Archive for Spirituality/Philosophy

Book Review: Is there Life After Death? The Extraordinary Science of What Happens When we die

Life After Death Cover Image

Click on image to buy book

Is there Life After Death?

The Extraordinary Science of What Happens When we die

By Anthony Peake

Review: Tim Bragg

(Part of Body, Mind, Spirit & Time)

Am I treading the same road that I have trod so many times? Am I alone on my wanderings – have I walked this way before so often that I am in an inescapable rut – or – is there a guide, placing signposts for me to veer onto new lanes? A guide that has intimate knowledge of my many intended or worn trails…

What a curious mesmerizing book this is! Gripping, thought provoking and unsettling. Great – my cup of tea! With ideas fashioned around the theories of Many Worlds; Multi-Universes; Quantum Theory…Time itself (and the nature of its and our subjective perceptions); shared consciousness; neurology; psychiatry and more – the reader is guaranteed a stimulating read. A book that provokes thought and a thoughtful response.

For some time now (well this is my subjective perception!) I have had this rather clichéd and simple notion that “Time is the Answer”. And yet this notion has deepened and become deeper and been given more credence through reading Peake’s book. Time – subjective – bending to the occasion…speeding up and slowing down…and fragmenting? Time stretching so that at death we cease to be ‘time-full’ but enter a new relationship with it. Does time cease or are we catapulted back to its (our) beginning? What is the relationship between Time, Matter and our Consciousness?  Has our universe and human consciousness sprung from a time-less and matter-less place? Although Peake doesn’t answer this last question he does give his coherent idea of what happens to (our) time as death approaches…

Is there life after death? Existence after death – a continued existence…if you’re looking for reassurance about conscious existence after ‘death’ then you’ll be both excited and – perhaps disappointed by this book. Excited because through its pages we learn about Quantum Theory – about how we bring into existence external reality through our sensory perceptions – that we are subjective beings in a subjectively made reality. There may not be an identifiable, objective reality – at least to us subjective beings. But more than this – we might not even be alone. And when I use the word ‘we’ I don’t just mean the consciousness reading these words  – there is also a ‘we’ that is ‘us’ – a dual consciousness within that we all seem to share. The brain divided and mirrored – holding two different ‘mind-beings’.

I am not going to use Peake’s scientific or esoteric words in this review – this is my review (and accordingly may only exist in ‘my’ reality – and in your reality I may not actually exist!) – but respond simply as a reader who has been affected by and has given considerable thought to the ideas. I am also aware that I don’t want to spoil the unfolding of the book’s ideas by giving too much away – because you need to be taken on its journey (as was I). Also, I am not without criticism or further questioning of ideas within it and, ultimately, not without a sinking feeling that what Peake’s research and originality offers is no more comforting than the traditional idea of reincarnation.

In Western societies the concept ofre-incarnation can sometimes be used to make sense of our existence and offer the hope of rebirth and re-existence rather than a one off life followed by annihilation…and yet, I, the ego am not aware of this pre-existence except through unusual “flash backs” to a supposed previous life. Thus the ‘I’ – the ‘me’ that I am fully aware of – will face obliteration. Now, without giving too much away (I hope) Peake argues for (and there is always enough scientific corroboration to make his points) that each human has indeed dual consciousness – that there is a Higher and Lower self…and that these entities exist in a form of communion, but that the Higher Self is only manifest (seemingly) at certain times – including in dream states and during hypnotism. This Higher Self also plays its ultimate significant part at the approach of death. This is where the possibility of “life after death” comes – though technically there is no death – only the perception of one’s death by other folk!

All sounding a bit much? Well you will discover the strange world of quantum particles and their unresolved existence until brought into ‘focus’ by sentient life…you will glimpse into the world of the schizophrenic which might be the world of your other consciousness (Higher Self) – an unfiltered world that our lower self finds overbearing; a world where ALL is perceived…why do we perceive all? You will have insight into those who experience Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and the idea that life is experienced between epileptic fits at birth and death…And how our mind has (perhaps) evolved to cope with the dying experience.

Sometimes we are treated to great rabbit-holes of fun and imagination that ultimately lead nowhere. We rush off after the White Rabbit – constantly eyeing his watch – “I’m late, I’m late!” – but find that though this pursuit is fascinating we are left somewhat perplexed and unfulfilled. This might result from my own intellectual failing. I have to state again: I LOVE this book. I love how it takes me into my own mind and for my mind to question itself and its very reality – but the ending felt a touch like bathos with questions seemingly left unanswered: what is the point of the eternal return (if any); is this reliving simply a product of a peculiar universe and mortal existence or is there some higher hand at work; can we escape this reliving – and if so how? …Perhaps there’s another ending waiting to be written – it felt a little unbalanced. I appreciate Peake’s desire to fuse science with areas of enquiry normally dealt with by religion or philosophy – but there’s so much more to delve into surely? I prefer to fuse science with spirituality – looking to science to answer WHY as well as HOW (however beguiling that HOW is!). It is in that WHY – that questioning that the spiritual element will be found – if we are the way we are and we are programmed to an eternal return – then WHY? Why does that mechanism exist?

The brain and the mind (co-dependent?!) are fascinating – figures given in the book reveal the brain’s amazing complexity. It’s a wonder people can manage to be so ‘un’ conscious having such a tool! Can consciousness exist apart from the brain – and if so – how? What can/could sustain it? Are “out of body experiences” proof of the ability of consciousness to exist independently? I have had an OBE – but was it within the capacity of my mind to PROJECT such a reality at an extreme type of stress…thus I wasn’t “out” of anywhere – just experiencing a different perspective?

Perhaps, as Peake suggests, we all eventually “fall out of time” – perhaps we stretch time into a kind of infinity…perhaps we re-tread this life over and over and over again. But if there is an escape to this mundane repetition it is an escape denied to ‘us’ (the ‘us’ that is connecting with these words) because the escape itself will exist in another universe, in another reality. Trillions of versions of us – like a mirror reflecting upon itself – like an infinite number of mirrors reflecting infinitely! And even the word ‘infinite’ is useless here because it suggests Time! And the BIG question – what for? Is there any profound reason behind all this? Becoming Perfect?  – How close to perfection would we need to come to escape this Eternal Return? Has anyone ever achieved perfection? Jesus gave into anger, was he forced to return and, if so, why didn’t he become Greater Than Jesus – or did he – yes you’ve got it – manifest in a different reality/world/universe? Not so much a Second Coming but a long time coming.

 Déjà vu, that notion of being here before, of experiencing the same feelings and senses before, is perhaps the key to unlock our sense of return…but – for “us” who have but an inkling of a re-run – so what? And even those in Peake’s book that seem to re-live their lives – and be aware of such – there is no comfort or satisfaction. There doesn’t seem to be a sense of justice in getting things right simply for a version of ourselves to exist in another Quantum Leap. And if ALL has happened to ALL then any sense of meaningful independent reality is lost! The subtlety of difference between ‘this’ and ‘that’ choice would be diluted in a vat so large that any such choice would be rendered meaningless! And given that people seem to go on making the same mistakes, are some ‘souls’ bound to re-live nightmare lives that are short and brutal over and over again!?

There certainly is more to Heaven and Earth than meets the eye, it seems. Quantum physics shows us a micro existence without common sense. But can we extrapolate into the world of Here and Now? Are there realms of the brain we can lose ourselves in? When we dream are we dreaming a reality? Perhaps this is evidence for survival of death – when I dream I certainly am in a ‘reality’ and though it is me – this ‘me’ is unconnected to the me that wakes into my apparent ‘normal’ reality (but only made ‘normal’ by the act of waking and of a sense of repetition). There is a connection at times (lucid dreaming fuses these two realities) but normally ‘I’ can live in two very different experiential worlds that have similarities – each seemingly with its own integrity and continuity – but that are DIFFERENT! And passing from one state to the other is unconscious – I am unaware of slipping through that ‘twilight’ world between wake and sleep.

Finally, though I can see and understand Peake’s idea of consciousness and its perception of time as one’s death looms, I wonder about those folk who have lost contact and consciousness with this world…did they see their mental death approaching – was any mechanism in place for them? If there is a ‘breather’ between returns – in which existence is it to be found? Again I apologise for being a tad cryptic – but you need to work through this book – take in the various speculations and new scientific research it provides and explores, and get led down Peake’s rabbit-hole world. As he says – he may not even exist in our world – well, my world – well, your world. Just as I might not exist in the world of whomever is reading these words. So in which case – who wrote them?

Comments (4)

The Crucible

THE CRUCIBLE
American High School Theatre Festival

Pilrig Studio Venue 103, 1bPIlrig Street

ARTHUR MILLER’S play The Crucible, set in the time of the infamous Salem Witch Trials of 1692 was intended as an indictment of Senator Joe McCarthy’s blacklisting of persons accused of communist sympathies in 1950sAmerica.

This modern dress production is presented by a talented bunch of High School students from Pius XI High School inWisconsin. Despite their youth, they have total mastery of the script.

Young Alex Sobczak’s manipulative accuser Abigail Williams was so convincing that the audience were scanning the ceiling for the imps and devils she claimed to see. Roc Bauman was every inch the stout God-fearing farmer who knew that the accusations of witchcraft against his wife Elizabeth and scores of others were nonsense; Connor could not make himself heard against the clamour for blood. Instead he came under suspicion too, especially as he could not remember all of the Ten Commandments. According to Reverend Hale, his examiner, ‘Theology is a fortress. No crack in the fortress can be allowed.’

The Crucible still speaks powerfully today as there will always be people who act or look different from the norm for one reason or another.  Such folk can become objects of suspicion, fear and hatred and can be vulnerable to victimisation by unscrupulous manipulators with a score to settle or in pursuit of power and influence.

Reviewed by David Kerr

***** Five stars

Leave a Comment

Philosophy: The Dirty Secret

Underneath the cool blue skies of this rich, poor and diverse world lies a dirty secret. Only it’s the kind of secret nobody wants to hear. The kind of secret pushed underground where corpses and rotten things belong. Under the subtle layered colours of diffuse light in the Northern Hemisphere or the vast horizon-stretching light of eternal days in the Southern Hemisphere, this secret is kept quiet – quiet…but only to greater – or – lesser degrees.

Where mankind is poor and unsubtle and living close to his animal neighbours the secret isn’t so hushed. Where man is civilised and praises the art and technique of its finest painters, musicians, poets, composers, architects, philosophers and religious practitioners – then this bestial secret is as silent as incest. My God what can it be this secret so bad? What war or inflicted famine can it refer? What hidden boil of racism as yet un-lanced? What defilement of the planet by Big Business; of International Capitalism? None? None of these? What then – some radical suicidal movement of politically or religiously induced thought? What is there so bad and yet so unsaid?
Beneath our veneer of civilisation…our table-talk civility and UNESCO trumpeting culture of The Family Sitting Round the Table…beneath the high-blown morality of the righteous off to church on a damp Sunday or to worship in the local Mosque or Synagogue there lurks the blood and sinew factory of churned-out death. Perpetual…simultaneously efficient and inefficient barbarity – a civilised humane slaughter on a scale that would make a Jewish survivor laugh.

It IS Big Business and it IS a product of International Capitalism – it is: animal slaughter on a scale unimaginable! Never ending stun-gunned and throat sliced…casual imperious kicks, violent indifference and meaningless banal torture…and within this – even – like the oubliette in a stinking dungeon are those slaughtered without stun – throats sliced and left to bleed-out consciousness – in the name of, God damn it – Religion!  Overriding even the tiniest decency and nod to humane-ity the Religious Righteous of Islam and Judaism (with the deaf ears of so many Christians) need their animals to bleed to death – calling out to “their” God; listening to the prayer as their cries fall into the slaughterer’s twitching ears. God Almighty!

Day in day out, night in night out animals are slaughtered so we humans can fatten ourselves on their flesh and blood. Day in day out, night in night out cruelties are visited on animals as if they were the vermin, the lice of Satan himself. No end of creative thought applied to this cruelty – no end to the warped imagination of Man…and yet others after fattening themselves hunt fellow creatures for the pleasure; not the necessity but for fun. And others cut up and into the flesh of beasts for “knowledge”. Others wear animals’ hides and fur. And others stand by and bark their nonsense in defence of religious slaughter, or hunting with dogs, or lethal dose 50 or that’s it’s natural…

And my God but don’t speak out against any of this. Don’t mention this dirty secret – don’t even wipe the blade across your best suit. Call him/her, this person, that person a racist, a fascist, a capitalist, a paedophile a common murderer but don’t say one word about the bloody conveyor belt, the dangling chains, the gruesome slaughterers, the caged and penned in necessities, of The Factory. Keep that bloody secret tight to the lips.

Animals have fed and clothed us for thousands and thousands of years. Yet across the globe, within its continents; in icy lands and tropical lands; regardless of skin colour; of religious or political belief  (with some notable exceptions) animals have been and are slaughtered for their meat; skinned for their fur or hide; kept as playthings and pets; used as hunt prey; used as live bait for hunting other creatures; farmed and (across all seas, in rivers and intensive fish-farms) fished – from ripping out elephants’ and rhinos’ tusks to casual kicking of abattoir animals (or sodomising with knives!), to “religious” slaughter, to breeding animals for their “looks” and incurring severe health problems; to skinning alive; to torturing before slaughter to” “improve taste”; to pipes inserted into the livers of bears for their bile; to penning birds in cages as pets; to forcing animals to perform for our amusement; to force-feeding geese; to slaughtering dolphins as a
rite of passage; to fighting bulls in arenas; to “kidnapping” chimpanzees; to de-beaking, de-tailing, de-clawing; to boiling lobsters; to chaining dogs; to vivisect!! Insulting animals by anthropomorphising them whilst at the same time visiting on them these untold cruelties – O look at the cute little pig “Babe” he’s talking just like us! And on and on these monstrosities happen across this globe without prejudice to the might and ability of Mankind to exploit and exploit and exploit! But…

Don’t say a word in polite company – not a word. Don’t be a bore. It’s a woman’s right to wear fur; it’s so passé to be anti! No, no, no I never THINK – why of course not – thinking might alter my behaviour, tut tut…It tastes so good…What would people think if I turned vegetarian?…Everything is fine just as it is and always has been…

Okay. Okay. What am I? What are you thinking? Some raving nutcase; some warped nut-burger? Some veggie spouting over-blown sentimental tosh-twaddle? God damn me a vegetarian (or worse were I a vegan! – which by the way doesn’t even exist on my spell-checker). It’s okay to love your cat and dog but it’s just a bit too left field, too eccentric, too ODD to care or show love for any other creature. Cats and dogs are different aren’t they? They’re kind of like us…
I generalise. There are folk who care. Lots of them! Folks who really care and get their hands “dirty” caring. So. This is what I’m saying:
If we are to eat meat – let us at the very least do so in the knowledge of where it comes from, how it is reared, how it is fed and how it is slaughtered. If we ARE civilised beings then let us do all this with humanity and true civility. (If we were TRULY civilised – would we eat meat at all?!) But the whole of animal “management” needs looking at. Just as the small, diverse farms have turned into bigger, narrower concerns, so too have the slaughterhouses (once close by to those older farms) – all been removed, shutdown and in their place Factory Slaughter-Houses (houses?!) created fitting of Factory Farming! Factory – a FACT!

There are climates where – were it not for modern day transport – we couldn’t BE vegetarian. Maybe it’s unrealistic to expect everyone to go veggie or vegan? – but by reducing consumption of meat and fish and by insisting on an improved manner of slaughter then things could improve for our fellow animals. As for wearing fur obtained by such procedures as anal electrocution and skinning alive – forget it! No justification whatsoever!

Further, how can – how CAN any religion not have a tolerant attitude towards animals? A religion and its practitioners should be the ones triumphing animal welfare and rights. They should be at the vanguard of Animal Rights! If we humans are the only ones with souls then surely, surely with reason and with spirituality those animals without souls only have their one life on this earth. This one often so short and violently ended life. Thus there should be no religious slaughter in its current barbaric methods. Yes, I know that recent CCTV footage stealthily filming x number of slaughterhouses didn’t film ONE pig slaughtered as it should have been – thus “legitimate” so-called “humane” slaughter is highly unpleasant too – but there are rules to be obeyed (as well as ignored and flouted it seems). Religious slaughter is the utmost in hypocrisy – it’s laughable, risible to be pitied were it not ABOVE the law of England and other lands. A religious practitioner
should surely think – when I die, having followed God’s laws I will be rewarded with eternal life, pleasure or whichever…but my religion states that only humans have souls (Christianity, Islam, Judaism etc). How lucky we are! Now these other creatures – created by my God – they only have their life on earth – will die forever; not only should I pity them but also give them the best possible life! Dream on. No. Somehow these other creatures of God are simply for our benefit – our exploitation. I can’t imagine Jesus strangling a lamb or slicing the throat of a cow. It just doesn’t seem worthy – but then, as I’m often told ((basically) – what the heck do I know about the “mind” of God – or – it doesn’t say “be a vegetarian” in the bible (add alternative religious book at will).

A religion that can sanction the stoning of a woman (who may have been raped by a married man, thus, apparently, committing “adultery”) is perhaps unlikely to be as squeamish about the slicing of an animal’s throat. Or a religion that holds that women – in general – are inferior to men (not different but equal – INFERIOR) –will, perhaps, hold that animals are way, way inferior. How curious. Slavery was once legal too wasn’t it? – and often sanctioned by Christianity!  There’s a kind of sadism at work here maybe. And sadists might well begin with cruelty to animals before moving on to humans. How we treat animals – especially as refined, “spiritual folk” should automatically alter and improve our treatment of fellow humans. It seems odd to be kind and sympathetic to humans yet indifferent and cold towards animals.
Of course we are all hypocrites. I’m a hypocrite! But I know it. I should be vegan and though I haven’t eaten meat or fish for over 35 years and have given up milk in tea and coffee and try and eat only goats’ milk I DO eat milk and cow’s cheese. I have begun to reduce my consumption and may well give it up entirely.

It IS hard for us humans to comprehend death (until it’s too late?) – hence our seemingly hard-wired ability to believe we will live forever (or some glib, O I know I’ll die – but not actually truly comprehending this eventuality). Thus – it’s hard to comprehend the never-ending mechanised slaughter of our fellow creatures. So how about this for an idea (it doesn’t have to last beyond a week though I have included an “ending”– maybe it’ll end much sooner and hit home effectively); if you have a cat or a dog (or can “borrow” one) put it in your front-room/lounge in an elevated cage with no flooring except the wire mesh. Make sure the cage is just big enough for the animal but small enough so that it can’t turn round, groom itself or do – well anything but breathe, eat, drink, urinate and defecate (it will have the “luxury” of smelling only its own waste). Set a little feeding trough and drink dispenser – it’s the least we can do – it has to
grow fatter so we can fatten upon it.

Leave your pet in the lounge – next to the TV – TURN THE TV UP! – though I would presume after a day or two it will have given up crying (meowing/barking – but you never know). Watch it. Watch. Okay a little boring – just watching. Never touch it and just scoop some other animals meat into the trough at regulated intervals. Keep watching. It might amuse for a while its attempts at biting the wires of the cage – but, well, nothing happens…nothing really happens. You move away for a few hours – and, well, when you come back – there it is. It’s not going anywhere and it’s not doing anything. Minute by minute. Hour by hour. Nothing. Eating when food arrives; drinking when there’s water to be drunk. Hour in hour out, hour in hour out. Well it’s kind of hard to have that animal – sorry, YOUR animal, your PET in the room with you now isn’t it? Even if you borrowed someone ELSE’S pet – actually even harder, the guilt, THE ABSOLUTE GUILT. But, well, one day
merges into another – maybe it gets harder feeding this animal; harder to look at it; harder to look at its eyes; INTO its eyes; harder to bear the smell and clean up. Harder to watch it – well, diminish – DIMINISH and grow fatter in its cage simultaneously. As if it isn’t your animal anymore – not really a personal thing any more – sort of…just a THING.
Well there is no longer any purpose to your once adored pet – it grows fat only to help you grow fat…its waste has to be collected and disposed of; it is no fun there in its cage and you can feel, sense its deep, deep misery. No running outside, stretching those limbs, chasing and living like a cat or dog should! There’s only one thing you can do – slaughter! Kill it. Get rid of it (or at this point halt the experiment and spend a long, long time winning back that pet’s confidence in you). The experiment must continue…

Now there may have been a time when you could have killed your pet right there at home – or taken it to the vet nearby to be “put to sleep”. You could have held it in your arms at least as you chose your method of death. But this is no longer a “pet” it’s a factory animal and due for factory slaughter. You can staple information to its ear, de-claw it and maybe de-fang it (just for everyone’s protection) and then it can be picked-up by a lorry full of other cats and dogs – no water, little light; cramped inside. A modern day cattle-truck for persecuted people only it’s a real cattle (animal) truck full of sentient creatures destined for the mouths and stomachs of people.

Wave your animal goodbye. Maybe a little concern as the lorry driver “helps” it into the acrid smelling trailer with a little sharp boot. And off. Off on a long journey to the factory slaughterhouse. If it’s “lucky” it’ll be a successful stun gun to the head and know nothing of its death – though it could smell death approaching. If it’s unlucky it may regain consciousness as its hind-legs are shacked to the conveyor belt. Then, for all its struggles it will feel the ice-steel of a knife bite across its throat. If it’s VERY unlucky it will go for RELIGIOUS slaughter.
Is the animal religious? Ummm no!
Is it an animal that follows the God of the Muslims or Jews? Ummm no!
So how can it be slaughtered religiously?
Is it one animal – a sacrifice – a REAL sacrifice for many, many animals – a token expression (as the animals aren’t Muslims or Jews)? One animal sacrifice as God allowed Abraham in place of his son? Ummm no! Many, many animals – those destined for religious homes and bellies (or sold stealthily through money-stained supermarkets) are killed in the name of HUMAN’S Gods!! It is human’s Gods (and they are mutually exclusive religions so even by THAT logic some of these animals have been killed for a non-God!). The Gods of humans demand the slaughter of animals as an act of sacrifice in HUMAN’S name. Ummm.

Would the slaughterer of these animals choose to be killed in this fashion? No sir! Stun first. Effective stun (if nothing more humane!) and then the throat slit. But these animals have no choice anyway.

The animals that go for religious slaughter can sense the fear and smell the blood as they wait in turn (though this is meant to be forbidden!). Your once beloved cat or dog will be upturned throat cut, gurgling on that warm blood in its throat; fighting to breathe; kicking its legs…hoisted up by its hind legs…what still not dead? Still struggling. Open the throat more so that it can drown in its blood or – as it wields its head (your pet!!) – lose consciousness slowly but surely. The last minutes for this animal are slow, packed with fear, packed with utter terror and pain – no where to run, to escape – held captive and dying.

And these slaughterers – what does this chain, unending gruelling chain of slicing animal throats do to THEIR soul?! With every gashing knife slash isn’t their soul diminished – its own spirit-essence draining away like the blood of their victims?
O God…O my God! Have pity on them all – and why would you make creatures so close to us so alien!! How like us they are (the vivisector’s argument) and yet – of course – unlike us! Eyes, ears, mouths, legs…feelings…

And so your pet is dead. And in this nightmare all pets would be slaughtered all the time. A factory. A business. What an alien world.

And you know, talking of things alien – what would another species make of this world and our treatment of animals if they visited? What would they make of the unending slaughter? It would take them time to find out our dirty secret – but can you imagine the confusion? Cuddly lambs and pigs in the toyshops for tiny children – carcasses and flesh on the dinner table! A whole lot of sentimental guff in the media and conversely – factory-farmed and slaughtered animals. And to find out a God (he/she/it), a deity, way, way above our intellectual scope has fashioned beings simply to satisfy our hunger! Almost as if allowing cannibalism. What would the aliens make of us? Maybe they would fatten upon and farm us?!
That’s what it’s all about in the end isn’t it? Hunger and taste. Hunger, warmth and fun and taste.

Hunger – well we need to eat; some have a choice and some haven’t. Some have the choice to be omnivorous, vegetarian or vegan. It’s easier to be omnivorous…and if you are and you’ve read this I would simply ask you to at least choose your meat carefully: buy organic; buy free-range; buy local; buy meat that hasn’t been factory-reared or halal/kosher slaughtered. But you must be responsible – and ALL slaughter is bad! It might be more expensive to eat free-range meat but eat a little bit less – eat good quality meat less often than cruelly slaughtered, cheap cuts every day. Just do that. Make a start! It WILL make a difference. Be aware. Be aware of what you’re popping into your mouth and digesting in your gut. Everything you think, feel, do is propelled by that meat and the vegetables, pulses, fruit and other such foods that you eat. You really ARE what you eat. Would you eat your dog or cat “slaughtered” in the experiment? No? then why a pig, a lamb or a cow?
Give it some thought…please.

Maybe you could have days when you eat “vegetarian”. Just call it an “alternative” diet – it’s just great food that doesn’t consist of meat or fish dishes. Don’t get hung-up on a word. Explore all the range of foods that are available to so many of us NOW! Eat those seasonal vegetables and fruit. There are so many combinations of vegetarian food – food that looks good, tastes good and IS good! Don’t be put off by lazy chefs in restaurants that can’t seem to grasp creating a meal that hasn’t had blood dripping from some part of it.

We vegetarians and vegans – don’t be too judgemental (it may well work against our ideals). I don’t know why everyone isn’t vegetarian (at least) but I’m married to a meat-eater – she’s cooked me the most amazing vegetarian meals for over twenty-years. Incredible stuff. But she’s hooked on meat – part of her (French) culture. It’s ingrained – but doesn’t have to last forever – culture’s CAN change! But she likes the taste! That’s it. She doesn’t buy meat that’s been factory-farmed or sacrificed to a religion. She cares where the meat comes from – but she’s never (it seems) going to be vegetarian. Meat eating seems hard-wired into human society and we vegetarians and vegans have to acknowledge that. We have to BE vegetarian and vegan and show society around us that it’s okay, it’s healthy – it’s better! But we’re not going to get anywhere by forcing folk. Direct action has its place and is the only answer sometimes – but if we are to
convert people to non meat-eating we have to take a different and subtler tack.

I turned vegetarian after seeing a sticker on the back window of a car over 35 years ago (I’ve lost count if it’s 36 or 37!). I’ve stuck to it! I’ve moved towards veganism – I understand THEIR arguments. I’m doing my best. The movement is in the right direction. I’m trying to look at the world and how it might be – how it might treat animals; how we might survive…how we COULD go vegetarian in great numbers…but veganism would be too hard for some – held in contempt by those who were vegan through poverty (think rural China) but now glorify in the gory. Eating meat has been the historical privilege of the wealthy.

I can’t argue the case for vegans other than to say – that it makes logical sense to move from meat eating to vegetarianism to being vegan. But the logic is stretched by the actual ability to be vegan (in Northern climates) and having to depend on modern supplements – yet we DO live in a modern world and it is this modern world that is killing animals in such a “modern” way! That is treating cows so abysmally in dairy “production”! My son – who is beginning to think about being vegetarian – finds it odd/interesting that if I DID eat meat – I would enjoy the taste. Maybe. But my response is that nothing is truly worthwhile without an element of sacrifice. Not to martyr oneself with that sacrifice – but to accept and acknowledge it. Maybe I’d LOVE to eat meat and fish – well, it’s irrelevant because I’m never going to. And what I DO eat I find excellent in taste, health AND spirituality.

While I write – and I confess that this has been hard to write – like wrenching out bad stuff…nothing much will have changed. How many animals have been in fear; been tortured; been hunted; been slaughtered? But. Also – maybe just a sense that the tide is turning…yes, yes, I know and have heard of the Islamic economic movement to use FOOD (halal) as the way to conquer the world – but each of US no matter what religion or none can use our MINDS to say NO. Use our courage to say no. Use our influence to help others reject inhumanely slaughtered animals (as if there were a humane way!); use our skills and sensitivities to wake people up. PLEASE. I beg all of you who agree with most of what I’ve written to pass this article to someone who is “asleep”.  We need religious folk to change their minds – we need Muslims and Jews to work at changing the attitudes and mores of their religion…We need Christians to begin to re-evaluate their relationship with our fellow
animals – just as they re-evaluated their attitude to our fellow men who were once enslaved!

We are the converted and we don’t need any further conversion (but yes, we need to stay firm at times and feel nourished in our beliefs and maybe improve our diet and beliefs). We need to ask those religious folk to analyse WHY their books tell them to do this or that…why their prophet or guru (if TRULY a spiritual leader) wouldn’t swipe away the factory farms as Jesus swiped away the money-lenders tables and contents. Sweep them away. Sweep away the old style of thinking. Ask why those religious folk who follow Jesus think it’s okay to slaughter their fellow animals. Ask what is truly spiritual and acceptable in our treatment of and relationship with our fellow animals.

Do a little. A little is so much more than nothing. Don’t give in to despair – because each minor revolution of the mind and heart and spirit will make for a better world not just for our fellow animals but for US TOO!

We will be forced to make hard choices soon. As our world population increases to near unsustainable levels how we produce our food will become more and more vital. Animals will either suffer in greater numbers and in utterly appalling conditions to satisfy our growth or we’ll begin – at last – to understand the nature of being human; a sentient creature with such intelligence on this finite little globe revolving through space. Please God; Please US that we make the right decisions…we won’t be able to get this one wrong.

Expose this “dirty secret” – once it’s been voiced it cannot remain a secret…it cannot remain un-thought of. Once it is no longer secret – it can be challenged and changed. And the power to change lies within us all.

- Tim Bragg

Comments (4)

Body, Mind, Spirit & Time Part 2

There are people who claim to have had “Near Death Experiences” – though what exactly can “near” mean? How “near” can one get to death? Is a miss as good as a mile – or is there a subtle connection between life and death? In these NDEs (as they are known) some folk report classical ideas of Heaven/Paradise and others Hell! The interesting consequence of research into NDEs is the seeming ability of consciousness to leave the body. But first – regarding Heaven and Hell.

If we take these NDEs seriously (and they certainly seem to have deeply affected those who have experienced them) then I am bound to ask: has GOD decided who goes to Hell and who to Heaven? And if God has decided how is it possible to draw such a distinct line – such a black and white JUDGEMENT? It would be interesting to know from those who have had NDEs if they considered themselves “worthy” of Heaven or Hell. Had something inextricably put them in one or other “place” – or maybe it was the lack of something?!

Is there no nuance, no shade to JUDGEMENT!? Okay – you this way – you that way. You have been 51% “good” – Heaven for you. You have been 51% “bad” Hell for you! Can the judgement of God be so unsubtle?!
Therefore one asks – are the experiences authentic? And: does it matter? Well if they ARE authentic – this should get us thinking very seriously about where we’re headed – and it DOES matter because either the experience is real or there is something very peculiar happening in the mind when it is “close” to death.

Maybe what matters is that consciousness “seems” to be able to leave the confines of the body/brain. People have been able to give graphic recollection of surgical procedure and also identify things seemingly impossible for them to do – as they have been lying unconscious on an operating table! How could they know that a trainer (sport’s shoe) is lying on the roof of a particular hospital building they have never previously been to? This is the exciting stuff (and hopefully not influenced by human perception or fraud!). Quantum Physics – of which I’m no expert – talks of things being able to be in two different places at the same time or of appearing and disappearing out of or into nothingness (if such a state exists). And the further one goes down and into the minutia of matter then the greater “space” there is between things as if reflecting the universe about us. If things can appear out of nowhere and befuddle conventional thought and science then maybe our
consciousness can leave the body and move and see things without the aid of limbs or eyes?! Science seems to be moving further from neat explanations of this world to uncovering wondrous and startling new facts and existence.

During NDEs in Heaven people experienced young, healthy bodies and could move instantly to a place thought of and there was talk of the non-existence of time – yet there WAS still movement! The blind from birth could see!! Presumably those who had lost limbs had them restored – and thus an IDEAL of the perfect body…Ideal to whom/what?

We interact with this world through our senses – I say “this world” but what other world could I mean? A “world” after death? A perceived world? If the “other world” is the world of mind (thought) then isn’t that formed through our sensory experiences. We also know that our senses are flawed – that the world around us – is to some extent – manufactured by our minds. Our minds can take information our eyes “see” and alter it so that this sight makes sense to us. Or our minds can take our sight and produce something other than what we see because “it” (!) thinks this will make better sense for us. The obvious example here is the hollowed out facemask that on being turned changes to 3D and convex not concave! Because that is the way our minds view faces!!! Even if we lose sight in patches our minds will flesh out the blind spots by taking information around them and making “sense” of them. Do our minds do the seeing and not our eyes!

When we approach death does our mind “see” things pre-ordained by a death mechanism? Do we enter a death realm or an infinite time-less state with a final thought or perception based on our beliefs? So – we are perhaps guided into final thoughts by some mechanism and in this we choose a state we have come to believe in through our life experiences. If we are Christian we may indeed see Jesus as a six-footer with long hair and a beard and enter through the Pearly-Gates into a Heaven where God IS and infuses us with light and love. Maybe another faith guides us into another limitless experience? How many thoughts/ideas can be held for infinity in those dying moments? Could fear and anxiety create a sense of Hell that actually thrusts us into perpetual and classical torment?! (Be careful what you wish for or think – especially at the point of death!!)
NDEs suggest that close to death (or what would once have BEEN death – before modern medicine) we become consciousness only and thus there is no light or matter. Then comes the “light”.

We “see” dead people on the television screen – acting as if they were alive – well they WERE alive! But these are mere reflections. Would these long dead folk retain any sense of who or what they are/were when plunged into timelessness? Maybe post death it is another existence where the body and mind is sharpened and it isn’t the end of the end? Thus – there isn’t infinity or timelessness at all. Just another form of experience before yet another “physical” stage – or the final end of (perceived) timelessness and infinity – SOME PARADOX! If people gain healthy bodies – superior to those on earth perhaps their minds are sharpened too? Can think things beyond our capabilities on this parochial earth…

If we were to go into a classical Heaven – where we are received with love and light and by our family members who have “passed-on” – how far would the interest of our spirit-ancestors go? How many generations back? Would we lose interest in the world we have left (given that we could maintain some sort of contact) – would we greet all our family members forever…or until the last generations before the Earth is vaporised? When would our forefathers’ interest wane in us, or our own interest in our sons’ sons’ sons’ wane? How far would those in Heaven go back? To the earliest humans? Would Heaven cope with the different strands of humanity? The different ideas of men? If the personality were to exist how much would it need to change to cope with being in Heaven? And if none of this is important in Heaven why has it been so important on Earth? Would all religions and philosophies and ideas and prejudices melt away on arrival in Heaven? Would it be Heaven for those
who hold strong beliefs to find their beliefs utterly at odds with existence in Heaven?!

There are said to be more people alive today than have ever lived! Thus more people will die now than at any other time. People living a multitude of different lives – often boring, frustrating, mundane lives – seemingly for no purpose…people dying in absolute (seeming) futility. People of all ages dying and passing into another existence. Who amongst us would cast the sinner into Hell? What would their sin need to be? How can we judge another – “let him with no sin cast the first stone”. But God (if existing) seems to have the power of judgement if Heaven and Hell do exist. SOMETHING would cast us one way or another. Perhaps only we – deep down – know the answer.

If we are “lucky” enough to enter Heaven (of course there is NO luck involved we hope) – then as we become sharpened in mind – bereft of prejudices; bereft of many things! Perhaps enlightened in many things – and as we think ourselves to places (in an instant thought!) time may become as time in our minds…not linear time but stream-of-consciousness time. Maybe if Heaven has got “time” then it is the time of our very own perceptions. Maybe Heaven (or Hell) itself might be our very own perception. How else would the diversity of thought within a myriad people co-exist in a state where personalities still exist? How long could a personality exist and remain connected to its earthly personality? Would infinity dilute personality out of existence?! And if our personalities change – then who, exactly, are “we”?

How close to SPIRIT is personality? What is spirit and where does it reside – how is it connected to “us”? So many folk talk about being “spiritual” but what do they mean? What does it mean to live a spiritual life and from where do they draw their ideas of spirituality?

Everyone who has had an NDE has been changed profoundly. Changed in a way that a dream or a hallucination can’t quite manage to change. Not everyone who has been “near death” has NDEs – or can recall them…why do some recall or have these experiences? Is their a mechanism we all have in our brains that works when the brain perceives imminent death – are our minds simply reacting to this process or driving it? When we enter Heaven or Hell are they of OUR making? Can time exist in another realm – could we exist in a time-less realm?

As I have – finally – been prompted to write a second part to this series (and believe me there have been many false starts! Mainly in my head…) – is there a REASON for me to do this? Is there a REASON for everything we do on this earth? Is there a REASON for our minds to think and our bodies to react or not. Is there ever an end to things? Well, with this question I’m ending this second part! There is so much more to think, to write, to explore – and no certainty of any answers. But the nature of our beings is to explore – isn’t it? And we explore physically and mentally – and spiritually? We certainly can’t remain indifferent to developments in science – especially when science uncovers an aspect of us that may prove to be TRULY enlightening!

Tim Bragg – February 2011

Comments (2)

The Holy Bible Quatercentenary Edition King James Version

THE 400th anniversary of the first publication of the King James Version of the Bible – mentioned last month – has not gone unnoticed by a number of publishers, most notably the Oxford University Press which has published a facsimile edition of the first edition in Roman type. This wonderful edition comes with gold tooling on the spine, two silken bookmarks, a fine heavy duty slipcase to keep it in shape and a useful afterword by the author of the definitive history of this important part of our national heritage, Gordon Campbell.

This edition preserves all the original spellings and even the occasional typographical errors of the 1611 edition. Most notable are some of the usages of the time that now seem peculiar to modern readers; ‘v’ for ‘u’; ‘j’ for ‘i’ and vice-versa for example. It’s quite surprising the number of differences from the regular copies of the King James Bible we read today, since the spelling was standardised in 1769 and some other changes were made to the text and its punctuation.

Many initial chapter letters are ornamented. For example, the initial ‘I’ at the beginning of John’s Gospel shows the evangelist with an eagle; his traditional symbol looking up towards the sun above him displaying the Word; the Name of God. There are other surprises too; a dedication to King James, an almanack for 39 years ahead from 1611 to 1640, a table for finding the date of Easter Day, orders for psalms and lessons to be read in church services and on Holy Days and some illustrated genealogies of biblical characters. The quality of these engravings is superb.

Some folk may also be surprised to see that the books of the Apocrypha formed part of the original King James Bible and appear between the Old and New Testaments. This is a large, heavy book well worth reading. Copies can be had on-line post-free from Amazon.co.uk.

David Kerr

The Holy Bible Quatercentenary Edition. An exact reprint in Roman type page for page, line for line, and letter for letter of the King James Version otherwise known as the Authorized Version published in the year 1611 with an anniversary essay by Gordon Campbell. ISBN 978-019-955760-8. Prices range from £28 to £60 depending where you shop.

Leave a Comment

DOUBLE TROUBLE: The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ

BOOK REVIEW

The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ

Philip Pullman

Click on image to buy this book

Advance publicity for this little book suggested that it might turn out to be a Christian version of The Satanic Verses; a catalyst for a Christian fundamentalist fatwa against the author; well-known atheist Philip Pullman. In fact, Christians are unlikely to be troubled by this book. It is unlikely to cause major crises of faith for many who don’t already have them.

In this reworking of the New Testament story, Mary had two little boys; Jesus and Christ. It’s Cain and Abel, Romulus and Remus and Jekyll and Hyde all over again. Jesus as a boy was just a normal mischievous child whereas Christ was a bit of a suck-up to his parents and the adults around him. Jesus became the itinerant preacher who took no thought for tomorrow. Christ hung around the fringes taking notes of Jesus’ sayings and occasionally ‘improving’ and embroidering them for posterity.

This works well until the Christ character is taken under the wing of an angel – though whether good or the fallen variety remains open to question. This angel persuades Christ use his notes to bring into being a great institution of authority based on a notion of received truth.

While Jesus himself is a revolutionary who believes that the Kingdom of God will shortly be revealed, the angel asks whether it is better on Earth “to aim for absolute purity and fail altogether, or to compromise and succeed a little?” Opting for the latter choice, Christ is encouraged to soften a point here, exaggerate another issue there while creating a series of newly coherent stories attractive to future worshippers.
Christ betrays his brother and then takes his place after the crucifixion in order to spread the story of the resurrection among Jesus’ bereft disciples.

This is a lovely book. Its black Cover with gold lettering, short chapters, pleasant typeface and rubric-styled headings makes it look like a prayer book or a modern version of the New Testament like The Message. In effect it’s a rewrite of the Gospels with one or two clever and interesting twists in the storyline.

The title seems to have been designed to be deliberately provocative. The Christ character does not seem to have been a scoundrel in the true sense. He isn’t Jesus’ evil twin. He did take a genuine interest in his brother’s ministry and teaching but though compromises and a misplaced sense of posterity, betrayed him and took a more calculating path that would lead to the establishment – not of the Kingdom of Heaven but of a hugely powerful Church on Earth.

Canongate Books, Edinburgh ISBN-10 1847678262

Leave a Comment

Spirituality and Philosphy: Virtual Reality

VIRTUALLY  THERE

by Patrick Harrington

When you are a prisoner, it is your duty to escape…    (Ursula K. Le Guin)

The term virtual reality is heard more and more these days in the media; but what does it really mean, and what are its social implications?

 

The popular vision of VR is probably akin to Science Fiction. Indeed, Reality Forbidden by Philip E. High (Ace Books, 1967) explores a society enslaved to a device called the “Dream Machine”. When this device is used:–

 

The subjective or imaginative products of the mind became, to the user, objective. If he wishes to fly like a bird then he will fly — subjectively. No-one will see him flying, but as far as he is concerned he will be soaring above the roofs.

Is this not what people look forward to? To don a VR helmet, slip on a data glove or full body suit — and for VR to supply the sensations (and experiences?) without any great physical commitment, without the inconvenience or danger of a real experience? The social and ethical questions this raises are complex and I will consider some of them later. For now we have defined VR as it approaches our aspirations and desires, but what is its technical definition?

 

There are, as you might expect with a new field, different definitions. Most professionals agree, however, that virtual realities are computer generated worlds which can be explored in real time. “Real time?” I hear you ask. Real time simply expressed means that the world you explore is continuously re-computed as it is explored. A virtual world is not like a CD or film which plays a set pre-recorded experience. Rather what you do will affect what happens next. The computer will respond to whatever you do inside the world.

 What happens in such a world is determined by the underlying computer programs which become in effect natural laws. If the laws say that you can fly then you can. If they say that you are bound by the law of gravity then you will be. To create a realistic world requires a huge amount of programming. Just think about it — if you are simply walking down a street within a virtual world, the software will not only have to model geometrical shapes from every possible perspective, it will also have to render surface textures and lighting effects accurately. At present as anyone who has used VR machines (such as at the Trocadero) will know, the images presented are cartoon-like.

 In High’s book it was the individual user that created his or her own world. This interpretation was perhaps drawn from an analogy between VR and mind-altering drugs. In our reality, however, VR is going to be a consumer item which only large corporations have the reserves of money, technology and skill to produce. The writer/scientist Steve Jeffery has argued that the mass marketing of VR as a consumer product will lead to missed opportunities; in particular:–

 

One of the most exciting ideas behind VR: to interact with really impossible planes of existence. Not just fantasy lands of dragons, but the mathematical spaces of Hawking or Mandelbrot where real discoveries may be made, rather than escapist entertainment. In reality, it is more likely that mass exposure is going to come in a welter of half-assed TV ads, probably following a glut of Terminator 2 and Lawnmower Man style “morphing” in the next few months. If not an electronics K-Mart (for whose products the street will find new and unexpected uses), a worse scenario is the dance of the virtual coffee beans all over our screens!

Many are also concerned that the growth of VR will have the effect of increasing the rate in which our perception of community or even society fractures. The growth in communications media has already split us apart (paradoxically) as we share fewer and fewer communication experiences. We are not all consuming the same information products, indeed the few that most share consist of soaps and news as entertainment. It is argued that VR could encourage the individual to step further down the path of isolation. It has even been suggested that linking VR technology with a computer network we would be able to travel to work and execute tasks without ever leaving home. Let’s face it, for many people a VR world might be preferable to the one in which they currently live. VR promises to alleviate the reality of disenfranchisement, with the illusion of omnipotence…

 Will we lose even the sense that there is a subjective reality? Articles in our radical sister publication Third Way have discussed how entertainment forms such as soaps can create a perceived peer-pressure (because people identify with the characters) and consequently changes in behaviour. I will never forget hearing about the number of people who sent letters of condolence when Meg Richardson died in Crossroads. Soap stars have become more familiar to many than members of their extended (and in some cases nuclear) family. Virtual Reality will remove the need for an actor-surrogate — you can become the character in a dream created by a corporation, but based on your desires.

The most fascinating and threatening aspect of VR is the fact that it represents a further attempt to turn our very thoughts, fantasies and fears into  commodities. The marketplace is a total concept extending as far as it is allowed. To view the marketplace as a space within which things happen rather than as a dynamic force, was one of the most dangerous mistakes made by the failed politicians. In advertising it is realised that you do not really sell products you sell promises — your messages are most effective when addressed to the satisfaction of a psychological need.

Capitalism was thus always more truly totalitarian than Communism simply because it had found the means to interact effectively with wants and desires. The next evolutionary stage of Capitalism will be based around the related areas of entertainment, information and psychology…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Body, Mind, Spirit & Time

A series for Counter Culture investigating Body, Mind, Spirit & Time
Part 1

Whether the spirit chooses the body or the body the spirit may be irrelevant to the fact that spirit “finds” itself in a material being and has to develop alongside – or catalyse – the human body’s development. We (the “I” the “ego”) become aware of ourselves gradually with the development of self-consciousness – the question is has that consciousness come about through the action of spirit or has it come about in order to enable awareness of the spirit. Or is spirit something that has simply been created by consciousness and has no independent or true existence?

Firstly, let us say (rightly or wrongly!) that spirit belongs in, or comes from, a timeless state – possibly a space-less state if that isn’t too much of a paradox. Does our spirit come into our body and eventually leave it or is it grown in the body at conception or sometime thereafter and then leaves it at death? If it is the former then has “our” spirit inhabited other material bodies beforehand? What might be the point of this? Certainly given that there is SOME point in our spirit having a material, earthly experience then exploring the potential of the realm of our human senses must be of some importance.

If the sole reason for the spirit is to experience why is it that these earthly bodies and their minds have deliberately put limits to that which they can experience? Rules and codes exist expressly forbidding some experiences of the flesh? Well I shall try and ask many more questions and ponder some of the answers that spring into my mind. These thoughts will fill a number of articles in future Counter Culture magazines and on-line. You are invited to comment and criticise and add to this debate. Anyone who has knowledge of the functioning of the brain and/or experience with mental dysfunction or mental illness or who has a strong atheistic or religious viewpoint are most welcome. We need to ask: Does spirit exist? Can spirit be measured?

Firstly – Time & Spirit
We are defined on this world by our span of life – between birth and death. We arrive in the world and grow physically and mentally before beginning to decay and die either of old age and/or illness and disease or accident: innocent or malicious. Everything we do is patterned by time and defined by time and – in fact – time only “stands still” or ceases to exist where there is NO MOVEMENT. We move externally and internally until (and even slightly after) death. We are the beings who give time reality. Time is our perception. In a sense we invented time! Interestingly though we don’t necessarily live an internal life in a linear time fashion. Thoughts come as if unbidden at any time; perpetually and almost unrestrained and if we recall our lives we might well not begin with our first memories and follow on sequentially – it is more likely that the most important moments of our lives will come first – and where do they come from; in our minds…stored away until needed/recalled – always there (one presumes) but not in our everyday consciousness until brought forth into that consciousness. Brought forth consciously or otherwise. And ideas about who we are or ideas that “spring” into our heads or thoughts that we try and marshal are also stored in our minds. They exist and they don’t exist at the same time (we are unaware of them until that deliberate conscious moment).

Okay this means that we perceive the external world in a linear, finite fashion but that our internal world although existing within our conscious linear world is – itself – non-linear. If there is an existence of the spirit then it has come from a state of neither time nor place (“place” will need to be analysed!) into this world of movement and “time” (created by us and continually fractionalised; from perceiving the time as the passing of a day to highly developed atomic clocks – the latest type of which can accurately “measure” time within a fraction of a second over millions of years!!!). The most obvious questions needed to be asked at a later stage are: Why? Why come into a finite existence? Is this earthly existence of paramount importance? Why would a timeless and placeless entity come into solidity and finiteness? Has the spirit come from eternal being? Is our mortal existence part of that eternal being? Mortality within immortality! And many, many more…

Before being carried away by streams of consciousness – we must keep focused on the essence of Spirit and Time:
Spirit. If the spirit animates our earthly body or simply uses our physical senses, in which manner has it a sense of being itself? Is that essence something we should know – in other words how much is the spirit PART of us? Is spirit beyond the capabilities of language? If so, how is it that we have named and identified something that is beyond the physical/beyond supposed language? Is there (or must there be) a connection between spirit and physical being? What is the interface – is it the mind? How far is the mind a spiritual or physical entity?

Two stories:
A man is everything he is because of what he has experienced; he has listened and learnt; spoken, touched, experienced pleasure and harm – everything he has seen is stored in his brain. He is fully formed and has a distinct personality. One day the man loses an arm. He is changed by this event and grieves over his loss. But he copes, learns to live with this handicap and is essentially the same man. Later he loses his other arm. Again he grieves and curses his fate – but he learns to use his legs and toes to do all the things he once did with his arms. He is still the same man with the same personality although he has become slightly bitter and more determined. Later he loses a leg. (He is an unlucky man – whatever “luck” is!) He needs to use a crutch to walk; he becomes ever more dependent – but he still lives, still experiences – is still the same man. Next (in this unsubtle relentless story) he loses his other leg. He is immobile except his ability to shuffle along or to be carried by others. Later he loses his sight. His personality – though the same – is still more bitter or maybe resigned or maybe wiser or maybe something else…he is definitely more dependent. But he can still laugh and joke when he isn’t given to periods of anger or frustration or sadness. He can communicate and have relationships with others. His personality is the same yet – as ever and as always – is developing through its sensory experience. Is he the same, essentially as when he was a child? Is he on a kind of interior journey? Have his experiences fundamentally changed him?

We continue the fate of this “poor” man. He loses his hearing. The world becomes silent as well as unseen – he is plunged into his interior world – a world made up of all the experiences of his senses before he became blind and deaf or without legs and arms. His interior world in his dreams is perhaps more real than the world he “wakes” into. But he can still feel the wind against his face…okay I can hardly bear to persecute this body further. But if he were to lose all senses he would – in effect – exist ONLY in his mind and his mind would be everything that made him who he was THROUGH HIS SENSES. If he creates jokes inside his mind or has courage or weeps bitter tears that is because he has learnt all these things – has experienced them or understood them through language; verbal and written – through interaction and physical experience.

Now. Let us hear a story of an even more unfortunate man:
This man was born and immediately put into a cell (this is a horrible idea and I don’t like writing about it – especially after the case recently in Austria) – he is fed and given water but denied all physical senses. No touch other than being fed (in twilight) and no verbal or otherwise communication. He grows and as he grows his movement is restricted and eventually he experiences complete sensory deprivation (perhaps suspended in a chamber used for such experiments). Without going into details because I don’t wish even a FICTIONAL character to be so cruelly treated – we will progress simply to the ideas of that man’s being or self or consciousness or state of mind. Given that I haven’t explored tight, narrative details (I am capable of this if any have read Biting Tongues and the detailed description of a man incarcerated in an old air-raid shelter for seven years) – we must presume that this man has had the most limited input to his senses. The man cannot talk – has no language. We might wonder at his ability to “think” and if one can indeed think without having language. What could we say of him?

Without language how developed would his mind be? How much of the mind is language based – would that mind choose to be itself using say – the experience of chemical reactions within the body and brain?
Without external sensory experience – how developed would/could his mind be? Again would the mind reflect internal bodily reactions?
What would his mind consist of and how would it make sense of itself; how would it be conscious? How could it be conscious without “thought”? Or am I showing my mind’s weakness by now being unable to comprehend a mind operating totally differently?
Would the man be a “vegetable” – equivalent to a vegetative state?
How would the man – in a permanent state of non-movement perceive time if there is part of him that comprehends something or identifies a “him” an “I” – though in non-language form?
Is he a man? (Heavy but necessary question.)
Where is his spirit, if indeed he has spirit – where might it be situated or interface?
There are many more questions but I’m uncomfortable with this character – and such a horrific fate. So, please imagine for yourselves what might or might not constitute this man’s mind. Yet there is a point to these two stories. The man of the second story cannot (we imagine!) articulate any connection with spirit and spirit inside him would have no – or little – ability to experience. Maybe the spirit would manifest in the workings of the body and internal organs etc but regardless – this is not the usual form of experience for either spirit or man.

The man in the first story – who also has a terrifying fate – develops his personality through tragic experience. But one could always imagine his spirit keeping him alive, functioning and giving him the will to continue. The man of the second story would lead an essentially interior life that would have no reference to anything we might understand. What memories would that mind have? What concrete experiences beyond taste (or even more cruelly) the absorption of food into the stomach? We cannot conceive of the nothingness of his mind – if indeed “conceive” and “nothingness” are the correct words. The man of the second story would be unlike any other man but perhaps most similar to a very heavily physically and mentally handicapped baby (and I mean this in the broadest sense). And I would wish to ponder at a later stage the experiences of those who have “lost” their minds.

We can say that our minds and personalities are dependent on our physical experiences and therefore NOT dependent on spirit. We can say that spirit and mind perhaps do not interface. We can say that spirit is maybe the outcome of a mind that reflects upon itself and that has sophisticated language. Without personality what could go on after our death? Is the man of the second story just unfortunate and the same as a lower-life animal or simple living being? Does the spirit/soul only reside in the human form – and if so why so in humans who are mentally and physically less able than say, primates? Is it possible that we can be totally unaware of our spiritual “self”? If spirit is neither of our mind nor our personality can/should we, our minds and personalities care too much? If we cannot know the spirit are we – in any meaningful sense – doomed to annihilation? Doomed to annihilation because we do not know our spirit or because (if one believes) spirit does not exist.

Okay it’s getting to sound fairly bleak and hopeless thus I am compelled to throw an optimistic light on the case.
Our minds can be changed by our experiences, by drugs by malfunctions; our personalities can change. Yet we come into this world with a personality (ask any parent); we do not enter tabula rasa as the romantic poets once thought. And yet at that point (birth!) we have experienced very little and NOTHING of this world. We can sense that the newly born babe has a definite personality (or it exudes something that makes it individual and different) – this is quite strange. This could well be its spirit. If spirit is formless and timeless then whichever body it enters is – in a sense – irrelevant other than there being some occult/mystical/Godly reason for spirit to need a physical experience (and here religions have their answers). People have claimed to experience being out of their body and during near-death experiences of inhabiting a spiritual body and plane and of meeting deceased loved ones. Those who had afflictions have experienced perfect health; the blind have been able to see. Maybe our unfortunate man of the second story would inhabit a “perfect” body and have an instant “personality” made manifest in ways unknown to us.

If the mind/personality can or does continue after the body’s death then either it would go into a timeless (motionless) state and thus the personality would become meaningless within eternity (I will come back to this) or the mind would create for itself an existence within timeless and spaceless-ness – whereby it exists in a heaven of its own creation. This to a degree is borne out by the different experiences of people having had near-death experiences based on their cultural/religious outlook; though there is a surprising amount of shared revelations across experiences.

Maybe we are not liberated by our senses but imprisoned by them. On death we are liberated from bodily existence. Our concept of our personality is limited by our ability to conceive!!!! Although – again to be meaningful – we would need to recognise ourselves beyond death or as stated earlier that would be simply another form of annihilation. (At this stage of my thoughts and arguments I deliberately haven’t introduced the idea that annihilation is what awaits us all!!).

We may indeed lose a sense of “ourselves” but in some way keep connected to our spiritual essence so that we might meld into a greater consciousness. We might simply operate on a super-natural level – a step-up from this existence. We might inhabit a parallel universe. These are all speculations. Everything IS speculation – but if this life has meaning then perhaps we must – as human beings with or without spirit – try to unravel the greatest mystery of them all – death. Some might say don’t worry about death and simply lead and experience life. I say we must do both – lead as moral a life as we are able (and certainly strive towards) whilst keeping in mind (!) that this life is finite and that everything we do on earth has a beginning and a very definite end. Are we flowers that bloom but once or are we perennial spirit – either way we (our personalities) have only one life to explore and develop; that in itself is enough to warrant much greater thought and investigation. As humans we need to constantly ask: Why?

Tim Bragg

Comments (1)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.