerability is not a weakness but a condition of rule.

It’s a story that treats intimacy as a form of governance, showing how personal loyalties and private tensions ripple outward into public consequence. The relationship between Victoria and Albert becomes a kind of constitutional experiment—two people trying to reconcile love with duty, individuality with expectation, all under the relentless scrutiny of an empire hungry for symbols. Their partnership is rendered not as fairy tale but as negotiation, full of tenderness, frustration, and the quiet recalibrations that sustain a shared life.

The film also captures the emotional labour embedded in monarchy, the way a ruler’s inner world becomes a matter of national interest. Victoria’s hesitations, her attachments, her griefs—they all become part of the machinery of power, shaping decisions and public moods in ways that official histories often flatten. By foregrounding this, the film restores a sense of humanity to a figure too often reduced to iconography.

Visually and tonally, it leans into the tension between the intimate and the imperial: candlelit rooms set against vast ceremonial spaces, whispered conversations echoing beneath the weight of inherited authority. It’s a reminder that monarchy is always a performance, but one fuelled by very real emotional stakes.

What lingers is the sense of a woman learning to inhabit her own myth while resisting its erasure of her private self. Victoria: A Royal Love Story suggests that power is never simply bestowed; it is shaped in the crucible of relationship, vulnerability, and the messy, ungovernable terrain of the heart.

Symbols of Evil PBS America, 8:35pm

A documentary that treats iconography not as static imagery but as a living, volatile force—something that can be bent, sharpened, and ultimately weaponised. It traces how symbols migrate from cultural shorthand to instruments of fear, acquiring authority not through inherent meaning but through repetition, spectacle, and the willingness of institutions to invest them with power. What begins as a mark or motif becomes a mechanism of control, shaping behaviour long before a word is spoken.

The film is particularly sharp on the way symbols operate beneath conscious thought. They bypass argument and go straight for the nervous system, embedding themselves in collective memory until they feel inevitable. That inevitability is the danger: once a symbol becomes naturalised, it can be used to justify almost anything. The documentary shows how regimes, movements, and even corporations understand this instinctively, cultivating imagery that can rally, intimidate, or erase with equal efficiency.

There’s also a clear sense of how symbols mutate under pressure. They’re never fixed; they’re contested spaces where meaning is fought over, reclaimed, or corrupted. The film tracks these shifts with a kind of forensic patience, revealing how the same emblem can be a beacon of identity for one group and a threat to another. It’s a reminder that visual language is always political, always in motion, always vulnerable to capture.

Visually, the documentary leans into the starkness of its subject matter—archival footage, close‑ups of artefacts, and the unsettling quiet of objects that have outlived the people who once wielded them. That stillness becomes its own commentary on endurance: symbols often survive the ideologies that created them, lingering as warnings or temptations depending on who encounters them next.

What lingers is the film’s insistence that symbols are never neutral. They shape the emotional climate in which decisions are made, loyalties formed, and violence justified. Symbols of Evil asks viewers to look harder, to question the images that claim authority over them, and to recognise how easily meaning can be twisted when fear becomes the organising principle of public life.

Killer Grannies Crime + Investigation, 9:00pm

A macabre true-crime series examining cases where social expectations collapse. Hosted by June Squibb, it plays on shock while exposing how violence hides behind familiarity.

Thursday 22 January 2026

🌟 Palestine Action: The Truth Behind the Ban Channel 4, 10:00pm

A timely and urgent Dispatches special examining the government’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action. It raises serious questions about civil liberties, proportionality, and the criminalisation of protest.

Strange Journey: The Rocky Horror Picture ShowSky Arts, 11:00pm

Strange Journey: The Rocky Horror Picture Show — Sky Arts, 11:00pm

A documentary that treats Rocky Horror not as a relic of midnight‑movie nostalgia but as a living organism—still mutating, still misbehaving, still refusing to be domesticated by the culture that once tried to smother it. What Sky Arts captures so well is the sheer durability of this strange little phenomenon: a piece of queer, camp, outsider theatre that somehow outpaced censorship, scandal, and decades of moral panic to become a communal ritual. It’s a reminder that subculture doesn’t just survive pressure; it often thrives because of it.

The film digs into the show’s origins with a kind of affectionate forensic curiosity, tracing how Richard O’Brien’s oddball experiment—part glam rock, part B‑movie pastiche, part sexual awakening—found its audience precisely because it didn’t ask for permission. The documentary understands that Rocky Horror’s power lies in its refusal to apologise for its own excess. It’s messy, transgressive, and defiantly unserious, and that unseriousness becomes a kind of liberation. You can feel the joy of a community discovering itself in real time.

There’s a sharp awareness, too, of how the show’s anarchic spirit became a lifeline for people who didn’t see themselves reflected anywhere else. The documentary gives space to the fans who built a culture around participation rather than passive consumption—shouting back, dressing up, claiming the cinema as a place where identity could be tried on, discarded, or embraced. It’s a portrait of fandom as self‑creation, long before the term became a marketing category.

Visually and tonally, the film leans into the tension between the show’s DIY origins and its later cultural ubiquity. Archival footage sits alongside contemporary reflections, creating a sense of continuity rather than nostalgia. The message is clear: Rocky Horror isn’t something that happened; it’s something that keeps happening, sustained by the people who refuse to let it ossify into heritage.

What lingers is the documentary’s insistence that joy can be radical. Strange Journey frames Rocky Horror as a testament to the resilience of the marginal, the playful, and the defiantly strange.

Kindling (2023) — BBC Three, 11:30pm

A quietly devastating drama that treats grief not as a narrative obstacle to be conquered but as a landscape young men are forced to navigate without a map. Kindling is striking for its emotional openness, its willingness to sit with the inarticulate, the awkward, the half‑formed attempts at connection that so often define male friendship. The film understands that masculinity, especially in youth, is a performance stitched together from fear and tenderness, and it refuses to neaten any of that into a comforting arc.

What gives the story its force is the way it captures the rituals of closeness—shared jokes, late‑night confessions, the unspoken agreements that hold a group together even as everything around them fractures. These boys aren’t equipped with the language of grief, so they build their own, piecemeal and imperfect. The film honours that improvisation rather than judging it, showing how love can be expressed through presence, distraction, and the stubborn refusal to let someone drift away alone.

There’s a tactile quality to the filmmaking that mirrors the emotional texture: sunlight on skin, the roughness of grass, the small domestic spaces where illness and friendship collide. These details ground the story in lived experience, reminding us that grief is not abstract—it’s physical, exhausting, and often strangely beautiful in the way it binds people together.

What the film resists, crucially, is catharsis. There’s no grand revelation, no tidy reconciliation, no moment where everything suddenly makes sense. Instead, Kindling offers something truer: the sense that grief reshapes rather than resolves, that the people left behind must learn to carry both memory and absence without instruction.

In the end, it’s that refusal to simplify emotional mess that makes Kindling linger. It’s a film that trusts its audience to sit with discomfort, to recognise the fragility beneath bravado, and to see masculinity not as armour but as something porous, vulnerable, and capable of profound care.

🌟 The Elephant Man (1980) BBC Four, 11:50pm

David Lynch’s most compassionate film works by stripping away the sensationalism that so often clings to stories of physical difference. Instead of leaning into horror, Lynch lets the fear sit with the onlookers, not with John Merrick himself. The result is a drama where dignity slowly eclipses spectacle, where the camera lingers not on deformity but on the quiet, searching humanity beneath it. It’s a film that understands restraint as a moral choice, refusing to exploit what it seeks to honour.

What gives the film its emotional force is the relationship between Merrick and Dr. Treves—a bond built on curiosity, guilt, and a growing recognition of shared vulnerability. Lynch treats their connection with a tenderness that feels almost radical, allowing moments of stillness to carry the weight of entire conversations. In these silences, the film finds its centre: the idea that compassion is not an instinct but a discipline, something learned, faltered in, and returned to. Hopkins and Hurt play this dance with extraordinary delicacy, each gesture revealing the cost of seeing another person fully.

By the time the film reaches its devastating final movement, The Elephant Man has become something far larger than a biographical drama. It’s a meditation on how societies decide who counts as human, and how easily cruelty can masquerade as curiosity. Lynch’s monochrome London—soot‑choked, fog‑bound, oppressive—becomes a moral landscape as much as a physical one. Yet within that darkness, the film insists on the possibility of grace. It’s this insistence, quiet but unshakeable, that makes it one of Lynch’s most enduring works.

Friday 23 January 2026

The G (2023) Film4, 9:00pm

A thriller that trusts atmosphere over adrenaline, The G builds its tension grain by grain, letting unease seep into the frame until it becomes almost tactile. This is menace understood not as spectacle but as accumulation—the way a look lingers too long, a silence stretches just a beat past comfort, a familiar landscape begins to feel subtly misaligned. The film’s power lies in that patience, in its refusal to rush toward confrontation when dread can do the work more effectively.

What emerges is a portrait of threat that feels rooted in lived experience rather than genre mechanics. The characters move through the story with the wary alertness of people who know danger rarely announces itself; it arrives in increments, in the slow tightening of circumstance. The film honours that truth, allowing paranoia to bloom organically, shaped by class, isolation, and the quiet violences that institutions overlook. It’s a thriller that understands fear as something that grows in the gaps—between neighbours, between generations, between what is said and what is meant.

By the time the tension finally crests, the film has earned every pulse of it. The G lingers because it recognises that the most unsettling stories are the ones that don’t explode—they seep, stain, and settle, leaving you with the sense that the real danger was never the event but the atmosphere that made it possible.

Benny’s Back (2018) BBC Three, 11:30pm

A compact, quietly unsettling drama, Benny’s Back understands that the real shock of a return isn’t the event itself but the way it destabilises the emotional architecture people have built in someone’s absence. The film treats Benny’s reappearance not as a plot twist but as a fault line, exposing the compromises, resentments, and half‑healed wounds that families learn to step around. It’s a story that trusts the audience to read the room—to notice the glances that last a beat too long, the pauses that say more than the dialogue ever could.

What makes the film compelling is its refusal to impose a neat emotional logic on the characters. Benny isn’t framed as saviour or saboteur; he’s simply a presence that forces everyone else to confront the versions of themselves they’ve been avoiding. The drama unfolds in the small ruptures—routine unsettled, loyalties tested, old patterns reasserting themselves with unnerving ease. The performances lean into this ambiguity, playing the tension with a kind of lived‑in naturalism that suggests a history too complicated to articulate.

By the end, Benny’s Back hasn’t resolved its tensions so much as illuminated them. The film’s power lies in its restraint, in its understanding that some returns don’t bring closure but clarity—an uncomfortable, necessary recognition of what has changed and what stubbornly hasn’t. It’s a drama that lingers precisely because it leaves space for the unsaid, trusting silence to carry the emotional truth.

Discovering Meryl Streep Sky Documentaries, 4:00pm

A career-spanning portrait of an actor whose intelligence and adaptability reshaped mainstream cinema across five decades.

Streaming Choice

Sandokan — Netflix (from Monday 19 January)

A lush, swashbuckling adventure centred on Sandokan, the Malaysian pirate‑prince who wages a guerrilla war against British colonial power. The series follows his battles across Borneo and the South China Sea, where rebellion, loyalty, and mythmaking collide with his unexpected romance with Lady Marianna, the consul’s daughter drawn into his world. What emerges is a tale of resistance wrapped in spectacle and desire, driven by a hero who refuses to bow to empire.

Drops of Gold – Season 2 — Apple TV+ (episodes 1–2 from Wednesday 21 January)

Season 2 picks up three years after the inheritance battle, sending Camille and Issei on a globe‑spanning quest to uncover the origin of a legendary wine even Alexandre Léger couldn’t identify. Their rivalry deepens into a fraught partnership as they navigate centuries‑old secrets, buried histories, and the emotional fallout of their shared past. The result is a richer, more expansive chapter—part mystery, part family reckoning—rooted in the show’s signature blend of sensory precision and high‑stakes oenological drama.

The Big Fake — Netflix (from Friday 23 January)

A gritty Italian period drama based on the true story of Toni Chichiarelli, a young painter in 1970s Rome whose talent leads him into the world of high‑stakes art forgery. The series follows his slide from idealistic artist to underworld operator, moving through galleries, criminal networks, and the shadowy overlap between culture and corruption. What emerges is a stylish, morally slippery character study about ambition, reinvention, and the dangerous allure of becoming someone other than yourself.

Cosmic Princess Kaguya — Netflix (from Thursday 22 January)

A neon‑bright reimagining of Japan’s oldest folktale, this animated musical follows Iroha, a Tokyo teenager who discovers a mysterious girl from the moon emerging from a glowing telephone pole. Drawn into the virtual world of Tsukuyomi, the two forge a creative partnership—part streaming hustle, part cosmic destiny—as Kaguya becomes an overnight star. The result is a dazzling blend of myth, metaverse, and emotional coming‑of‑age, driven by music, spectacle, and the fragile bond between two girls caught between worlds.

The Beauty — Disney+ (first three episodes from Thursday 22 January)

A glossy, unsettling thriller set in the global fashion world, where a string of supermodel deaths exposes a designer virus that makes its hosts physically flawless while hiding lethal consequences. FBI agents Cooper Madsen and Jordan Bennett are drawn into a chase that spans Paris, Venice, Rome, and New York as they uncover a conspiracy engineered by a tech billionaire using beauty as both lure and weapon. What unfolds is a stylish collision of glamour, body horror, and moral reckoning, tracing how perfection becomes the most dangerous currency of all.

Book cover for 'The Angela Suite' by Anthony C. Green featuring the title, author's name, and an image of feet beside a camera.

Leave a Comment

« Newer Posts · Older Posts »